Legal provisions of COM(2005)138 - EC position concerning the proposal to amend the International Convention on the Harmonisation of Frontier Controls of Goods 1982 - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
| dossier | COM(2005)138 - EC position concerning the proposal to amend the International Convention on the Harmonisation of Frontier Controls of Goods ... |
|---|---|
| document | COM(2005)138  |
| date | April 14, 2005 |
|
52005PC0138
Proposal for a Council Decision on the position to be taken by the Community concerning the proposal to amend the International Convention on the Harmonisation of Frontier Controls of Goods 1982 /* COM/2005/0138 final - ACC 2005/0053 */
[pic] | COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES |
Brussels, 14.4.2005
COM(2005) 138 final
2005/0053 (ACC)
Proposal for a
COUNCIL DECISION
on the position to be taken by the Community concerning the proposal to amend the International Convention on the Harmonisation of Frontier Controls of Goods 1982
(presented by the Commission)
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1. The International Convention on the Harmonisation of Frontier Controls of Goods (the Harmonisation Convention), signed at Geneva on 21 October 1982, was approved on behalf of the Community by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1262/84 of 10 April 1984 and entered into force on 12 September 1987. There are currently 45 Contracting Parties to the Convention, including the European Community and its Member States.
2. The Harmonisation Convention introduced measures designed to facilitate, and so develop, international trade through the harmonisation (where appropriate) of the various frontier controls that are applied to the movement of goods. However, the rapidly changing political scene in Central and Eastern Europe made it necessary, in particular, to consider ways to rationalise other border crossing formalities.
3. The UN/ECE Inland Transport Committee decided at its February 1999 session that the Harmonisation Convention should be revised to include provisions to facilitate the border crossing of vehicles carrying perishable goods under the provisions of the ATP Agreement The UN/ECE Working Party on Customs Questions affecting Transport, with the assistance of an ad hoc expert group, has subsequently produced draft proposals to add a new annex to the Harmonisation Convention in order to complement the existing provisions.
4. The purpose of the draft annex is to facilitate international trade by reducing, harmonising and co-ordinating procedures and paperwork in connection with the border control of goods, in particular live animals and perishable goods. The draft annex essentially contains obligations that aim at reducing delays at border crossing points in respect of live animals and perishable goods (through, by example, the use of 'one stop' technology to enable joint controls between neighbouring countries 24 hours a day, and the separation of traffic flows to give priority to the movement of these goods), improving the operation of border crossing points, as well as technical matters relating to the mutual recognition of international vehicle inspection and weight certificates.
5. The facilitation of international trade and the removal of technical obstacles to trade is an objective of the common commercial policy and thus falls under the exclusive competence of the Community. The measures set out in the draft annex are consistent with Community legislation.
6. In the light of the above, the Commission proposes that the Council adopts the annexed decision.
2005/0053 (ACC)
Proposal for a
COUNCIL DECISION
on the position to be taken by the Community concerning the proposal to amend the International Convention on the Harmonisation of Frontier Controls of Goods 1982
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133, in conjunction with Article 300 (2), sub paragraph two thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,
Whereas:
(1) The International Convention on the Harmonisation of Frontier Controls of Goods, 1982 (the Harmonisation Convention) was approved by Council Regulation (EEC) No1262/84, of 10 April 1984 and entered into force in the Community on 12 September 1987,
(2) Article 22 of the Harmonisation Convention, in conjunction with its Annex 7, provides that the Administrative Committee can propose and adopt amendments to the Convention. These amendments are to be accepted unless a Contracting Party objects within 12 months of the United Nation's communication of the proposed amendment to the Contracting Parties,
(3) The United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE) Inland Transport Committee decided at its February 1999 session that the Harmonisation Convention should be revised to include provisions to facilitate the border crossing of vehicles,
(4) The UN/ECE Working Party on Customs Questions affecting Transport subsequently produced draft proposals to add a new Annex 8 to the Harmonisation Convention in order to complement the existing provisions,
(5) The purpose of the draft annex is to facilitate international trade by reducing, harmonising and co-ordinating procedures and paperwork in connection with the border control of goods, in particular live animals and perishable goods. The draft annex essentially contains obligations that aim at reducing delays at border crossing points in respect of live animals and perishable goods (through, by example, the use of 'one stop' technology to enable joint controls between neighbouring countries 24 hours a day, and the separation of traffic flows to give priority to the movement of these goods), improving the operation of border crossing points, as well as technical matters relating to the mutual recognition of international vehicle inspection and weight certificates,
(6) The facilitation of international trade and the removal of technical obstacles to trade is an objective of the common commercial policy and thus falls under the exclusive competence of the Community,
(7) Administrative Committee has been asked to adopt the proposed amendment at its June 2005 session,
(8) The Community position concerning the proposed amendment should be determined.
HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: