Legal provisions of COM(2023)662 - Use of contract staff in 2020 and 2021 - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
dossier | COM(2023)662 - Use of contract staff in 2020 and 2021. |
---|---|
document | COM(2023)662 |
date | October 25, 2023 |
Table of Contents
1. Introduction 3
a) Scope of the report 3
b) Contract staff 3
2. Contract staff in institutions and agencies 5
3. Contract staff at the European Commission 6
a) Evolution in the use of contract staff at the Commission. 6
b) Breakdown by function group of Commission contract staff. 7
c) Breakdown by gender of Commission’s contract staff in 2020 and 2021. 8
d) Breakdown by nationality of Commission’s contract staff in 2020 and 2021 10
e) Breakdown by DG of Commission’s contract staff. 21
4. Contract staff in other institutions and agencies 28
a) Introduction 28
b) Contract staff in the other institutions 29
c) Contract staff in the agencies 32
ANNEX 37
1. Introduction
a. Scope of the report
This report is presented pursuant to Article 79(3) of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union (CEOS), which provides that ‘the Commission shall provide a yearly report on the use of contract staff including numbers of staff, level and type of posts, geographical balance and budgetary resources per function group’. It includes the information related to years 2020 and 2021, with data taken at 31 December of each relevant year.
This report includes data for 60 different entities subdivided between:
a. The European Commission,
b. the other Union’s institutions as defined in article 13 of the Treaty on the European Union, except for the European Central Bank, and the bodies treated as institutions for the purpose of the Staff Regulations, by virtue of article 1b thereof and
c. the agencies, i.e. the bodies to whom the Staff Regulations apply under the Union acts establishing them, as provided for by Article 1a, paragraph 2, of the Staff Regulations1. These bodies include decentralised agencies, joint undertakings (JU)2, the European Institute of Innovation and Technology (EIT) and executive agencies. This report includes for the first time data for the European Public Prosecutor Office (EPPO).
Data concerning the Commission include all contract staff, i.e. staff financed upon administrative, operational and research budget lines, as well as upon revenue stemming from Service Level Agreements with the other institutions and bodies.3
b. Contract staff
The category of contract staff was created in 2004 as part of the reform of the Staff Regulations. Since then, contract staff have made a useful contribution to the work of the institutions by carrying out administrative support activities at a lower cost and by bringing in skills not always readily available within the institutions.
Articles 3a and 3b of the CEOS define the role of contract staff and functions that they may perform.
3a Contract staff are staff not assigned to a post included in the establishment plan of the instutition concerned and engaged for the performance of full-time or part-time duties:
- in an institution: to carry out exclusively manual or administrative support tasks in function group I,
- in the EU Representations and Delegations, the Agencies and other entities: to perform the functions specified in Article 80(2) of the CEOS in function groups I, II, III and IV.
3a Contract staff benefit from a contract that can evolve into a contract of indefinite duration, after a first renewal for a definite duration.
3b Contract staff (or "auxiliary contract staff) are engaged in an institution:
- to perform tasks other than those referred to in article 3a(1)(a) of the CEOS without being assigned to a post included in the establishment plan of the institution concerned, or
- to replace an official or temporary staff member who is temporarily unable to perform his or her duties.
3b Contract staff are engaged for limited duration periods, from a minimum of 3 months to a maximum of 6 years.
Article 80 of the CEOS establishes the correspondance between each function group (FG) and the type of duties to be performed:
Function group | Grade | Tasks |
IV | 13 to 18 | Administrative, advisory, linguistic and equivalent technical tasks, performed under the supervision of officials or temporary staff. |
III | 8 to 12 | Executive tasks, drafting, accountancy and other equivalent technical tasks, performed under the supervision of officials or temporary staff. |
II | 4 to 7 | Clerical and secretarial tasks, office management and other equivalent tasks, performed under the supervision of officials or temporary staff. |
I | 1 to 3 | Manual and administrative support service tasks, performed under the supervision of officials or temporary staff. |
2. Contract staff in institutions and agencies
The number of contract staff on 31 December has continued to grow during the years 2020 and 2021. At the Commission, this increase was marginal and, as a consequence, the share of contract staff employed by the Commission compared to the total number of contract staff continued its decline during the last years. An increase is observed in other institutions, with the majority of them in the European Parliament (see table 19a), and in agencies. It is also noted that from a budgetary point of view the salaries of contract staff in agencies are financed through the agencies’ operational budget, whereas their pensions are financed by the institutions’ overall administrative budget (Heading VII).
The number of Contract Agents on 31st December of the respective years is split as follows:
Table 1 - Number of contract staff at the Commission, other institutions and agencies
2020 | 2021 | |
European Commission | 7581 | 7615 |
Other institutions | 3051 | 3420 |
Agencies | 4606 | 5311 |
Total | 15238 | 16346 |
Table 2 - Evolution in the number of contract staff at the Commission, other institutions and agencies
2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 vs 2019 | 2021 vs 2020 | |
European Commission | 7478 | 7581 | 7615 | + 1.38% | + 0.45% |
Other institutions | 2918 | 3051 | 3420 | + 4.56% | + 12.09% |
Agencies | 4109 | 4606 | 5311 | + 12.10% | + 15.31% |
Total | 14505 | 15238 | 16346 | + 5.05% | + 7.27% |
Table 3 - Share of the Commission, other institutions and agencies in the total number of contract staff
Table 4 - Evolution of the relative share of the Commission, other institutions and agencies and JU in the total number of contract staff
2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2020 vs 2019 | 2021 vs 2020 | |
European Commission | 52.29% | 51.55% | 49.75% | 46.59% | -3.5% | -6.4% |
Other institutions | 18.84% | 20.12% | 20.02% | 20.92% | -0.5% | +4.5% |
Agencies and JU | 28.86% | 28.33% | 30.23% | 32.49% | +6.7% | +7.5% |
3. Contract staff at the European Commission
a. Evolution in the use of contract staff at the Commission
The number of contract agents in the Commission evolved as follows since their introduction in 2004.
Table 5 - Evolution over time within the Commission
b. Breakdown by function group of Commission contract staff
The majority of Commission contract staff (more than 40%) is employed to carry out Administrative, advisory, linguistic and equivalent technical tasks (GF IV)
Table 6a – Commission contract staff by function group
2020 | 2021 | |
FGI | 857 | 851 |
FGII | 2083 | 2029 |
FGIII | 1485 | 1414 |
FG IV | 3156 | 3321 |
Total | 7581 | 7615 |
Table 6b - Breakdown by Function Group of Commission’s contract staff in 2020 and 2021
c. Breakdown by gender of Commission’s contract staff in 2020 and 2021
At the Commission, contract staff is predominantly feminine (ca 60%, in average). However, there are significant differences depending on the function group.
The distribution is balanced in function group IV (administrative, advisory, linguistic and equivalent technical tasks). Female staff is predominant in functions groups III (executive tasks) and II (clerical and secretarial tasks) while male staff is predominant in function group I (manual tasks).
The breakdown of contract staff by gender, function group (FG and grade) and grade is shown in the charts and tables below.
Table 7 - Breakdown by gender, FG and grade of Commission’s contract staff in 2020 and 2021
Table 8a - Breakdown by function group and gender of Commission's contract staff in 2020
2020 | Female | Male | Total | |||
FG I | FG I 01 | 67 | 48% | 72 | 52% | 139 |
FG I 02 | 96 | 40% | 145 | 60% | 241 | |
FG I 03 | 162 | 34% | 315 | 66% | 477 | |
FGI all | 325 | 38% | 532 | 62% | 857 | |
FG II | FG II 04 | 213 | 78% | 60 | 22% | 273 |
FG II 05 | 786 | 82% | 174 | 18% | 960 | |
FG II 06 | 516 | 82% | 117 | 18% | 633 | |
FG II 07 | 181 | 83% | 36 | 17% | 217 | |
FG II all | 1696 | 81% | 387 | 19% | 2083 | |
FG III | FG III 08 | 210 | 65% | 115 | 35% | 325 |
FG III 09 | 459 | 70% | 196 | 30% | 655 | |
FG III 10 | 196 | 59% | 139 | 41% | 335 | |
FG III 11 | 68 | 54% | 59 | 46% | 127 | |
FG III 12 | 22 | 51% | 21 | 49% | 43 | |
FG III all | 955 | 64% | 530 | 36% | 1485 | |
FG IV | FG IV 13 | 134 | 62% | 83 | 38% | 217 |
FG IV 14 | 741 | 55% | 596 | 45% | 1337 | |
FG IV 15 | 297 | 53% | 261 | 47% | 558 | |
FG IV 16 | 377 | 48% | 405 | 52% | 782 | |
FG IV 17 | 71 | 43% | 94 | 57% | 165 | |
FG IV 18 | 27 | 28% | 70 | 72% | 97 | |
FG IV all | 1647 | 52% | 1509 | 48% | 3156 | |
Total Contract Staff | 4623 | 61% | 2958 | 39% | 7581 |
Table 8b - Breakdown by function group and gender of Commission's contract staff in 2021
2021 | Female | Male | Total | |||
FG I | FG I 01 | 80 | 48% | 85 | 52% | 165 |
FG I 02 | 57 | 33% | 114 | 67% | 171 | |
FG I 03 | 184 | 36% | 331 | 64% | 515 | |
FGI all | 321 | 38% | 530 | 62% | 851 | |
FG II | FG II 04 | 196 | 74% | 69 | 26% | 265 |
FG II 05 | 744 | 82% | 165 | 18% | 909 | |
FG II 06 | 491 | 82% | 107 | 18% | 598 | |
FG II 07 | 214 | 83% | 43 | 17% | 257 | |
FG II all | 1645 | 81% | 384 | 19% | 2029 | |
FG III | FG III 08 | 205 | 64% | 115 | 36% | 320 |
FG III 09 | 420 | 70% | 184 | 30% | 604 | |
FG III 10 | 191 | 58% | 140 | 42% | 331 | |
FG III 11 | 61 | 50% | 61 | 50% | 122 | |
FG III 12 | 17 | 46% | 20 | 54% | 37 | |
FG III all | 894 | 63% | 520 | 37% | 1414 | |
FG IV | FG IV 13 | 157 | 62% | 97 | 38% | 253 |
FG IV 14 | 895 | 57% | 686 | 43% | 1581 | |
FG IV 15 | 234 | 52% | 218 | 48% | 452 | |
FG IV 16 | 393 | 49% | 403 | 51% | 796 | |
FG IV 17 | 71 | 43% | 93 | 57% | 164 | |
FG IV 18 | 21 | 28% | 53 | 72% | 74 | |
FG IV all | 1771 | 53% | 1550 | 47% | 3321 | |
Total Contract Staff | 4631 | 61% | 2984 | 39% | 7615 |
d. Breakdown by nationality of Commission’s contract staff in 2020 and 2021
It is worth noting that, as for officials and temporary agents4, engagement of contract staff is carried out on the basis of the required profile, the applicants' abilities and language knowledge, without any quotas by nationality.
The breakdown by nationality is most likely influenced by a combination of factors, in particular geographical proximity to the location of the institution’s headquarters (for the Commission, mainly Brussels, Luxembourg and Ispra), salary levels and the duration of the proposed contracts. Candidates are more likely to accept a post with a fixed-term contract if they are resident at or near the site of the institution offering them a job, also considering that the duration of the first contract is as a general rule of just one year.
In 2020, as well as in 2021, all Member States were represented in all function groups, with the exception of Austria, which was not represented in Function Group I.
The nationalities most represented among contract staff were - in descending order - Italian, Belgian, French, Spanish and Greek. These five nationalities altogether, which represent ca. 44% of the EU population, account for ca. two thirds of all contract staff (and even almost 85% in FGI). This share has been stable since 2005.
Table 9 - Breakdown by nationality and gender of Commission's contract staff in 2020 and 2021 asess geographical balance.
Table 10a - Contract staff by nationality and gender in 2020 at the Commission
2020 | Female | Male | Total | ||||
All FGs | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share of Total | Cumulated Share5 |
IT | 846 | 54% | 723 | 46% | 1569 | 20,7% | 21% |
BE | 850 | 64% | 485 | 36% | 1335 | 17,6% | 38% |
FR | 534 | 57% | 401 | 43% | 935 | 12,3% | 51% |
ES | 452 | 58% | 325 | 42% | 777 | 10,2% | 61% |
GR | 262 | 57% | 199 | 43% | 461 | 6,1% | 67% |
RO | 257 | 72% | 102 | 28% | 359 | 4,7% | 72% |
PL | 220 | 75% | 72 | 25% | 292 | 3,9% | 76% |
DE | 131 | 51% | 128 | 49% | 259 | 3,4% | 79% |
PT | 162 | 66% | 85 | 34% | 247 | 3,3% | 82% |
BG | 100 | 66% | 51 | 34% | 151 | 2,0% | 84% |
HU | 83 | 66% | 43 | 34% | 126 | 1,7% | 86% |
LT | 66 | 69% | 30 | 31% | 96 | 1,3% | 87% |
NL | 51 | 54% | 43 | 46% | 94 | 1,2% | 88% |
SK | 65 | 72% | 25 | 28% | 90 | 1,2% | 90% |
HR | 64 | 72% | 25 | 28% | 89 | 1,2% | 91% |
IE | 47 | 60% | 31 | 40% | 78 | 1,0% | 92% |
CZ | 58 | 76% | 18 | 24% | 76 | 1,0% | 93% |
AT | 45 | 61% | 29 | 39% | 74 | 1,0% | 94% |
SI | 44 | 66% | 23 | 34% | 67 | 0,9% | 95% |
FI | 45 | 69% | 20 | 31% | 65 | 0,9% | 96% |
SE | 39 | 70% | 17 | 30% | 56 | 0,7% | 96% |
LV | 37 | 73% | 14 | 27% | 51 | 0,7% | 97% |
EE | 37 | 90% | 4 | 10% | 41 | 0,5% | 97% |
DK | 25 | 68% | 12 | 32% | 37 | 0,5% | 98% |
CY | 25 | 71% | 10 | 29% | 35 | 0,5% | 98% |
LU | 10 | 67% | 5 | 33% | 15 | 0,2% | 99% |
MT | 9 | 82% | 2 | 18% | 11 | 0,1% | 99% |
UK | 39 | 57% | 30 | 43% | 69 | 0,9% | 100% |
Others | 20 | 77% | 6 | 23% | 26 | 0,3% | 100% |
Total | 4623 | 61% | 2958 | 39% | 7581 | 100,0% |
Table 10b - Contract staff by nationality and gender in 2021 at the Commission
2021 | Female | Male | Total | ||||
All FGs | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share of Total | Cumulated Share |
IT | 874 | 54% | 732 | 46% | 1606 | 21,1% | 21% |
BE | 829 | 63% | 488 | 37% | 1317 | 17,3% | 38% |
FR | 552 | 57% | 419 | 43% | 971 | 12,8% | 51% |
ES | 464 | 58% | 337 | 42% | 801 | 10,5% | 62% |
GR | 260 | 58% | 187 | 42% | 447 | 5,9% | 68% |
RO | 261 | 75% | 86 | 25% | 347 | 4,6% | 72% |
PL | 224 | 74% | 77 | 26% | 301 | 4,0% | 76% |
DE | 132 | 48% | 141 | 52% | 273 | 3,6% | 80% |
PT | 156 | 65% | 83 | 35% | 239 | 3,1% | 83% |
BG | 96 | 66% | 50 | 34% | 146 | 1,9% | 85% |
HU | 83 | 65% | 45 | 35% | 128 | 1,7% | 86% |
HR | 77 | 75% | 26 | 25% | 103 | 1,4% | 88% |
NL | 51 | 54% | 44 | 46% | 95 | 1,2% | 89% |
LT | 59 | 66% | 31 | 34% | 90 | 1,2% | 90% |
SK | 60 | 70% | 26 | 30% | 86 | 1,1% | 91% |
CZ | 54 | 70% | 23 | 30% | 77 | 1,0% | 92% |
IE | 43 | 57% | 32 | 43% | 75 | 1,0% | 93% |
AT | 49 | 68% | 23 | 32% | 72 | 0,9% | 94% |
FI | 46 | 72% | 18 | 28% | 64 | 0,8% | 95% |
SI | 42 | 66% | 22 | 34% | 64 | 0,8% | 96% |
SE | 43 | 74% | 15 | 26% | 58 | 0,8% | 97% |
LV | 36 | 73% | 13 | 27% | 49 | 0,6% | 97% |
EE | 35 | 88% | 5 | 13% | 40 | 0,5% | 98% |
CY | 26 | 72% | 10 | 28% | 36 | 0,5% | 98% |
DK | 21 | 64% | 12 | 36% | 33 | 0,4% | 99% |
LU | 9 | 56% | 7 | 44% | 16 | 0,2% | 99% |
MT | 11 | 85% | 2 | 15% | 13 | 0,2% | 99% |
UK | 28 | 54% | 24 | 46% | 52 | 0,7% | 100% |
Others | 10 | 63% | 6 | 38% | 16 | 0,2% | 100% |
Total | 4631 | 61% | 2984 | 39% | 7615 | 100,0% |
Table 11a - Contract staff by gender and nationality in function group IV in 2020
2020 | Female | Male | Total | ||||
FG IV | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share of Total | Cumulated Share |
IT | 360 | 47% | 409 | 53% | 769 | 24,4% | 24% |
FR | 211 | 49% | 223 | 51% | 434 | 13,8% | 38% |
ES | 185 | 51% | 181 | 49% | 366 | 11,6% | 50% |
BE | 116 | 49% | 119 | 51% | 235 | 7,4% | 57% |
GR | 75 | 40% | 113 | 60% | 188 | 6,0% | 63% |
DE | 74 | 45% | 92 | 55% | 166 | 5,3% | 68% |
PL | 81 | 69% | 37 | 31% | 118 | 3,7% | 72% |
RO | 71 | 61% | 45 | 39% | 116 | 3,7% | 76% |
PT | 60 | 59% | 41 | 41% | 101 | 3,2% | 79% |
BG | 54 | 69% | 24 | 31% | 78 | 2,5% | 81% |
NL | 30 | 54% | 26 | 46% | 56 | 1,8% | 83% |
HU | 26 | 49% | 27 | 51% | 53 | 1,7% | 85% |
AT | 29 | 57% | 22 | 43% | 51 | 1,6% | 87% |
IE | 29 | 62% | 18 | 38% | 47 | 1,5% | 88% |
LT | 29 | 64% | 16 | 36% | 45 | 1,4% | 89% |
SK | 24 | 65% | 13 | 35% | 37 | 1,2% | 91% |
SI | 22 | 65% | 12 | 35% | 34 | 1,1% | 92% |
FI | 21 | 64% | 12 | 36% | 33 | 1,0% | 93% |
HR | 19 | 58% | 14 | 42% | 33 | 1,0% | 94% |
CZ | 24 | 75% | 8 | 25% | 32 | 1,0% | 95% |
SE | 16 | 62% | 10 | 38% | 26 | 0,8% | 96% |
LV | 15 | 65% | 8 | 35% | 23 | 0,7% | 96% |
DK | 14 | 67% | 7 | 33% | 21 | 0,7% | 97% |
EE | 16 | 89% | 2 | 11% | 18 | 0,6% | 98% |
CY | 10 | 83% | 2 | 17% | 12 | 0,4% | 98% |
LU | 8 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 8 | 0,3% | 98% |
MT | 4 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 4 | 0,1% | 98% |
UK | 11 | 32% | 23 | 68% | 34 | 1,1% | 99% |
Others | 13 | 72% | 5 | 28% | 18 | 0,6% | 100% |
Total | 1647 | 52% | 1509 | 48% | 3156 | 100,0% |
Table 11b - Contract staff by gender and nationality in function group IV in 2021
2021 | Female | Male | Total | ||||
FG IV | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share of Total | Cumulated Share |
IT | 399 | 49% | 419 | 51% | 818 | 24,6% | 25% |
FR | 242 | 50% | 240 | 50% | 482 | 14,5% | 39% |
ES | 195 | 50% | 192 | 50% | 387 | 11,7% | 51% |
BE | 126 | 51% | 120 | 49% | 246 | 7,4% | 58% |
GR | 94 | 48% | 101 | 52% | 195 | 5,9% | 64% |
DE | 77 | 43% | 101 | 57% | 178 | 5,4% | 69% |
PL | 81 | 67% | 40 | 33% | 121 | 3,6% | 73% |
RO | 74 | 69% | 34 | 31% | 108 | 3,3% | 76% |
PT | 63 | 62% | 39 | 38% | 102 | 3,1% | 79% |
BG | 49 | 64% | 27 | 36% | 76 | 2,3% | 82% |
HU | 37 | 53% | 33 | 47% | 70 | 2,1% | 84% |
NL | 30 | 55% | 25 | 45% | 55 | 1,7% | 85% |
AT | 30 | 63% | 18 | 38% | 48 | 1,4% | 87% |
LT | 30 | 63% | 18 | 38% | 48 | 1,4% | 88% |
CZ | 27 | 64% | 15 | 36% | 42 | 1,3% | 90% |
IE | 21 | 54% | 18 | 46% | 39 | 1,2% | 91% |
SI | 24 | 65% | 13 | 35% | 37 | 1,1% | 92% |
SK | 24 | 65% | 13 | 35% | 37 | 1,1% | 93% |
FI | 24 | 69% | 11 | 31% | 35 | 1,1% | 94% |
HR | 19 | 56% | 15 | 44% | 34 | 1,0% | 95% |
SE | 21 | 70% | 9 | 30% | 30 | 0,9% | 96% |
LV | 16 | 70% | 7 | 30% | 23 | 0,7% | 97% |
DK | 12 | 60% | 8 | 40% | 20 | 0,6% | 97% |
EE | 16 | 89% | 2 | 11% | 18 | 0,5% | 98% |
CY | 12 | 75% | 4 | 25% | 16 | 0,5% | 98% |
LU | 5 | 71% | 2 | 29% | 7 | 0,2% | 99% |
MT | 7 | 100% | 0% | 7 | 0,2% | 99% | |
UK | 7 | 26% | 20 | 74% | 27 | 0,8% | 100% |
Others | 9 | 60% | 6 | 40% | 15 | 0,5% | 100% |
Total | 1771 | 53% | 1550 | 47% | 3321 | 100,0% |
Table 12a - Contract staff by gender and nationality in function group III in 2020
2020 | Female | Male | Total | ||||
FG III | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share of Total | Cumulated Share |
IT | 177 | 65% | 96 | 35% | 273 | 18,4% | 18% |
FR | 117 | 61% | 76 | 39% | 193 | 13,0% | 31% |
BE | 108 | 59% | 74 | 41% | 182 | 12,3% | 44% |
ES | 90 | 58% | 65 | 42% | 155 | 10,4% | 54% |
GR | 81 | 69% | 37 | 31% | 118 | 7,9% | 62% |
RO | 62 | 72% | 24 | 28% | 86 | 5,8% | 68% |
PL | 46 | 74% | 16 | 26% | 62 | 4,2% | 72% |
DE | 33 | 58% | 24 | 42% | 57 | 3,8% | 76% |
BG | 23 | 56% | 18 | 44% | 41 | 2,8% | 79% |
PT | 21 | 64% | 12 | 36% | 33 | 2,2% | 81% |
HR | 22 | 76% | 7 | 24% | 29 | 2,0% | 83% |
HU | 17 | 65% | 9 | 35% | 26 | 1,8% | 85% |
SK | 20 | 77% | 6 | 23% | 26 | 1,8% | 86% |
CZ | 18 | 78% | 5 | 22% | 23 | 1,5% | 88% |
LT | 13 | 59% | 9 | 41% | 22 | 1,5% | 89% |
NL | 10 | 53% | 9 | 47% | 19 | 1,3% | 91% |
SE | 12 | 67% | 6 | 33% | 18 | 1,2% | 92% |
SI | 14 | 82% | 3 | 18% | 17 | 1,1% | 93% |
IE | 7 | 50% | 7 | 50% | 14 | 0,9% | 94% |
LV | 11 | 79% | 3 | 21% | 14 | 0,9% | 95% |
FI | 10 | 77% | 3 | 23% | 13 | 0,9% | 96% |
AT | 8 | 67% | 4 | 33% | 12 | 0,8% | 96% |
CY | 6 | 55% | 5 | 45% | 11 | 0,7% | 97% |
EE | 10 | 91% | 1 | 9% | 11 | 0,7% | 98% |
DK | 4 | 57% | 3 | 43% | 7 | 0,5% | 98% |
LU | 1 | 25% | 3 | 75% | 4 | 0,3% | 99% |
MT | 3 | 75% | 1 | 25% | 4 | 0,3% | 99% |
UK | 10 | 71% | 4 | 29% | 14 | 0,9% | 100% |
Others | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0,1% | 100% | ||
Total | 955 | 64% | 530 | 36% | 1485 | 100,0% |
Table 12b - Contract staff by gender and nationality in function group III in 2021
2021 | Female | Male | Total | ||||
FG III | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share of Total | Cumulated Share |
IT | 151 | 61% | 97 | 39% | 248 | 17,5% | 18% |
FR | 109 | 58% | 79 | 42% | 188 | 13,3% | 31% |
ES | 104 | 60% | 70 | 40% | 174 | 12,3% | 43% |
BE | 96 | 58% | 70 | 42% | 166 | 11,7% | 55% |
RO | 69 | 75% | 23 | 25% | 92 | 6,5% | 61% |
GR | 58 | 65% | 31 | 35% | 89 | 6,3% | 68% |
PL | 47 | 72% | 18 | 28% | 65 | 4,6% | 72% |
DE | 33 | 55% | 27 | 45% | 60 | 4,2% | 77% |
HR | 26 | 76% | 8 | 24% | 34 | 2,4% | 79% |
PT | 21 | 62% | 13 | 38% | 34 | 2,4% | 81% |
BG | 19 | 59% | 13 | 41% | 32 | 2,3% | 84% |
SK | 18 | 72% | 7 | 28% | 25 | 1,8% | 85% |
NL | 13 | 54% | 11 | 46% | 24 | 1,7% | 87% |
HU | 16 | 73% | 6 | 27% | 22 | 1,6% | 89% |
LT | 10 | 53% | 9 | 47% | 19 | 1,3% | 90% |
CZ | 11 | 73% | 4 | 27% | 15 | 1,1% | 91% |
IE | 9 | 60% | 6 | 40% | 15 | 1,1% | 92% |
SE | 10 | 67% | 5 | 33% | 15 | 1,1% | 93% |
AT | 11 | 79% | 3 | 21% | 14 | 1,0% | 94% |
SI | 11 | 79% | 3 | 21% | 14 | 1,0% | 95% |
FI | 11 | 85% | 2 | 15% | 13 | 0,9% | 96% |
LV | 10 | 77% | 3 | 23% | 13 | 0,9% | 97% |
EE | 10 | 83% | 2 | 17% | 12 | 0,8% | 98% |
CY | 7 | 78% | 2 | 22% | 9 | 0,6% | 98% |
DK | 3 | 60% | 2 | 40% | 5 | 0,4% | 99% |
LU | 2 | 40% | 3 | 60% | 5 | 0,4% | 99% |
MT | 1 | 50% | 1 | 50% | 2 | 0,1% | 99% |
UK | 8 | 80% | 2 | 20% | 10 | 0,7% | 100% |
Others | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,0% | 100% | ||
Total | 894 | 63% | 520 | 37% | 1414 | 100,0% |
Table 13a - Contract staff by gender and nationality in function group II in 2020
2020 | Female | Male | Total | ||||
FG II | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share of Total | Cumulated Share |
BE | 496 | 85% | 89 | 15% | 585 | 28,1% | 28% |
IT | 245 | 80% | 63 | 20% | 308 | 14,8% | 43% |
FR | 184 | 74% | 63 | 26% | 247 | 11,9% | 55% |
ES | 147 | 79% | 38 | 21% | 185 | 8,9% | 64% |
RO | 116 | 82% | 25 | 18% | 141 | 6,8% | 70% |
GR | 94 | 82% | 21 | 18% | 115 | 5,5% | 76% |
PL | 73 | 82% | 16 | 18% | 89 | 4,3% | 80% |
PT | 64 | 86% | 10 | 14% | 74 | 3,6% | 84% |
HU | 37 | 86% | 6 | 14% | 43 | 2,1% | 86% |
DE | 23 | 72% | 9 | 28% | 32 | 1,5% | 87% |
BG | 21 | 75% | 7 | 25% | 28 | 1,3% | 89% |
LT | 24 | 86% | 4 | 14% | 28 | 1,3% | 90% |
HR | 23 | 88% | 3 | 12% | 26 | 1,2% | 91% |
SK | 21 | 84% | 4 | 16% | 25 | 1,2% | 92% |
CZ | 15 | 79% | 4 | 21% | 19 | 0,9% | 93% |
NL | 11 | 65% | 6 | 35% | 17 | 0,8% | 94% |
FI | 12 | 86% | 2 | 14% | 14 | 0,7% | 95% |
SI | 8 | 62% | 5 | 38% | 13 | 0,6% | 95% |
LV | 11 | 92% | 1 | 8% | 12 | 0,6% | 96% |
AT | 8 | 73% | 3 | 27% | 11 | 0,5% | 97% |
CY | 9 | 82% | 2 | 18% | 11 | 0,5% | 97% |
IE | 9 | 82% | 2 | 18% | 11 | 0,5% | 98% |
SE | 10 | 91% | 1 | 9% | 11 | 0,5% | 98% |
EE | 10 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 10 | 0,5% | 99% |
DK | 6 | 86% | 1 | 14% | 7 | 0,3% | 99% |
MT | 2 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 0,1% | 99% |
LU | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 0,0% | 99% |
UK | 13 | 93% | 1 | 7% | 14 | 0,7% | 100% |
Others | 3 | 75% | 1 | 25% | 4 | 0,2% | 100% |
Total | 1696 | 81% | 387 | 19% | 2083 | 100,0% |
Table 13b - Contract staff by gender and nationality in function group II in 2021
2021 | Female | Male | Total | ||||
FG II | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share of Total | Cumulated Share |
BE | 478 | 83% | 98 | 17% | 576 | 28,4% | 28% |
IT | 260 | 81% | 60 | 19% | 320 | 15,8% | 44% |
FR | 181 | 74% | 62 | 26% | 243 | 12,0% | 56% |
ES | 134 | 78% | 37 | 22% | 171 | 8,4% | 65% |
RO | 110 | 85% | 20 | 15% | 130 | 6,4% | 71% |
GR | 96 | 78% | 27 | 22% | 123 | 6,1% | 77% |
PL | 76 | 83% | 16 | 17% | 92 | 4,5% | 82% |
PT | 54 | 86% | 9 | 14% | 63 | 3,1% | 85% |
HR | 32 | 94% | 2 | 6% | 34 | 1,7% | 86% |
BG | 26 | 79% | 7 | 21% | 33 | 1,6% | 88% |
HU | 27 | 84% | 5 | 16% | 32 | 1,6% | 90% |
DE | 21 | 68% | 10 | 32% | 31 | 1,5% | 91% |
LT | 19 | 86% | 3 | 14% | 22 | 1,1% | 92% |
SK | 18 | 82% | 4 | 18% | 22 | 1,1% | 93% |
CZ | 15 | 83% | 3 | 17% | 18 | 0,9% | 94% |
IE | 11 | 69% | 5 | 31% | 16 | 0,8% | 95% |
NL | 8 | 67% | 4 | 33% | 12 | 0,6% | 96% |
SE | 11 | 92% | 1 | 8% | 12 | 0,6% | 96% |
FI | 9 | 82% | 2 | 18% | 11 | 0,5% | 97% |
LV | 10 | 91% | 1 | 9% | 11 | 0,5% | 97% |
AT | 8 | 80% | 2 | 20% | 10 | 0,5% | 98% |
SI | 7 | 70% | 3 | 30% | 10 | 0,5% | 98% |
CY | 7 | 78% | 2 | 22% | 9 | 0,4% | 99% |
EE | 8 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 8 | 0,4% | 99% |
DK | 6 | 86% | 1 | 14% | 7 | 0,3% | 99% |
MT | 3 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 3 | 0,1% | 100% |
LU | 2 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 0,1% | 100% |
UK | 8 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 8 | 0,4% | 100% |
Others | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,0% | 100% | ||
Total | 1645 | 81% | 384 | 19% | 2029 | 100,0% |
Table 14a - Contract staff by gender and nationality in function group I in 2020
2020 | Female | Male | Total | ||||
FG I | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share of Total | Cumulated Share |
BE | 130 | 39% | 203 | 61% | 333 | 38,9% | 39% |
IT | 64 | 29% | 155 | 71% | 219 | 25,6% | 64% |
ES | 30 | 42% | 41 | 58% | 71 | 8,3% | 73% |
FR | 22 | 36% | 39 | 64% | 61 | 7,1% | 80% |
GR | 12 | 30% | 28 | 70% | 40 | 4,7% | 84% |
PT | 17 | 44% | 22 | 56% | 39 | 4,6% | 89% |
PL | 20 | 87% | 3 | 13% | 23 | 2,7% | 92% |
RO | 8 | 50% | 8 | 50% | 16 | 1,9% | 94% |
IE | 2 | 33% | 4 | 67% | 6 | 0,7% | 94% |
FI | 2 | 40% | 3 | 60% | 5 | 0,6% | 95% |
BG | 2 | 50% | 2 | 50% | 4 | 0,5% | 95% |
DE | 1 | 25% | 3 | 75% | 4 | 0,5% | 96% |
HU | 3 | 75% | 1 | 25% | 4 | 0,5% | 96% |
SI | 0 | 0% | 3 | 100% | 3 | 0,4% | 97% |
CZ | 1 | 50% | 1 | 50% | 2 | 0,2% | 97% |
DK | 1 | 50% | 1 | 50% | 2 | 0,2% | 97% |
EE | 1 | 50% | 1 | 50% | 2 | 0,2% | 97% |
LU | 0 | 0% | 2 | 100% | 2 | 0,2% | 98% |
LV | 0 | 0% | 2 | 100% | 2 | 0,2% | 98% |
NL | 0 | 0% | 2 | 100% | 2 | 0,2% | 98% |
SK | 0 | 0% | 2 | 100% | 2 | 0,2% | 98% |
CY | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 1 | 0,1% | 98% |
HR | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 1 | 0,1% | 98% |
LT | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 1 | 0,1% | 99% |
MT | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 1 | 0,1% | 99% |
SE | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 0,1% | 99% |
AT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,0% | 99% | ||
UK | 5 | 71% | 2 | 29% | 7 | 0,8% | 100% |
Others | 3 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 3 | 0,4% | 100% |
Total | 325 | 38% | 532 | 62% | 857 | 100,0% |
Table 14b - Contract staff by gender and nationality in function group I in 2021
2021 | Female | Male | Total | ||||
FG I | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share in nationality | Staff | Share of Total | Cumulated Share |
BE | 129 | 39% | 200 | 61% | 329 | 38,7% | 39% |
IT | 64 | 29% | 156 | 71% | 220 | 25,9% | 65% |
ES | 31 | 45% | 38 | 55% | 69 | 8,1% | 73% |
FR | 20 | 34% | 38 | 66% | 58 | 6,8% | 79% |
GR | 12 | 30% | 28 | 70% | 40 | 4,7% | 84% |
PT | 17 | 44% | 22 | 56% | 39 | 4,6% | 89% |
PL | 20 | 87% | 3 | 13% | 23 | 2,7% | 91% |
RO | 8 | 47% | 9 | 53% | 17 | 2,0% | 93% |
BG | 2 | 40% | 3 | 60% | 5 | 0,6% | 94% |
FI | 2 | 40% | 3 | 60% | 5 | 0,6% | 95% |
IE | 2 | 40% | 3 | 60% | 5 | 0,6% | 95% |
DE | 1 | 25% | 3 | 75% | 4 | 0,5% | 96% |
HU | 3 | 75% | 1 | 25% | 4 | 0,5% | 96% |
NL | 0 | 0% | 4 | 100% | 4 | 0,5% | 97% |
SI | 0 | 0% | 3 | 100% | 3 | 0,4% | 97% |
CY | 0 | 0% | 2 | 100% | 2 | 0,2% | 97% |
CZ | 1 | 50% | 1 | 50% | 2 | 0,2% | 97% |
EE | 1 | 50% | 1 | 50% | 2 | 0,2% | 98% |
LU | 0 | 0% | 2 | 100% | 2 | 0,2% | 98% |
LV | 0 | 0% | 2 | 100% | 2 | 0,2% | 98% |
SK | 0 | 0% | 2 | 100% | 2 | 0,2% | 98% |
DK | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 1 | 0,1% | 98% |
HR | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 1 | 0,1% | 99% |
LT | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 1 | 0,1% | 99% |
MT | 0 | 0% | 1 | 100% | 1 | 0,1% | 99% |
SE | 1 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 1 | 0,1% | 99% |
AT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,0% | 99% | ||
UK | 5 | 71% | 2 | 29% | 7 | 0,8% | 100% |
Others | 2 | 100% | 0 | 0% | 2 | 0,2% | 100% |
Total | 321 | 38% | 530 | 62% | 851 | 100,0% |
e. Breakdown by DG of Commission’s contract staff
The tables below give an overview on the distribution of Commission contract staff across the different Directorates General, services and offices attached to the Commission67.
Table 15a - Breakdown by gender, DG and two clusters of FGs of Commission's contract staff in 2020
FG I-II-III | FG IV | TOTAL ALL FG | |||||||||
M | F | Total | % | M | F | Total | % | Total | % | ||
AGRI | 6 | 23 | 29 | 38,7% | 21 | 25 | 46 | 61,3% | 75 | 1,0% | |
BUDG | 15 | 37 | 52 | 80,0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 20,0% | 65 | 0,9% | |
CdP-OSP | 0 | 10 | 10 | 100,0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,0% | 10 | 0,1% | |
CLIMA | 1 | 14 | 15 | 68,2% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 31,8% | 22 | 0,3% | |
CNECT | 38 | 70 | 108 | 61,0% | 27 | 42 | 69 | 39,0% | 177 | 2,4% | |
COMM | 92 | 207 | 299 | 86,9% | 15 | 30 | 45 | 13,1% | 344 | 4,6% | |
COMP | 20 | 33 | 53 | 93,0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 7,0% | 57 | 0,8% | |
DEFIS | 2 | 13 | 15 | 78,9% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 21,1% | 19 | 0,3% | |
DEVCO | 64 | 130 | 194 | 18,0% | 421 | 465 | 886 | 82,0% | 1080 | 14,5% | |
DGT | 15 | 31 | 46 | 32,9% | 30 | 64 | 94 | 67,1% | 140 | 1,9% | |
DIGIT | 13 | 22 | 35 | 42,7% | 32 | 15 | 47 | 57,3% | 82 | 1,1% | |
EAC | 20 | 26 | 46 | 76,7% | 1 | 13 | 14 | 23,3% | 60 | 0,8% | |
ECFIN | 3 | 9 | 12 | 52,2% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 47,8% | 23 | 0,3% | |
ECHO | 35 | 67 | 102 | 64,6% | 19 | 37 | 56 | 35,4% | 158 | 2,1% | |
EMPL | 22 | 63 | 85 | 64,4% | 18 | 29 | 47 | 35,6% | 132 | 1,8% | |
ENER | 9 | 32 | 41 | 95,3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4,7% | 43 | 0,6% | |
ENV | 7 | 31 | 38 | 79,2% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 20,8% | 48 | 0,6% | |
EPSO | 5 | 18 | 23 | 95,8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4,2% | 24 | 0,3% | |
ESTAT | 15 | 32 | 47 | 53,4% | 10 | 31 | 41 | 46,6% | 88 | 1,2% | |
FISMA | 6 | 14 | 20 | 95,2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4,8% | 21 | 0,3% | |
FPI | 7 | 25 | 32 | 32,0% | 33 | 35 | 68 | 68,0% | 100 | 1,3% | |
GROW | 23 | 49 | 72 | 77,4% | 6 | 15 | 21 | 22,6% | 93 | 1,2% | |
HOME | 11 | 26 | 37 | 80,4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 19,6% | 46 | 0,6% | |
HR | 71 | 131 | 202 | 91,4% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 8,6% | 221 | 3,0% | |
IAS | 2 | 2 | 4 | 33,3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 66,7% | 12 | 0,2% | |
IDEA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,0% | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100,0% | 1 | 0,0% | |
JRC | 108 | 123 | 231 | 21,8% | 480 | 351 | 831 | 78,2% | 1062 | 14,3% | |
JUST | 6 | 25 | 31 | 83,8% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 16,2% | 37 | 0,5% | |
MARE | 10 | 42 | 52 | 76,5% | 6 | 10 | 16 | 23,5% | 68 | 0,9% | |
MOVE | 13 | 37 | 50 | 80,6% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 19,4% | 62 | 0,8% | |
NEAR | 47 | 104 | 151 | 28,5% | 185 | 194 | 379 | 71,5% | 530 | 7,1% | |
OIB | 348 | 613 | 961 | 97,5% | 4 | 21 | 25 | 2,5% | 986 | 13,2% | |
OIL | 93 | 134 | 227 | 97,8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2,2% | 232 | 3,1% | |
OLAF | 7 | 12 | 19 | 86,4% | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13,6% | 22 | 0,3% | |
OP | 8 | 7 | 15 | 93,8% | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6,3% | 16 | 0,2% | |
PMO | 125 | 317 | 442 | 99,5% | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0,5% | 444 | 6,0% | |
REFORM | 5 | 25 | 30 | 46,9% | 15 | 19 | 34 | 53,1% | 64 | 0,9% | |
REGIO | 26 | 65 | 91 | 96,8% | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3,2% | 94 | 1,3% | |
RTD | 46 | 86 | 132 | 36,1% | 95 | 139 | 234 | 63,9% | 366 | 4,9% | |
SANTE | 8 | 55 | 63 | 62,4% | 12 | 26 | 38 | 37,6% | 101 | 1,4% | |
SCIC | 29 | 39 | 68 | 100,0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,0% | 68 | 0,9% | |
SG | 23 | 33 | 56 | 93,3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 6,7% | 60 | 0,8% | |
SJ | 2 | 15 | 17 | 77,3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 22,7% | 22 | 0,3% | |
TAXUD | 5 | 10 | 15 | 57,7% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 42,3% | 26 | 0,3% | |
TRADE | 9 | 21 | 30 | 78,9% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 21,1% | 38 | 0,5% | |
UKTF | 0 | 4 | 4 | 100,0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,0% | 4 | 0,1% | |
Total | 1 401 | 2 930 | 4302 | 57,8% | 1 530 | 1 617 | 3141 | 42,2% | 7443 | 100% |
Table 15b - Breakdown by gender, DG and two clusters of FGs of Commission's contract staff in 2021
FG I-II-III | FG IV | TOTAL ALL FG | |||||||||
M | F | Total | % | M | F | Total | % | Total | % | ||
AGRI | 4 | 24 | 28 | 38,4% | 20 | 25 | 45 | 61,6% | 73 | 1,0% | |
BUDG | 12 | 33 | 45 | 65,2% | 6 | 18 | 24 | 34,8% | 69 | 0,9% | |
CdP-OSP | 0 | 11 | 11 | 100,0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,0% | 11 | 0,1% | |
CLIMA | 2 | 13 | 15 | 68,2% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 31,8% | 22 | 0,3% | |
CNECT | 24 | 41 | 65 | 45,5% | 29 | 49 | 78 | 54,5% | 143 | 1,9% | |
COMM | 91 | 218 | 309 | 86,6% | 18 | 30 | 48 | 13,4% | 357 | 4,8% | |
COMP | 25 | 31 | 56 | 98,2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1,8% | 57 | 0,8% | |
DEFIS | 3 | 12 | 15 | 75,0% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 25,0% | 20 | 0,3% | |
DGT | 16 | 36 | 52 | 34,9% | 29 | 68 | 97 | 65,1% | 149 | 2,0% | |
DIGIT | 14 | 18 | 32 | 37,2% | 40 | 14 | 54 | 62,8% | 86 | 1,2% | |
EAC | 12 | 25 | 37 | 74,0% | 1 | 12 | 13 | 26,0% | 50 | 0,7% | |
ECFIN | 4 | 4 | 8 | 11,6% | 27 | 34 | 61 | 88,4% | 69 | 0,9% | |
ECHO | 35 | 71 | 106 | 62,4% | 25 | 39 | 64 | 37,6% | 170 | 2,3% | |
EMPL | 19 | 57 | 76 | 55,5% | 25 | 36 | 61 | 44,5% | 137 | 1,8% | |
ENER | 12 | 29 | 41 | 93,2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6,8% | 44 | 0,6% | |
ENV | 7 | 24 | 31 | 75,6% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 24,4% | 41 | 0,5% | |
EPSO | 5 | 16 | 21 | 95,5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4,5% | 22 | 0,3% | |
ESTAT | 18 | 33 | 51 | 58,6% | 8 | 28 | 36 | 41,4% | 87 | 1,2% | |
FISMA | 3 | 16 | 19 | 76,0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 24,0% | 25 | 0,3% | |
FPI | 10 | 26 | 36 | 29,8% | 38 | 47 | 85 | 70,2% | 121 | 1,6% | |
GROW | 14 | 31 | 45 | 55,6% | 13 | 23 | 36 | 44,4% | 81 | 1,1% | |
HERA | 0 | 1 | 1 | 50,0% | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50,0% | 2 | 0,0% | |
HOME | 11 | 26 | 37 | 80,4% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 19,6% | 46 | 0,6% | |
HR | 66 | 143 | 209 | 90,9% | 9 | 12 | 21 | 9,1% | 230 | 3,1% | |
IAS | 2 | 2 | 4 | 44,4% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 55,6% | 9 | 0,1% | |
IDEA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,0% | 0 | 0,0% | |
INTPA | 64 | 128 | 192 | 17,4% | 437 | 474 | 911 | 82,6% | 1103 | 14,7% | |
JRC | 120 | 135 | 255 | 22,8% | 483 | 381 | 864 | 77,2% | 1119 | 15,0% | |
JUST | 8 | 25 | 33 | 84,6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 15,4% | 39 | 0,5% | |
MARE | 11 | 36 | 47 | 73,4% | 6 | 11 | 17 | 26,6% | 64 | 0,9% | |
MOVE | 14 | 33 | 47 | 81,0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 19,0% | 58 | 0,8% | |
NEAR | 33 | 100 | 133 | 26,0% | 179 | 199 | 378 | 74,0% | 511 | 6,8% | |
OIB | 364 | 620 | 984 | 97,3% | 5 | 22 | 27 | 2,7% | 1011 | 13,5% | |
OIL | 93 | 145 | 238 | 97,9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 2,1% | 243 | 3,2% | |
OLAF | 6 | 11 | 17 | 85,0% | 3 | 0 | 3 | 15,0% | 20 | 0,3% | |
OP | 15 | 11 | 26 | 96,3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3,7% | 27 | 0,4% | |
PMO | 125 | 308 | 433 | 99,3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0,7% | 436 | 5,8% | |
REFORM | 7 | 18 | 25 | 43,1% | 12 | 21 | 33 | 56,9% | 58 | 0,8% | |
REGIO | 37 | 56 | 93 | 76,2% | 6 | 23 | 29 | 23,8% | 122 | 1,6% | |
RTD | 24 | 43 | 67 | 27,8% | 71 | 103 | 174 | 72,2% | 241 | 3,2% | |
SANTE | 8 | 50 | 58 | 63,7% | 9 | 24 | 33 | 36,3% | 91 | 1,2% | |
SCIC | 29 | 39 | 68 | 100,0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,0% | 68 | 0,9% | |
SG | 22 | 26 | 48 | 81,4% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 18,6% | 59 | 0,8% | |
SJ | 1 | 15 | 16 | 69,6% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 30,4% | 23 | 0,3% | |
TAXUD | 3 | 11 | 14 | 58,3% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 41,7% | 24 | 0,3% | |
TRADE | 10 | 21 | 31 | 77,5% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 22,5% | 40 | 0,5% | |
Total | 1 401 | 2 930 | 4175 | 55,8% | 1 530 | 1 617 | 3303 | 44,2% | 7478 | 100% |
Contract staff 3a
Table 16a - 3a contract staff by FG, gender and DG in 2020 at the Commission
FGI | FGII | FGIII | FGIV | ||||||||||||
M | F | TOTAL | M | F | TOTAL | M | F | TOTAL | M | F | TOTAL | Total | % | ||
AGRI | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 0,3% | |
BUDG | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0,4% | |
CdP-OSP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,0% | |
CLIMA | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0,0% | |
CNECT | 7 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0,3% | |
COMM | 31 | 5 | 36 | 32 | 127 | 159 | 19 | 66 | 85 | 15 | 30 | 45 | 325 | 9,3% | |
COMP | 6 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0,2% | |
DEFIS | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0,0% | |
DEVCO | 3 | 8 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 12 | 35 | 356 | 334 | 690 | 736 | 21,1% | |
DGT | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0,2% | |
DIGIT | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0,1% | |
EAC | 10 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0,3% | |
ECFIN | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0,0% | |
ECHO | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0,2% | |
EMPL | 4 | 13 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17 | 0,5% | |
ENER | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0,3% | |
ENV | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0,0% | |
EPSO | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 0,7% | |
ESTAT | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0,1% | |
FISMA | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0,1% | |
FPI | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 28 | 26 | 54 | 60 | 1,7% | |
GROW | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0,2% | |
HR | 28 | 24 | 52 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52 | 1,5% | |
JRC | 56 | 8 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 1,8% | |
JUST | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0,1% | |
MARE | 3 | 11 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 20 | 0,6% | |
MOVE | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0,2% | |
NEAR | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 156 | 139 | 295 | 328 | 9,4% | |
OIB | 222 | 68 | 290 | 85 | 502 | 587 | 41 | 43 | 84 | 4 | 21 | 25 | 986 | 28,2% | |
OIL | 36 | 9 | 45 | 44 | 106 | 150 | 13 | 19 | 32 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 232 | 6,6% | |
OLAF | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0,2% | |
OP | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0,1% | |
PMO | 28 | 9 | 37 | 58 | 258 | 316 | 39 | 50 | 89 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 444 | 12,7% | |
REGIO | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0,2% | |
RTD | 9 | 7 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 0,5% | |
SANTE | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0,2% | |
SCIC | 17 | 8 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 0,7% | |
SG | 10 | 8 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0,5% | |
SJ | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0,0% | |
TAXUD | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0,0% | |
TRADE | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 11 | 0,3% | |
TOTAL | 513 | 261 | 774 | 224 | 1012 | 1236 | 151 | 202 | 353 | 574 | 559 | 1133 | 3496 | 100% |
Table 16b - 3a contract staff by FG, gender and DG in 2021 at the Commission
FGI | FGII | FGIII | FGIV | |||||||||||||
M | F | TOTAL | M | F | TOTAL | M | F | TOTAL | M | F | TOTAL | Total | % | |||
AGRI | 3 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 0,3% | ||
BUDG | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0,4% | ||
CdP-OSP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0,0% | ||
CLIMA | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0,0% | ||
CNECT | 7 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0,3% | ||
COMM | 32 | 5 | 37 | 28 | 132 | 160 | 20 | 72 | 92 | 18 | 30 | 48 | 337 | 9,5% | ||
COMP | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0,2% | ||
DEFIS | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0,0% | ||
DGT | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0,2% | ||
DIGIT | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0,1% | ||
EAC | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0,1% | ||
ECFIN | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0,0% | ||
ECHO | 1 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0,2% | ||
EMPL | 4 | 12 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0,5% | ||
ENER | 2 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0,3% | ||
ENV | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0,0% | ||
EPSO | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 19 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 0,6% | ||
ESTAT | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0,1% | ||
FISMA | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0,1% | ||
FPI | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 29 | 31 | 60 | 65 | 1,8% | ||
GROW | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0,2% | ||
HR | 25 | 24 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 1,4% | ||
INTPA | 3 | 8 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 11 | 34 | 364 | 336 | 700 | 745 | 21,1% | ||
JRC | 56 | 8 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 1,8% | ||
JUST | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0,1% | ||
MARE | 3 | 10 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 19 | 0,5% | ||
MOVE | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0,2% | ||
NEAR | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 150 | 145 | 295 | 321 | 9,1% | ||
OIB | 222 | 68 | 290 | 93 | 501 | 594 | 49 | 51 | 100 | 5 | 22 | 27 | 1011 | 28,6% | ||
OIL | 34 | 8 | 42 | 44 | 111 | 155 | 15 | 26 | 41 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 243 | 6,9% | ||
OLAF | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0,2% | ||
OP | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0,3% | ||
PMO | 24 | 7 | 31 | 58 | 250 | 308 | 43 | 51 | 94 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 436 | 12,4% | ||
REGIO | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0,2% | ||
RTD | 9 | 6 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 0,5% | ||
SANTE | 1 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 0,2% | ||
SCIC | 18 | 8 | 26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26 | 0,7% | ||
SG | 9 | 6 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 0,4% | ||
SJ | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0,0% | ||
TAXUD | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0,0% | ||
TRADE | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 0,3% | ||
TOTAL | 504 | 251 | 755 | 228 | 1010 | 1238 | 159 | 222 | 381 | 581 | 574 | 1155 | 3529 | 100% |
Contract staff 3b
Table 17a - 3b contract staff by FG, gender and DG in 2020 at the Commission
FGII | FGIII | FGIV | ||||||||||
M | F | TOTAL | M | F | TOTAL | M | F | TOTAL | Total | % | ||
AGRI | 2 | 11 | 13 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 19 | 24 | 43 | 64 | 1,6% | |
BUDG | 1 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 18 | 27 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 50 | 1,3% | |
CdP-OSP | 0 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0,3% | |
CLIMA | 1 | 10 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 21 | 0,5% | |
CNECT | 2 | 25 | 27 | 29 | 42 | 71 | 27 | 41 | 68 | 166 | 4,2% | |
COMM | 1 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 0,5% | |
COMP | 4 | 10 | 14 | 10 | 21 | 31 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 49 | 1,2% | |
DEFIS | 0 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 18 | 0,5% | |
DEVCO | 13 | 40 | 53 | 25 | 70 | 95 | 65 | 131 | 196 | 344 | 8,7% | |
DGT | 11 | 27 | 38 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 30 | 64 | 94 | 133 | 3,4% | |
DIGIT | 2 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 32 | 15 | 47 | 78 | 2,0% | |
EAC | 2 | 11 | 13 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 1 | 13 | 14 | 49 | 1,2% | |
ECFIN | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 22 | 0,6% | |
ECHO | 8 | 21 | 29 | 26 | 41 | 67 | 19 | 37 | 56 | 152 | 3,9% | |
EMPL | 5 | 22 | 27 | 13 | 28 | 41 | 18 | 29 | 47 | 115 | 2,9% | |
ENER | 2 | 8 | 10 | 5 | 16 | 21 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 33 | 0,8% | |
ENV | 3 | 23 | 26 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 47 | 1,2% | |
ESTAT | 6 | 18 | 24 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 10 | 31 | 41 | 83 | 2,1% | |
FISMA | 1 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0,5% | |
FPI | 1 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 40 | 1,0% | |
GROW | 3 | 14 | 17 | 19 | 29 | 48 | 6 | 15 | 21 | 86 | 2,2% | |
HOME | 2 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 21 | 30 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 46 | 1,2% | |
HR | 22 | 72 | 94 | 21 | 35 | 56 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 169 | 4,3% | |
IAS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 12 | 0,3% | |
IDEA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0,0% | |
JRC | 21 | 73 | 94 | 31 | 42 | 73 | 480 | 351 | 831 | 998 | 25,3% | |
JUST | 1 | 10 | 11 | 4 | 14 | 18 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 35 | 0,9% | |
MARE | 1 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 23 | 29 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 48 | 1,2% | |
MOVE | 1 | 20 | 21 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 54 | 1,4% | |
NEAR | 4 | 27 | 31 | 25 | 62 | 87 | 29 | 55 | 84 | 202 | 5,1% | |
OLAF | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 0,4% | |
OP | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 0,4% | |
REFORM | 1 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 18 | 22 | 15 | 19 | 34 | 64 | 1,6% | |
REGIO | 5 | 11 | 16 | 17 | 51 | 68 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 87 | 2,2% | |
RTD | 7 | 33 | 40 | 30 | 46 | 76 | 93 | 139 | 232 | 348 | 8,8% | |
SANTE | 3 | 38 | 41 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 12 | 26 | 38 | 94 | 2,4% | |
SCIC | 9 | 29 | 38 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 | 1,1% | |
SG | 7 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 42 | 1,1% | |
SJ | 0 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 21 | 0,5% | |
TAXUD | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 25 | 0,6% | |
TRADE | 0 | 12 | 12 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 27 | 0,7% | |
UKTF | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0,1% | |
TOTAL | 155 | 668 | 823 | 377 | 739 | 1116 | 926 | 1082 | 2008 | 3947 | 100% |
Table 17b - 3b contract staff by FG, gender and DG in 2021 at the Commission
FGII | FGIII | FGIV | ||||||||||
M | F | TOTAL | M | F | TOTAL | M | F | TOTAL | Total | % | ||
AGRI | 0 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 18 | 24 | 42 | 62 | 1,6% | |
BUDG | 1 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 16 | 22 | 6 | 18 | 24 | 54 | 1,4% | |
CdP-OSP | 0 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0,3% | |
CLIMA | 2 | 9 | 11 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 21 | 0,5% | |
CNECT | 1 | 22 | 23 | 16 | 16 | 32 | 29 | 49 | 78 | 133 | 3,4% | |
COMM | 1 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 0,5% | |
COMP | 4 | 7 | 11 | 16 | 22 | 38 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 50 | 1,3% | |
DEFIS | 1 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 19 | 0,5% | |
DGT | 13 | 31 | 44 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 29 | 68 | 97 | 142 | 3,6% | |
DIGIT | 1 | 4 | 5 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 40 | 14 | 54 | 82 | 2,1% | |
EAC | 1 | 11 | 12 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 1 | 12 | 13 | 46 | 1,2% | |
ECFIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 27 | 34 | 61 | 68 | 1,7% | |
ECHO | 4 | 22 | 26 | 30 | 44 | 74 | 25 | 39 | 64 | 164 | 4,2% | |
EMPL | 2 | 22 | 24 | 13 | 23 | 36 | 25 | 36 | 61 | 121 | 3,1% | |
ENER | 3 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 15 | 22 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 34 | 0,9% | |
ENV | 1 | 16 | 17 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 40 | 1,0% | |
ESTAT | 5 | 19 | 24 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 8 | 28 | 36 | 82 | 2,1% | |
FISMA | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 11 | 13 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 23 | 0,6% | |
FPI | 1 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 17 | 24 | 9 | 16 | 25 | 56 | 1,4% | |
GROW | 3 | 8 | 11 | 10 | 17 | 27 | 13 | 23 | 36 | 74 | 1,9% | |
HERA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0,1% | |
HOME | 2 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 19 | 28 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 46 | 1,2% | |
HR | 21 | 81 | 102 | 20 | 38 | 58 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 181 | 4,6% | |
IAS | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 0,2% | |
INTPA | 15 | 37 | 52 | 23 | 72 | 95 | 73 | 138 | 211 | 358 | 9,1% | |
JRC | 23 | 77 | 100 | 41 | 50 | 91 | 483 | 381 | 864 | 1055 | 26,7% | |
JUST | 3 | 9 | 12 | 4 | 15 | 19 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 37 | 0,9% | |
MARE | 1 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 22 | 29 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 45 | 1,1% | |
MOVE | 2 | 18 | 20 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 50 | 1,3% | |
NEAR | 4 | 25 | 29 | 18 | 60 | 78 | 29 | 54 | 83 | 190 | 4,8% | |
OLAF | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 0,4% | |
OP | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 0,4% | |
REFORM | 3 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 12 | 21 | 33 | 58 | 1,5% | |
REGIO | 3 | 14 | 17 | 30 | 40 | 70 | 6 | 23 | 29 | 116 | 2,9% | |
RTD | 3 | 18 | 21 | 12 | 19 | 31 | 70 | 102 | 172 | 224 | 5,7% | |
SANTE | 6 | 32 | 38 | 1 | 12 | 13 | 9 | 24 | 33 | 84 | 2,1% | |
SCIC | 8 | 30 | 38 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 42 | 1,1% | |
SG | 8 | 10 | 18 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 44 | 1,1% | |
SJ | 0 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 22 | 0,6% | |
TAXUD | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 23 | 0,6% | |
TRADE | 3 | 12 | 15 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 30 | 0,8% | |
TOTAL | 153 | 624 | 777 | 359 | 665 | 1024 | 963 | 1185 | 2148 | 3949 | 100% |
4. Contract staff in other institutions and agencies
a. Introduction
The number of contract agents working for the other institutions increased by 4,56% from 2019 to 2020 and by 12,09% from 2020 to 2021. For agencies, the increase is of 12.10% and 15.31% respectively.
Table 18a - Trends in the breakdown of contract staff between other institutions and agencies
b. Contract staff in the other institutions
The tables below show the distribution of contract agents in institutions other than the Commission.
Table 19a Breakdown of contract staff among the other institutions in 2020
Table 19b Breakdown of contract staff among the other institutions in 2021
Table 20a – Breakdown by gender and function group in the other institutions in 2020
FGI | FGII | FGIII | FGIV | Total | |||||||||
F | M | Total | F | M | Total | F | M | Total | F | M | Total | ||
COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS | 8 | 17 | 25 | 8 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 60 |
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION | 27 | 118 | 145 | 14 | 5 | 19 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 205 |
COURT OF AUDITORS | 5 | 37 | 42 | 10 | 3 | 13 | 11 | 4 | 15 | 11 | 3 | 14 | 84 |
COURT OF JUSTICE | 6 | 83 | 89 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 38 | 18 | 56 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 180 |
EUROPEAN DATA PROTECTION SUPERVISOR | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 37 |
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE | 8 | 14 | 22 | 12 | 2 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 47 |
EUROPEAN EXTERNAL ACTION SERVICE | 19 | 19 | 38 | 142 | 13 | 155 | 69 | 69 | 138 | 96 | 120 | 216 | 547 |
EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 |
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT | 237 | 730 | 967 | 135 | 41 | 176 | 242 | 150 | 392 | 206 | 142 | 348 | 1883 |
Total | 311 | 1019 | 1330 | 340 | 81 | 421 | 384 | 252 | 636 | 363 | 301 | 664 | 3051 |
Table 20b - Breakdown by gender and function group in the other institutions in 2021
FGI | FGII | FGIII | FGIV | Total | |||||||||
F | M | Total | F | M | Total | F | M | Total | F | M | Total | ||
COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS | 8 | 16 | 24 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 57 |
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION | 27 | 120 | 147 | 14 | 3 | 17 | 20 | 4 | 24 | 30 | 16 | 46 | 234 |
COURT OF AUDITORS | 5 | 36 | 41 | 13 | 3 | 16 | 13 | 5 | 18 | 14 | 4 | 18 | 93 |
COURT OF JUSTICE | 5 | 83 | 88 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 36 | 23 | 59 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 185 |
EUROPEAN DATA PROTECTION SUPERVISOR | 7 | 1 | 8 | 13 | 4 | 17 | 18 | 6 | 24 | 49 | |||
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE | 8 | 14 | 22 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 46 |
EUROPEAN EXTERNAL ACTION SERVICE | 17 | 18 | 35 | 140 | 14 | 154 | 70 | 85 | 155 | 106 | 124 | 230 | 574 |
EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 6 | ||||||
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT | 246 | 834 | 1080 | 158 | 38 | 196 | 285 | 242 | 527 | 222 | 151 | 373 | 2176 |
Total | 316 | 1121 | 1437 | 359 | 74 | 433 | 449 | 369 | 818 | 415 | 317 | 732 | 3420 |
Table 21a – Breakdown by nationality in the other institutions in 2020
AT | BE | BG | CY | CZ | DE | DK | EE | EL | ES | FI | FR | HR | HU | IE | IT | LT | LU | LV | MT | NL | PL | PT | RO | SE | SI | SK | UK | Other | Total | |
COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS | 0 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 60 |
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION | 2 | 77 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 19 | 2 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 36 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 205 |
COURT OF AUDITORS | 1 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 21 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 84 |
COURT OF JUSTICE | 14 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 62 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 15 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 180 | ||
EUROPEAN DATA PROTECTION SUPERVISOR | 0 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 37 |
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE | 1 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 47 |
EUROPEAN EXTERNAL ACTION SERVICE | 7 | 121 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 1 | 4 | 19 | 51 | 6 | 85 | 3 | 9 | 6 | 74 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 13 | 23 | 41 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 547 |
EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT | 12 | 443 | 43 | 6 | 14 | 58 | 8 | 10 | 99 | 153 | 13 | 356 | 20 | 27 | 17 | 198 | 14 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 24 | 64 | 76 | 131 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 26 | 9 | 1883 |
Grand Total | 23 | 702 | 75 | 11 | 26 | 105 | 11 | 22 | 157 | 247 | 26 | 547 | 26 | 44 | 29 | 356 | 27 | 22 | 13 | 7 | 36 | 96 | 136 | 190 | 21 | 21 | 25 | 40 | 10 | 3051 |
Table 21b – Breakdown by nationality in the other institutions in 2021
AT | BE | BG | CY | CZ | DE | DK | EE | EL | ES | FI | FR | HR | HU | IE | IT | LT | LU | LV | MT | NL | PL | PT | RO | SE | SI | SK | Other | Total | |
COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS | 0 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 57 |
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION | 2 | 81 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 26 | 2 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 40 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 234 |
COURT OF AUDITORS | 0 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 93 |
COURT OF JUSTICE | 0 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 2 | 64 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 17 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 185 |
EUROPEAN DATA PROTECTION SUPERVISOR | 0 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 49 |
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE | 1 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46 |
EUROPEAN EXTERNAL ACTION SERVICE | 8 | 123 | 19 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 1 | 4 | 28 | 54 | 7 | 79 | 2 | 10 | 5 | 73 | 9 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 9 | 17 | 27 | 45 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 574 |
EUROPEAN OMBUDSMAN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT | 15 | 527 | 44 | 5 | 14 | 72 | 8 | 15 | 112 | 174 | 15 | 396 | 23 | 24 | 17 | 236 | 17 | 15 | 5 | 6 | 32 | 51 | 93 | 184 | 16 | 16 | 17 | 27 | 2176 |
Grand Total | 26 | 794 | 75 | 11 | 24 | 123 | 10 | 26 | 181 | 288 | 28 | 591 | 28 | 43 | 34 | 401 | 33 | 26 | 14 | 7 | 44 | 86 | 156 | 248 | 23 | 27 | 28 | 46 | 3420 |
c. Contract staff in the agencies
The following table shows the evolution of the number of contract staff in the agencies since 2013.
Table 22a - Breakdown of contract staff by type of agency in 2013 – 2021
In 2020, 51.1% of contract staff were employed in decentralised agencies, 43.3% in executive agencies and 5.6% in joint undertakings. In 2021, respectively 52.0%, 43.1% and 4,9 %. These figures are in line with the observed increase in the relative share of decentralised agencies and a decrease in the relative share of executive agencies and Joint Undertakings.
Table 22b - Breakdown of contract staff by type of agency in 2013 – 2021
2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
Decentralised agencies | 44,6% | 48,3% | 40,8% | 44,3% | 47,2% | 47,4% | 49,1% | 51,1% | 52,0% |
Executive agencies | 48,5% | 44,7% | 52,0% | 49,3% | 46,2% | 46,5% | 44,9% | 43,3% | 43,1% |
Joint undertakings | 6,9% | 7,0% | 7,2% | 6,4% | 6,6% | 6,1% | 6,0% | 5,6% | 4,9% |
The breakdown by function group, gender and nationality are as follows.
Table 23a - Breakdown by function group in 2020
GFI | GFII | GFIII | GFIV | TOTAL | ||||||
Decentralised agencies | 45 | 60,0% | 273 | 42,3% | 811 | 48,1% | 1223 | 55,6% | 2352 | 51,1% |
Executive agencies | 29 | 38,7% | 349 | 54,0% | 770 | 45,7% | 847 | 38,5% | 1995 | 43,3% |
Joint undertakings | 1 | 1,3% | 24 | 3,7% | 104 | 6,2% | 130 | 5,9% | 259 | 5,6% |
Table 23b - Breakdown by function group in 2021
GFI | GFII | GFIII | GFIV | TOTAL | ||||||
Decentralised agencies | 45 | 57,7% | 222 | 39,3% | 918 | 48,2% | 1578 | 57,1% | 2763 | 52,0% |
Executive agencies | 32 | 41,0% | 320 | 56,6% | 881 | 46,3% | 1054 | 38,1% | 2287 | 43,1% |
Joint undertakings | 1 | 1,3% | 23 | 4,1% | 104 | 5,5% | 133 | 4,8% | 261 | 4,9% |
Table 24a - Breakdown by function group and gender in 2020
FGI | FGII | FGIII | FGIV | Total | |||||||||||
F | M | Total | F | M | Total | F | M | Total | F | M | Total | ||||
Decentralised agencies | 10 | 35 | 45 | 215 | 58 | 273 | 557 | 254 | 811 | 602 | 621 | 1223 | 2352 | ||
BEREC | Riga, LV | Agency for Support for BEREC | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 20 | |||
CPVO | Angers, FR | Community Plant Variety Office | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | ||||||
EUROJUST | The Hague, NL | Eurojust | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 24 | ||
EU-OSHA | Bilbao, ES | European Agency for Safety and Health at Work | 0 | 8 | 1 | 9 | 11 | 2 | 13 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 27 | ||
EASO | Valletta, MT | European Asylum Support Office | 0 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 34 | 18 | 52 | 89 | ||
EBA | Paris, FR | European Banking Authority | 0 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 26 | 11 | 37 | 45 | ||||
FRONTEX | Warsaw, PL | European Border and Coast Guard Agency | 19 | 19 | 8 | 1 | 9 | 80 | 11 | 91 | 66 | 202 | 268 | 387 | |
ECDC | Stockholm, SE | European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control | 2 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 13 | 31 | 5 | 36 | 36 | 20 | 56 | 107 | |
CEDEFOP | Thesaloniki, EL | European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training | 3 | 3 | 11 | 1 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 20 | ||
ECHA | Helsinki, FI | European Chemicals Agency | 3 | 3 | 27 | 7 | 34 | 26 | 29 | 55 | 20 | 19 | 39 | 131 | |
EEA | Copenhagen, DK | European Environment Agency | 0 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 36 | 24 | 60 | 80 | |||
EFCA | Vigo, ES | European Fisheries Control Agency | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 14 | |||
EFSA | Parma, IT | European Food Safety Authority | 1 | 1 | 15 | 4 | 19 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 62 | 32 | 94 | 123 | |
EUROFUND | Dublin, IE | European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 11 | ||
GSA | Prague, CZ | European GNSS Agency | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 22 | 26 | 48 | 61 | |||
EIGE | Vilnius, LT | European Institute for Gender Equality | 0 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 14 | |||
EIOPA | Frankfurt a.M., DE | European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority | 0 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 21 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 30 | |||
ELA | Bratislava, SK | European Labour Authority | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 10 | |||||
EMSA | Lisbon, PT | European Maritime Safety Agency | 2 | 2 | 14 | 4 | 18 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 46 | |
EMA | Amsterdam, NL | European Medicines Agency | 2 | 2 | 25 | 1 | 26 | 55 | 22 | 77 | 69 | 25 | 94 | 199 | |
EMCDDA | Lisbon, PT | European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction | 2 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 31 | |
EPPO | Luxembourg, LU | European Public Prosecutor’s Office | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | ||||
ESMA | Paris, FR | European Securities and Markets Authority | 0 | 0 | 19 | 5 | 24 | 17 | 29 | 46 | 70 | ||||
ETF | Turin, IT | European Training Foundation | 0 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 18 | 2 | 20 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 41 | ||
ENISA | Heraklion, EL | European Union Agency for Cybersecurity | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 27 | |||
FRA | Vienna, AT | European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 33 | ||
EUROPOL | The Hague, NL | European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation | 1 | 1 | 30 | 20 | 50 | 65 | 43 | 108 | 16 | 31 | 47 | 206 | |
CEPOL | Budapest, HU | European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training | 0 | 0 | 20 | 6 | 26 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 46 | ||||
ERA | Valenciennes, FR | European Union Agency for Railways | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 13 | 17 | 32 | |
ACER | Ljubljana, SL | European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 17 | 26 | 30 | ||||
EU-LISA | Tallinn, EE; Strasbourg, FR | European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice | 0 | 0 | 14 | 13 | 27 | 18 | 37 | 55 | 82 | ||||
EASA | Cologne, DE | European Union Aviation Safety Agency | 0 | 0 | 41 | 19 | 60 | 12 | 16 | 28 | 88 | ||||
EUIPO | Alicante, ES | European Union Intellectual Property Office | 5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 57 | 33 | 90 | 62 | 37 | 99 | 195 | ||
CDT | Luxemburg, LU | Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 9 | 22 | |||
Executive agencies | 15 | 14 | 29 | 307 | 42 | 349 | 508 | 262 | 770 | 530 | 317 | 847 | 1995 | ||
CHAFEA | Luxembourg, LU | Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 25 | 15 | 40 | 57 | ||
EACEA | Brussels, BE | Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency | 2 | 3 | 5 | 55 | 8 | 63 | 110 | 65 | 175 | 71 | 22 | 93 | 336 |
ERCEA | Brussels, BE | European Research Council Executive Agency | 4 | 3 | 7 | 73 | 14 | 87 | 89 | 52 | 141 | 89 | 56 | 145 | 380 |
EASME | Brussels, BE | Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises | 2 | 2 | 31 | 4 | 35 | 94 | 39 | 133 | 126 | 81 | 207 | 377 | |
INEA | Brussels, BE | Innovation and Networks Executive Agency | 3 | 3 | 28 | 2 | 30 | 52 | 29 | 81 | 77 | 49 | 126 | 240 | |
REA | Brussels, BE | Research Executive Agency | 6 | 5 | 11 | 116 | 14 | 130 | 156 | 72 | 228 | 142 | 94 | 236 | 605 |
Joint undertakings | 1 | 0 | 1 | 20 | 4 | 24 | 77 | 27 | 104 | 52 | 78 | 130 | 259 | ||
BBI | Brussels, BE | Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 10 | ||||
Clean Sky | Brussels, BE | Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |||||
ECSEL | Brussels, BE | ECSEL Joint Undertaking | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 16 | ||
EHPC | Brussels, BE | European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | ||
EIT | Budapest, HU | European Institute of Innovation and Technology | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 22 | ||
FCH2 | Brussels, BE | Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |||||
F4E | Barcelona, ES | Fusion for Energy Joint Undertaking | 0 | 11 | 1 | 12 | 48 | 6 | 54 | 29 | 66 | 95 | 161 | ||
IMI2 | Brussels, BE | IMI 2 Joint Undertaking | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 15 | ||||
SESAR | Brussels, BE | SESAR Joint Undertaking | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||
S2R | Brussels, BE | Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 16 | ||
Total Agencies | 26 | 49 | 75 | 542 | 104 | 646 | 1142 | 543 | 1685 | 1184 | 1016 | 2200 | 4606 |
Table 24b - Breakdown by function group and gender in 2021
FGI | FGII | FGIII | FGIV | Total | |||||||||||
F | M | Total | F | M | F | M | Total | F | M | ||||||
Decentralised agencies | 10 | 35 | 45 | 165 | 57 | 222 | 629 | 289 | 918 | 769 | 809 | 1578 | 2763 | ||
BEREC | Riga, LV | Agency for Support for BEREC | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 21 | ||||
CPVO | Angers, FR | Community Plant Variety Office | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | |||||||
EU-OSHA | Bilbao, ES | European Agency for Safety and Health at Work | 6 | 1 | 7 | 12 | 3 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 28 | |||
EASO | Valletta, MT | European Asylum Support Office | 7 | 6 | 13 | 32 | 19 | 51 | 72 | 30 | 102 | 166 | |||
EBA | Paris, FR | European Banking Authority | 5 | 2 | 7 | 26 | 15 | 41 | 48 | ||||||
FRONTEX | Warsaw, PL | European Border and Coast Guard Agency | 21 | 21 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 82 | 17 | 99 | 102 | 279 | 381 | 507 | |
ECDC | Stockholm, SE | European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control | 1 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 11 | 31 | 7 | 38 | 42 | 28 | 70 | 120 | |
CEDEFOP | Thesaloniki, EL | European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training | 3 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 18 | ||
ECHA | Helsinki, FI | European Chemicals Agency | 3 | 3 | 23 | 6 | 29 | 32 | 28 | 60 | 23 | 18 | 41 | 133 | |
EEA | Copenhagen, DK | European Environment Agency | 8 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 38 | 24 | 62 | 81 | ||||
EFCA | Vigo, ES | European Fisheries Control Agency | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 12 | ||||
EFSA | Parma, IT | European Food Safety Authority | 1 | 1 | 14 | 5 | 19 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 66 | 44 | 110 | 141 | |
EUROFUND | Dublin, IE | European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 13 | |||
EIGE | Vilnius, LT | European Institute for Gender Equality | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 12 | |||
EIOPA | Frankfurt a.M., DE | European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority | 1 | 1 | 21 | 3 | 24 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 34 | ||||
ELA | Bratislava, SK | European Labour Authority | 4 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 11 | ||||||
EMSA | Lisbon, PT | European Maritime Safety Agency | 2 | 2 | 14 | 4 | 18 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 50 | |
EMA | Amsterdam, NL | European Medicines Agency | 2 | 2 | 83 | 24 | 107 | 68 | 28 | 96 | 205 | ||||
EMCDDA | Lisbon, PT | European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction | 1 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 9 | 4 | 13 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 36 | |
EPPO | Luxembourg, LU | European Public Prosecutor’s Office | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 12 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 30 |
ESMA | Paris, FR | European Securities and Markets Authority | 25 | 5 | 30 | 21 | 34 | 55 | 85 | ||||||
ETF | Turin, IT | European Training Foundation | 4 | 2 | 6 | 18 | 3 | 21 | 12 | 2 | 14 | 41 | |||
EUROJUST | The Hague, NL | European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation | 3 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 4 | 22 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 42 | |||
ENISA | Heraklion, EL | European Union Agency for Cybersecurity | 1 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 8 | 19 | 28 | ||||
FRA | Vienna, AT | European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 12 | 7 | 19 | 34 | ||||
EUROPOL | The Hague, NL | European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation | 1 | 1 | 30 | 21 | 51 | 66 | 48 | 114 | 31 | 40 | 71 | 237 | |
CEPOL | Budapest, HU | European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training | 23 | 9 | 32 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 58 | ||||||
ERA | Valenciennes, FR | European Union Agency for Railways | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 16 | 22 | 37 | |
ACER | Ljubljana, SL | European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators | 4 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 16 | 27 | 35 | ||||||
EU-LISA | Tallinn, EE; Strasbourg, FR | European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice | 2 | 2 | 21 | 20 | 41 | 20 | 44 | 64 | 107 | ||||
EUSPA | Prague, CZ | European Union Agency for the Space Programme | 1 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 19 | 24 | 43 | 56 | ||||
EASA | Cologne, DE | European Union Aviation Safety Agency | 40 | 18 | 58 | 11 | 16 | 27 | 85 | ||||||
EUIPO | Alicante, ES | European Union Intellectual Property Office | 5 | 5 | 33 | 19 | 52 | 106 | 61 | 167 | 224 | ||||
CDT | Luxemburg, LU | Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union | 8 | 7 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 23 | ||||||
Executive agencies | 18 | 14 | 32 | 280 | 40 | 320 | 610 | 271 | 881 | 646 | 408 | 1054 | 2287 | ||
CINEA | Brussels, BE | European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency | 3 | 3 | 35 | 4 | 39 | 70 | 33 | 103 | 129 | 90 | 219 | 364 | |
EACEA | Brussels, BE | European Education and Culture Executive Agency | 3 | 3 | 6 | 48 | 8 | 56 | 123 | 64 | 187 | 77 | 25 | 102 | 351 |
HaDEA | Brussels, BE | European Health and Digital Executive Agency | 1 | 1 | 28 | 3 | 31 | 54 | 22 | 76 | 91 | 53 | 144 | 252 | |
EISMEA | Brussels, BE | European Innovation Council and SMEs Executive Agency | 1 | 1 | 28 | 2 | 30 | 72 | 34 | 106 | 85 | 53 | 138 | 275 | |
ERCEA | Brussels, BE | European Research Council Executive Agency | 5 | 3 | 8 | 68 | 11 | 79 | 93 | 47 | 140 | 84 | 58 | 142 | 369 |
REA | Brussels, BE | Research Executive Agency | 7 | 6 | 13 | 73 | 12 | 85 | 198 | 71 | 269 | 180 | 129 | 309 | 676 |
Joint undertakings | 1 | 0 | 1 | 19 | 4 | 23 | 76 | 28 | 104 | 51 | 82 | 133 | 261 | ||
CBE JU | Brussels, BE | Circular Bio-based Europe Joint Undertaking | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 9 | ||||||
CAJU | Brussels, BE | Clean Aviation Joint Undertaking | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5 | |||||||
CHP | Brussels, BE | Clean Hydrogen Joint Undertaking | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||
EU-RAIL | Brussels, BE | Europe’s Rail Joint Undertaking | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 13 | ||||
EHPC | Brussels, BE | European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 11 | |||
EIT | Budapest, HU | European Institute of Innovation and Technology | 1 | 1 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 21 | ||||
F4E | Barcelona, ES | Fusion for Energy Joint Undertaking | 12 | 2 | 14 | 46 | 8 | 54 | 31 | 69 | 100 | 168 | |||
IHI JU | Brussels, BE | Innovative Health Initiative Joint Undertaking | 1 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 13 | |||||
KDT JU | Brussels, BE | Key Digital Technology Joint Undertaking | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 18 | ||
SESAR | Brussels, BE | SESAR Joint Undertaking | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
Total Agencies | 29 | 49 | 78 | 464 | 101 | 565 | 1315 | 588 | 1903 | 1466 | 1299 | 2765 | 5311 |
Table 25a - Breakdown by nationality in 2020
AT | BE | BG | CY | CZ | DE | DK | EE | EL | ES | FI | FR | HR | HU | IE | IT | LT | LU | LV | MT | NL | PL | PT | RO | SE | SI | SK | UK | Oth | Total | |||
Decentralised agencies | 18 | 65 | 73 | 7 | 34 | 82 | 15 | 27 | 221 | 292 | 56 | 144 | 34 | 76 | 28 | 298 | 51 | 2 | 34 | 14 | 84 | 241 | 127 | 188 | 42 | 27 | 31 | 32 | 9 | 2352 | ||
BEREC | Riga, LV | Agency for Support for BEREC | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CPVO | Angers, FR | Community Plant Variety Office | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EUROJUST | The Hague, NL | Eurojust | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||
EU-OSHA | Bilbao, ES | European Agency for Safety and Health at Work | 1 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||
EASO | Valletta, MT | European Asylum Support Office | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 22 | 2 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 89 | |||||||||
EBA | Paris, FR | European Banking Authority | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 45 | |||||||||||
FRONTEX | Warsaw, PL | European Border and Coast Guard Agency | 4 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 53 | 24 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 12 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 155 | 29 | 48 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 387 | ||||
ECDC | Stockholm, SE | European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 11 | 28 | 1 | 1 | 107 | ||||||
CEDEFOP | Thesaloniki, EL | European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training | 1 | 1 | 17 | 1 | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
ECHA | Helsinki, FI | European Chemicals Agency | 1 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 14 | 36 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 131 | ||||||
EEA | Copenhagen, DK | European Environment Agency | 1 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 80 | ||||||||
EFCA | Vigo, ES | European Fisheries Control Agency | 10 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
EFSA | Parma, IT | European Food Safety Authority | 4 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 13 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 57 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 123 | |||||||||||||
EUROFUND | Dublin, IE | European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
GSA | Prague, CZ | European GNSS Agency | 1 | 3 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 61 | |||||||||||||
EIGE | Vilnius, LT | European Institute for Gender Equality | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 14 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
EIOPA | Frankfurt a.M., DE | European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 30 | |||||||||||||||
ELA | Bratislava, SK | European Labour Authority | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
EMSA | Lisbon, PT | European Maritime Safety Agency | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 46 | |||||||||||||||||
EMA | Amsterdam, NL | European Medicines Agency | 3 | 5 | 13 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 19 | 27 | 15 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 32 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 11 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 199 | ||||
EMCDDA | Lisbon, PT | European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 16 | 2 | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||
EPPO | Luxembourg, LU | European Public Prosecutor’s Office | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
ESMA | Paris, FR | European Securities and Markets Authority | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 70 | |||||||||||||
ETF | Turin, IT | European Training Foundation | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 25 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 41 | ||||||||||||||
ENISA | Heraklion, EL | European Union Agency for Cybersecurity | 1 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||
FRA | Vienna, AT | European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 33 | |||||||||||||||
EUROPOL | The Hague, NL | European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation | 3 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 13 | 20 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 11 | 2 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 54 | 9 | 15 | 17 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 206 | |||||
CEPOL | Budapest, HU | European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 46 | |||||||||||||||||
ERA | Valenciennes, FR | European Union Agency for Railways | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 32 | ||||||||||||||||
ACER | Ljubljana, SL | European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||
EU-LISA | Tallinn, EE; Strasbourg, FR | European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice | 1 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 11 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 82 | |||||||||||
EASA | Cologne, DE | European Union Aviation Safety Agency | 3 | 3 | 1 | 24 | 1 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 88 | |||||||||
EUIPO | Alicante, ES | European Union Intellectual Property Office | 4 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 97 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 26 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 195 | |||||||||
CDT | Luxemburg, LU | Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 22 | |||||||||||||||||
Executive agencies | 10 | 428 | 70 | 6 | 11 | 58 | 2 | 5 | 176 | 195 | 12 | 197 | 19 | 34 | 9 | 361 | 27 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 18 | 92 | 40 | 153 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 1995 | ||
CHAFEA | Luxemburg, LU | Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 57 | ||||||||||||
EACEA | Brussels, BE | Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency | 2 | 97 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 15 | 24 | 4 | 43 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 66 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 336 | ||||
ERCEA | Brussels, BE | European Research Council Executive Agency | 1 | 96 | 15 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 38 | 31 | 37 | 4 | 10 | 2 | 57 | 2 | 4 | 16 | 7 | 40 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 380 | |||||||
EASME | Brussels, BE | Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises | 4 | 62 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 9 | 2 | 28 | 39 | 1 | 50 | 5 | 3 | 69 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 7 | 27 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 377 | ||||
INEA | Brussels, BE | Innovation and Networks Executive Agency | 1 | 31 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 29 | 29 | 2 | 22 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 38 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 6 | 18 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 240 | |||||
REA | Brussels, BE | Research Executive Agency | 1 | 138 | 24 | 1 | 3 | 15 | 2 | 60 | 67 | 5 | 40 | 3 | 10 | 2 | 120 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25 | 10 | 52 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 605 | |||
Joint Undertakings | 0 | 21 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 83 | 1 | 27 | 2 | 19 | 4 | 35 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 9 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 259 | ||
BBI | Brussels, BE | Bio-based Industries Joint Undertaking | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Clean Sky | Brussels, BE | Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ECSEL | Brussels, BE | ECSEL Joint Undertaking | 6 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
EHPC | Brussels, BE | European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
EIT | Budapest, HU | European Institute of Innovation and Technology | 1 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 22 | |||||||||||||||||||||
FCH2 | Brussels, BE | Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
F4E | Barcelona, ES | Fusion for Energy Joint Undertaking | 7 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 73 | 1 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 161 | |||||||||
IMI2 | Brussels, BE | IMI 2 Joint Undertaking | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SESAR | Brussels, BE | SESAR Joint Undertaking | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S2R | Brussels, BE | Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Agencies | 28 | 514 | 146 | 14 | 47 | 150 | 17 | 33 | 405 | 570 | 69 | 368 | 55 | 129 | 41 | 694 | 79 | 6 | 39 | 17 | 104 | 341 | 176 | 357 | 53 | 38 | 52 | 55 | 9 | 4606 |
Table 25b - Breakdown by nationality in 2021
AT | BE | BG | CY | CZ | DE | DK | EE | EL | ES | FI | FR | HR | HU | IE | IT | LT | LU | LV | MT | NL | PL | PT | RO | SE | SI | SK | Other | Total | |||
Decentralised agencies | 23 | 72 | 88 | 10 | 41 | 96 | 16 | 31 | 330 | 60 | 183 | 46 | 90 | 33 | 401 | 58 | 2 | 36 | 21 | 84 | 264 | 144 | 221 | 39 | 29 | 39 | 276 | 30 | 2763 | ||
BEREC | Riga, LV | Agency for Support for BEREC | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 1 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||||||
CPVO | Angers, FR | Community Plant Variety Office | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
EU-OSHA | Bilbao, ES | European Agency for Safety and Health at Work | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
EASO | Valletta, MT | European Asylum Support Office | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 65 | 3 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 28 | 1 | 166 | ||||||
EBA | Paris, FR | European Banking Authority | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 48 | |||||||
FRONTEX | Warsaw, PL | European Border and Coast Guard Agency | 3 | 5 | 18 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 31 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 3 | 23 | 17 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 173 | 36 | 68 | 6 | 5 | 70 | 1 | 507 | |||
ECDC | Stockholm, SE | European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 12 | 30 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 120 | ||||||
CEDEFOP | Thesaloniki, EL | European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training | 1 | 1 | 16 | 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
ECHA | Helsinki, FI | European Chemicals Agency | 1 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 38 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 4 | 133 | |||||
EEA | Copenhagen, DK | European Environment Agency | 1 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 11 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 81 | |||||||||
EFCA | Vigo, ES | European Fisheries Control Agency | 9 | 1 | 2 | 12 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
EFSA | Parma, IT | European Food Safety Authority | 3 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 70 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 2 | 141 | |||||||||||||
EUROFUND | Dublin, IE | European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||
EIGE | Vilnius, LT | European Institute for Gender Equality | 1 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
EIOPA | Frankfurt a.M., DE | European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 34 | ||||||||||||
ELA | Bratislava, SK | European Labour Authority | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
EMSA | Lisbon, PT | European Maritime Safety Agency | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 3 | 50 | ||||||||||||||||
EMA | Amsterdam, NL | European Medicines Agency | 3 | 5 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 30 | 15 | 5 | 9 | 3 | 35 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 22 | 7 | 205 | |||
EMCDDA | Lisbon, PT | European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 3 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||
EPPO | Luxembourg, LU | European Public Prosecutor’s Office | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 30 | |||||||||||||||||
ESMA | Paris, FR | European Securities and Markets Authority | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 85 | ||||||||
ETF | Turin, IT | European Training Foundation | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 26 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 41 | |||||||||||||||
EUROJUST | The Hague, NL | European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 42 | ||||||||||
ENISA | Heraklion, EL | European Union Agency for Cybersecurity | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 28 | |||||||||||||||||||||
FRA | Vienna, AT | European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights | 7 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 34 | |||||||||||||
EUROPOL | The Hague, NL | European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation | 5 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 20 | 4 | 10 | 3 | 11 | 3 | 23 | 5 | 1 | 58 | 9 | 17 | 26 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 1 | 237 | |||||
CEPOL | Budapest, HU | European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 27 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 58 | ||||||||||||||||
ERA | Valenciennes, FR | European Union Agency for Railways | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 37 | |||||||||||||
ACER | Ljubljana, SL | European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 35 | ||||||||||||||||
EU-LISA | Tallinn, EE; Strasbourg, FR | European Union Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice | 2 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 21 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 17 | 107 | ||||||||
EUSPA | Prague, CZ | European Union Agency for the Space Programme | 1 | 2 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 56 | |||||||||||||
EASA | Cologne, DE | European Union Aviation Safety Agency | 4 | 3 | 1 | 24 | 1 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 85 | |||||||||
EUIPO | Alicante, ES | European Union Intellectual Property Office | 3 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 113 | 23 | 1 | 6 | 28 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 224 | ||||||||
CDT | Luxemburg, LU | Translation Centre for the Bodies of the European Union | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 23 | |||||||||||||||
Executive agencies | 13 | 455 | 84 | 9 | 16 | 67 | 2 | 5 | 221 | 242 | 13 | 211 | 24 | 37 | 13 | 412 | 32 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 21 | 99 | 54 | 176 | 13 | 10 | 24 | 18 | 2287 | ||
CINEA | Brussels, BE | European Climate, Infrastructure and Environment Executive Agency | 4 | 50 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 1 | 42 | 47 | 4 | 37 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 64 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 7 | 24 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 364 | |||
EACEA | Brussels, BE | European Education and Culture Executive Agency | 2 | 97 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 18 | 28 | 4 | 44 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 70 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 351 | |||
HaDEA | Brussels, BE | European Health and Digital Executive Agency | 3 | 27 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 29 | 32 | 18 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 49 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 252 | |||||
EISMEA | Brussels, BE | European Innovation Council and SMEs Executive Agency | 1 | 48 | 16 | 4 | 8 | 21 | 24 | 28 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 42 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 14 | 8 | 25 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 275 | ||||
ERCEA | Brussels, BE | European Research Council Executive Agency | 2 | 93 | 13 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 36 | 30 | 37 | 3 | 13 | 2 | 55 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 7 | 36 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 369 | ||||
REA | Brussels, BE | Research Executive Agency | 1 | 140 | 29 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 3 | 75 | 81 | 5 | 47 | 4 | 11 | 3 | 132 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 30 | 13 | 57 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 676 | ||
Joint Undertakings | 0 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 90 | 1 | 30 | 2 | 19 | 2 | 33 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 9 | 18 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 261 | ||
CBE JU | Brussels, BE | Circular Bio-based Europe Joint Undertaking | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
CAJU | Brussels, BE | Clean Aviation Joint Undertaking | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CHP | Brussels, BE | Clean Hydrogen Joint Undertaking | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EU-RAIL | Brussels, BE | Europe’s Rail Joint Undertaking | 4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||
EHPC | Brussels, BE | European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||
EIT | Budapest, HU | European Institute of Innovation and Technology | 1 | 1 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||
F4E | Barcelona, ES | Fusion for Energy Joint Undertaking | 7 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 80 | 1 | 16 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 25 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 168 | ||||||||
IHI JU | Brussels, BE | Innovative Health Initiative Joint Undertaking | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||
KDT JU | Brussels, BE | Key Digital Technology Joint Undertaking | 6 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
SESAR | Brussels, BE | SESAR Joint Undertaking | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
36 | 547 | 175 | 19 | 59 | 173 | 18 | 37 | 662 | 74 | 424 | 72 | 146 | 48 | 846 | 91 | 6 | 43 | 26 | 107 | 368 | 207 | 415 | 53 | 40 | 65 | 503 | 51 | 5311 |
ANNEX
List of Directorates-General, Services and Offices at the European Commission on 31/12/2021
1. AGRI: Agriculture and Rural Development
2. BUDG: Budget
3. CdP-OSP: Staff Committee - Representative Trade Unions and Staff Associations
4. CLIMA: Climate Action
5. CNECT: Communications Networks, Content and Technology
6. COMM: Communication
7. COMP: Competition
8. DEFIS: Defence Industry and Space
9. DGT: Translation
10. DIGIT: Informatics
11. EAC: Education, Youth, Sport and Culture
12. ECFIN: Economic and Financial Affairs
13. ECHO: European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (ECHO)
14. EMPL: Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
15. ENER: Energy
16. ENV: Environment
17. EPSO: European Personnel Selection Office
18. ESTAT: Eurostat
19. FISMA: Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union
20. FPI: Service for Foreign Policy Instruments
21. GROW: Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs
22. HERA: European Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Authority
23. HOME: Migration and Home Affairs
24. HR: Human Resources and Security
25. IAS: Internal Audit Service
26. INTPA: International Cooperation and Development (DEVCO in 2020)
27. JRC: Joint Research Centre
28. JUST: Justice and Consumers
29. MARE: Maritime Affairs and Fisheries
30. MOVE: Mobility and Transport
31. NEAR: Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations
32. OIB: Office for Infrastructure and Logistics in Brussels
33. OIL: Office for Infrastructure and Logistics in Luxembourg
34. OLAF: European Anti-Fraud Office
35. OP: Publications Office
36. PMO: Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements
37. REFORM: Structural Reform Support
38. REGIO: Regional and Urban Policy
39. RTD: Research and Innovation
40. SANTE: Health and Food Safety
41. SCIC: Interpretation
42. SG: Secretariat-General
43. SJ: Legal Service
44. TAXUD: Taxation and Customs Union
45. TRADE: Trade
1 It is to be noted that the Staff Regulations do not apply to the European Central Bank and the European Investment Bank (including the European Investment Fund), which have adopted specific rules for their staff pursuant to Article 36(1) of Protocol n° 4 and Article 11(7) of Protocol n°5 annexed to the Treaties. Also, the Single Resolution Board is not mentioned in this report as it does not employ contract agents. They are therefore out of the scope of this report.
2 See Article 187 TFEU.
3 It is to be noted that the budgetary data (sent each year with the draft budget to the Budgetary Authority - Working Document, parts II and III) show contract staff numbers at the time when the draft budget is presented (including contract staff recruited using assigned revenue), i.e.: a statement of the position at 1 April of year N-1 (where N is the year of the draft budget), budgetary implementation in year N-2 and requests for appropriations with estimates of full-time equivalents (FTE) for year N. This is why some differences appear in the numbers for contract staff, depending on the data source. Since several budget lines include appropriations for external personnel without establishing a distinction between the different categories of that personnel, the budget figures convey the best possible estimates based on the likely average costs and the repartition between categories.
4 See article 27 of the Staff Regulations.
5 Nationalities are ranked in the table from the largest to the smallest. The cumulated share indicates the sum of the shares of the first ranked nationalities
6 See Annex I for the list with full names of Directorates General s, services and offices on 31 December 2021.
7 Please note that the scope of the data presented in this chapter is limited to staff in activity at the moment of the snapshot. For this reason the totals do not match with the data displayed in the other chapters.
EN EN