Legal provisions of COM(2024)313 - - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
dossier | COM(2024)313 - . |
---|---|
document | COM(2024)313 |
date | July 26, 2024 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Legal base 2
2. Content of the report 2
3. Data basis 3
4. Analysis for the 2021 reporting period 3
4.1 CO2 emissions and fuel consumption 3
4.1.1 Performance of the fleet of the Union 3
4.1.2 Performance of the fleet of the Member States 5
4.1.3 Performance of the fleet of the manufacturers 7
4.1.4 CO2 emissions at different mission profiles/payload combinations 9
4.1.5 CO2 emissions and fuel consumption by fuel type 10
4.2 Advanced CO2 technologies and alternative powertrains 11
4.2.1 Advanced CO2 technologies 11
4.2.2 Alternative fuels 12
4.2.3 Alternative powertrains 15
5. Conclusion 15
5.1 CO2 emissions 16
5.2 Fuels and powertrains 16
1. LEGAL BASIS
Article 10 of Regulation (EU) 2018/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 June 2018 on the monitoring and reporting of CO2 emissions from and fuel consumption of new heavy-duty vehicles1 requires the Commission to publish each year a report with its analysis of the data transmitted by Member States and manufacturers for the preceding reporting period. This is the third report under this provision, providing a data analysis for the reporting period 2021 running from 1 July 2021 to 30 June 2022 with a reporting deadline of 30 September 2022.
The CO2 emissions from and fuel consumption of new heavy-duty vehicles are determined via the Vehicle Energy Consumption Calculation Tool (VECTO), a simulation tool for heavy-duty vehicles developed by the European Commission. The principles underpinning the simulation of new heavy-duty vehicles using VECTO are provided by Regulation (EU) 2017/2400 on the determination of the CO2 emissions and fuel consumption of heavy-duty vehicles2.
2. Content of the report
In accordance with the requirements of Article 10 of Regulation (EU) 2018/956, this analysis covers the performance of the heavy-duty vehicles fleet of
1. the Union
2. each Member State
3. each manufacturer
All three items above are estimated based on the CO2 emissions for selected representative heavy-duty vehicle groups for different mission profiles, payload combinations and different fuels. Additionally, selected values on the average fuel consumption of the heavy-duty vehicle fleet of the Union are included.
The analysis also covers the available data on the uptake of new and advanced CO2 reducing technologies, as well as of alternative powertrains.
It is based on the data available to the Commission on 20 March 2024.
Further performance values can be found in the Central Register for data on heavy-duty vehicles3.
Results of on-road verification tests could not be added to the report as they are not available to the Commission for the reporting period 2021.
3. Data basis
This report is based on data including all vehicles reported by manufacturers, matched by registrations in the Member States during the reporting period of 2021. These cover lorries in vehicle groups 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 16.
All these lorries are defined as heavy lorries in Regulation (EU) 2017/2400. This report, when relevant, distinguishes between lorries below (groups 1, 2 and 3) and above (4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 16) 16 tonnes of technically permissible maximum laden mass.
Buses and coaches are not included.
4. Analysis for the 2021 reporting period
4.1 CO2 emissions and fuel consumption
This section provides an analysis of the CO2 emissions by Member States, manufacturers, vehicle groups and different mission profiles. Additionally, selected values on fuel consumption, as well as different fuel types used by the newly registered vehicles are presented. Heavy duty vehicles with alternative powertrains, i.e. zero-emission vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles, and dual-fuel vehicles, are separately discussed in section 4.2. To be noted that sometimes not all the information required is available. Therefore some vehicles have been excluded from certain tables, which explains why the total vehicles shown in the different tables does not always match.
4.1.1 Performance of the fleet of the Union
The reported CO2 emissions strongly depend on the vehicle groups and sub-groups4.
Table 1 provides data on the composition and CO2 emissions of the vehicle groups and sub-groups. In particular, it shows the number of vehicles as well as the average specific CO2 emissions of different groups and sub-groups. The very large majority of matched lorries below 16 tonnes of technically permissible maximum laden mass belong to groups 2 and 3. As regards lorries above 16 tonnes, the vehicles in sub-group 5-Long Haul (5-LH) represent 70% of all new lorries above 16 tonnes. These are the most common vehicles used for long-haul freight transportation in the EU.
Average specific CO2 emissions of a heavy-duty vehicle from a given sub-group are calculated as a weighted mean over different mission profiles5 as defined in Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2019/1242. For vehicle groups 1, 2, 3, 11, 12 and 16, the mission profile weights used for all calculations in this report are not yet defined in legislation6.
Table 1 also provides the average payload7 in tonnes for all vehicle groups as well as the average specific CO2 emissions in g/tkm, calculated dividing the average specific CO2 emissions in g/km by the average payload in tonnes.
Table 1: Number of vehicles, average specific CO2 emissions in g/km, average payload in tonnes and average specific CO2 emissions in g/tkm per vehicle group and sub-group (note: RD stands for vehicles used mostly for Regional Delivery, LH for Long Haul, and UD for Urban Delivery)
Vehicle group | Vehicle sub-group8 | Number of vehicles | Average specific CO2 emissions (g/km) | Average payload (t) | Average specific CO2 emissions (g/tkm) |
1 | - | 2 455 | 610 | 1.44 | 424 |
2 | - | 8 648 | 627 | 2.34 | 268 |
3 | - | 8 013 | 700 | 3.37 | 208 |
4 | 4-UD | 72 | 813 | 2.65 | 307 |
4-RD | 11 221 | 628 | 3.18 | 198 | |
4-LH | 3 816 | 730 | 7.42 | 98 | |
vocational | 115 | 1 437 | |||
5 | 5-RD | 1 031 | 860 | 10.26 | 84 |
5-LH | 146 009 | 768 | 13.84 | 55 | |
vocational | 0 | - | |||
9 | 9-RD | 12 657 | 698 | 6.28 | 111 |
9-LH | 17 180 | 843 | 13.40 | 63 | |
vocational | 832 | 1 621 | |||
10 | 10-RD | 45 | 811 | 10.26 | 79 |
10-LH | 6 343 | 801 | 13.84 | 58 | |
11 | - | 2 589 | 835 | 5.39 | 155 |
12 | - | 1 479 | 1 015 | 9.81 | 104 |
16 | - | 4 085 | 1 082 | 9.81 | 110 |
EU total | - | 226 590 |
4.1.2 Performance of the fleet per Member States
Table 2 provides information on the average specific CO2 emissions9 in g/km for each Member State. Vocational vehicles as well as vehicles whose CO2 emissions are not certified (such as dual fuel and hybrid vehicles) are not taken into account. For conciseness reasons, only emission values for vehicle (sub)group 2, sub-group 5-Long-Haul (5-LH), and group 16 are shown. These 3 (sub)groups have been selected as the representative groups for lorries below 16 tonnes (groups 1, 2, and 3) and lorries above 16 tonnes (currently subject to the CO2 standards: groups 4, 5, 9, and 10; not subject to current CO2 standards: groups 11, 12 and 16) respectively10.
Table 2: Average specific CO2 emissions in g/km of vehicle (sub)groups 2, 5-LH and 16, as well as the number of lorries registered in each Member State in certain groups
Lorries below 16 tonnes | Lorries above 16 tonnes | |||||
Groups 1, 2, 3 No. of vehicles | Group 2 Avg. spec. CO2 em. (g/km) | Groups 4, 5, 9, 10 No. of vehicles | Sub-group 5-LH Avg. spec. CO2 em. (g/km) | Groups 11, 12, 16 No. of vehicles | Group 16 Avg. spec. CO2 em. (g/km) | |
Austria | 397 | 631 | 3 780 | 777 | 290 | 1 090 |
Belgium | 729 | 623 | 5 478 | 778 | 647 | 1 061 |
Bulgaria | 53 | 613 | 2 908 | 748 | 4 | 1 013 |
Croatia | 132 | 625 | 809 | 763 | 24 | 1 120 |
Cyprus | 12 | - | 11 | 762 | 0 | - |
Czechia | 695 | 653 | 6 101 | 765 | 285 | 1 080 |
Denmark | 275 | 607 | 2 862 | 757 | 455 | 1 072 |
Estonia | 12 | 595 | 497 | 754 | 63 | 1 083 |
Finland | 138 | 629 | 1 118 | 775 | 758 | 1 102 |
France | 3 891 | 608 | 31 156 | 772 | 1 629 | 1 089 |
Germany | 6 847 | 625 | 42 543 | 774 | 1 512 | 1 065 |
Greece | 82 | 630 | 221 | 771 | 4 | 1 089 |
Hungary | 113 | 632 | 4 266 | 764 | 20 | 1 130 |
Ireland | 168 | 642 | 1 347 | 761 | 79 | 1 059 |
Italy | 1 778 | 682 | 16 901 | 773 | 121 | 1 095 |
Latvia | 11 | 587 | 1 359 | 759 | 77 | 1 010 |
Lithuania | 16 | 616 | 6 974 | 765 | 39 | - |
Luxemburg | 3 | 630 | 609 | 786 | 6 | 1 051 |
Malta | 3 | 660 | 1 | - | 0 | - |
Netherlands | 683 | 608 | 9 408 | 766 | 275 | 1 060 |
Poland | 935 | 638 | 26 900 | 760 | 350 | 1 092 |
Portugal | 173 | 666 | 3 052 | 762 | 80 | 1 150 |
Romania | 117 | 633 | 4 839 | 767 | 41 | 1 084 |
Slovakia | 166 | 634 | 2 349 | 760 | 44 | 1 082 |
Slovenia | 43 | 650 | 1 691 | 758 | 31 | 1 118 |
Spain | 1 277 | 627 | 16 955 | 765 | 132 | 1 102 |
Sweden | 360 | 592 | 3 122 | 755 | 1 177 | 1 084 |
Unknown11 | 3 | - | 87 | 781 | 5 | 1 086 |
EU total | 19 112 | 627 | 197 344 | 768 | 8 148 | 1 082 |
4.1.3 Performance of the fleet of the manufacturers
Table 3 presents average specific CO2 emissions in g/km, for all manufacturers, in line with the data presented in Table 2.Vocational vehicles are not taken into account.
Table 3: Average specific CO2 emissions in g/km of vehicle (sub)groups 2, 5-LH and 16
Lorries below 16 tonnes | Lorries above 16 tonnes | |||||
Groups 1, 2, 3 Number of vehicles | Group 2 Average specific CO2 emissions (g/km) | Groups 4, 5, 9, 10 Number of vehicles | Sub-group 5-LH Average specific CO2 emissions (g/km) | Groups 11, 12, 16 Number of vehicles | Group 16 Average specific CO2 emissions (g/km) | |
ANADOLU ISUZU OTOMOTIV SANAYII VE TICARET A.S. | 100 | |||||
DAF Trucks N.V. | 1 837 | 668 | 35 615 | 771 | 279 | 1 035 |
Daimler Truck AG | 4 767 | 628 | 38 296 | 781 | 1 103 | 1 122 |
Ford Otomotiv Sanayi A.S. | 0 | - | 3 625 | 808 | 0 | - |
ISUZU MOTORS LIMITED | 45 | 752 | 0 | - | 0 | - |
Iveco S.p.A. | 3 418 | 700 | 1 078 | - | 0 | - |
Iveco-Magirus A.G. | 0 | - | 13 551 | 792 | 648 | 1 107 |
MAN Truck & Bus AG | 4 228 | 601 | 25 541 | 754 | 960 | 1 043 |
Mitsubishi Fuso Truck & Bus Corporation | 444 | - | 0.0 | - | 0 | - |
RENAULT TRUCKS | 3 003 | 577 | 19 492 | 785 | 386 | 1 081 |
SCANIA CV AB | 0.0 | - | 24 211 | 728 | 1 849 | 1 071 |
VOLVO TRUCK CORPORATION | 1 270 | 593 | 35 935 | 761 | 2 923 | 1 090 |
EU total | 19 112 | 627 | 197 344 | 768 | 8 148 | 1 082 |
Table 4 and Table 5 present the number of vehicles registered, for all manufacturers, in different groups and subgroups, respectively. Vocational vehicles are not included.
Table 4: Number of vehicles per vehicle group for each manufacturer, for groups 1,2, 3, 11, 12 and 16
Vehicle Group | Total | ||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 12 | 16 | ||
ANADOLU ISUZU OTOMOTIV SANAYII VE TICARET A.S. | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
DAF Trucks N.V. | 79 | 873 | 885 | 107 | 46 | 126 | 2 116 |
Daimler Truck AG | 429 | 2 164 | 2 174 | 292 | 246 | 565 | 5 870 |
Ford Otomotiv Sanayi A.S. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
ISUZU MOTORS LIMITED | 0 | 25 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 |
Iveco S.p.A. | 452 | 1 446 | 1 520 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 418 |
Iveco-Magirus A.G. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 268 | 28 | 352 | 648 |
MAN Truck & Bus AG | 911 | 2 189 | 1 128 | 219 | 161 | 580 | 5 188 |
Mitsubishi Fuso Truck & Bus Corporation | 444 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 444 |
RENAULT TRUCKS | 0 | 1 485 | 1 518 | 143 | 37 | 206 | 3 389 |
SCANIA CV AB | 0 | 0 | 0 | 575 | 302 | 972 | 1 849 |
VOLVO TRUCK CORPORATION | 40 | 466 | 764 | 983 | 656 | 1284 | 4 193 |
Total | 2 455 | 8 648 | 8 009 | 2 587 | 1 476 | 4 085 | 27 260 |
Table 5: Number of vehicles per vehicle sub-group for each manufacturer, for groups 4, 5, 9 and 10
Vehicle sub-group | Total | |||||||||
4-UD | 4-RD | 4-LH | 5-RD | 5-LH | 9-RD | 9-LH | 10-RD | 10-LH | ||
ANADOLU ISUZU OTOMOTIV SANAYII VE TICARET A.S. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
DAF Trucks N.V. | 9 | 1 086 | 435 | 69 | 30 856 | 521 | 1 834 | 3 | 802 | 35 615 |
Daimler Truck AG | 0 | 1 746 | 1 017 | 410 | 27 776 | 2 725 | 4 020 | 7 | 595 | 38 296 |
Ford Otomotiv Sanayi A.S. | 0 | 259 | 1 | 1 | 3 283 | 64 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 3 625 |
ISUZU MOTORS LIMITED | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Iveco S.p.A. | 14 | 1 064 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 078 |
Iveco-Magirus A.G. | 0 | 331 | 166 | 71 | 10 079 | 1 601 | 1 160 | 0 | 143 | 13 551 |
MAN Truck & Bus AG | 0 | 1 998 | 618 | 189 | 17 006 | 2 384 | 2 696 | 15 | 635 | 25 541 |
Mitsubishi Fuso Truck & Bus Corporation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
RENAULT TRUCKS | 0 | 2 123 | 576 | 71 | 13 644 | 1 927 | 898 | 0 | 253 | 19 492 |
SCANIA CV AB | 49 | 1 196 | 549 | 131 | 15 496 | 1 958 | 3 036 | 12 | 1 784 | 24 211 |
VOLVO TRUCK CORPORATION | 0 | 1 418 | 443 | 87 | 27 058 | 1 469 | 3 360 | 8 | 2092 | 35 935 |
Total | 72 | 11 221 | 3 805 | 1 029 | 145 198 | 12 649 | 17 021 | 45 | 6 304 | 197 344 |
4.1.4 CO2 emissions at different mission profiles/payload combinations
In VECTO, all vehicles are simulated over different mission profiles and with two different payloads (low or representative). Each vehicle group is simulated over a defined number of corresponding mission profiles.
Table 6 presents average specific emissions in g/km and g/tkm from vehicle groups 2, subgroup 5-LH and group 16.
Table 6: Average specific CO2 emissions in g/km and g/tkm of vehicle groups 2, 5, and 16 for each mission profile
Lorries below 16 tonnes | Lorries above 16 tonnes | |||||
Vehicle group 2 | Vehicle sub-group 5 LH | Vehicle group 16 | ||||
Mission profile / payload12 | Average CO2 emissions (g/km) | Average CO2 emissions (g/tkm) | Average CO2 emissions (g/km) | Average CO2 emissions (g/tkm) | Average CO2 emissions (g/km) | Average CO2 emissions (g/tkm) |
RDL | 509 | 849 | 659 | 253 | - | - |
RDR | 548 | 183 | 820 | 64 | - | - |
LHL | 670 | 515 | 632 | 243 | - | - |
LHR | 774 | 79 | 826 | 43 | - | - |
UDL | 646 | 1 076 | 1 043 | 401 | - | - |
UDR | 746 | 249 | 1 434 | 111 | - | - |
REL | - | - | 835 | 239 | - | - |
RER | - | - | 1 059 | 61 | - | - |
LEL | - | - | 797 | 228 | - | - |
LER | - | - | 1 073 | 40 | - | - |
MUL | - | - | - | - | - | - |
MUR | - | - | - | - | - | - |
COL | - | - | 781 | 300 | 909 | 350 |
COR | - | - | 1 009 | 78 | 1 156 | 90 |
4.1.5 CO2 emissions and fuel consumption by fuel type
Table 7 provides the average specific CO2 emissions by fuel type. Similarly to Table 2 and Table 3, it presents values for vehicle (sub)groups 2, 5-LH and 16, excluding vocational vehicles. A more detailed analysis of the different fuels used by newly registered vehicles is given in section 4.2.2 Alternative fuels.
Table 7: Number of vehicles, average specific CO2 emissions in g/km and average fuel consumption of vehicle (sub)groups 2,5-LH and 16 by fuel type
Lorries below 16 tonnes | Lorries above 16 tonnes | ||||||||
Vehicle group 2 | Vehicle sub-group 5-LH | Vehicle group 16 | |||||||
Fuel type (engine) | Number of vehicles | Av. spec. CO2 emissions (g/km) | Average fuel consumption | Number of vehicles | Av. spec. CO2 emissions (g/km) | Average fuel consumption | Number of vehicles | Av. spec. CO2 emissions (g/km) | Average fuel consumption |
Diesel (CI) | 8 503 | 627 | 24 l/100 km | 141 119 | 768 | 29 l/100 km | 4039 | 1 083 | 41 l/100 km |
Ethanol (CI) | 0 | - | - | 0 | - | - | 2 | 1 089 | 73 l/100 km |
LNG (PI) | 0 | - | 0 | 3 182 | 753 | 272 g/km | 6 | 1 009 | 364 g/km |
CNG (PI) | 143 | 609 | 226 g/km | 875 | 754 | 280 g/km | 38 | 1 051 | 391 g/km |
Unknown | 2 | 627 | 14 | 794 | 0 | - | - | ||
EU | 8 648 | 627 | 145 190 | 768 | 4 085 | 1 082 |
4.2 Advanced CO2 technologies and alternative powertrains
This section focuses on the use of advanced and alternative technologies within the vehicles registered. In particular, it lists the total number of vehicles and the share of the fleet equipped with a given technology. It compares the fleets of different manufacturers and Member States.
4.2.1 Advanced CO2 technologies
During the reporting period of 2021, manufacturers could, but were not obliged to, indicate additional “advanced CO2 technologies”13. This information had no influence on VECTO simulation results.
Out of all new vehicles of the manufacturer which has reported on such technologies, 67% were equipped with an active front grille, classified as an advanced aerodynamic measure. Furthermore, around 95% of its new vehicles were equipped with a pulse and glide technology, leading to more energy-efficient driving.
No conclusions about advanced CO2 technologies within the whole fleet of the Union can be drawn.
Besides this optional information on “advanced CO2 technologies”, the manufacturers had to indicate whether the registered vehicle is equipped with an advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS) technology14. Table 8 presents the total number of vehicles equipped with an ADAS technology.
Table 8: Number of vehicles per vehicle group equipped with an ADAS technology
Vehicle group | Total | ||||||||||
ADAS technology | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 16 | |
Engine stop-start during vehicle stop | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Eco-roll without engine stop-start | 319 | 2 257 | 2 244 | 5 770 | 126 510 | 18 036 | 4 338 | 1564 | 1017 | 2209 | 164 264 |
Eco-roll with engine stop-start | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Predictive cruise control | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 763 | 94 989 | 9 062 | 2 729 | 512 | 446 | 916 | 111 417 |
Total number of vehicles in group | 2 455 | 8 648 | 8 013 | 15 224 | 147 040 | 30 669 | 6 388 | 2 589 | 1 479 | 4 085 | 226 590 |
Share of vehicles equipped with at least 1 ADAS (%) | 13 | 26 | 28 | 38 | 86 | 59 | 68 | 64 | 71 | 57 | 73 |
No vehicles registered during the reporting period of 2021 were equipped with the ADAS technologies “engine stop-start during vehicle stop” or “eco-roll with engine stop-start”.
4.2.2 Alternative fuels
The fuel and engine type of a registered vehicle were mandatory specifications during the reporting period as they have an impact on the emissions determination via VECTO. Even though almost 97% of vehicles registered use Diesel, a small amount of newly registered vehicles uses ethanol, LNG, or CNG. Table 9 gives an overview of the different fuel and engines within the vehicle groups.
Table 9: Number of vehicles per vehicle group by fuel type (AF: Alternative Fuels)
Vehicle group | Total | |||||||||||
Fuel type (engine) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 16 | ||
Conventional fuels | Diesel (CI) | 2 451 | 8 503 | 7 913 | 14 573 | 142 118 | 28 889 | 6 337 | 2 576 | 1 475 | 4 039 | 218 874 |
Petrol (CI) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
Alternative fuels | Ethanol (CI) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
Ethanol (PI) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
LNG (PI) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65 | 3 189 | 369 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3 636 | |
CNG (PI) | 3 | 143 | 81 | 453 | 901 | 1 091 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 38 | 2 724 | |
Total number of vehicles in group | 2 455 | 8 648 | 8 013 | 15 224 | 147 040 | 30 669 | 6 388 | 2 589 | 1 479 | 4 085 | 226 590 | |
Share of vehicles using AF (%) | 0% | 2% | 1% | 3% | 3% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | 2.8% |
Table 10 shows data per Member State in terms of the number of vehicles using alternative fuels. The data are summed up within the two most important categories: lorries below 16 tonnes (i.e. groups 1, 2, and 3), as well as lorries above 16 tonnes (i.e. groups 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 16) and exclude the alternative powertrains presented in the next section.
Table 10: Number of vehicles per Member State by fuel. Gas powered include LNG and CNG
Vehicle groups 1 ,2, and 3 | Vehicle groups 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 16 | Total number of vehicles (excl. ZEV) | Share of vehicles using AF (%) | |||||
Member State | Diesel (CI) | Ethanol (CI) | Gas powered | Diesel (CI) | Ethanol (CI) | Gas powered | ||
Austria | 397 | 0 | 0 | 4050 | 0 | 23 | 4 470 | 1% |
Belgium | 721 | 0 | 8 | 6 003 | 0 | 149 | 6 881 | 2% |
Bulgaria | 51 | 0 | 2 | 2 792 | 0 | 119 | 2 964 | 4% |
Croatia | 132 | 0 | 0 | 827 | 0 | 1 | 960 | 0% |
Cyprus | 12 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 0% |
Czechia | 695 | 0 | 0 | 6 365 | 0 | 31 | 7 091 | 0% |
Denmark | 276 | 0 | 0 | 3 298 | 0 | 80 | 3 654 | 2% |
Estonia | 12 | 0 | 0 | 552 | 0 | 7 | 571 | 1% |
Finland | 137 | 0 | 1 | 1 809 | 0 | 55 | 2 002 | 3% |
France | 3767 | 0 | 119 | 31 257 | 7 | 1 459 | 36 609 | 4% |
Germany | 6841 | 0 | 1 | 43 272 | 0 | 1 164 | 51 278 | 2% |
Greece | 82 | 0 | 0 | 248 | 0 | 0 | 330 | 0% |
Hungary | 113 | 0 | 0 | 4 282 | 0 | 3 | 4 398 | 0% |
Ireland | 168 | 0 | 0 | 1 417 | 0 | 13 | 1 598 | 1% |
Italy | 1753 | 0 | 24 | 16 312 | 0 | 736 | 18 825 | 4% |
Latvia | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 367 | 0 | 69 | 1 447 | 5% |
Lithuania | 16 | 0 | 0 | 6 919 | 0 | 94 | 7 029 | 1% |
Luxemburg | 3 | 0 | 0 | 612 | 0 | 6 | 621 | 1% |
Malta | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0% |
Netherlands | 680 | 0 | 1 | 9 571 | 0 | 217 | 10 469 | 2% |
Poland | 919 | 0 | 16 | 26 417 | 0 | 869 | 28 221 | 3% |
Portugal | 166 | 0 | 7 | 3 096 | 0 | 35 | 3 304 | 1% |
Romania | 117 | 0 | 0 | 4 788 | 0 | 102 | 5 007 | 2% |
Slovakia | 166 | 0 | 0 | 2 360 | 0 | 33 | 2 559 | 1% |
Slovenia | 43 | 0 | 0 | 1 709 | 0 | 14 | 1 766 | 1% |
Spain | 1 224 | 0 | 48 | 16 438 | 0 | 645 | 18 355 | 4% |
Sweden | 359 | 0 | 0 | 4 143 | 1 | 208 | 4 711 | 4% |
Unknown15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 91 | 0 | 1 | 95 | 1% |
Total EU | 18 867 | 0 | 227 | 200 007 | 8 | 6 133 | 225 242 | 3% |
Differences between Member States might result from differently developed re-filling infrastructures for alternative fuels, e.g. CNG/LNG. Nonetheless, the number of registered vehicles using alternative fuels is low throughout the whole EU.
4.2.3 Alternative powertrains
Regulation (EU) 2019/1242 defines a zero-emission heavy-duty vehicle (ZEV) as a vehicle without an internal combustion engine, or with an internal combustion engine that emits less than 1 g CO2/kWh, or less than 1 g CO2/km.
27 hybrid electric16 and 1290 dual-fuel vehicles17 have been registered in the reporting period 2021 in the vehicle groups covered by the report, including those in group 0 (between 3.5 and 7.5 tonnes) Table 11 shows that the number of zero-emission vehicles registered during the reporting period was very limited.
Table 11: Number of ZEV (Zero Emission Vehicles) by manufacturer
Manufacturer | ZEV | Share of ZEV |
ANADOLU ISUZU OTOMOTIV SANAYII VE TICARET A.S. | 0 | 0.00% |
DAF NV | 17 | 0.04% |
DAIMLER TRUCK AG | 21 | 0.05% |
FORD OTOMOTIV SANAYI AS | 0 | 0.00% |
ISUZU MOTORS LIMITED | 0 | 0.00% |
IVECO SPA | 0 | 0.00% |
IVECO MAGIRUS AG | 0 | 0.00% |
MAN TRUCK AND BUS SE | 13 | 0.04% |
MITSUBISHI FUSO TRUCK & BUS CORPORATION | 0 | 0.00% |
RENAULT TRUCK SA | 85 | 0.37% |
SCANIA CV AB | 67 | 0.26% |
VOLVO TRUCK CORPORATION | 84 | 0.20% |
Total number of vehicles | 287 | 0.13% |
Out of these 287 battery-electric vehicles, 120 belong to the sub-group 4-LH (the subgroup with the highest number of vehicles).
5. Conclusion
This third report aims to present the status quo of the EU’s heavy-duty vehicle fleet.
The report compares the performance of the fleets of different Member States, manufacturers, and vehicle groups. It provides selected values on CO2 emissions, fuel consumption, as well as the share of alternative technologies in heavy-duty vehicles registered during the third reporting period. This section summarises the key observations from the reported data.
5.1 CO2 emissions
A fair comparison of the performance of different Member States and manufacturers in terms of the average specific CO2 emissions of their fleets is only possible within a given group or sub-groups (for lorries in groups 4, 5, 9 and 10).
Within the representative group for lorries below 16 tonnes, i.e. group 2, significant differences among the fleets of different Member States and manufacturers can be observed. The relative difference between the best- and the worst-performing Member State’s fleet is of more than 16% (see Table 2). For the manufacturers, the relative difference accounts to around 30% (see Table 3).
As for the lorries above 16 tonnes, the variation between the Member States’ fleets amounts to 5% for the 5-Long Haul group and 14% for group 16. Likewise, for manufacturers, this disparity reaches around 11% in the 5-LH group and 8% in group 16. Furthermore, the data on the uptake of advanced technologies indicates that nearly three quarters of the newly registered vehicles are equipped with at least one advanced driver-assistance system. The data on additional advanced CO2 technologies is limited, but suggests that a high share of vehicles might be equipped with advanced aerodynamic measures or a pulse and glide technology.
5.2 Fuels and powertrains
At present, diesel vehicles still account for more than 97% of all newly registered heavy-duty vehicles covered in this report18. Only a limited number of vehicles use alternative fuels or alternative powertrains, mostly LNG and CNG.
The share of vehicles using alternative fuels, i.e. ethanol, CNG, or LNG, significantly varies between the Member States. While it is very low (well below 0.5%) in Croatia, Cyprus, Greece, Hungary and Malta, it reaches a share of above 4% in Bulgaria, France, Italy, Latvia and Sweden (see Table 10). This is due to a relatively high share of natural gas vehicles, reflecting a quite well-developed gas refilling infrastructure in these countries.
Currently, the number of zero-emission heavy-duty vehicles across the EU is small, with only 287 battery-electric vehicles matched during the 2021 reporting period (see Table 11)
1 Regulation (EU) 2018/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 June 2018 on the monitoring and reporting of CO2 emissions from and fuel consumption of new heavy-duty vehicles (OJ L 173, 9.7.2018, p. 1).
2 Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2400 of 12 December 2017 implementing Regulation (EC) No 595/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the determination of the CO2 emissions and fuel consumption of heavy-duty vehicles and amending Directive 2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulation (EU) No 582/2011 (OJ L 349, 29.12.2017, p. 1).
3 As provided for by Article 6 of Regulation (EU) 2018/956. The Central Register is published by the European Environment Agency (EEA) under https://discomap.eea.europa.eu/app/CO2HDV/.
4 The vehicle sub-groups reflect the vehicles’ typical usage pattern and specific technical characteristics. They are defined by Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2019/1242.
5 Regulation (EU) 2019/1242 defines a mission profile as a “combination of a target speed cycle, a payload value, a body or trailer configuration and other parameters, if applicable, reflecting the specific use of a vehicle”.
6 The definitions used for this report can be found in Annex A.1 of COM(2023) 517 final
7 Annex A.2 of REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION under Regulation (EU) 2018/956 analysing the data transmitted by Member States and manufacturers for the reporting period 2020 on CO2 emissions from and fuel consumption of new heavy-duty vehicles, COM(2023) 517 final, provides a description on how the average payload has been calculated for all vehicle groups.
8 As defined in Regulation (EU) 2019/ 1242
9 Annex A.3 of REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION under Regulation (EU) 2018/956 analysing the data transmitted by Member States and manufacturers for the reporting period 2020 on CO2 emissions from and fuel consumption of new heavy-duty vehicles, COM(2023) 517 final, provides a description on how the average specific CO2 emissions, are calculated
10 For the lorries below 16 tonnes, groups 2 and 3 contain a comparable number of vehicles. Regarding the average specific CO2 emissions and average payload, group 2 is “in between” groups 1 and 3 (see Table 2), and hence best represents these lorries. Sub-group 5-LH and group 16 are a representative group, as they account for the highest share of newly registered lorries above 16 tonnes in the groups which are and are not subject to the current CO2 standards, respectively. In some countries, no group 16 vehicle has been registered in the reporting period, and hence their average emissions are not available.
11 Unknown vehicles are those registered in more than one Member State, and then they could not be attributed to one precise Member State.
12 The mission profiles are defined in Table 2 of Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2019/1242
13 Field 74 of Table 2 in Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2018/956.
14 Fields 97-100 of Table 2 in Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2018/956.
15 Unknown vehicles are those registered in more than one Member State, and then they could not be attributed to one precise Member State.
16 A hybrid electric vehicle is a vehicle combining an internal combustion engine with an electric motor
17 A dual-fuel vehicle is a vehicle with an internal combustion engine that is designed to operate on two different fuels at the same time
18 No distinction has been made between engines that are type-approved for different diesel fuel blends
EN EN