Explanatory Memorandum to COM(1976)711 - Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION FOR adopting a research programme in the field of Treatment and Use of Sewage Sludge (concerted action) (submitted to the Council by the Commission)

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

ARCHIVES HISTORIQUES DE LA COMMISSION

COLLECTION RELIEE DES DOCUMENTS 'COM'

1.

COM (76)711


Vol. 1976/0211

Disclaimer

Conformement au reglement (CEE, Euratom) n° 354/83 du Conseil du ler fevrier 1983 concernant I’ouverture au public des archives historiques de la Communaute economique europeenne et de la Communaute europeenne de I’energie atomique (JO L 43 du 15.2.1983, p.

1), tel que modifie par le reglement (CE, Euratom) n° 1700/2003 du 22 septembre 2003 (JO L 243 du 27.9.2003, p.

1), ce dossier est ouvert au public. Le cas echeant, les documents classifies presents dans ce dossier ont ete declassifies conformement a I’article 5 dudit reglement.

In accordance with Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 354/83 of 1 February 1983 concerning the opening to the public of the historical archives of the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ L 43, 15.2.1983, p.

1), as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1700/2003 of 22 September 2003 (OJ L 243, 27.9.2003, p.

1), this file is open to the public. Where necessary, classified documents in this file have been declassified in conformity with Article 5 of the aforementioned regulation.

In Obereinstimmung mit der Verordnung (EWG, Euratom) Nr. 354/83 des Rates vom 1. Februar 1983 uber die Freigabe der historischen Archive der Europaischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft und der Europaischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABI. L 43 vom 15.2.1983, S.

1), geandert durch die Verordnung (EG, Euratom) Nr. 1700/2003 vom 22. September 2003 (ABI. L 243 vom 27.9.2003, S.

1), ist diese Datei der Offentlichkeit zuganglich. Soweit erforderlich, wurden die Verschlusssachen in dieser Datei in Obereinstimmung mit Artikel 5 der genannten Verordnung freigegeben.
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

C0M(76) 711 final Brussels, 6 January 1977

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION FOR

2.

I ' '


adopting a research programme in the field of Treatment and Use of Sewage Sludge (concerted action)

(submitted to the Council by the Commission)

C0M(76) 711 finr-i.

COi'TTEl

3.

page


I Introduction 2

II Valuation of COST Project 68 an ' lusions 2

III Definition of the problem . 3

IV Proposal of a new programme 4

A) General considerations 4

B) Topics of Research 5

V Duration of the Programme 8

VI Implementation of the programme 8

VII Financial Volxirne ' 9

4.

Draft Council Decision for adopting a arch programme in the 10


field of Treatment and Use of Sewage, i> oerted aotion) ,

Annex I tc the Draft Council Decision 13

Annex II to the Draft Council Deoision 15

2-

Research programme in the field of "Treatment and 'fee of Sewage Sludge" (Concerted Action)

5.

I. Introduction


Research in the field of sewage sludge processing was the subject of COST I-roject 68, which ran from 1972 until 1974. This project covered only part of the problems related to the environmental impact of the sludges produced during waste water treatment.

Research ?n this field was therefore included in the 2rd Environment a] Research Programme of the European Economic Community (indirect Action), approved by the Council of Ministers on 15 March 1976. In view of the experience gained dr.ring the implementation of CC3T Project 68, research on treatment and use of sewage sludge is to be executed as a Concerted Action; interested non-member cor~tries will be invited to participate.

6.

II. Evaluation of COST Project 68 and conclusions


COST Pi'oject 63 'Sewage Sludge Processing', based on an Agreement signed in Brussels on 23 November 1971'
started on 1 August 1972 and ended officially on 31 July 1974. Since most of the national projects wire financed until the end of 1974 practical work went on until this date.

The following countries participated in the project :

7.

third countries


Yugoslavia

Norway

Switzerland

Sweden

Finland

Turkey

Member countries

Denmark

Germany

France

Italy

The Netherlands United Kingdom Belgium

The aims of the projects were limited to some selected aspects of sewage sludge treatment and disposal. The three main topics were

—3—

a) standardization of characteristic values of sludge,

8.

r) elaboration of methods for the characterization of sludge parameters, '


c) comparative tests of combined sludge—refuse incinerators*

9.

Details on the implementation of the project and the major results are comprehensively dealt in the Final Report (Document EUC0/3P/


4S/75).

Since COST Project 68 was one of the first attempts to coordinate European research within the framework of COST, there was some delay in getting it off the ground, and the running time of only two years was certainly too short, to achieve all of the rather ambitious goals

set ah the beginning,Tha Projoet■ is, Jiokcvory.oacmsidered to be-s, success,.-and alx participants agreed that a follow-up programme is highly justified, from the viewpoint of the scientific needasas well as i nexercise of international . colldboration. ‘ * vc-v :•

Th^re is general agreement' ameng- the' par ti cipating scientists .that . the scope of-a follow-up progu anoc should be. broader. In 'particular the environmental problems of sludge use should be covered.

Eased on recommendations oi' the Management Committee of Project 68 and on their own study of the subject, the Services of the Commission prepared an outline of a new project, which was submitte to the Scientific and Technical Research Committee (CRE3T) in early 1975*

Based on a recommendation from CREST, the Council of Ministers in ’ March 1975 recognized tie Community Interest of this research.

Following this, an experi, committee discussed in detail the research. needs, talcing into account an inquiry on sludge disposal and use in the interested countries and an inventory of ongoing ratio nal res e aroh.

The recommendations of inis expert committee, prepared over 3 meetings (23 June, 26 September, 4 December 1975)' are giver-hereafter. The programme war approved by the Advisory Committee on Programme Management for Environmental Research on 4 March 1976.

III. Definition ox the problem ,

Daring the purification of waste-water up to J00 kg sewage sludge (°) (corresponding to 30-40 kg dry matter) per year and inhabitant are produced; to this huge amount large quantities of bio-degradable industrial sludges (from breweries, food industry, etc...) ha’/e to be adaed. These sludges contain about 95fc water; they are difficult to handle from a technological point of view. Improper disposal of

(’) the amount depends on the treatment procedure, and varies from about 300 kg (digested sludge) to about J00 kg (raw primary and secondary sludge). • .

■4—

sewage sludge causes serious environmental problems (odour nuisance, water pollution by run-off, eutrophication, microbial pollution, heavy metal contamination); disposal at sea or on land, so far widely used, will therefore come under closer supervision, as will incineration causing air pollution.

It would be desirable to solve these problems by improving sewage sludge processing in order to obtain products which can be used in agriculture or fcr land reclamation, minimizing polii'.tion end disposal co^-t. The fact that the price of inorganic fertilizers .has a tendency to increase w: 11 favour these goals.

Research in this field should therefore, in principle, aim at

— the improvement of treatment processes in order to obtain "marketable" products,

— a thorough assessment of environmental problems related to land use. of sewage sludge, including hygienic and esthetic aspects,

— reducing cost of sludge treatment end disposal.

Research concerning sludge processing and sludge use is complicated by a number of important analytical problems; due to the complex nature of sludge, many of these are still unsolved, or current methods are unsatisfactory. Therefore, high priority is attributed to research into the methodology of sludge characterization.

IV, Proposal of a new programme A) General considerations

In monjr places, for economical reasons, sewage sludge is still disposed of at sea or on land without further treatment. The ecological consequences are not yet fully assessed, but it goes for granted that alternative solutions have to be promoted.

Incineration of sludge was deemed for a long tine to be the be3t . solution of the sludge problem, and was one of the main scopes of Project 68, but recent developments (rising energy cost, need for 'recycling of raw materials) indicate Ahafc sludge incineration will be limited in the future to certain geographical situations; further research was not recommended.

The advisability of including research on the industrial use of sludges, e.g. in the fabrication of construction materials, was also explored; it was concluded, that this is mainly industrial research, and that the amounts which can be industrially used are relatively small. The evolution in this field should be closely followed, and relevant research possibly included at a later stage.

It is generally recognized that the most practicable solution for sludge disposal is its use in agriculture and for land reclamation, ect... Therefore ail research aiming at the elimination of

10.

constraints -to land spreading are of primary importance. These constraints are mainly


- hygienic aspects

- odour nuisance

- content of pollutants, in particular heavy metals and persistent organic compounds, which may influence quality and quantity of crops with obvious consequences for the food chain

- possible negative effects on soil quality after continued application

- contamination of ground and surface water

An economic use on land, however, requires further on—plant treatment at lou cost. Considerable work has been done already, but teclinical processes are far from being perfect and need further reduct in in cost. , •

In principle, the processing of 'raw sludge' as it is produced in , waste water treatment plants, has to aim at

- a reduction of quantity and volume, to be achieved by degradation of organic matter and/or removal of water,

- a reduction of the polluting potential, including sanitary aspects and, in particular, the elimination of bad odours,

11.

Two subsequent procedures are applied


- anaerobic and aerobic digestion ("stabilization"), '

- mechanical dewatering. 1

In order to inorese the (direct or indirect) 'economic' value of the final product, further processing, e.g. composting of sludge, is ‘

practised.

B) Topics of Research •

For practical reasons the programme proposal given in the following is subdivided into 4 main headings ;

1) Sludge stabilization and odour problems ..

2) Dewatering of sludge .

12.

3) Problems related to sludge characterization (pollutants, microbiology)


4) Environmental.problems related to land use of sewage sludge

There is, of course, an overlap between these fields, and the attribution of items is in some cases-arbitrary. The list is not ranked by priority.

1' Sludge stabilization and odour problems

13.

1.1. Odour characterization and objective odour measurement


1.2. Relationship between odour nuisance and 'degree of stability'

14.

1.3. Definition and analytical procedures for the determination of


other parameters for the 'degree of stability' and their links to odour nuisance (in part continuation of COST Project 68), in particular .

- content of total organic matter

- lipoid content

~ protein content .

' carbohydrate content

- enzyme activities and other biochemical parameters .

- H^S formation

- reiox potential

- oxygen uptake .

- gas formation '

15.

1.4. Comparative evaluation of different stabilization procedures


- anaerobic stabilization

- aerobic stabilization •* chemical stabilization

In view of the aims mentioned above (reduction of quantity and . volume reduction of polluting potentials) and in view of their effects on dewatering properties and sludge use.

2. Faol)lens related to mechanical sludge dewatering

2.1. Basio research on ;*ater binding forces for a better understanding

16.

of the colloidal state of sludge, location of electrical charges, Zeta potential, etc...., and their importance for the action of flocculants. "


17.

2.2. Development of analytical procedures and. their standardization for the prediction of dewavering properties (continuation ef COST Project 68), in particular


- empiric tests for 'centrifugability' ,

- particle size distribution .

- specific filtration resistance

- their connection with already standardized tests, e.g. viscosity or oapillary suction time.

.3. i-'.c'.,:.e;o3 related to the use of flccculants, for economio

reasons considered to be of primary importance, in particular .

- standard flocculation agents for te3t pumoses

~ -flocculating properties of polymers as a function of their chemical nature

- preparation and stability of flocculant solutions

—-ptim-.m use of •flocculant^ and of combination thereof as a function of sludge characteristics and dewatering techniques

- optimum timing of flocculant addition

- possible harmful effects of flocculants on the environment 2-4® Evaluation of thickening and dowatoring equipment

3• Analytical^ problems related to sludge treatment and use

3.1. Characterization of pathogens in sewage sludge .

3.2. Critical evaluation, of the efficiency of desinfection procedures. in particular

- pasteurization

- desinfection by irradation

. - sonication

3.3. Research into content and chemical state of pollutants in sludge., in particular of heavy metals and persistent organic compounds and the establishment of 3tandordized analytical methods for tnc.ir determination (in part continuation of COST Project 68)

3./|. Influence cf industrial wastes introduced to waste water purification plants on pollutant content. 1

. Er.viis.'inertal Problems related to land use of sewage sludge . .1. Pr'- ct quality •

4.1.1. fpeci processing of sludge for agricultural use (e.g. composting

togei. with refuse), •

1.1.2. l.mproA mt 0f desinfection procedures

4.1.3. Tomova. ' heavy metals and other pollutants

4.2. ilfiocts sludge application

1,2.1. hrjisfe. pollutants to plants as a function of their chemical state ir. at ion to different soil characteristics, and harmful effects agetation

4.2.2. Critical evaluation of the effects cf long range arpi to * of alu.ige or processed sludge (compost) on roil quality, and effects on ground water

4.2.3. Optimum land use of sewage sludge in general, and, in particular, of sludges from dephospbaiation plants.

V. Duration of the Programme

A duration of 3 years is proposed for this programme.

VI. Implementation of the programme

The project is implemented as a 'concerted action' within the framework of the Environmental Research Progi'amme of the European Communities. Non-member countries will be invited to participate. In principle member countries should subject all ongoing or planned government sponsored research projects covered by the programme to a co-ordinalion within the framework of the concerted action and inform the other participating countries on results, planning, etc. ... A Research Coordination Committee is established, in which the member countries and Commission are represented b,y a delegate, who may be assisted, by experts.

Provisions will be made for an adequate representation of participating non-member countries on thi3 Committee.

The competences of the Advisory Committee on Programme Ilanagement fcr Fnvironmental Research cover also the implementation of this programme; this Committee is, in particular, duly qualified for giving this research its proper place within the overall environmen-tai research programme of the European Communities.

The Research Coordination Committee is the body in which the exchange cf information between the member countries and the Commission is staged.

Beyond this, the terms of reference of this Commitl.ee are essentially

- to assise in the co-ordination of the national research projects executed in this field and to advise the executing laboratories

i. in order to avoid unnecessary duplication as well as not to leave . any gaps ihhthe.-programme;

- to advise governments and the Commission with regard to research needs in this field;

- to evaluate the results of research and to draw conclusions with regard to their applications;

- to promote exchange of experience between the scientists involved by organizing symposia, etc, to promote the dissemination of knowledge

.-i. F.i_u n;‘al Volume

The financial volume of the research in this field in the member countries is estimated at 6 m.u.a. for a 3-year period. This figure is based on estimates of the present annual volume of ongoing research projects, as communicatei by the experts.

The inventory of ongoing research projects indicates that, with a few exceptions, all member countries would contribute research in 4 research fields.

The cost of co-ordination, on charge of the Community budget, is estimated at 140.000 u.a. for the 3 years period.

- 10

_________ COUNCIL DECISION FOR

18.

adopting a research programme in the field of Treatment and Use of Sewage Sludge (concerted action)


The Council of +he European Communities,

HAVING REGAIN) to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 235 thereof;

HALVING REGARD to the proposal of the Commission; .

HAVING REGAIiD to the opinion of the European Parliament;

FHEREA.S by virtue of Article 2 of the Treaty, the Community has been assigned. thi task of promoting throughout the Community a harmonious development of economic activities, a cor.tinuoixs and balanced errpanoicn and an accelerated raising of the standard of living;

THE^EAS In its declaration of 22 November 1973, the Council of the European Communi ties has approved the principles end objectives of a Community environmental policy and the general description of the actions to be undertaken at Community level;

UHE1EAS the Council stressed in its Resolution of 14 January 1974 on an initial outline programme of the European Communities in the field of science and technology that an appropriate approach should be adopted tc rds the whole range of available ways and means including concerted ac- ,ons in an effort to ensure maximum effectiveness v;hile endeavouring to obtain a fair allocation of tasks among the laboratories and research bor es in the Community and the Ileraber states and that whenever it proves do. rable cooperation with non-member countries should be made possible;

NTH PEAS in its decision of 15 Harch 1976 the Council has approved a second environmental research programme;

TTLLIEAS A COMMUNITY CONCERTED RESEARCH ACTION IN THE .FIELD OF TREATMENT AND USE OF SEWAGE SLUDGE IS LIKELY TO CONTRIBUTE EFFECTIVELY TO THE ACHIEVEMENT OF ERE ABOVE MENTIONED AIMS, IN PARTICULAR WITH REGARD TO THE REDUCTION OF ENV„RONRNEIITAL POLLUTION AND +0 the economic use of resources; '


MTIEEA.S the Eember Countries carry out research in this field, and agree to subject this research, the volume of which is estimated at about 6 m.u.a., to a coordination on Community level for a period of 3 years.

MT r;EA.S the Treaty has not provided the necessary powers for this purpose;

E;:: ^EAS THE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL RESEARCH COMMITTEE (CREST) HAS GIVEN IXO OPINION WITH REGARD TO THE COMMISSION PROPOSAL.;

H/" DECIDED

- 11 -

19.

Article 1


for a period of 5 years '

"h; Community implements/a concerted research action in the field of Treat-. ii.-it .rid Use of Sewage Sludge .within the framework of its Environmental Research Mr tigr anihi x .Th'a
-actiot consists- ini thl bo-ordination.-, ht Community- levelcof researc which is described in Annex I and which forms part of the national research programmes of the Member States,

Article 2

The financial contribution by the Community i,o the realisation of the coordination action will be determined in the budgetary procedure. It is estimated at 140.000 u.a., the unit of account being defined according to the financial regulation in force.

20.

Article 3


To assist the Commission in the carrying out of the coordination action and the Member States in the execution of the research projects in the context of this coordination, a Research Coordination Committee "Treatment and Use of Sewage Sludge", hereinafter referred to as 'the Committee', is hereby established. .

The terms of reference and the composition of this Committee ere defined in Annex II.

The Committee shall draw up its miles of procedure. Its secretariat will be provided by the Commission. .

21.

Article 4


(a) In accordance with a procedure to be adopted by the Commission in agreement with the Committee, the Member States shall exchange regularly all useful information concerning the execution of the research covered by the . coordination action. This information shall be treated as confidential if requested by the Member State which provides it.

(b) The Commission shall prepare yearly progress reports on the basis of the

informatJon supplied. '

io) At the end of the coordination period, the Commission in agreement with the Committee, shall forward to the Member Stated a report on the execution and results of the coordination action. aPrI European Pariiamen

Th.1 Commission shall publish this report six months after it has been forwarded, unless a Member State objects.

la this case the report shall be distributed, at their request, solely to '-.be institutions and undertakings carrying out on the territory of Member Sxates, a research activity justifying access to the knowledge resulting from the performance of the research covered by the Community.coordination action. The Commission, in agreement with the Committee, m?y make provisions that tiis report remains confidential and is net passed to third pea-ties.

ihrfci.de 5

The Community may, under "the conditions laid down in Article 228 of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Comrrmnity, conclude agreements with other States involved in European co-operation in the field of Scientific and Technical Research (COST/ to permit them to participate in the coordination action which is the subject of this Decision.

22.

Article 6


Annex I to this Decision may be amended by the Council, on a proposal by the Commission, after consulting'the Committee, in the event of a substantial ibhange in the financial or technical conditions governing the research which is covered by the coordination action.

23.

Article 7


This Decision comes into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

24.

Done at



date


For the Council The President


An


fr>


e Draft Council I)' J;; SI ON or,_a research pro,:-.:-...-dip J •'f Treatment and Use of Sewage Sludge v (concerted ~.cAion)


The T.ro\li

cenV'/ii.of

topics:


25.

,/ill be carried out with the main purpose of acquiring scienti of the Programme cf Action of the European Communities of the



fic and technical knowledge required for the iraple-environment. The research will cover the following


Research top'.eg

Division of research work among member states

B BRD TK P I IRL BL UK lux

■ M- ■ ^ ■>■— ■ ■''■ 1 M — I I l' 11 ■ fc - - _ — - ■

1) Sludge stabilisation and odour problems:

- definition and determination of "degree of stability" and relationships to odour nuisance

- comparative evaluation of stabilisation procedures

26.

2) Problems related to sludge dewatering,'


- research on water binding forces

- development and standardisation of methods for the assessment of dewatering properties

- problems related to the use of flocculants

- comparative evaluation cf thickening and dewatering ' equipment

3) Analytical problems related to sludge treatment and use:

- characterisation of pathogens and evaluation of des-infeciion procedures

charaoioris'tion and determination of pollutants (heat/ metals, persistent organic compounds) in '

sj.udga and c evelopnent of standardised analytical methods

Research topics

Division of research work among ' member states


B BRB IK p

Luc-':


27.

IRL NL



UK


4) Environmental problems related to sludge use:

- special processing of sludge for agricultural use (e.g. composting) including the improvement of desinfection procedures and pollutant removal

- traixjfer of pollutants to plants and harmful

effects on vegetation ■

- effects of long range sludge application • on.-soil-quality andiground vjater l. /

28.

. - optimum lane use of sludge, including sludge


from tiephosphatation plants

Annex II to the Draft- Council Docision on a research programme in the field of Treatment and Use of Sewage Sludge (concerted action)

TER^S OF REFERENCE AMD COMPOSITION OF TIRE RESEARCH COORDINATION COMMITTEE

"TREATMENT AND USE OF SEWAGE SLUDGE"

1. The Committee shall:

1.1 Contribute to the optimum execution of the programme by giving its opinion on all of its aspects on request from the Commission and on its own initiative.

1.2rEvaluate the results and draw conclusions as regards to their application.

1.3 Insure the exchange of information and dissemination of data and knowledge relating to the prograr.une.

1.4 Keep abreast of the relovant research being done in the participating states and in other countries.

2. The Committee’s reports and opinions shall be transmitted to the Commission and to the participating States. If necessary, minority opinions may also be mentioned.

3. The Committee is composed of one representative from each participating State who will be responsible for coordinating the national contribution to the programme, and also one from the Commission. Each representative may be accompanied by experts.

4. The Committee shall designate its Chairman for a period of one year.