Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2004)178-2 - Specific procedure for admitting third-country nationals for purposes of scientific research - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
| dossier | COM(2004)178-2 - Specific procedure for admitting third-country nationals for purposes of scientific research. |
|---|---|
| source | COM(2004)178  |
| date | 16-03-2004 |
The proposal for a directive seeks to create a special procedure for admitting third-country nationals for the purpose of carrying out scientific research. It revolves around three key elements:
Contents
- 1.1. Central role of research organisations
- 1.2. Division of roles between research organisations and Member States
- 1.3. Assumption of responsibility by research organisations
- 1.4. A broad interpretation of the concept of researcher, adapted to the needs of the European Union
- 1.5. A residence permit not linked to the status of the researcher
- 1.6. The mobility of researchers in the European Union
- 1.7. A simplified, streamlined procedure
- 2. Choice of legal base for the proposed directive
- 3. Subsidiarity and proportionality
- Comments on the Articles
- Article 2
- Article 3
- Chapter II
- Article 5
- Chapter III
- Article 7
- Article 8
- Article 9
- Chapter IV
- Article 11
- Article 12
- Article 13
- Chapter V
- Article 15
- Article 16
- Article 17
- Article 18
- Article 19
- Article 20
- Article 21
Following the example of a number of Member States, the proposal provides for the introduction of a special admission mechanism for researchers from non-member countries. The unique feature of this is that it gives authorised research organisations a role in the procedure leading to the issue of a residence permit. The aim is to facilitate the admission and mobility of researchers by relieving the immigration authorities in the Member States of the task of checking whether the research project is credible, particularly as regards the financial aspects, and whether the person has the necessary skills to see it through. This task will be assigned to the research organisations, which will thus play an essential role in the admission procedure by signing with the third-country national concerned a hosting agreement offering guarantees concerning the ability to complete the envisaged research and the conditions, in particular the financial aspects, in which the research will be conducted. The hosting agreement is reminiscent of the fast-track procedure for issuing residence permits proposed by the Commission for students and pupil exchanges i; there is a fundamental difference, however, in that it actually triggers the admission procedure. As the name suggests, it is a legal contract by which the organisation undertakes to host the researcher, and the researcher undertakes to complete the research project, on the terms laid down and subject to issue of the residence permit by the immigration authorities. Note that it does not determine the legal status of the researcher in relation to the host organisation; this will be laid down in a separate legal instrument which, depending on the individual case, could be an employment contract, a fellowship, etc.
The admission procedure envisaged does not impinge on the powers of the Member States' immigration authorities, which will still have to be involved for a researcher to be admitted. The respective roles of the host research organisation and the competent authority of the Member State must therefore be clearly laid down. The research organisation will have to check the conditions which have to be fulfilled for it to be able to sign a hosting agreement: this could be the existence of a research project meeting the requirements of Article 5 and accepted by the host organisation, evidence that the researcher is in possession of adequate resources and health insurance for the duration of the stay, and an undertaking by the host organisation to meet the researcher's living expenses, health costs and return travel costs. The Member States will check the identity of the third-country nationals and their travel documents and ascertain that they do not constitute a threat to public order, public security or public health. Such threats will concern not only the person of the third-country national but also the purpose of the research envisaged, for instance whether the work could be sensitive from a military angle and for that reason could be considered a threat to public security. The Member States will also check that a hosting agreement satisfying the requirements of Articles 5 i has been signed and that the host organisation has formally undertaken to meet the costs of the researcher. Member States have the power to check whether the hosting agreement has been signed by the research organisation in compliance with the terms laid down in Article 5, in particular as regards the researcher's financial resources and health insurance. As the objective is to simplify the procedure, this double check on the conditions laid down in Article 5 will be performed by Member States only in exceptional or problem cases. The admission procedures are based instead on the trust to be built up between Member States and research organisations.
The research organisations empowered to use the special admission procedure have been defined in broad terms on the basis of the European Union's research requirements. As the effort to be made to achieve the 3% of GDP target for investment in research i largely concerns the private sector, it is necessary to include that sector. For the purpose of this proposal, a research organisation should accordingly be understood to mean any type of public or private establishment or firm conducting research, such as a university, a laboratory, a research centre, a foundation, a firm, an international organisation or non-governmental organisation, etc. Because of the prerogatives granted to research organisations and their collaboration with the immigration authorities, measures will be taken to check their reliability and to ensure that they assume their responsibilities in performing their tasks. In this connection the proposed directive requires organisations to be approved before they can apply the special procedure. The approval arrangements differ according to whether they are involved in research as a principal activity or as an ancillary activity, and an additional requirement is imposed on private firms in order to limit the risks of the procedure being abused. In return for the prerogatives granted, the proposed directive makes the research organisation financially responsible for the researcher's living expenses, health costs and return travel costs, should any of these have to be borne by the host state, or if the researcher were to remain illegally in the European Union after expiry of the residence permit. Finally, the proposal allows Member States to refuse to renew or to withdraw the approval of a research organisation which fails to meet the conditions required or which signs research agreements with persons who do not satisfy the admission conditions, who misuse their researcher status to work for purposes other than their research project or who remain illegally in the European Union after expiry of their residence permit.
1.4. A broad interpretation of the concept of researcher, adapted to the needs of the European Union
Given that the European Union will have a serious shortage of researchers in the coming years, it was not thought to be appropriate to restrict the procedure to persons who already have the status of researcher in their country of origin. The stress has been placed instead on the purpose of admission, namely carrying out a research project, which should enable the European Union to temporarily host as researchers high-level professionals or experts who are not necessarily involved in research in their country of origin, or young graduates who are needed in the European Union, in particular for the exact sciences. The qualifications of persons for whom admission is sought, and the scientific value of the research planned, will in principle be assessed exclusively by the research organisations, with due respect for the minimum requirements set in this connection by the directive, namely a post-graduate degree i and the presentation of a project setting out the purpose of the research, its duration and funding. The directive provides for its scope to be extended to include people who might be admitted for the purpose of teaching in a higher education establishment in order to fit in with the practices of the Member States concerned.
In addition to a fast admission procedure, one of the other major benefits that this directive will offer third-country researchers and research organisations is the simplification of the conditions under which they can be admitted as migrants. The Commission noted in 1996, in its Green Paper Education - training - research: the obstacles to transnational mobility i, that one of the difficulties encountered by researchers lies in the many different types of status which may be imposed on them (employees or self-employed, student, scholarship-holder, etc.). Although this directive will not put an end to the differing social or tax status of researchers in the domestic law of Member States, it will give them a uniform status in aliens legislation. The proposal is to create a specific avenue for admission for researchers whereby third-country nationals can be admitted, regardless of the type of legal relationship (employment contract, scholarship, etc.) i they have with the host research organisation. The researchers admitted on the basis of an employment contract will not then have to obtain a work permit in Member States still requiring one in their case, even though the state of the market no longer justifies this for research. Similarly, given the needs of the European Union, any form of quotas set by Member States having the effect of limiting the number of researchers who can be admitted under this directive is not compatible with it. It should be stressed that traditional avenues of admission for researchers (employee or self-employed, student, placements, scholarships, etc.) will continue to exist alongside the new special admission procedure and can be used by research organisations or by third-country nationals who do not fulfil the conditions of this directive.
Steps must be taken to promote mobility so that third-country nationals can pursue a research project in several different Member States without running into difficulties in gaining admission to these countries. The directive allows researchers in possession of a residence permit and a passport or travel document to pursue activities related to their research project in a second Member State during the period of validity of their residence permit and subject to considerations of public order, public security and public health. In addition, the directive contains a provision to ensure that researchers wanting to go to a second Member State in connection with another research project will not have to return to their country of origin to apply for an extension to their stay in another Member State, as is sometimes the case nowadays. The simplified admission procedure envisaged by this directive can easily be relaunched in the Member State in which the researcher wishes to prolong his or her research, by signing a new hosting agreement. In such cases Member States will naturally be inclined to reduce their checks because they know that another Member State has already carried out checks. The special procedure introduced by this directive can also be used by third-country nationals who are already resident in the European Union, including long-term residents. Long-term residents have not been excluded from the scope of this directive because the conditions provided for in the Directive on the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents i granting a right of residence in the other Member States, are less advantageous than those laid down in this directive.
The directive allows an application for a residence permit to be made on the spot when the third-country national is on the territory of the host Member State, provided that he or she is in the country legally. This option gives the necessary flexibility to the admission procedure by allowing researchers to extend a short stay to a long stay. Under the proposal it is for Member States to decide whether the application for a residence permit is made by the researcher or the research organisation. Provision is made for the application to be presented by the research organisation because of the role given to such organisations in the admission procedure, but the residence permit itself will ultimately always be issued to the third-country national concerned, who for this purpose will have to go in person to the competent authority. Member States will have to issue the residence permit within 30 days of submission of the application. This deadline, which is shorter than that provided for in other directives, is justified on the one hand because admission procedures must be particularly speedy for researchers if they are to remain attractive, and on the other as the checks which Member States have to carry out will be simplified by the upstream collaboration with the research organisations.
Finally, with a view to the promotion in third countries of research opportunities available in Europe, Member States are asked to make additional efforts at transparency in order to ensure access in countries of origin to information about the special admission procedure. This task for Member States will be helped by the Internet Researchers' Mobility Portal i that the Commission opened on 10 July 2003 in collaboration with the Member States and third countries associated in setting up the European research area.
2.1. The legal base has been chosen in the light of the objective for the proposed directive, which is to regulate the conditions and procedures under which third-country nationals can enter and reside in the territory of the Member States for the purpose of carrying out scientific research. It is not, therefore, concerned with the conditions for admission to research organisations, which remain the responsibility of the Member States and, in many cases, the organisations themselves. The legal base chosen is Article 63(3)(a) and i of the Treaty establishing the European Community, as amended by the Treaty of Amsterdam, which entered into force on 1 May 1999.
2.2. This proposal must therefore be adopted under the procedure laid down in Article 67 of the EC Treaty: by the Council acting unanimously after consulting the European Parliament. Because it is based on Title IV of the Treaty, Denmark will not take part in the adoption of the proposal, and the directive will not be binding upon or applicable to Denmark, in accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark, annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community. Nor will it apply to the United Kingdom and Ireland, under Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland, unless these countries decide otherwise, according to the arrangements laid down in the Protocol.
3.1. The European Community does not have exclusive competence in Title IV of the EC Treaty 'Visas, asylum, immigration and other policies related to free movement of persons', with the result that it can only intervene, according to the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, if and in so far as the measure or objectives of the proposed action cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action, be better achieved by the Community. Action by the Community may not go beyond what is necessary to achieve the objectives of the Treaty.
3.2. The proposed directive satisfies these three criteria. The objective set by the European Council was to facilitate 'entry and residence for researchers from third countries'. As noted above in point 2.1, only nine Member States have adopted measures aimed at facilitating the admission of such researchers, and only two have introduced a special admission procedure. There are many differences between the measures taken by these nine Member States, which could make it more difficult for researchers from non-member countries to come to the European Union and restrict their mobility within the EU. There seems, therefore, to be a need for harmonisation. Harmonisation must also be introduced rapidly if Member States are to meet the European Council's target of investing 3% of their GDP in research by the deadline. Judging from the current situation the measures by the Member States will not achieve an adequate degree of harmonisation of the rules on the admission of researchers from third countries into the European Community within the time limit.
3.3. However, the Commission feels that, in view of the principle of subsidiarity, it should be left to the Member States to settle certain matters relating to researchers from third countries as they see fit: the directive does not specify what financial resources the researchers must have in order to be admitted, Member States are merely required to state publicly the minimum monthly figure they will set. The length of the residence permit may be restricted to one year or adjusted to the length of the research project, at the Member State's discretion. The Member States will have to decide whether the applications for residence permits have to be submitted by the research organisations or by the third-country nationals. Finally, they will be able to decide what happens in the absence of a decision within the 30-day deadline specified for deciding on applications for admission. And of course Member States are free to adopt more favourable arrangements and, in particular, to extend the benefits of the special procedure for researchers to allow the admission of third-country nationals for the purpose of teaching in higher education establishments. The proposal also refers to the regulations or administrative practice of the Member State in question for matters relating to the definition of a research organisation or higher education establishment.
3.4. In view of the fact that the main objective is to help make the European Union the most competitive and most dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world, the action to be taken should obviously be taken at Community level.
3.5. True to the principle of proportionality, the Commission proposes the adoption of a directive and a recommendation. The directive is binding as regards the general principles that are laid down, thereby addressing the problem of disparities between national systems. However, it leaves Member States free to choose the most appropriate means for applying these principles in their domestic legislation in the light of national conditions.
Chapter I: General provisions
Article 1
The purpose of the Directive is to introduce a special procedure governing the entry and residence of third-country nationals coming to carry out a research project in the European Community for a period of more than three months. The procedure applies only in cases covered by a hosting agreement as defined in Article 5, signed with a research organisation approved in accordance with Article 4.
This article defines, as necessary, the concepts used in the proposal for a Directive. They are based directly on those which have already been used in existing Community legislation.
(a) 'Third-country nationals': persons who are not nationals of one of the Member States of the European Union and stateless persons within the meaning of the New York Convention of 28 September 1954.
(b) 'Researcher': a third-country national admitted for research purposes under the procedure laid down by the Directive, without being required to be a researcher. He or she must hold at least a second-cycle university degree (master's degree) within the meaning of the Bologna process for a European Higher Education Area. There is no general requirement to obtain recognition of qualifications, but this condition must be met in certain specific cases (e.g. a doctor who will be required to treat patients as part of a research project). In principle, it is up to the research organisation hosting the third-country national to assess their qualifications.
(c) 'Research': the definition comes from the Frascati Manual i produced by the OECD for surveys on research and experimental development. For the purposes of this Directive, it covers basic and applied research, as well as experimental development i. It is intended as a guide to assist Member States in determining whether an organisation applying for approved status is indeed conducting research. Obviously, it leaves the competent authority with some discretionary power. Further explanations and examples are given in the Frascati Manual. The definition could also help Member States wishing to verify that the project for which an approved organisation has signed a hosting agreement is a genuine research project.
(d) 'Research organisation': this is a broad concept covering both the public and private sectors. A research organisation may be a university, a foundation, a research centre, a laboratory, a firm, an international organisation or a non-governmental organisation. What matters is that the organisation conducts research and has been approved by the Member State where it is located.
(e) 'Residence permit': the definition refers to existing European legislation.
1. It is not the Commission's intention in proposing this Directive to dismiss international agreements on the admission of researchers which contain more favourable terms for third-country nationals.
2. This paragraph allows Member States to adopt or keep more favourable national rules, provided that they are compatible with the Directive. For example, Member States may wish to adopt rules applying the principle of non-discrimination on nationality grounds to third-country nationals covered by the Directive in respect of certain rights. In addition, the specific procedure introduced by the Directive for researchers may be extended to third-country nationals seeking entry for purposes of teaching in a higher education establishment, so that Member States which so wish can allow lecturers to benefit from the same system as researchers.
3. This paragraph excludes specific categories of person from the scope of the Directive:
(a) The exclusion of applicants for asylum or subsidiary protection and persons granted temporary protection does not affect their access to the labour market, including research posts, which is governed by the relevant (proposals for) directives. It means that they cannot use this Directive to request a change in status, since such changes are possible only under more favourable national legislation adopted by individual Member States.
(b) This subparagraph excludes doctoral students conducting research relating to their theses as students covered by the proposal for a Directive on the conditions of entry and residence of third country nationals for the purposes of studies, vocational training or voluntary service i. The Directive thus precludes the risk of abuse related to the admission of students. Doctoral students may none the less be caught by the scope of the Directive if they have a status as a researcher other than that of student, as where they are working on their doctoral thesis under an employment contract.
(c) This is a standard provision excluding third-country nationals who are subject to a procedure for removal, even if it has not yet been enforced.
(d) Cases involving the secondment by a research organisation of one of its researchers to a research organisation in another Member State are not covered by the Directive, but by specific rules on secondment.
Research organisations
Article 4
This article sets out the various stages in the procedure for approving research organisations.
1. The first paragraph stipulates that approval of the research organisation is a precondition for the provisions of the Directive to apply. The wording leaves Member States completely free to lay down in their national law and according to the procedure of their choice which authority will be responsible on their territory for approving research organisations.
2. This paragraph requires research organisations to provide the approval authority with information indicating the category to which they belong. This information should cover that part of their activities given over to research in accordance with their tasks (public authority) or corporate purpose (private firm).
3. The Directive distinguishes between three categories of research organisation. The approval procedure depends on the proportion of the organisation's work given over to research, as laid down in the legal provisions setting it up. This paragraph covers the first category: public or private organisations whose main activity is research and to which approval is granted for an unlimited period of time. This includes, for example, large public organisations and research foundations. Higher education establishments such as universities are also included in this first category, even though their activities include both research and teaching.
4. The second category comprises public organisations whose research activities are supplementary to their main tasks. They are also approved for an unlimited time.
5. For the last category, approval is limited to five years, so that Member States can regularly check that the organisations concerned are conducting research activity.
6. In return for its prerogatives under the admission procedure, the research organisation must assume responsibility for any residence costs, health costs, and costs of the researcher's return which may arise from his presence on the Member State's territory. This responsibility ceases when the researcher leaves the European Union i or when another research organisation takes over responsibility for him under a new hosting agreement. It continues at most for one year following the date of expiry of the hosting agreement or the date on which the research organisation informs the Member State, in accordance with Article 5 i, of an event making it impossible to implement the hosting agreement, for as long as the researcher has not left the territory of the European Union. Beyond this period, it makes sense for the Member States, who are responsible for ensuring the effective return of third-country nationals, to bear the costs related to the continuation of their illegal residence.
7. The Directive includes a notification requirement so that the authorities responsible for approving research organisations can check that the research project has been carried out. The confirmation must show that the planned research work has in fact been carried out, without necessarily indicating the research findings, which may be confidential. This information, to be provided within two months of the expiry of the hosting agreement, should show up any cases where the research organisation's approval would have to be withdrawn on the basis of paragraph 9.
8. In order to make it easier to access information and thus to take advantage of the Directive, the lists of approved research organisations must be published each year in the Member States. They must distinguish between the three categories of organisation and take account of any changes that occurred in the previous year. The Directive leaves Member States free to decide on the arrangements for implementing this paragraph.
9. Paragraph 9 sets out the situations where Member States may withdraw approval or refuse to renew it. Withdrawal or non-renewal is conditional on them, but not automatic, and Member States may use their discretion. These situations arise where the research organisation does not meet or no longer meets the conditions in paragraphs 2 to 7, where the researcher does not meet or no longer meets the conditions in Articles 5 and 6 or where he is found to be residing for purposes other than research and the Member States have applied Article 8 i, withdrawing or refusing to renew his residence permit. Given the seriousness of the circumstances in the last two cases, the research organisation may not be approved again until five years after the decision to withdraw or not to renew approval.
1. The cornerstone of the specific admission procedure for researchers is the 'hosting agreement'. This is a legal contract by which the researcher undertakes to complete the research project and the research organisation, to host the researcher for that purpose. It obviously covers all aspects of the research project. It does not govern the researcher's status. It is concluded subject to the residence permit being issued by the immigration authorities. A hosting agreement may be renewed several times between the same researcher and the same research organisation or with other approved organisations, provided the conditions laid down in paragraph 2 are met.
2. Three conditions must be met before the research organisation signs the hosting agreement:
(a) The relevant authority in the host organisation must have approved the research project. The project must be described in a document setting out:
- the research work that the person concerned intends to carry out.
- the duration of the work and how it is to be funded. The resources needed for the work (laboratory costs, costs of equipment, etc.) and the remuneration paid to the researcher must be specified. Where the researcher is bound by an employment contract, the salary must be indicated, so that it can be monitored.
- the researcher's qualifications for the planned research (formal qualifications required, professional experience, etc.).
These aspects must be described in sufficient detail to enable the relevant authority in the research organisation, and the Member States' immigration authorities in exceptional cases, to assess them.
(b) The research organisation must have verified that the researcher has sufficient resources to meet his needs (food, accommodation, etc.) and travel costs and is not likely to need financial support from the Member State. In order to help research organisations assess this delicate matter and to establish the necessary trust for them to cooperate with the immigration authorities, the resources assessment will be carried out on the basis of a minimum monthly amount required by the Member States. The Directive does not propose a minimum amount. Each Member State will have to decide on the minimum required for a third-country national to reside on its territory.
(c) This condition is a basic requirement for admission to and movement within the European Union.
3. The statement formalises the undertaking to assume financial responsibility which the research organisation must give to the Member State concerned before hosting a researcher under a hosting agreement.
4. The hosting agreement will automatically lapse if the legal relationship between the researcher and the research organisation comes to an end, for example, if a researcher subject to an employment contract is dismissed. Research organisations must immediately inform the Member States of any occurrence likely to prevent implementation of the hosting agreement, such as loss of funding for the research, a serious accident suffered by the researcher rendering him unable to carry out the planned project or even a researcher not carrying out the planned research. The purpose of this provision is to enable Member States to take prompt action, in particular with regard to withdrawing the third-county national's residence permit.
Conditions for the entry and residence of researchers
Article 6
Once the hosting agreement is signed, the application for a residence permit is lodged with the relevant authority in the Member State. That authority will issue the residence permit when the four conditions stipulated are met:
(a) In accordance with a standard rule, the third-country national must have a valid passport or equivalent travel documents.
(b) Presentation of the hosting agreement referred to in Article 5. Various aspects can be checked: status of the signatories, researcher's formal qualifications, adequacy of the funding and of the researcher's resources, the latter's salary if he is employed, etc.
(c) Presentation of the statement of financial responsibility, as referred to in Article 5 i.
(d) This check must cover not only the third-country national concerned, but also the subject of the research, which the Member State may consider incompatible with public policy, public security or public health.
This article has been worded in such a way as to allow the duration of residence permits to be adjusted in accordance with the duration of the research projects, which can vary. The basic principle is that residence permits will be issued for one year, unless the research project planned is shorter, in which case the permit will cover the duration of the project. The principle of a minimum of one year is intended to simplify administrative procedures. The Directive also enables Member States which so wish to issue researcher residence permits for more than one year in order to cover the entire research project. Residence permits may be renewed annually as long as the conditions for issue are met. Residence permits may be also be renewed if the researcher signs a new hosting agreement with the host organisation or another organisation approved by the Member State, provided the relevant conditions are met.
This article covers the cases where researcher residence permits may be refused or withdrawn. Paragraph 1(a) refers to cases where the holder does not meet or no longer meets the conditions for entering and residing on the territory of the Member States. It can cover cases where organisations sign hosting agreements for work which does not qualify as research within the meaning of Article 2(c). Subparagraph (b) covers cases where the special procedure for researchers is misused by people who do not conduct the planned research and, in particular, who principally carry out other paid work. The second paragraph covers reservations regarding public policy, public security or public health. These decisions must be taken on a case-by-case basis, taking account of the specific situation of the person concerned and the principle of proportionality. No one may be penalised for suffering from an illness contracted after entering the territory.
This article stipulates that fraud, where it is found to have been committed, will be punished by the withdrawal of the residence permit issued under the Directive.
Researchers' rights
Article 10
If the researcher's application for admission is successful, he is entitled to enter and reside on the territory of the Member State concerned for the purposes of carrying out the research project for which he has been admitted. The Directive does not govern the status of researchers (employee, self-employed, scholarship holder, etc.) but authorises them to conduct research on the terms planned (depending on the case, remuneration under an employment contract, a scholarship, etc.) without having to obtain a work permit in cases where it would normally have been required by the Member States. Researchers are also authorised occasionally to perform paid work related to their research, such as contributing to a scientific publication, taking part in a selection board, producing a report or giving professional advice. The Directive leaves Member States free to choose the procedure for issuing the residence permit (directly in the country of origin or on application lodged on arrival in the Member State), but stipulates that visa requirements may not be an obstacle to the entry of the third-country nationals concerned.
In order to take account of the value to the Member State concerned of researchers' knowledge and of normal practice in the Member States, the Directive will allow researchers to teach in universities and similar establishments. They may lecture on previous work or on the ongoing research they are involved in. However, since the purpose of their stay is primarily research, the number of teaching hours is restricted to an annual maximum, to ensure that teaching remains an ancillary activity. The exact number is not specified in the Directive for reasons of flexibility. Reference is made to each Member State's own decision in this respect.
Holders of residence permits are entitled to the same substantive treatment as nationals with respect to certain rights (recognition of qualifications, social insurance benefits, tax concessions, access to goods and services). Social welfare is deliberately not included as researchers are supposed to have sufficient resources not to require financial support from the host Member State in accordance with Article 5(2)(b) and Article 6(c). The conditions relating to pay and dismissal will apply only to researchers taken on as employees. In such cases, social dumping must be prevented by ensuring that researchers have the same salary as nationals in comparable positions.
This article takes account of the growing need for mobility of researchers within the European Research Area. Obviously, if Europe is to be internationally competitive, it is vital that the work of researchers not be hindered or held up because of a need to travel to another Member State.
This article therefore stipulates that where work related to the research project is conducted in another Member State, the holder of a residence permit issued under the Directive can travel to that Member State at any time during the validity of the residence permit to conduct that work, on presentation of a valid passport or travel document and provided he does not pose a threat to public policy, public security or public health.
Procedure and transparency
Article 14
Allowing host research organisations to lodge the application for admission on the researcher's behalf is intended to speed up the procedure for issuing the residence permit. The Directive leaves it to Member States to determine who should lodge the application: the research organisation or the researcher as they prefer, or one of the two if the Member State decides to opt for only one possibility.
In principle, the application for admission should be presented by the researcher in the third country where he resides via the diplomatic or consular authorities of the Member State where he wishes to conduct the research. In order to simplify the admission procedure and avoid researchers being required to return to their country of origin in order to lodge an application, the Directive allows the application to be made on the spot if the third-country national is already lawfully on the territory of the Community at the time of lodging the application. This will apply in particular where a researcher wishes to renew a hosting agreement or to conclude a new one in order to continue his research.
The Directive leaves Member States free to consider applications for residence permits made by people who do not meet the conditions laid down, for reasons of flexibility and to avoid precluding regularisation by the Member States.
The three paragraphs are based on the provisions of other directives already adopted in the immigration field i and set out the procedural rules for examining a request for admission or for renewal of a residence permit.
Notification must be given in writing in accordance with the Member States' own laws. Member States must specify what happens in the absence of a reply from the authorities. Since the speed of the specific admission procedure is one of the keys to its success, the period for Member States to reply to a request for a residence permit is set at thirty days. However, it may be extended in exceptionally complex cases.
The second paragraph requires Member States to give reasons for decisions rejecting the application or amending, withdrawing or failing to renew the residence permit and to specify the administrative or legal means of appeal available to the person concerned. This information must also indicate the deadlines for bringing such appeals.
The third paragraph stipulates that the researcher must be able to bring an appeal before the courts against a decision rejecting his application or amending, withdrawing or refusing to renew his residence permit.
This article requires Member States to set their own fees up to a maximum determined by the real costs of processing applications.
Since the purpose of the Directive is to attract researchers to the European Union, it is particularly important for information on admission possibilities to be easily accessible from outside the European Union. The Directive therefore contains a specific provision on transparency. It is intended to foster the worldwide dissemination of information on the possibilities available under the Directive and the national implementing rules in the Member States. The information must be updated regularly and must cover the conditions and procedures for entering and residing on the territory of the Member States for the purposes of carrying out a research project (including the minimum monthly amount of financial resources required by the Member State under Article 5(2)(b)) and the research organisations approved under the Directive. Member States do not necessarily have to disseminate this information themselves and may for example leave it up to the organisations, but they must ensure that it is available on the internet. Implementation of this article will be greatly facilitated by the information efforts already undertaken at European level as part of the European Research Area, especially the creation of the internet researchers' mobility portal.
This is a standard provision of Community law. The Commission must report to the Council and Parliament on the application of the Directive by the Member States with a view to identifying any amendments or additions that might usefully be made. The first report must be submitted three years after the deadline for implementation set in Article 19 has expired, and subsequent reports, at a frequency to be determined.
This article sets the date by which Member States will have to incorporate the Directive into their national law, i.e. 31 December 2006 at the latest. Member States must systematically and promptly inform the Commission of the legislative, regulatory and administrative amendments they adopt to this end, which must include a reference to the Directive.
This article sets the date for the entry into force of the Directive in accordance with the date of its publication in the Official Journal.
This article stipulates that the Directive is addressed to the Member States, with the exception of Denmark in accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community and the United Kingdom and Ireland in accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland annexed to the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community, unless the latter two countries decide otherwise in accordance with the procedure determined by that Protocol.