Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2013)580 - Repeal of Council Decision 2007/124/EC, Euratom

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

dossier COM(2013)580 - Repeal of Council Decision 2007/124/EC, Euratom.
source COM(2013)580 EN
date 09-08-2013
1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL

1.1. Multiannual framework 2007-13

Under the multiannual framework 2007-13, the General Programme on Security and Safeguarding Liberties was established. Its key objective was to ensure effective operational cooperation in the fight against terrorism, including its consequences, organised crime and general crime, to support the provision of intelligence on a European scale and to strengthen the prevention of crime and terrorism, in order to promote secure societies based on the rule of law.

Given that these objectives had different legal bases in the Treaties and fundamentally different legal regimes, the General Programme was composed of two different legal instruments. Firstly, Council Decision 2007/125/JHA established the Specific Programme ‘Prevention of and Fight against Crime’ (hereinafter referred to as the ‘ISEC specific programme’). The specific programme focused on four thematic areas: crime prevention and criminology, law enforcement, protection and support to witnesses, and protection of victims. Secondly, Council Decision 2007/124/EC, Euratom established the Specific Programme ‘Prevention, Preparedness and Consequence Management of Terrorism and other Security-related risks’ (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIPS specific programme’). Its general objective was to support Member States’ efforts to prevent, prepare for, and protect people and critical infrastructure against terrorist attacks and other security-related incidents.

1.2. Multiannual framework 2014-20

Within the comprehensive framework of the Internal Security Fund, the instrument for financial support for police cooperation, preventing and combating crime, and crisis management (hereinafter referred to as ‘the ISF-Police’) will provide financial support for police cooperation, exchange of and access to information, crime prevention and the fight against cross-border and serious and organised crime, including terrorism, the protection of people and critical infrastructure against security-related incidents and the effective management of security-related risks and crises.

Consequently, the ISEC and CIPS specific programmes providing financial support for this policy area under the multiannual framework 2007-13 have to be repealed with effect from 1 January 2014, subject to transitional rules.

As far as the ISEC specific programme is concerned, it is repealed by the Regulation establishing the ISF-Police.

As for the CIPS specific programme, it was not possible to do the same because its repeal requires a separate legal act, due to the different voting rules under its double legal base (EC/Euratom). However, the final provision concerning the entry into force of this Decision is drafted in such a way that the repeal of the CIPS specific programme will coincide with the entry into force of the Regulation establishing the ISF-Police as if the repeal of the CIPS specific programme was stated in the Regulation establishing the ISF-Police itself. Therefore the repeal of the CIPS and ISEC specific programmes will be dealt with in exactly the same way.

1.

LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSAL



2.1.        Content of the proposed action

In view of the above, the Commission proposes that the Decision establishing the CIPS specific programme be repealed with effect from 1 January 2014.

2.2.        Legal basis

Council Decision 2007/124/EC, Euratom was adopted on the basis of Article 308 of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Article 203 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community.

The legal basis of this proposal to repeal the abovementioned Council Decision is Article 352 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 203 of the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community.

2.

BUDGETARY IMPLICATION



The proposal does not have any direct implication for the EU budget.