Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2013)694 - EU position within UNECE regarding amendments to numerous regulations and resolutions on the construction of vehicles and the global technical regulation on pole side impact - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
| dossier | COM(2013)694 - EU position within UNECE regarding amendments to numerous regulations and resolutions on the construction of vehicles and ... |
|---|---|
| source | COM(2013)694  |
| date | 09-10-2013 |
At international level, the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) develops harmonised requirements, intended to remove technical barriers to the trade in motor vehicles between the Contracting Parties to the Revised 1958 Agreement and to ensure that such vehicles offer a high level of safety and environmental protection.
By Council Decision 97/836/EC of 27 November 1997 the Union acceded to the Agreement of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (“UNECE”) concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted to and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions[1] (“Revised 1958 Agreement”), and by Council Decision 2000/125/EC of 31 January 2000 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement concerning the establishing of Global Technical Regulations for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles[2] ("Parallel Agreement"), the Union acceded to the Parallel Agreement.
The meetings of UNECE WP29, the World Forum for Harmonisation of Vehicle Regulations, are held three times per year in March, June and November of each calendar year. In each meeting session new amendments to existing UNECE Regulations or Global Technical Regulations are adopted in order to allow for technical progress. Prior to each WP29 meeting these amendments were adopted by one of the six working groups (GRs) that are active under WP29.
Subsequently, in a WP29 meeting the final vote for adoption of the amendments, supplements and corrigenda takes place, provided the quorum is reached and there is a qualified majority among contracting parties. The EU is a contracting party to two Agreements (1958 and 1998 Agreements) under WP29 and votes on behalf of the Member States. A Council Decision, referred to as 'mega decision', containing the list of amendments, supplements and corrigenda, is prepared each time and permits the Commission to vote on behalf of the Member States in each WP29 meeting.
This Council Decision defines the Union's position in the voting of the amendments, supplements and corrigenda submitted for vote in the November 2013 WP29 meeting that will take place on 11 to 15 November 2013.
Contents
The Technical Committee Motor Vehicles has been consulted and the comments from Member State experts taken into account.
· Summary of the proposed action
The proposal defines the Union's position in the voting of the amendments to UNECE Regulations No 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 10, 12, 14, 16, 17, 19, 23, 31, 37, 38, 43, 48, 49, 50, 54, 67, 69, 70, 77, 83, 87, 91, 94, 95, 98, 99, 100, 101, 103, 107, 110, 112, 113, 115, 117, 119, 121, 123, 128 and 129, regarding a proposal for amendments to the Consolidated Resolution on the Construction of Vehicles (R.E.3), regarding the adoption of a proposal for a Global Technical Regulation on Pole Side Impact.
· Legal basis
Article 114, in conjunction with Article 218(9) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
· Subsidiarity principle
The vote in favour of international instruments like draft UNECE Regulations and Global Technical Regulations and their incorporation into the Union system for the type-approval of motor vehicles can only be done by the Union. This does not only prevent fragmentation of the Internal Market, but also ensures equal health and safety standards across the Union. It also offers advantages of economies of scale: products can be made for the whole Union market and even the international market, instead of being customised to obtain national type-approval for every single Member State.
The proposal therefore complies with the subsidiarity principle.
· Proportionality principle
The proposal complies with the proportionality principle as it does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve the objectives of ensuring the proper functioning of the Internal Market, while at the same time providing for a high level of public safety and protection.
· Choice of instruments
The use of a Council Decision is required by Article 218(9) TFEU in order to establish the positions to be adopted on the Union’s behalf in a body set up by an international agreement.