Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2015)15 - Amendment of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1311/2013 laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL

Article 19 of Council Regulation No 1311/2013 of 2 December laying down the multiannual financial framework for the years 2014-2020[1] (MFF Regulation) provides for a revision of the multiannual financial framework (MFF) in case of late adoption of rules or programmes under shared management:

1. In the event of the adoption after 1 January 2014 of new rules or programmes under shared management for the Structural Funds, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund, the Asylum and Migration Fund and the Internal Security Fund, the MFF shall be revised in order to transfer to subsequent years, in excess of the corresponding expenditure ceilings, allocations not used in 2014.

2. The revision concerning the transfer of unused allocation for the year 2014 shall be adopted before 1 May 2015.

As a consequence of the late agreement on the MFF 2014-2020, the various legal acts laying down provisions for implementing the funds were adopted in December 2013 for the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund (ESF), the Cohesion Fund (CF) and the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), and as late as May 2014 for the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF), the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) and the Internal Security Fund (ISF). A range of Implementing Acts and Delegated Acts were subsequently adopted in the course of 2014 for each Fund.

The Commission’s strategy to launch an informal dialogue on the programming documents for the European Structural and Investment Funds (ESI Funds, i.e. ERDF, ESF, CF, EAFRD and EMFF) as from 2012 has achieved important results. The adoption of Partnership Agreements with Member States took about four month less than in the previous programming period.

Nevertheless, as a result of the late agreement on legal acts, a significant amount of programmes could not be adopted in 2014 and were not advanced enough either to benefit from the procedure for carry-over of appropriations under Article 13 of the Financial Regulation[2]: Programmes which are 'ready for adoption' at the end of 2014, but cannot be adopted formally due to lack of time, can benefit from the 'carry-over' procedure under Article 13(2)(a) of the Financial Regulation as regards the 2014 commitment. In this context 'ready for adoption' means that the preparatory stages have been completed and no further actions are required before launching the procedure for the Commission decision to adopt the programme. In such cases, the carry-over procedure allows for the 2014 commitment to be carried over to 2015 provided that 2014 amounts are committed up to 31 March 2015.

Allocations not used in 2014 nor carried over need to be transferred to subsequent years by means of a revision of the MFF in accordance with Article 19 of the MFF Regulation.

The revision of the MFF ceilings will have to be accompanied by an Amending Budget as far as 2015 commitment appropriations are concerned. Both the revision and the Amending Budget will be a prerequisite for the adoption of programmes which trigger the budgetary commitment and the payment of the initial pre-financing.

1.

LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSAL



2.

2.1. Scope of the revision


The revision under Article 19 of the MFF Regulation applies to the adoption after 1 January 2014 of new rules or programmes under shared management for the ESI Funds, the AMIF and the ISF. It thus applies to programmes adopted after 1 January 2014 even when the relevant legal act was adopted by that time. Moreover, ‘rules’ covers not only the basic legislative acts laying down the provisions for implementing the funds concerned, but also implementing and delegated acts, to the extent to which they are a prerequisite for preparing or finalising the programmes.

Consequently, this provision also applies to funds from the specific allocation for the Youth Employment Initiative as the legal basis is the same as for programmes.

It also applies to the Fund for European Aid to the most Deprived (FEAD) as its commitments originate from the Structural Funds and are implemented under shared management.

Finally, Article 19 also covers contributions from the ERDF to the cross-border and sea-basin programmes established under the European Neighbourhood Instrument and the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance as those amounts are part of national allocations defined in Article 91(2) of the ESI Funds’ Common Provisions Regulation (CPR)[3].

Conversely, the provision does neither apply to amounts transferred from the Cohesion Fund to the Connecting Europe Facility, nor to technical assistance at the initiative of the Commission, nor to innovative actions, as these are not part of programmes and are managed by the Commission under direct management. It does not apply either to contributions from Heading 4 of the MFF even when transferred to the ERDF and the European Territorial Cooperation objective.

Article 19 does not impose any constraints as to the profile of the transfer of allocations to subsequent years.

3.

3. TRANSFER OF ALLOCATIONS


Commitment appropriations for programmes under shared management within the meaning of Article 19 of the MFF Regulation lapsed in 2014 for an amount of EUR 21,043,639,478 in current prices. This corresponds to the 2014 tranches of programmes that could neither be committed in 2014 nor carried over to 2015.

The below table shows the distribution by Fund of the 2014 commitments, distinguishing those adopted in 2014 from those carried-over as well as from those to be transferred under Article 19 of the MFF Regulation:

The Commission proposes to transfer the bulk of the allocations not used in 2014 to year 2015 in order to keep the pace of investments for growth and jobs, minimise differences of treatment with programmes adopted in 2014 and ensure equal treatment with programmes whose 2014 commitment tranche is carried-over in accordance with Article 13 of the Financial Regulation i. Hence, all allocations not used in 2014 nor carried over will be transferred to 2015, except in the following cases:

The unused EAFRD allocations are proposed to be transferred in equal parts to 2015 and 2016. This is justified by the cumulative effect of, in particular, the following circumstances:

– The regulatory framework providing the essential elements necessary to Member States for the preparation of their rural development programmes was completed only in the second half of 2014. Furthermore, the latest regulation amending the basic act following Member States' decisions to transfer amounts between direct aids and rural development, and thereby impacting the programming, came into force only at the end of December 2014.

– Because of the transitional rules under Regulation (EU) No 1310/2013 significant amounts spent under the new rural development programmes are still paid under the budget line for the old programmes during the transition between two periods. Therefore, doubling the available commitments on the budget line for the new RDPs would result in additional unused appropriations in 2015 as the total annual payments would not consume all the available commitments in the budget line for the new RDPs.

– As opposed to the other ESI Funds, programmes financed from the EAFRD will not benefit from annual pre-financing, resulting in a higher amount of interim payments to be claimed within the decommitment deadlines.

For contributions from the ERDF to the cross-border and sea-basin programmes established under the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI-CBC programmes) and the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA-CBC programmes) it is proposed to transfer the whole 2014 ERDF allocation to 2017. The set-up of these programmes is more complex and takes longer. This is due to the specific character of those programmes involving Member States and candidate or neighbouring countries.

For programmes financed from the AMIF or the ISF, allocations not used in 2014 shall be transferred to years 2015 to 2017 with a degressive profile. The basic acts for these funds were only adopted in May 2014, with the adoption of a number of implementing and delegated acts still pending. These funds are subject to a stricter decommitment rule than for the ESI Funds i.e. n+2, as from the second year of implementation, instead of n+3. Finally, the Member States’ experience in managing these funds under shared management is rather new. The proposed transfer of the 2014 allocations over three years takes account of these particular features.

Consequently, the allocations not used in 2014 are proposed to be transferred to subsequent years as shown in the below table.

4.

4. IMPLICATIONS ON PAYMENTS


Concerning the implications on payments in 2015, they will be covered within the voted budget for 2015. The first initial pre-financing that has not been paid in 2014 will have to be paid in 2015 together with the second pre-financing. However, the corresponding unused appropriations in 2014 have been used by transfers to reduce the backlog of unpaid bills from the previous period 2007-2013 and the reverse operation could be done, if need be, in 2015 to cover the pre-financings.

The medium and longer term implications on interim payments of the transfer are more difficult to predict.

The legislative acts laying down the provisions for implementing the funds contain provisions for the automatic decommitment of appropriations not used within a given deadline, which is of n+3 years for the ESI Funds and of n+2 years for the AMIF and the ISF.

The year “n” corresponds to the year of the budgetary commitment. As both in case of a carry-over and in case of a transfer of commitment appropriations from 2014 to 2015 the budgetary commitment will be made in 2015, the n+3 period will start from 2015, with the deadline shifting accordingly from end 2017 to end 2018. In case of n+2, the same applies: the period will start from 2015 and the deadline shift accordingly by one year.

This could in principle result in a shift of payments from one year to another without this lowering the overall needs over the 2014-2020 period. On the other hand, the real pace of implementation will not be pre-determined by the transfer. Under all programmes, regardless of their date of adoption, expenditure is eligible as from 1 January 2014 (and as from 1 September 2013 for the Youth Employment Initiative and 1 December 2013 for the Fund for European Aid to the Most Deprived). This means that implementation could start before the formal adoption of the respective programme and limit the impact of the delay on the submission of interim payment claims.

Both the fact that Member States have n+3 years to spend the funds (n+2 for AMIF and ISF), taking account of initial and annual pre-financing, and the availability of the Global Margin for payments (Article 5 of the MFF Regulation) are expected to further mitigate the impact of the transfer of commitments from 2014 on annual payment ceilings.

For these reasons, the Commission does not propose to revise the payment ceilings. It will review the situation regularly in the light of implementation and make proposals if appropriate in accordance with the relevant provisions of the MFF Regulation.

5.

5. REVISED FINANCIAL FRAMEWORK IN CURRENT PRICES


The proposed transfer of allocations in the below MFF table is expressed in current prices and incorporates the technical adjustment made for 2015[5].

The Council regulation amending the MFF Regulation must refer to the basic table set out in its Annex, which is expressed in constant 2011 prices. The amounts in current prices are thus to be converted into 2011 prices.