Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2013)246 - Common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development and the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund covered by the Common Strategic Framework and laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
| dossier | COM(2013)246 - Common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the European ... |
|---|---|
| source | COM(2013)246  |
| date | 22-04-2013 |
The Commission presented its proposals for a regulation laying down common provisions on the ERDF, the ESF, the CF, the EAFRD and the EMFF and general provisions on cohesion policy funds on 6 October 2011 (COM(2011) 615 final).
The initial Commission's proposal for the EMFF Regulation aligned the management and control system for the EMFF with the arrangements proposed for the EAFRD. This was proposed mainly for the reason that the authorities managing the EAFRD and EMFF are often the same and would benefit from harmonised arrangements for these two funds.
During the examination of the EMFF proposal in the Fisheries Working Group in the Council, a number of Member States have expressed reservations as regards the shift to the system proposed by the Commission for management and control and for financial management. In the previous (2000-2006) and the current (2007-2013) programming periods the delivery system of the EMFF was aligned with arrangements set up under cohesion policy and Member States consider that the highest degree of continuity should be ensured. They have expressed a view that continuing with such arrangements would enable to make the best use of the expertise gained by national authorities currently involved in the management of EU funds for fisheries.
Although a majority of Member States have indicated that they prefer alignment of the EMFF with the delivery system for cohesion policy, they have also highlighted the need to take into account the principle of proportionality (CPR Article 4(5)). The fisheries operational programmes, in most of the cases, are smaller than those under cohesion policy and also have specific features to ensure that the EMFF contributes to the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy.
In order to facilitate the already on-going negotiations in the Council and the European Parliament the Commission proposes a simultaneous amendment of the Commission proposals for the Common Provisions Regulation and of the EMFF Regulation to ensure simple and streamlined integration of the EMFF into an already existing set of rules for cohesion policy.
A close alignment of EMFF delivery systems with those proposed for cohesion policy in the manner proposed will contribute to harmonisation and consistency of rules across these different Funds (ERDF, ESF, CF and EMFF). It enables harnessing the experience attained in previous programming periods and facilitates a smooth transition from one programming period to the next.
Contents
The Commission proposal amending the Common Provisions Regulation and the EMFF Regulation has been preceded by throrough discussions on the delivery arrangements of the EMFF in the Fisheries Working Party of the Council and bilateral contacts with the Member States.
An Impact Assessment has been carried out for the original legislative proposals.
The proposal involves a parallel amendment of the Commission proposals for the Common Provisions Regulation and of the EMFF Regulation:
· the EMFF is integrated in the relevant provisions in the Common Provisions Regulation which were initially specific to cohesion policy, creating a new Part Four of the Common Provisions Regulation which applies to cohesion policy and to the EMFF;
· Respective provisions (which correspond to the delivery arrangements of the EAFRD or overlap with the articles of the Common Provisions Regulations in its amended form) are deleted from the EMFF Regulation and appropriate references to the CPR are introduced in the EMFF Regulation, where necessary.
Recitals and definitions are aligned with the changes to the articles and amendment of the structure of the regulations. The terminology used in the new Part Four is adjusted to accommodate the specificities of the EMFF and in certain instances it is clarified that the Fund-specific rules under the EMFF may set out complementary rules.
The amended proposal will have no budgetary implications. The availability of new data and macro-economic forecasts as well as the accession of the Republic of Croatia results however in changes of the cohesion envelope.
These modifications are without prejudice to the on-going negotiations on the MFF Regulation and to the Financial Regulation.
5. SUMMARY OF AMENDMENTS
As regards the Common Provisions Regulation, the amendment concerns recitals 3, 75, 78, 80, 84 and 87. It also introduces changes in Article 1 and Article 3 to clearly set out the applicability of each Part of the Common Provisions Regulation as regards each of the Funds (ERDF, ESF, CF, EMFF and EAFRD). It has required limited adjustment of definitions set out under paragraphs , i, (25) and (26) of Article 2 in order to replace references to Part Three with references to Part Four.
It includes amendments to Articles 55 i, 64 , 74 , 112 , 113 , 114 (b) and (g), 117 , 120, 121 , 124, 126 , 128, 130 , 131 , 133, 134 , 135, 136, 137 and 140 .
As regards the EMFF Regulation, the amendment concerns recitals 86, 89, 101, 103, 104 and deletion of recitals 91, 93, 94 and 97. It includes amendments to Articles 3, 12, 14, 20, 24, 25, 28, 33, 37, 38, 39, 45, 46, 54, 56, 61, 62, 63, 64, 67, 75, 78, 92, 94, 95, 102, 103, 105, 108, 117, 118, 119, 120, 122, 126, 128, 129, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 1369, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142,143, 144, 145, 146, 147, 148, 149, 150,151, 152, 153, 154 and deletion of Articles 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 104, 106, 107, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 121, 123, 124, 125, 127 and 130.
For clarity reasons, this amending proposal is presented in a consolidated form, including all the amendments to the Common Provisions Regulation adopted by the Commission so far, i.e. COM(2012) 496 of 11 September 2012 and COM(2013) 146 of 12 March 2013. However, only the modifications proposed through this amending proposal are presented in a highlighted format.