Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2017)162 - EU position within the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin as regards the request of Ukraine to become Party to that Convention - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
| dossier | COM(2017)162 - EU position within the Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin as regards the request of ... |
|---|---|
| source | COM(2017)162  |
| date | 06-04-2017 |
1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL
• Reasons for and objectives of the proposal
The Regional Convention on pan-Euro-Mediterranean preferential rules of origin 1 (hereafter the Convention) lays down provisions on the origin of goods traded under relevant Agreements concluded between the Contracting Parties.
Article 5(1) of the Convention provides that a third party may become a Contracting Party to the Convention, provided that the candidate country or territory has a free trade agreement in force, providing for preferential rules of origin, with at least one of the Contracting Parties. To that end, Article 5(2) and (3) of the Convention require a third party to submit a written request for accession to the depositary of the Convention which, in turn, has to submit the request to the Joint Committee for its consideration. Article 2(2) of the Convention provides that, for the purposes of the Convention, ‘third party’ means any neighbouring country or territory which is not a Contracting Party.
Ukraine submitted its written request for accession to the Convention to the depositary of the Convention (the General Secretariat of the Council of the EU) on 12 September 2016.
Ukrainian authorities confirmed that Ukraine has a free trade agreement with several Contracting Parties, notably with the EU, EFTA states, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Montenegro. As a consequence, Ukraine complies with the condition set out in Article 5(1) of the Convention to become a Contracting Party.
The request should therefore be submitted to the Joint Committee of the Convention for adoption of a Decision inviting Ukraine to accede to the Convention, in accordance with Article 4(3)(b) of the Convention The position to be taken by the EU within the Joint Committee should be established by the Council.
According to the Commission, the accession of Ukraine does not require any transitional measures as referred to in Article 4(3)(c) of the Convention.
2. LEGAL BASIS, SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY
• Legal basis
The legal basis for the Council Decision is Article 207 in conjunction with Article 218(9) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Article 218(9) TFEU provides that when a decision having legal effect needs to be taken in a body set up by an international agreement, the Council, on a proposal from the Commission or the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, shall adopt a decision establishing the position to be adopted on the European Union’s behalf.
The decision to be taken by the Joint Committee of the Convention falls under this provision.
• Subsidiarity (for non-exclusive competence)
The proposal falls under the exclusive competence of the Union.
3. RESULTS OF EX-POST EVALUATIONS, STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
• Stakeholder consultations
The Contracting Parties to the Convention and the Member States were informed of the request made by Ukraine at the meeting of the Joint Committee of the Convention of 28 September 2016.
• Collection and use of expertise
No recourse to external expertise has been necessary.
• Impact assessment
Furthermore, it has not been necessary to conduct an impact assessment, since the accession of a third party to the Convention is only subject to the condition that it has a free trade agreement in force with at least one of the Contracting Parties to the Convention.