Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2017)769 - Repeal of Regulation 256/2014 concerning the notification to the Commission of investment projects in energy infrastructure within the EU

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.



1. CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL

The following proposal for repealing Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 (‘the Regulation’) is put forward in the context of the Commission's REFIT programme and commitment on better regulation. The objective is to ensure a legislative framework that is fit for purpose and high-quality, as stated in the Interinstitutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Better Law-Making 1 . The Commission has identified this Regulation as no longer fit for purpose and proposes that it be repealed.

On 26 February 2014, Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 on the notification of investment projects in energy infrastructure within the European Union to the Commission was adopted to ensure that the EU’s energy policy develops in an effective way and responds to the EU’s real needs. This Regulation was supported by Commission implementing Regulation (EU) No 1113/2014 of 16 October 2014, which set out the form and technical details of the notification referred to in Articles 3 and 5 of Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 2 .

Based on Article 194 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 and Commission implementing Regulation (EU) No 1113/2014 required Member States to notify the Commission of investment projects on which construction or decommissioning work had started or on which a final investment decision had been taken. In this way, the Commission was meant to gain access to data and information on planned developments in production, transmission and storage capacities, as well as on projects in the various energy sectors of interest to the EU and important for future energy and investment policies.

Therefore, the Regulation aimed to give the Commission an overall picture of the development of investment in energy infrastructure in the EU so that it could better fulfil its responsibilities in the field of energy.

The obligations under this Regulation were already in force under Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 617/2010 of 24 June 2010 concerning the notification to the Commission of investment projects in energy infrastructure within the European Union and repealing Regulation (EC) No 736/96 3 . The Court of Justice annulled Council Regulation No 617/2010 4  due to its wrong legal basis, but its effects remained until Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 was adopted. 

Member States have gone through three reporting exercises (2011, 2013 and 2015) since the obligations under this Regulation and its predecessor, Council Regulation No 617/2010, have been in place. Therefore, enough time has elapsed for the Commission to be able to carry out an evidence-based critical analysis of whether the Regulation has had the expected results.

2. RESULTS OF EX-POST EVALUATIONS, STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS

Ex-post evaluations, regulatory fitness and simplification

The Commission ordered three external studies after the three Member State reporting exercises took place under this Regulation and its predecessor. In the light of their findings, in 2016 the Commission reviewed Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 as per Article 11 of the Regulation itself. This was part of a wider fitness check that covered the planning and reporting obligations under the body of energy legislation. The Commission published it in November 2016 5 , along with its proposal for a Regulation on the Governance of the Energy Union 6 .

This exercise revealed that:

1. There were significant overlaps between reporting obligations under this Regulation and reporting obligations to ENTSO-E 7 and ENTSO-G 8 , with little to no value added by obligations under this Regulation.

2. Most of the information provided by the Member States under this Regulation can be easily obtained from other sources: ENTSOs (European Network of Transmission System Operators), TYNDPs (ten-year network development plans), the annual reports of Transmission System Operators and utility companies, national sectoral development plans (e.g. renewables action plans), etc. Furthermore, the Commission regularly collects market information through its Energy Market Observation System (EMOS).

3. Across all three exercises completed, data collected only covered about half of the EU's energy sector.

4. Inherent difficulties in implementing some of the Regulation’s requirements, especially in relation to information to be provided regarding future capacity, undermined the usefulness of the three reporting exercises carried out.

Consequently, the Commission concluded that Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 did not have the expected results. It should, therefore, be proposed that it be repealed.

Stakeholder consultations

As part of the preparatory work for its proposal for a legislative initiative on the Governance of the Energy Union 9 , the Commission carried out an extensive consultation to collect views and input from stakeholders, citizens and Member States. The consultation asked how existing planning and reporting arrangements in the energy field could be improved to meet the objectives of the Energy Union and to reduce administrative burden.

The public consultation was launched on 11 January 2016, lasted over 12 weeks and closed on 22 April 2016. The responses fed into the Commission's evaluation and fitness check of existing planning and reporting obligations as well as into the impact assessment of its legislative proposal on the Governance of the Energy Union.

Respondents to the consultation identified the obligations under Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 as ones which could be repealed 10 .


3. LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSAL

The proposal repeals Regulation (EU) No 256/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 concerning the notification to the Commission of investment projects in energy infrastructure within the European Union, replacing Council Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 617/2010 and repealing Council Regulation (EC) Nº 736/96.

The legal basis of Regulation (EU) No 256/2014, namely, Article 194 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union, is subject to the ordinary legislative procedure. The Commission is therefore proposing the repeal of this Regulation to the European Parliament and to the Council.

4. BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS

The Regulation had very limited budgetary implications, which related to expenditure on information technology, data purchasing and reimbursement of experts. No major direct impact was expected for Member State budgets either.

The repeal of this Regulation will put an end to the limited expenditure linked to it. It will help rationalise the use of Commission and Member State resources by removing double reporting obligations and processing of data which have become available via other, higher-quality sources.