Explanatory Memorandum to COM(2024)71 - EU position in the EU-CTC Joint Committee established by the Convention of 20 May 1987 on a common transit procedure as regards amendments to that Convention

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

1.Subject matter of the proposal

This proposal concerns the decision establishing the position to be taken on the Union's behalf in the EU-CTC 1 Joint Committee on common transit (‘the Joint Committee‘) in connection with the envisaged adoption of a decision amending an Appendix to the Convention of 20 May 1987 on a common transit procedure.

Contents

1.

Context of the proposal



2.

2.1.The Convention


The Convention of 20 May 1987 on a common transit procedure (‘the Agreement’) aims to facilitate the movements of goods between the European Union and other countries that are Contracting Parties to the Convention. It extends the Union customs transit procedure 2 to the Contracting Parties to the Convention other than the European Union and sets out the obligations on traders and customs authorities for goods transported under this procedure from one Contracting Party to another. The Agreement entered into force on 1 January 1988.

The European Union is a party to the Agreement 3 . The other Contracting Parties are the Republic of Iceland, the Republic of North Macedonia, the Kingdom of Norway, the Republic of Serbia, the Swiss Confederation, the United Kingdom, the Republic of Türkiye and Ukraine. These countries are referred to in the Convention as common transit countries.

3.

2.2.The Joint Committee


The Joint Committee is to administer the Convention and to ensure its proper implementation. The Committee, by means of decisions, adopts amendments to the Appendices to the Convention.

The Joint Committee's decisions are adopted by mutual agreement 4 by the Contracting Parties as stipulated by Article 14 i of the Convention.

4.

2.3.The envisaged act of the Joint Committee


The Joint Committee in accordance with Articles 15 i and 20 of the Convention, is to adopt a decision regarding the amendment of the Appendix IIIa to the Convention (‘the envisaged act’).

The purpose of the envisaged act is to align the Convention with the amended Annex B of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2446 5 (‘the Delegated Act’) and Annex B of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2447 6 (‘the Implementing Act’) which lay down the common data element requirements, formats and codes for the transit declaration. These acts were amended, respectively in December 2020 7 and February 2021 8 , to ensure inter-operability between the customs electronic systems used for the different types of declarations and notifications. Therefore, Appendix IIIa to the Convention, which replicates the Annex B of the Delegated Act and the Annex B of the Implementing Act, should be amended accordingly.

Following the changes in the structure of Appendix IIIa to the Convention, corrections are required in Appendix I with regard to the references to the sections of Appendix IIIa.

The envisaged act will become binding on the parties in accordance with their own legislation, in line with Article 15 of the Convention which provides: ‘It shall be the responsibility of the Joint Committee to administer this Convention and ensure its proper implementation. Decisions taken under points (a) to (d) shall be put into effect by the Contracting Parties in accordance with their own legislation’.

5.

3.Position to be taken on the Union's behalf


The proposed position is to support an amendment of the Appendix IIIa to the Convention in order to align it with the Union law.

The Union customs law governing the Union transit arrangements and, in particular, the amended Annex B of the Delegated Act and Implementing Act, which lays down the common data element requirements, formats and codes for the transit declaration.

The proposed position is consistent with the common commercial policy.

The proposed amendments to the Convention will result in tangible benefits for both, traders and customs administrations by aligning the Convention with the current Union legislation and, hence, creating uniform conditions for the harmonised implementation of the provisions concerning the Union transit and the common transit procedure.

6.

4.Legal basis


7.

4.1.Procedural legal basis


8.

4.1.1.Principles


Article 218 i of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) provides for decisions establishing ‘the positions to be adopted on the Union’s behalf in a body set up by an agreement, when that body is called upon to adopt acts having legal effects, with the exception of acts supplementing or amending the institutional framework of the agreement.’

The concept of ‘acts having legal effects’ includes acts that have legal effects by virtue of the rules of international law governing the body in question. It also includes instruments that do not have a binding effect under international law, but that are ‘capable of decisively influencing the content of the legislation adopted by the EU legislature’ 9 .

9.

4.1.2.Application to the present case


The Joint Committee is a body set up by an agreement, namely the Convention on a common transit procedure. Article 15 i a) of the Convention stipulates that the EU-CTC Join Committee shall adopt amendments to the Appendices to the Convention by means of decisions.

The act which the Joint Committee is called upon to adopt constitutes an act having legal effects. The envisaged act will be binding under international law in accordance with Articles 15 i and 20 of the Convention.

The envisaged act does not supplement or amend the institutional framework of the Agreement.

Therefore, the procedural legal basis for the proposed decision is Article 218 i TFEU.

10.

4.2.Substantive legal basis


11.

4.2.1.Principles


The substantive legal basis for a decision under Article 218 i TFEU depends primarily on the objective and content of the envisaged act in respect of which a position is taken on the Union's behalf. If the envisaged act pursues two aims or has two components and if one of those aims or components is identifiable as the main one, whereas the other is merely incidental, the decision under Article 218 i TFEU must be founded on a single substantive legal basis, namely that required by the main or predominant aim or component.

12.

4.2.2.Application to the present case


The main objective and content of the envisaged act relate to ensuring efficient border crossing procedures. The main objective and content of the envisaged act therefore relates to the common commercial policy.

Therefore, the substantive legal basis of the proposed decision is Article 207 TFEU.

13.

4.3.Conclusion


The legal basis of the proposed decision should be Article 207 TFEU, in conjunction with Article 218 i TFEU.

14.

5.Publication of the envisaged act


As the act of the Joint Committee will amend the Convention and its Appendix, it is appropriate to publish it in the Official Journal of the European Union after its adoption.