Considerations on COM(2005)56 - Rules on local border traffic at the external land borders of the Member States and amending the Schengen Convention and the Common Consular Instructions

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

 
 
(1) The need to develop rules on local border traffic in order to consolidate the Community legal framework on external borders was highlighted in the Commission Communication entitled "Towards an integrated management of the external borders of the Member States of the European Union". This need was confirmed by the Council on 13 June 2002, with the approval of the "Plan for the management of the external borders of the Member States of the European Union", subsequently endorsed by the European Council in Seville on 21 and 22 June 2002.

(2) It is in the interest of the enlarged Community to ensure that the borders with its neighbours are not a barrier to trade, social and cultural interchange or regional cooperation. An efficient system for local border traffic should consequently be developed.

(3) The local border traffic regime constitutes a derogation from the general rules governing the border control of persons crossing the external borders of the Member States of the European Union which are set out in Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code)1.

OJ L 105, 13.4.2006, p. 1.

(4) The Community should lay down criteria and conditions to be complied with when the crossing of an external land border under the local border traffic regime is being eased for border residents. Such criteria and conditions should ensure a balance between, on the one hand, the easing of border crossing for bona fide border residents having legitimate reasons frequently to cross an external land border and, on the other hand, the need to prevent illegal immigration and potential threats to security posed by criminal activities.

(5) As a general rule, in order to prevent abuses, local border traffic permits should be issued only to those who have been lawfully resident in a border area for at least one year. Bilateral Agreements concluded between Member States and neighbouring third countries may provide for a longer period of residence. In exceptional and duly justified cases, such as those relating to minors, changes in marital status or inheritance of land, those bilateral Agreements may also provide for a shorter period of residence.

(6) Local border traffic permits should be issued to border residents whether or not they are subject to a visa requirement pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 of

15 March 2001 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement1. As a result, this Regulation should be read together with Council Regulation (EC) No 1932/2006 of 21 December 2006 amending Regulation (EC)

No 539/20012, which is designed to exempt from the visa obligation border residents who benefit from the local border traffic regime established by this Regulation. As a consequence, this Regulation may enter into force only in conjunction with that amending Regulation.

OJ L 81, 21.3.2001, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 851/2005 (OJ L 141, 4.6.2005, p. 3).

See in this Official Journal.

(7) The Community should lay down specific criteria and conditions for the issuing of local border traffic permits to border residents. Those criteria and conditions should be consistent with the entry conditions imposed on border residents crossing an external land border under the local border traffic regime.

(8) The right to free movement enjoyed by citizens of the Union and members of their families and the equivalent rights enjoyed by third-country nationals and members of their families under Agreements between the Community and its Member States, on the one hand, and the third countries concerned, on the other hand, should not be affected by the establishment of rules on local border traffic at Community level. However, where border crossing is eased under the local border traffic regime for border residents, and this entails less systematic control, border crossing should, as a matter of course, be eased for any person enjoying the Community right of free movement residing in the border area concerned.

(9) For the implementation of the local border traffic regime, Member States should be allowed to maintain or conclude, if necessary, bilateral Agreements with neighbouring third countries, provided that such Agreements comply with the rules laid down in this Regulation.

(10) This Regulation does not affect the specific arrangements applied in Ceuta and Melilla, as referred to in the Declaration by the Kingdom of Spain on the towns of Ceuta and Melilla in the Final Act to the Agreement on the Accession of the Kingdom of Spain to the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement of 14 June 1985 between the Governments of the States of the Benelux Economic Union, the Federal Republic of Germany and the French Republic on the gradual abolition of checks at their common borders signed at Schengen on 19 June 19901.

(11) Penalties, as provided for in national law, should be imposed by Member States on border residents who abuse the local border traffic regime established by this Regulation.

(12) The Commission should submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council on the application of this Regulation. The report should be accompanied, where necessary, by legislative proposals.

(13) This Regulation respects the fundamental rights and freedoms and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

(14) Since the objective of this Regulation, namely the laying down of the criteria and conditions for the establishment of a local border traffic regime at external land borders, directly affects the Community acquis on external borders and cannot thus be achieved sufficiently by the Member States and can therefore, by reason of the scale and effects of this Regulation, be better achieved at Community level, the Community may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty establishing the European Community. In accordance with the principle of proportionality, as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective.

OJ L 239, 22.9.2000, p. 69.

(15) In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation, and is not bound by it or subject to its application. Given that this Regulation builds upon the Schengen acquis under the provisions of Title IV of Part Three of the Treaty establishing the European Community, Denmark shall, in accordance with Article 5 of that Protocol, decide within a period of six months after the date of adoption of this Regulation whether it will implement it in its national law.

(16) As regards Iceland and Norway, this Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters' association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis1, which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 19992 on certain arrangements for the application of that Agreement.

(17) This Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis3. The United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.

OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p. 36. OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p. 31. OJ L 131, 1.6.2000, p. 43.

(18) This Regulation constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC of

28 February 2002 concerning Ireland's request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis1. Ireland is therefore not taking part in its adoption and is not bound by it or subject to its application.

(19) As regards Switzerland, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement signed between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A of

Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 4(1) of Decision 2004/849/EC2 and Article 4(1) of Decision 2004/860/EC3.

(20) Articles 4(b) and 9(c) of this Regulation constitute provisions building on the Schengen acquis or otherwise related to it within the meaning of Article 3(2) of the 2003 Act of Accession.