Considerations on COM(2018)192 - Conclusion of the Economic Partnership Agreement with Japan

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

 
dossier COM(2018)192 - Conclusion of the Economic Partnership Agreement with Japan.
document COM(2018)192 EN
date December 20, 2018
 
table>(1)In accordance with Council Decision (EU) 2018/966 (2), the Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership (‘the Agreement’) was signed on 17 July 2018.
(2)In order to ensure an efficient operation of the wine export facilitation system provided for in the Agreement, the Commission should be authorised to temporarily suspend, on behalf of the Union and as provided for in paragraph 3 of Article 2.29 of the Agreement, the acceptance of self-certification of wine products as set out in Article 2.28 of the Agreement. The Commission should also be authorised to terminate that temporary suspension on behalf of the Union and as provided for in paragraph 4 of Article 2.29 of the Agreement.

(3)In accordance with Article 218(7) of the Treaty, it is appropriate for the Council to authorise the Commission to approve, on behalf of the Union, certain modifications to the Agreement. The Commission should therefore be authorised to approve modifications pursuant to Article 10.14 of the Agreement as regards Part 2 of Annex 10 to the Agreement after consultation with the special committee appointed by the Council in accordance with Article 207(3) of the Treaty. That authorisation should not apply to modifications to commitments under paragraph 4 (‘Procurement of railway-related goods and services’) and paragraph 5 (‘Services’) of Section A of Part 2 of Annex 10 to the Agreement. The Commission should also be authorised to approve modifications of Annex 14-A and Annex 14-B to the Agreement.

(4)In accordance with Article 23.5 of the Agreement, nothing in the Agreement is to be construed as conferring rights or imposing obligations on persons, without prejudice to the rights and obligations of persons under other public international law. It is therefore not possible to invoke the Agreement directly before the courts of the Union or of the Member States.

(5)The Agreement should be approved,