Considerations on COM(2018)605 - EU position in UNECE working parties on customs & transport and a convention on border crossing procedures for passengers and luggage carried in international traffic by rail

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

 
dossier COM(2018)605 - EU position in UNECE working parties on customs & transport and a convention on border crossing procedures for passengers ...
document COM(2018)605 EN
date September 28, 2018
 
table>(1)The Russian Federation has proposed a new UNECE Convention on the facilitation of border crossing procedures for passengers, luggage and load-luggage carried in international traffic by rail (‘the draft Convention’). The Organisation for Cooperation between Railways (OSJD) has supported the draft Convention.
(2)The Working Party on Customs Questions affecting Transport (WP.30) acts within the framework of the policies of UNECE and subject to the general supervision of the Inland Transport Committee (ITC). The role of the WP.30 is to initiate and pursue actions aimed at harmonisation and simplification of regulations, rules and documentation for border crossing procedures for the various modes of inland transport.

(3)The WP.30 will take a decision on the endorsement of the draft Convention and on its transmission to the ITC for formal approval.

(4)The Union is represented in the WP.30 and the ITC by the Member States of the Union. All Member States of the Union are members of the WP.30 and the ITC with a right to vote.

(5)The draft Convention contains general provisions on how to organise border controls of passenger trains. It can be seen as a basis for any multilateral and bilateral agreements in the absence of which none of the elements covered by the draft Convention could work.

(6)For the Member States of the Union, such multilateral and bilateral agreements can be concluded even without the draft Convention. For the Russian Federation and some other countries represented in the OSJD, the legal framework seems to necessitate such a convention in order to make it easier to conclude multilateral and bilateral agreements.

(7)The substance of the draft Convention appears to have neither beneficial nor adverse effects for the Member States of the Union. Therefore the Union should not support the draft Convention but has no reason to block its adoption.

(8)Even if it does not appear to be in the Union's interest to accede to the draft Convention, in accordance with its general policy on institutional aspects, any new international convention should contain a clause allowing for the participation of regional economic integration organisations. The draft Convention does not contain a clause which would allow the Union to accede to the Convention.

(9)Therefore, the Union position within the WP.30 and the ITC should be neutral if a clause allowing for the participation of regional economic integration organisations is inserted. In that case, the Member States of the Union should abstain. Otherwise the Member States of the Union should vote against the adoption of the draft Convention.

(10)In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the Position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application. Given that this Decision builds upon the Schengen acquis, Denmark shall, in accordance with Article 4 of that Protocol, decide within a period of six months after the Council has decided on this Decision whether it will implement it in its national law.

(11)This Decision constitutes a development of provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC (1); the United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.

(12)This Decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC (2); Ireland is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application.

(13)As regards Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus and Romania, the provisions of this Decision constitute provisions building upon, or otherwise relating to, the Schengen acquis, within, respectively, the meaning of Article 3(2) of the 2003 Act of Accession, Article 4(2) of the 2005 Act of Accession and Article 4(2) of the 2012 Act of Accession.

(14)It is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the Union's behalf within the WP.30 and the ITC as the draft Convention concerns elements on visa formalities that fall within the competence of the Union,