Since the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2021/241 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4), which established the Recovery and Resilience Facility (the ‘Facility’), unprecedented geopolitical events triggered by Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and their direct and indirect aggravation of the consequences of the COVID-19 crisis have considerably affected the Union’s society and economy, its people and its economic, social and territorial cohesion. In particular, it is clearer than ever that the Union’s energy security and energy independence are indispensable for a successful, sustainable and inclusive recovery from the COVID-19 crisis, as they are also major factors contributing to the resilience of the Union’s economy.
(2)
Due to the direct links between a sustainable recovery, building the Union’s resilience and energy security, reducing dependence on fossil fuels, in particular from Russia, and the Union's role in a just and inclusive transition, the Facility is an instrument well suited to contribute to the Union’s response to those emerging challenges. This is also the case in light of Union climate and environmental legislation and of the Union’s international commitments, and in particular the Paris Agreement adopted under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (5).
(3)
In the Versailles Declaration of 10 and 11 March 2022, the Heads of State and Government invited the Commission to propose by the end of May of the same year a REPowerEU plan to phase out the Union’s dependency on Russian fossil fuel imports, which invitation was reiterated in the European Council Conclusions of 24 and 25 March 2022. That goal should be achieved well before 2030 in a way that is consistent with the European Green Deal, set out in the communication of the Commission of 11 December 2019, and with the climate objectives for 2030 and 2050 enshrined in Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council (6).
(4)
The Facility’s ability to support reforms and investments dedicated to diversifying energy supplies, in particular fossil fuels, as well as to increase the resilience, security and sustainability of the Union’s energy system, thereby contributing to energy affordability and strengthening the strategic autonomy of the Union alongside an open economy, should be enhanced. To achieve those objectives, the Union needs to increase energy efficiency and the reliability and resilience of transmission and distribution networks, to promote system flexibility, to minimise congestions, including by means of increased grid and electricity storage capacity, to promote digitalisation, and to ensure resilient supply chains, cybersecurity and the protection and climate adaptation of all infrastructure, while reducing strategic energy dependencies.
(5)
To maximise complementarity, consistency and coherence of policies and actions taken by the Union and Member States to foster independence, security and sustainability of the Union’s energy supply, those energy-related reforms and investments should be established through a dedicated ‘REPowerEU chapter’ of the recovery and resilience plans.
(6)
The effective transition towards green energy and the rapid reduction in dependency on fossil fuel energy in an inclusive way call for measures to boost energy efficiency and savings in buildings and related critical energy infrastructure and decarbonise industries faster. It is imperative to increase rapidly investment in energy efficiency measures, such as the uptake of sustainable and efficient heating and cooling solutions, which present an effective means to address some of the most pressing challenges of energy supply and energy cost. Therefore, support should also be given to reforms and investments increasing energy efficiency, decarbonising industry – including by the use of low-carbon fuels, such as low-carbon hydrogen, and by the uptake of renewable hydrogen and other renewable fuels of non-biological origin – and increasing energy savings of the Member States’ economies, in line with the Union’s energy and climate targets and legal framework. The Commission should, in particular, encourage Member States to include in their REPowerEU chapters measures supporting the decarbonisation of industry.
(7)
The phasing out of the dependency on Russian fossil fuel imports is expected to lead to a reduction in the overall energy dependency of the Union. The REPowerEU chapters should contribute to increasing and strengthening the strategic autonomy of the Union without excessively increasing its dependency on imports of raw materials from third countries.
(8)
In the preparation of the recovery and resilience plans as well as of the REPowerEU chapters, Member States should coordinate their economic policies in such a way as to attain the objectives on economic, social and territorial cohesion set out in Article 174 of the Treaty, aiming to reduce disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardness of the least favoured regions, paying particular attention to remote, peripheral and isolated areas and islands, which already experience additional constraints.
(9)
To maximise the scope of the Union’s response, all Member States which submit a recovery and resilience plan after the entry into force of this Regulation, requesting the use of additional funding in the form of loans, or, in accordance with new rules to be established under this amending Regulation, from auctioning of allowances from the emissions trading system under Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (7) or from transfers from the Brexit Adjustment Reserve established by Regulation (EU) 2021/1755 of the European Parliament and of the Council (8), should be required to include a REPowerEU chapter in their recovery and resilience plan. In line with the existing possibility, under Regulation (EU) 2021/241, of submitting a draft recovery and resilience plan, and in order to ensure proper preparation of the REPowerEU chapters, Member States can submit a draft REPowerEU chapter before the submission of a modified recovery and resilience plan. Unnecessary administrative burden should be avoided.
(10)
REPowerEU chapters should include new reforms and investments, starting from 1 February 2022, contributing to the REPowerEU objectives and tackling the crisis caused by recent geopolitical events. However, measures included in the already adopted Council implementing decision that contribute to the REPowerEU objectives can be included in the REPowerEU chapter if, following the update of the maximum financial contribution, the Member State concerned is subject to a decrease of its maximum financial contribution. In that case, the Member State should be able to include such measures in its REPowerEU chapter up to an amount of estimated costs equal to the decrease in the maximum financial contribution.
(11)
A Member State should be able to include in its REPowerEU chapter the scaled-up part of measures included in the already adopted Council implementing decision, together with the corresponding milestones and targets. Such scale-up should introduce a substantive improvement in the level of ambition of the measures, as reflected in the design or level of the corresponding milestones and targets, while building on the measures included in the already adopted Council implementing decision.
(12)
A Member State should submit its REPowerEU chapter in the form of an addendum to its recovery and resilience plan. A REPowerEU chapter should contain an explanation of how the measures included therein are coherent with the efforts of the Member State concerned to achieve the REPowerEU objectives, taking into account the measures included in the already adopted Council implementing decision, as well as an explanation of the overall contribution of those measures and other nationally funded and Union-funded complementary or accompanying measures to the REPowerEU objectives.
(13)
REPowerEU chapters should inter alia contribute to increasing the share of sustainable and renewable energies in the energy mix and to addressing energy infrastructure bottlenecks. As regards natural gas infrastructure, the reforms and investments in the REPowerEU chapters to diversify supply away from Russia should build on the needs currently identified through the assessment conducted and agreed by the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Gas, established in the spirit of solidarity as regards security of supply, and take into account strategic energy security needs of the Member State concerned and the reinforced preparedness measures, including energy storage, taken to adapt to new geopolitical threats, without undermining the long-term contribution to the green transition.
(14)
An appropriate assessment criterion should be added to serve as a basis for the Commission to assess reforms and investments in the REPowerEU chapters and to ensure that those reforms and investments are fit to achieve the specific REPowerEU objectives. An A rating should be required under that new assessment criterion for the relevant recovery and resilience plan to be positively assessed by the Commission.
(15)
Investments in infrastructure and technologies alone are not sufficient to ensure a reduction in dependency on fossil fuels in view of existing labour and skill shortages. In that context, it is already possible to dedicate resources to the reskilling and upskilling of people, to further equipping the workforce with green skills as well as to the research and the development of innovative solutions linked to the green transition. Member States are encouraged to further invest in reskilling and upskilling, especially for green and related digital skills and technologies, to ensure that no one will be left behind throughout the green transition. Where a Member State includes in its REPowerEU chapter measures related to reskilling and upskilling of people, the Commission should consider whether such measures significantly contribute to supporting a requalification of the workforce towards green and related digital skills.
(16)
In light of the economic and social impact of the current energy crisis, where persistently high and volatile energy prices are aggravating the impact of the COVID-19 crisis by further increasing the financial burden for consumers, in particular for the most vulnerable, including households with low income, and for vulnerable companies including micro-, small and medium enterprises, and in recognition of the principles of the European Pillar of Social Rights, it should be possible to include, in the REPowerEU chapters, measures to help structurally address situations of energy poverty, through long-lasting reforms and investments. Reforms and investments that aim to tackle energy poverty should provide a higher level of financial support to energy efficiency schemes, including via dedicated financial instruments, clean energy policies and schemes to reduce energy demand for those households and companies including micro-, small and medium enterprises facing severe difficulties due to high energy bills.
(17)
Energy-demand reduction measures taken by Member States should incentivise investments in energy savings.
(18)
The application of a new regime on REPowerEU chapters should be without prejudice to all other legal requirements under Regulation (EU) 2021/241, unless otherwise provided.
(19)
The recovery and resilience plan, including the REPowerEU chapter, should contribute effectively to addressing all or a significant subset of the challenges identified in the relevant country-specific recommendations, including the country-specific recommendations adopted under the 2022 European Semester cycle which refer inter alia to the energy challenges that Member States are facing.
(20)
An effective transition to green energy and a reduction in energy dependency involves significant digital investments. In light of Regulation (EU) 2021/241, Member States should provide an explanation of how the measures in the recovery and resilience plan, including those in the REPowerEU chapter, are expected to contribute to the digital transition and to addressing the resulting challenges and whether they account for an amount contributing to the digital target based on the methodology for digital tagging. However, given the unprecedented urgency and importance of energy challenges faced by the Union, reforms and investments in the REPowerEU chapter should not be taken into account when calculating the plan’s total allocation for the purpose of applying the digital target requirement set by Regulation (EU) 2021/241. Nevertheless, Member States should endeavour to include in the REPowerEU chapters, to the maximum extent possible, measures that contribute to the digital target based on the methodology for digital tagging.
(21)
Lengthy administrative procedures are some of the main obstacles to the deployment of renewable energy. Those barriers include the complexity of the applicable rules for site selection and administrative authorisations for projects, the complexity and duration of the assessment of the environmental impact of the projects, grid connection issues, and staffing constraints of the permit-granting authorities or grid operators. Further simplification and speeding up of the administrative permit-granting processes for renewables and related power grid infrastructure is necessary to ensure that the Union achieves its energy and climate targets. Recommendations were made to Member States in the context of the 2022 European Semester to accelerate the deployment of renewable energy. As announced in the communication of the Commission of 18 May 2022 entitled ‘REPowerEU Plan’, the Commission has proposed to amend Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (9) on energy from renewable sources, aiming to establish a faster permit-granting process for renewables. In addition, Council Regulation (EU) 2022/2577 (10), which lays down a framework to accelerate the deployment of renewable energy, has introduced temporary emergency rules.
(22)
Pursuant to Article 18(4), point (q), of Regulation (EU) 2021/241, the Member States should provide a summary of the consultation process, conducted in accordance with national legal frameworks, of local and regional authorities, social partners and other relevant stakeholders concerned with the implementation of their recovery and resilience plans. That consultation should be complemented to address reforms and investments to be included in a potential REPowerEU chapter, in a way that allows stakeholders sufficient time to react while ensuring a speedy finalisation of the REPowerEU chapter by the Member State concerned. The updated summary should set out the stakeholders consulted, explain the outcome of the complementary consultation and outline how the input received from the stakeholders was reflected in the REPowerEU chapters.
(23)
The application of the principle of ‘do no significant harm’ within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council (11) (the principle of ‘do no significant harm’) is essential to ensure that the reforms and investments undertaken as part of the recovery from the COVID-19 crisis are implemented in a sustainable manner. It should continue to apply to the reforms and investments supported by the Facility, with one targeted exemption to safeguard the Union’s immediate energy security concerns. Considering the objective of diversifying energy supplies away from Russian suppliers, the reforms and investments set out in the REPowerEU chapters which are necessary to improve energy infrastructure and facilities to meet immediate security of supply needs for gas should be eligible for financial support under the Facility even if they do not comply with the principle of ‘do no significant harm’. As a rule, oil infrastructure and facilities are excluded from the REPowerEU chapter. By derogation, a Member State that has been subject to the exceptional temporary derogation in Article 3m(4) of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 (12) until the entry into force of this amending Regulation, due to its specific dependence on crude oil and geographical situation, should be able to include in the REPowerEU chapter oil infrastructure and facilities necessary to meet immediate security of supply needs.
The Commission should assess whether measures expected to address immediate security of energy supply needs are eligible for the derogation from the principle of ‘do no significant harm’. For the purpose of that assessment, the Commission should consider, among other conditions, the risk of lock-in effects and the unavailability of cleaner, technologically and economically feasible alternatives that could be deployed within a comparable timeline. Such assessment should be proportionate, taking into account the urgency of achieving the REPowerEU objectives. In case of doubts, the Commission should be able to request Member States to provide relevant information to support the assessment. The evaluation of cleaner alternatives should be performed within reasonable limits.
(24)
All measures in the recovery and resilience plans should be undertaken in compliance with the applicable Union and national environmental acquis, in particular relating to environmental impact assessment and nature protection. For measures benefitting from the derogation from the principle of ‘do no significant harm’, Member States should undertake satisfactory efforts to limit the potential harm to environmental objectives within the meaning of Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, where feasible, and to mitigate the harm through other measures, including measures in the REPowerEU chapters.
(25)
The REPowerEU chapters should be consistent with the national energy and climate plans of Member States and with the Union climate targets set out in Regulation (EU) 2021/1119.
(26)
Reflecting the European Green Deal as Europe’s sustainable growth strategy and the importance of tackling climate change in line with the Union’s commitments to implement the Paris Agreement and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, the Facility is to contribute to the mainstreaming of climate action and environmental sustainability and to the achievement of an overall target of 30 % of Union budget expenditure supporting climate objectives. To that end, the measures supported by the Facility and included in recovery and resilience plans of Member States should contribute to the green transition, including biodiversity, or to addressing the challenges resulting therefrom, and should account for an amount that represents at least 37 % of the recovery and resilience plan’s total allocation and for at least 37 % of the total estimated costs of the measures in the REPowerEU chapter based on the methodology for climate tracking set out in Annex VI to Regulation (EU) 2021/241. That methodology should be used accordingly for measures that cannot be directly assigned to an intervention field listed in that Annex. If the Member State concerned and the Commission agree, it should be possible to increase the coefficients for support for the climate objectives to 40 % or 100 % for individual investments, as explained in the recovery and resilience plan, to take account of accompanying reform measures that credibly increase their impact on the climate objectives. To that end, it should be possible to increase the coefficients for support for the climate objectives up to a total amount of 3 % of the allocation of the recovery and resilience plan for individual investments. The Facility should support activities that fully respect the climate and environmental standards and priorities of the Union and the principle of ‘do no significant harm’.
(27)
Member States should, where relevant, include in REPowerEU chapters measures having a cross-border or multi-country dimension or effect, as identified in the Commission’s most recent needs assessment, contributing, among other things, to generating European added value. It should also be taken into account that measures carried out in one Member State could have spill-over effects in other Member States. The Commission should facilitate co-operation between Member States as early as possible with a view to developing measures having a cross-border or multi-country dimension or effect to be included in the REPowerEU chapters. Member States should strive to ensure those measures account for an amount that represents at least 30 % of the estimated costs of the measures in the REPowerEU chapter. In addition to measures having a cross-border or multi-country dimension or effect, measures at national level that contribute to securing energy supply in the Union as a whole, in line with the REPowerEU objectives, in particular as regards addressing existing bottlenecks in terms of energy transmission, distribution and storage, as identified in the Commission’s most recent needs assessment, thereby increasing the potential for cross-border flows between Member States, should be considered as having a cross-border or multi-country dimension or effect. Measures reducing dependency on fossil fuels and reducing energy demand should also be considered as having a positive cross-border effect as they free up further capacity or supply for other Member States.
(28)
An appropriate assessment criterion should be added to serve as a basis for the Commission to assess the cross-border or multi-country dimension or effect of the reforms and investments in the REPowerEU chapters.
(29)
Further incentives should be provided for Member States to request loan support to ensure the uptake of the available funds by Member States while complying with the principles of equal treatment, solidarity, proportionality and transparency. To that end, Member States should communicate as clearly as possible to the Commission, at the latest 30 days after the entry into force of this Regulation, whether they intend to submit a request for loan support. The Commission should present to the European Parliament and the Council, simultaneously, on equal terms and without undue delay, an overview of the intentions expressed by the Member States and the proposed way forward for the distribution of the available resources. The communication of an intention should not prejudice the ability of Member States to request loan support until 31 August 2023 in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EU) 2021/241, including in the case of requests exceeding 6,8 % of their gross national income (GNI) where the relevant conditions apply. It should also not prejudice the entering into of the corresponding loan agreement by the Commission after the adoption of the relevant Council implementing decision.
(30)
Member States are encouraged to submit the REPowerEU chapters as soon as possible and preferably by two months of the entry into force of this amending Regulation. In line with Article 19(1) of Regulation (EU) 2021/241, the Commission should assess the modified recovery and resilience plan submitted by the Member State within two months and make a proposal for a Council implementing decision. Given the urgency of the challenges that the Member States are facing, the Commission should strive to conclude the assessment of the modified recovery and resilience plans without undue delay.
(31)
In addition, to incentivise a high level of ambition for reforms and investments to be included in the REPowerEU chapter, new dedicated funding sources should be provided.
(32)
Council Regulation (EU) 2022/1854 (13) introduces a temporary solidarity contribution for Union companies and permanent establishments with activities in the crude petroleum, natural gas, coal and refinery sectors applicable in all Member States. Member States are invited to use a proportion of the proceeds generated by that temporary contribution to foster synergies and complementarities with the reforms and investments in their REPowerEU chapters in a coherent manner, for the funding of measures to be implemented at national level in accordance with the REPowerEU objectives.
(33)
The current economic and geopolitical situation requires the Union to mobilise available resources to rapidly diversify the Union’s energy supply and reduce dependence on fossil fuels before 2030. In that context, Directive 2003/87/EC should allow for an exceptional monetisation by auctioning of a portion of allowances from the innovation fund and of allowances allocated to Member States, except allowances distributed for the purposes of solidarity, growth and interconnections, and should direct revenues towards reforms and investments contributing to the REPowerEU objectives, in the Facility framework. The auctioning of allowances from the innovation fund and of allowances allocated to Member States should also be frontloaded. A portion of allowances from the market stability reserve that would otherwise be invalidated should be used to replenish the innovation fund.
(34)
In the context of the Union emergency intervention to address high energy prices resulting from the impact of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, targeted exceptional temporary measures under the 2014-2020 cohesion policy framework set out in Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (14), through a flexible use of resources from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund (ESF), and the Cohesion Fund, should help small and medium enterprises (SMEs) particularly affected by energy price increases, as well as vulnerable households, cover energy costs incurred and paid as from 1 February 2022. Such support is fully in line with the REPowerEU objectives.
(35)
In particular, the ERDF should exceptionally be used to provide working capital support to SMEs particularly affected by energy price increases. Support to SMEs particularly affected by energy price increases should be proportionate and respect applicable State aid rules. Moreover, the ESF should exceptionally be used to provide support to vulnerable households, as defined in national rules, to help them meet their energy consumption costs even in the absence of measures increasing the employability of the people supported, i.e., active measures. Those are exceptional measures strictly necessary to address the energy crisis resulting from the impact of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. They ensure that people supported have access to essential services, thereby also contributing to the conditions conducive to good health necessary to participate in the labour market. Support may be provided by the ERDF, the ESF and the Cohesion Fund interchangeably. Furthermore, in addition to the ESF, it should be possible to use the ERDF and the Cohesion Fund to support job retention measures through short-time work and equivalent schemes, including support to the self-employed. Such schemes aim to protect employees and the self-employed against the risk of unemployment. The resources allocated to such schemes are to be used exclusively to support workers and self-employed. Union support to such short-time work and equivalent schemes should be limited in time. It should also be possible to use REACT-EU resources set out in Article 92a of Regulation (EU) No 1303/2013 for those three types of support in order to reinforce the ongoing efforts of Member States towards the resilient recovery of their economies following the COVID-19 crisis.
(36)
Specific programming arrangements should allow resources to be exclusively programmed within dedicated priority axes and contribute to specific investment priorities. In order to offer significant support to Member States in their efforts to contain the fall-out of the energy crisis, Member States should exceptionally benefit from a co-financing rate of 100 % to be applied to the dedicated priority axes of operational programmes providing exclusively such support until the end of the 2014-2020 programming period. Those limited and targeted measures should complement the structural interventions in the cohesion policy supporting the production of clean energy and promotion of energy efficiency. In order to take account of Union budgetary constraints, payments by the Commission to such operations under the dedicated priorities should be capped at EUR 5 000 000 000 in 2023.
(37)
In order to provide Member States and regions with sufficient flexibility in addressing the newly emerging challenges, Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council (15) should provide Member States with the possibility to request up to 7,5 % of resources under the ERDF, the European Social Fund Plus and the Cohesion Fund to contribute to the REPowerEU objectives. It should be possible that those Funds provide support to the REPowerEU objectives where such support falls within the scope of the Fund concerned, contributes to its specific objectives and complies with the rules set out in Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 and the relevant Fund-specific Regulation, including the principle of ‘do no significant harm’.
(38)
Member States should have the possibility to transfer all or part of their provisional allocation from the resources of the Brexit Adjustment Reserve to the Facility. The COVID-19 crisis, aggravated by the threat to the Union’s energy security, has exacerbated the negative repercussions of the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union in Member States, including their regions and local communities, and sectors, in particular in those that are most adversely affected by that withdrawal. The measures to be funded under the Brexit Adjustment Reserve and the reforms and investments to be funded under the Facility can serve similar purposes and have similar content. Both the Brexit Adjustment Reserve and the Facility aim ultimately at mitigating the negative impacts on economic, social and territorial cohesion. In that context, whilst reforms and investments under the Facility primarily aim to address the economic consequences of the pandemic, they can also contribute to countering unforeseen and adverse consequences in the Member States and sectors that are worst affected by Brexit. Finally, commitments and payment appropriations under both the Brexit Adjustment Reserve and the Facility are entered over and above the ceilings of the multiannual financial framework. Under that scenario, and bearing in mind the global energy market disruption caused by the more recent geopolitical developments, it is appropriate to provide flexibility to Member States by allowing transfers from the Brexit Adjustment Reserve to the Facility, which will permit catering for the objectives of both, and ultimately to bring about economic, social and territorial cohesion.
(39)
Disbursements of additional funding to Member States which include a REPowerEU chapter in their recovery and resilience plan should be made following the rules of the Facility until the end of 2026.
(40)
A request, submitted in a recovery and resilience plan, for dedicated funding, including an allocation from the auctioning of allowances of the emissions trading system under Directive 2003/87/EC, transfers of resources from the ERDF, the European Social Fund Plus or the Cohesion Fund governed by Article 26 of Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 and transfers of resources from the Brexit Adjustment Reserve, for measures contained in a REPowerEU chapter should reflect a higher financial need linked to reforms and investments included in that chapter.
(41)
To ensure that financial support is frontloaded to better respond to the current energy crisis, it should be possible that, upon request of a Member State to be submitted together with the REPowerEU chapter in a modified recovery and resilience plan, an amount of the additional funding required to finance measures of the REPowerEU chapter be paid in the form of two pre-financing payments.
The Commission should make, to the extent possible, the first pre-financing payment within two months of it entering into the legal commitment for the purposes of Regulation (EU) 2021/241, and the second pre-financing payment within 12 months of the entry into force of the Council implementing decision approving the assessment of the recovery and resilience plan including a REPowerEU chapter. Those payments should be subject to available resources, in particular the availability of funds from the NextGenerationEU account, of funds approved in the Union annual budget and of the revenue obtained from the auctioning of allowances of the emissions trading system under Directive 2003/87/EC, and to the effective prior transfer of resources under shared management programmes, if requested.
(42)
In order to comply with the payment ceilings of the multiannual financial framework, a cap should be established for payments corresponding to the pre-financing for amounts transferred under Regulation (EU) 2021/1060.
(43)
The Commission should monitor the implementation of the reforms and investments outlined in the REPowerEU chapter and their contribution to the REPowerEU objectives and provide information in relation thereto in particular through exchanges during the recovery and resilience dialogue, through reporting in the recovery and resilience scoreboard, and through a dedicated section in the annual report to be submitted to the European Parliament and to the Council.
(44)
Recent geopolitical events have considerably affected prices of energy, food and construction materials and have also caused shortages in the global supply chains, resulted in increased inflation and generated new challenges, including a risk of energy poverty and higher costs of living. A response to those challenges might be required. It could be that those developments have a direct impact on the capacity to implement the measures in recovery and resilience plans. To the extent that Member States can demonstrate that such developments make a specific milestone or target no longer achievable, either totally or partially, such situations could be invoked as objective circumstances under Regulation (EU) 2021/241. Moreover, to the extent that Member States can demonstrate that the achievement of a specific milestone or target conflicts with the achievement of the REPowerEU objectives, such situations could also be invoked as objective circumstances under that Regulation. In addition, no request for amendments should undermine the overall implementation of recovery and resilience plans, including the reform and investment efforts of the Member States.
(45)
Regulations (EU) 2021/241, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) 2021/1060 and (EU) 2021/1755, and Directive 2003/87/EC should therefore be amended accordingly.
(46)
In order to allow for the prompt application of the measures provided for in this Regulation, it should enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union,
