Considerations on COM(2022)713 - Proposal for extension of the period of entitlement for audiovisual co-productions as in Article 5 Protocol on Cultural Cooperation to the Free Trade Agreement with Korea - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
| dossier | COM(2022)713 - Proposal for extension of the period of entitlement for audiovisual co-productions as in Article 5 Protocol on Cultural ... |
|---|---|
| document | COM(2022)713  |
| date | February 21, 2023 |
| (2) | The Protocol on Cultural Cooperation (2) (the ‘Protocol’) annexed to the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part (3) (the ‘Free Trade Agreement’), sets up the framework within which the Parties are to cooperate for the facilitation of exchanges regarding cultural activities, goods and services, including in the audiovisual sector. |
| (3) | The Protocol exceptionally includes provisions on the entitlement for audiovisual co-productions to benefit from the respective schemes that is in principle reserved for developing countries with developing audiovisual industries. |
| (4) | Pursuant to those provisions of the Protocol, following the initial period of 3 years, that period of entitlement is to be renewed for further successive periods of the same duration, unless a Party terminates the entitlement by giving notice in writing at least 3 months before the expiry of the initial or any subsequent period. In accordance with those provisions, the period of entitlement was last extended until 30 June 2023, no Party having terminated it. The actual effects of the Protocol in relation to audiovisual co-productions are to be assessed in due time by the Committee on Cultural Cooperation (the ‘Committee’) and to serve as the basis for the Union’s decision on whether or not to extend the period of entitlement for a further period of 3 years until 2023. |
| (5) | In accordance with Decision (EU) 2015/2169, the Commission is to provide notice to the Republic of Korea of the Union’s intention not to extend the period of entitlement to co-production, following the procedure set out in the Protocol unless, on a proposal from the Commission, the Council agrees 4 months before the end of such period of entitlement to continue the entitlement. If the Council agrees to continue the entitlement, that procedure is to become applicable again at the end of the renewed period of entitlement. |
| (6) | On 17 October 2019, the Union Domestic Advisory Group provided for in the Protocol was consulted on the extension of the period of entitlement, as provided for in the provisions on the entitlement for audiovisual co-productions of the Protocol. |
| (7) | In view of the close, historical and unique relationship between the Union and the Republic of Korea, the Council agreed with the extension of the period of entitlement for audiovisual co-productions to benefit from the respective schemes of the Parties for the promotion of local/regional cultural content as provided for in the Protocol. |
| (8) | Council Decision (EU) 2020/470 (4) therefore extended the period of entitlement for audiovisual co-productions for a duration of 3 years, from 1 July 2020 to 30 June 2023. However, by means of a judgment of 1 March 2022 in the case Commission v Council (5), the Court of Justice annulled Decision (EU) 2020/470. In its judgment, the Court also maintained the effects of that Decision until the grounds for annulment established have been remedied. |
| (9) | On 28 November 2022, the Council adopted Decision (EU) 2022/2335 (6), which amended Decision (EU) 2015/2169 in conformity with that judgment. |
| (10) | In order to remove any doubt as to the commitment of the Union regarding the extension of the period of the entitlement for a duration of 3 years, from 1 July 2020 to 30 June 2023, and thus to ensure the proper implementation of the Protocol, a new decision should be adopted on the basis of Decision (EU) 2015/2169, and apply as of 1 July 2020, in conformity with that judgment. |
| (11) | This Decision should not affect the respective competences of the Union and the Member States. In particular, it should not affect the competence of Member States to conclude co-production agreements, |