Considerations on COM(2024)218 - - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
| dossier | COM(2024)218 - . |
|---|---|
| document | COM(2024)218 |
| date | May 30, 2024 |
(2) In accordance with Article 66(1) of the Convention, the Group of Experts on Action against Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (‘GREVIO’) has been tasked with monitoring the implementation of the Convention by its Parties. Pursuant to Article 68(11) of the Convention, GREVIO is to adopt its reports and conclusions concerning the measures taken by the Party concerned to implement the provisions of the Convention.
(3) The Committee of the Parties to the Convention may adopt recommendations addressed to the Party concerned, in accordance with Article 68(12) of the Convention. The recommendations are based on the GREVIO reports and differentiate between those measures which the Committee of the Parties considers the Party concerned should take as soon as possible, with a requirement to report back to the Committee of the Parties on steps taken in this regard within a 3-year period, and those measures which, while important, the Committee of the Parties considers could be left at a secondary level of immediacy. At the end of the 3-year period, the Party must report back to the Committee of the Parties on the actions taken, within 10 specific areas of the Convention. On the basis of this information, and any additional information obtained from non-governmental organisations, civil-society and national institutions for the protection of human rights, the Committee of the Parties is to adopt conclusions on the implementation of the recommendations, prepared by the Secretariat of the Committee.
(4) The Committee of the Parties, during its 16th meeting on 31 May 2024, is expected to adopt the following draft recommendation and four draft conclusions, concerning five State Parties’ implementation of the Convention (‘the draft recommendation and conclusions’):
- Recommendation on the implementation of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence by Liechtenstein [IC-CP(2024)1-prov];
- Conclusions on the implementation of recommendations in respect of Andorra adopted by the Committee of the Parties [IC-CP(2024)2-prov];
- Conclusions on the implementation of recommendations in respect of Belgium adopted by the Committee of the Parties [IC-CP(2024)3-prov];
- Conclusions on the implementation of recommendations in respect of Malta adopted by the Committee of the Parties [IC-CP(2024)4-prov]; and
- Conclusions on the implementation of recommendations in respect of Spain adopted by the Committee of the Parties [IC-CP(2024)5-prov].
(5) The Union has exclusive competence to accept obligations set out in the Convention with regard to its own institutions and public administration, within the scope of Article 336 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. In its Opinion 1/19 (Istanbul Convention) of 6 October 2021, EU:C:2021:832, paragraph 305, the Court of Justice has confirmed that a significant part of the obligations of the Convention relating to the adoption of preventive and protection measures are, in essence, binding on the Union as regards the staff in its administration and as regards the members of the public visiting the premises and buildings of its institutions, agencies and bodies. Moreover, in paragraph 307 of the same Opinion, the Court held that the Union should not confine itself to establishing minimum requirements or supporting measures, but should itself ensure that these obligations are fully satisfied.
(6) The draft recommendation and conclusions concern the implementation of provisions of the Convention which also apply to the Union with regard to its own institutions and public administration. It is therefore appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the Union’s behalf in the Committee of the Parties with regard to matters related to institutions and public administration of the Union, as the envisaged acts are capable of decisively influencing the content of Union law in that they may affect the interpretation of relevant provisions of the Convention in the future.
(7) As regards Liechtenstein, the draft recommendation on its implementation of the Convention include the need to develop a comprehensive strategy or action plan for preventing and combating all forms of violence covered by the Convention (Article 7 of the Convention), to ensure gender budgeting and earmarked funding to identify sums spent on addressing violence against women and domestic violence by all relevant institutions (Article 8 of the Convention), to allocate human and financial resources to coordinating bodies (Article 10 of the Convention), to conduct population-based surveys on all forms of violence covered by the Convention and to promote research on the situation of women victims (Article 11 of the Convention), to ensure a free, dedicated state-wide telephone helpline (Article 24 of the Convention) and to make use of police barring orders to ensure victim protection (Article 52 of the Convention). As the recommendations on these matters are in line with the Union’s policies and objectives and do not raise any concerns with respect to Union law, the position of the Union should be to not object to the adoption of the recommendation addressed to Liechtenstein.
(8) As regards Andorra, the draft conclusions on its implementation of the Convention include the need to ensure that relevant stakeholders receive sufficient human and financial resources (Article 8 and Article 25 of the Convention), to ensure a coordinated and cross-cutting approach to preventing and combating violence against women (Article 7 of the Convention), to promote regular research activities on the situation of all forms of violence covered by the scope of the Convention (Article 11 of the Convention) and to ensure that victims have access to emergency barring orders in line with the Convention (Article 52 of the Convention). As the conclusions on these matters are in line with the Union’s policies and objectives and do not raise any concerns with respect to Union law, the position of the Union should be to not object to the adoption of the conclusions addressed to Andorra.
(9) As regards Belgium, the draft conclusions on its implementation of the Convention include the need to ensure data collection on violence against women (Article 11 of the Convention) and to ensure that specialist support services receive funding in a manner that ensures their continued services (Article 8 and 25 of the Convention). As the conclusions on these matters are in line with the Union’s policies and objectives, and do not raise any concerns with respect to Union law, the position of the Union should be to not object to the adoption of the conclusions addressed to Belgium.
(10) As regards Malta, the draft conclusions on its implementation of the Convention include the need to strengthen co-operation with non-governmental actors, including those providing specialist support services, and to ensure their effective participation in the design of relevant policies (Article 7 of the Convention), to ensure the comprehensive collection of data in relation to all forms of violence covered by the Convention (Article 11 of the Convention), and to ensure that the legislation is in line with the Convention as regards emergency barring orders and protection orders (Article 52 and Article 53 of the Convention). As the conclusions on these matters are in line with the Union’s policies and objectives and do not raise any concerns with respect to Union law, the position of the Union should be to not object to the adoption of the conclusion addressed to Malta.
(11) As regards Spain, the draft conclusions on its implementation of the Convention include the need to harmonise the level of support and protection of women victims throughout the country and to evaluate the implementation of relevant measures (Article 10 and Article 25 of the Convention). As the conclusions on these matters are in line with the Union’s policies and objectives and do not raise any concerns with respect to Union law, the position of the Union should be to not object to the adoption of the conclusions addressed to Spain.