Annexes to COM(2005)457 - Placing on the market of pyrotechnic articles - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
dossier | COM(2005)457 - Placing on the market of pyrotechnic articles. |
---|---|
document | COM(2005)457 |
date | May 23, 2007 |
Essential safety requirements
(1) | Each pyrotechnic article must attain the performance characteristics specified by the manufacturer to the notified body in order to ensure maximum safety and reliability. |
(2) | Each pyrotechnic article must be designed and manufactured in such a way that it can be disposed of safely by a suitable process with minimum effect on the environment. |
(3) | Each pyrotechnic article must function correctly when used for its intended purpose. Each pyrotechnic article must be tested under realistic conditions. If this is not possible in a laboratory, the tests must be carried out in the conditions in which the pyrotechnic article is to be used. The following information and properties — where applicable — must be considered or tested:
During transportation and normal handling, unless specified by the manufacturer's instructions, the pyrotechnic articles should contain the pyrotechnic composition. |
(4) | Pyrotechnic articles must not contain:
|
(5) | The various groups of pyrotechnic articles must at least also comply with the following requirements: A. Fireworks
B. Other pyrotechnic articles
C. Ignition devices
|
ANNEX II
Conformity assessment procedures
1. MODULE B: EC type-examination
1. | This module describes that part of the procedure by which a notified body ascertains and attests that a sample, representative of the production envisaged, meets the relevant provisions of Directive 2007/23/EC (hereinafter referred to as this Directive). |
2. | The application for EC type-examination must be lodged by the manufacturer with the notified body of his choice. The application must include:
The applicant must place at the disposal of the notified body a sample representative of the production envisaged, hereinafter called ‘type’. The notified body may request further samples if needed for carrying out the test programme. |
3. | The technical documents must enable the conformity of the article with the requirements of this Directive to be assessed. They must, as far as is relevant for such assessment, cover the design, manufacture and operation of the article and contain where relevant for the assessment:
|
4. | The notified body must:
|
5. | Where the type meets the relevant provisions of this Directive, the notified body must issue an EC type-examination certificate to the applicant. The certificate must contain the name and address of the manufacturer, the results of the examination and the data necessary for the identification of the approved type. A list of the relevant parts of the technical documents must be annexed to the certificate and a copy thereof kept by the notified body. Where the manufacturer is refused a type certificate, the notified body must provide detailed reasons for such refusal. Provision must be made for an appeals procedure. |
6. | The applicant must inform the notified body that holds the technical documents concerning the EC type-examination certificate of all modifications to the approved article which must receive additional approval where such changes may affect the conformity with the essential requirements or the prescribed conditions for use of the article. This additional approval must be given in the form of an addition to the original EC type-examination certificate. |
7. | Each notified body must communicate to the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning EC type-examination certificates and additions issued or withdrawn. |
8. | The other notified bodies may receive copies of the EC type-examination certificates and/or any additions thereto. The annexes to the certificates must be kept at the disposal of the other notified bodies. |
9. | The manufacturer must keep with the technical documents copies of EC type-examination certificates and any additions thereto for a period of at least 10 years after the last date of manufacture of the article concerned. Where the manufacturer is not established within the Community, the obligation to keep the technical documents available is the responsibility of the person who places the product on the market. |
2. MODULE C: Conformity to type
1. | This module describes that part of the procedure whereby the manufacturer ensures and declares that the pyrotechnic articles concerned are in conformity with the type as described in the EC type-examination certificate and satisfy the requirements of this Directive that apply to them. The manufacturer must affix the CE marking to each pyrotechnic article and draw up a written declaration of conformity. |
2. | The manufacturer must take all measures necessary to ensure that the manufacturing process ensures the conformity of the manufactured product with the type as described in the EC type-examination certificate and with the essential safety requirements of this Directive. |
3. | The manufacturer must keep a copy of the declaration of conformity for a period of at least 10 years after the last date of manufacture of the article concerned. Where the manufacturer is not established within the Community, the obligation to keep the technical documents available is the responsibility of the person who places the product on the market. |
4. | A notified body chosen by the manufacturer must perform or cause to be performed examinations of the article at random intervals. A suitable sample of the finished articles, taken on the spot by the notified body, must be examined and appropriate tests, defined in the applicable harmonised standard referred to in Article 8 of this Directive or equivalent, carried out to check the conformity of the article with the requirements of this Directive. In the event of one or more samples of the articles examined not conforming, the notified body must take appropriate measures. Under the responsibility of the notified body the manufacturer must affix the identification number of that body during the manufacturing process. |
3. MODULE D: Production quality assurance
1. | This module describes the procedure whereby a manufacturer who satisfies the obligations set out in point 2 ensures and declares that the pyrotechnic articles concerned are in conformity with the type as described in the EC type-examination certificate and satisfy the requirements of this Directive. The manufacturer must affix the CE marking to each article and draw up a written declaration of conformity. The CE marking must be accompanied by the identification number of the notified body responsible for the monitoring referred to in point 4. |
2. | The manufacturer must operate an approved quality system for production, final product inspection and testing as specified in point 3. He must be subject to the monitoring referred to in point 4. |
3. Quality system
3.1. | The manufacturer must lodge an application for assessment of his quality system with the notified body of his choice in relation to the pyrotechnic articles concerned. The application must include:
|
3.2. | The quality system must ensure the conformity of pyrotechnic articles with the type as described in the EC type-examination certificate and with the requirements of this Directive that apply to them. All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the manufacturer must be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies, procedures and instructions. The quality system documents must permit a consistent interpretation of the quality programmes, plans, manuals and quality records. They must contain in particular an adequate description of:
|
3.3. | The notified body must assess the quality system to determine whether it satisfies the requirements referred to in point 3.2. It must presume conformity with those requirements in respect of quality systems that implement the relevant harmonised standard. The auditing team must have at least one member with experience of assessing the relevant product technology. The assessment procedure must include an inspection visit to the manufacturer's premises. A duly substantiated assessment decision must be notified to the manufacturer. It must contain the results of the examination. |
3.4. | The manufacturer must undertake to fulfil the obligations arising out of the quality system as approved and maintain it at an adequate and efficient level. The manufacturer must keep the notified body that has approved the quality system informed of any proposed change to the quality system. The notified body must assess the changes proposed and decide whether the altered quality system will still satisfy the requirements referred to in point 3.2 or whether reassessment is required. A duly substantiated assessment decision must be notified to the manufacturer. It must contain the results of the examination. |
4. Monitoring under the responsibility of the notified body
4.1. | The purpose of monitoring is to make sure that the manufacturer duly fulfils the obligations arising out of the approved quality system. |
4.2. | The manufacturer must allow the notified body access for inspection purposes to the manufacturing, inspection, testing and storage premises and provide it with all necessary information, in particular:
|
4.3. | The notified body must periodically carry out audits to make sure that the manufacturer maintains and applies the quality system and provide an audit report to the manufacturer. |
4.4. | Additionally the notified body may pay unannounced visits to the manufacturer. During such visits the notified body may, if necessary, carry out tests or have them carried out to verify that the quality system is functioning correctly. The notified body must provide the manufacturer with a visit report and, if a test has taken place, with a test report. |
5. | The manufacturer must, for a period of at least 10 years after the last date of manufacture of the article, keep at the disposal of the national authorities:
|
6. | Each notified body must give the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning quality system approvals issued or withdrawn. |
4. MODULE E: Product quality assurance
1. | This module describes the procedure whereby a manufacturer who satisfies the obligations set out in point 2 ensures and declares that the pyrotechnic articles are in conformity with the type as described in the EC type-examination certificate. The manufacturer must affix the CE marking to each article and draw up a written declaration of conformity. The CE marking must be accompanied by the identification number of the notified body responsible for the monitoring referred to in point 4. |
2. | The manufacturer must operate an approved quality system for final pyrotechnic article inspection and testing as specified in point 3. He must be subject to the monitoring referred to in point 4. |
3. Quality system
3.1. | The manufacturer must lodge an application with the notified body of his choice for the assessment of the quality system in relation to his pyrotechnic articles. The application must include:
|
3.2. | Under the quality system, each pyrotechnic article must be examined and appropriate tests, as defined in the relevant harmonised standard(s) referred to in Article 8 of this Directive or equivalent, carried out in order to verify the conformity of the article with the relevant requirements of this Directive. All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the manufacturer must be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies, procedures and instructions. The quality system documents must permit a consistent interpretation of the quality programmes, plans, manuals and quality records. They must in particular contain an adequate description of:
|
3.3. | The notified body must assess the quality system to determine whether it satisfies the requirements referred to in point 3.2. It must presume conformity with these requirements in respect of quality systems that implement the relevant harmonised standard. The auditing team must have at least one member with experience of assessing the relevant product technology. The assessment procedure must include an inspection visit to the manufacturer's premises. A duly substantiated assessment decision must be notified to the manufacturer. It must contain the results of the examination. |
3.4. | The manufacturer must undertake to fulfil the obligations arising out of the quality system as approved and maintain it at an adequate and efficient level. The manufacturer must keep the notified body which has approved the quality system informed of any proposed change to the quality system. The notified body must assess the changes proposed and decide whether the altered quality system will still satisfy the requirements referred to in point 3.2 or whether a reassessment is required. A duly substantiated assessment decision must be notified to the manufacturer. It must contain the results of the examination. |
4. Monitoring under the responsibility of the notified body
4.1. | The purpose of monitoring is to make sure that the manufacturer duly fulfils the obligations arising out of the approved quality system. |
4.2. | The manufacturer must allow the notified body access for inspection purposes to the manufacturing, inspection, testing and storage premises and provide it with all necessary information, in particular:
|
4.3. | The notified body must periodically carry out audits to ensure that the manufacturer maintains and applies the quality system and must provide an audit report to the manufacturer. |
4.4. | Additionally, the notified body may pay unannounced visits to the manufacturer. During such visits the notified body may, if necessary, carry out tests or have them carried out to verify that the quality system is functioning correctly. The notified body must provide the manufacturer with a visit report and, if a test has been carried out, with a test report. |
5. | The manufacturer must for a period of at least 10 years after the last date of manufacture of the article keep at the disposal of the national authorities:
|
6. | Each notified body must forward to the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning quality system approvals issued or withdrawn. |
5. MODULE G: Unit verification
1. | This module describes the procedure whereby the manufacturer ensures and declares that the pyrotechnic article which has been issued with the certificate referred to in point 2 conforms with the relevant requirements of this Directive. The manufacturer must affix the CE marking to the article and draw up a declaration of conformity. |
2. | The notified body must examine the pyrotechnic article and carry out the appropriate tests as set out in the relevant harmonised standard(s) referred to in Article 8 of this Directive, or equivalent tests, to ensure the conformity of the article with the relevant requirements of this Directive. The notified body must affix, or cause to be affixed, its identification number to the approved pyrotechnic article and draw up a certificate of conformity concerning the tests carried out. |
3. | The aim of the technical documents is to enable conformity with the requirements of this Directive to be assessed and the design, manufacture and operation of the pyrotechnic article to be understood. Where necessary for the assessment, the documents must contain:
|
6. MODULE H: Full quality assurance
1. | This module describes the procedure whereby the manufacturer who satisfies the obligations set out in point 2 ensures and declares that the articles concerned meet the requirements of this Directive. The manufacturer or his importer must affix the CE marking to each article and draw up a written declaration of conformity. The CE marking must be accompanied by the identification number of the notified body responsible for the monitoring referred to in point 4. |
2. | The manufacturer must operate an approved quality system for the design, production, final product inspection and testing as specified in point 3 and must be subject to the monitoring referred to in point 4. |
3. Quality system
3.1. | The manufacturer must lodge an application for assessment of his quality system with a notified body. The application must include:
|
3.2. | The quality system must ensure the conformity of the article with the requirements of this Directive. All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the manufacturer must be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies, procedures and instructions. The quality system documents must permit a consistent interpretation of the quality programmes, plans, manuals and quality records. They must contain in particular an adequate description of:
|
3.3. | The notified body must assess the quality system to determine whether it satisfies the requirements referred to in point 3.2. It must presume conformity with those requirements in respect of quality systems that implement the relevant harmonised standard. The auditing team must have at least one member with experience of assessing the relevant product technology. The assessment procedure shall include an inspection visit to the manufacturer's premises. A duly substantiated assessment decision must be notified to the manufacturer. It must contain the results of the examination. |
3.4. | The manufacturer must undertake to fulfil the obligations arising out of the quality system as approved and maintain it at an adequate and efficient level. The manufacturer must keep the notified body that has approved the quality system constantly informed of any proposed update of the quality system. The notified body must assess the changes proposed and decide whether the altered quality system will still satisfy the requirements referred to in point 3.2 or whether reassessment is required. A duly substantiated assessment decision must be notified to the manufacturer. It must contain the results of the examination. |
4. EC monitoring under the responsibility of the notified body
4.1. | The purpose of EC monitoring is to make sure that the manufacturer duly fulfils the obligations arising out of the approved quality system. |
4.2. | The manufacturer must allow the notified body access for inspection purposes to the manufacturing, inspection, testing and storage premises and provide it with all necessary information, in particular:
|
4.3. | The notified body must periodically carry out audits to make sure that the manufacturer maintains and applies the quality system and provide an audit report to the manufacturer. |
4.4. | Additionally the notified body may pay unannounced visits to the manufacturer. During such visits the notified body may, if necessary, carry out tests or have them carried out to verify that the quality system is functioning correctly. The notified body must provide the manufacturer with a visit report and, if a test has taken place, with a test report. |
5. | The manufacturer must, for a period of at least 10 years after the last date of manufacture of the article, keep at the disposal of the national authorities:
|
6. | Each notified body must give the other notified bodies the relevant information concerning quality system approvals issued or withdrawn. |
ANNEX III
Minimum criteria to be taken into account by Member States for the bodies responsible for conformity assessments
1. | The body, its director and the staff responsible for carrying out the verification tests must not be the designer, manufacturer, supplier, installer or importer of pyrotechnic articles which they inspect, nor the authorised representative of any of these parties. They must not become involved either directly or as authorised representative in the design, construction, marketing, maintenance or importation of such articles. This does not preclude the possibility of exchanges of technical information between the manufacturer and the body. |
2. | The body and its staff must carry out the verification tests with the highest degree of professional integrity and technical competence and must be free from all pressures and inducements, particularly financial, which might influence their judgment or the results of the inspection, especially from persons or groups of persons with an interest in the result of verifications. |
3. | The body must have at its disposal the necessary staff and possess the necessary facilities to enable it to perform properly the administrative and technical tasks connected with verification; it must also have access to the equipment required for special verification. |
4. | The staff responsible for inspection must have:
|
5. | The impartiality of inspection staff must be guaranteed. Their remuneration must not depend on the number of tests carried out or on the results of such tests. |
6. | The body must take out civil liability insurance unless its liability is assumed by the State in accordance with national law, or the Member State itself is directly responsible for the tests. |
7. | The staff of the body must observe professional secrecy with regard to all information gained in carrying out its tasks (except vis-à-vis the competent administrative authorities of the State in which its activities are carried out) under this Directive or any provision of national law giving effect to it. |
ANNEX IV
Conformity marking
The CE conformity marking must consist of the initials ‘CE’ taking the following form:
If the marking is reduced or enlarged the proportions given in the above graduated drawing must be respected.