Annexes to COM(2004)310 - Quality of gasoline and diesel fuel used for road transport in the EU - First annual Report (Reporting years 2001 and 2002) - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
| dossier | COM(2004)310 - Quality of gasoline and diesel fuel used for road transport in the EU - First annual Report (Reporting years 2001 and 2002). |
|---|---|
| document | COM(2004)310  |
| date | April 27, 2004 |
[8] The term "regular" is used for fuels with a sulphur content which is in accordance with Directive 98/70/EC (150 ppm for gasoline and 350 ppm for diesel); the term "low sulphur" corresponds to a sulphur content of 50 ppm; the term "sulphur free" to a sulphur content of 10 ppm.
Figure 5: 2001 EU fuel sales proportions by fuel type (%)
>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>
Legend: EU fuel sales by fuel type (%)
>TABLE POSITION>
Unsurprisingly the largest total sales of fuels in 2001 were made in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom (Figure 6). Whilst diesel sales are higher in many Member States, it is interesting to note the variations in relative sales of petrol and diesel. In France and United Kingdom the differences are particularly pronounced, with diesel sales in France being almost double those of petrol, and diesel sales being almost 30% less than petrol in the United Kingdom.
Figure 6: 2001 national fuel sales by fuel type across the EU (million litres)
>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>
There is also a variation in the number of grades of fuel reported to be available across the EU (Figure 7) in 2001, with clearly more petrol grades available, despite the larger quantities of diesel sold. It also appears that only four Member States have actually defined national fuel grades for low (<50 ppm) or sulphur free (<10 ppm) fuels (Austria, Germany, Luxembourg and Sweden). Other Member States have either left the availability of low or sulphur free fuels simply to market conditions, or provided some form of incentive to encourage market change (e.g. the reduction in duty for low sulphur fuels in the UK). Reporting of fuel sales under the Commission Decision (which allows Member States to define their own "national fuel grades") has also been varied.
Figure 7: Number of fuel grades available nationally by fuel type across the EU
>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>
Although low sulphur fuels were available in many countries across the EU (see Figures 8 and 9), some countries were yet to introduce separately marketed low (<50 ppm) or sulphur free (<10 ppm) fuels at all (Belgium, France, Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain). Fuels that have low sulphur content were available in these countries in some cases. However, it was not completely clear whether the sulphur content was either not guaranteed (as needed for some next-generation cleaner technologies to function at optimum efficiency), or whether insufficient data is available to specify the sales/availability of low sulphur fuel grades.
Figure 8: National sales proportions of low sulphur petrol grades across the EU (%)
>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>
Whilst sulphur free petrol was available in Austria, Germany and Ireland; sulphur free diesel was only available in Sweden. Also, in 2001 three countries (Denmark, Sweden and the UK) had fully moved over to low or sulphur free diesel fuel, but no countries had fully switched to low or sulphur free petrol.
Figure 9: National Sales Proportions of Low Sulphur Diesel Grades across the EU (%)
>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>
4.2 Compliance with Directive 98/70/EC in 2001
In terms of compliance with Directive 98/70/EC, five Member States (Greece, Luxembourg, Portugal, Sweden and UK) were in complete compliance with limit values for both petrol and diesel.
In 2001, ten of the Member States reported at least one petrol sample that was noncompliant with Directive 98/70/EC. Of these, the main parameters of concern were summer vapour pressure (the most often exceeded, across all fuel grades), distillation (evaporation at 100°C) and aromatics content. Motor octane number (MON), benzene content and sulphur content were also exceeded by some samples for more than one Member State. However, for all parameters at least one sample exceeded the limit value (and the limit of tolerance for the test method).
For diesel reporting, only four of the Member States reported at least one sample that was noncompliant with Directive 98/70/EC. Of these, the main parameters of concern were sulphur content and density, however for all parameters the Directive's limit values were exceeded by at least one sample.
The following Table 1 summarises the compliance of Member States with Directive 98/70/EC for the year 2001 reporting.
Table 1: Summary of MS compliance with 98/70/EC for 2001 reporting.
>TABLE POSITION>
Notes:
1. It is not possible to confirm whether limit values have been respected in all samples, where reporting data is incomplete.
2. Insufficient information provided to enable assessment of whether one particular sample was noncompliant with the distillation limit value.
3. Although all oxygenates not were measured (other than ethers with more than 5 carbon atoms per molecule), Greece has stated the other oxygenates were not added and the oxygen content can be calculated directly from the oxygenates content, so would also be compliant.
4. Ireland is of the opinion that the exceedances found could not be categorically confirmed because the samples were stored for a longer period than desirable prior to analysis, which could have affected the results disfavourably.
5. Although all oxygenates were not measured (other than ethers with more than 5 carbon atoms per molecule), Italy and Portugal have stated no other oxygenates are added to the fuels.
6. The format of the data provided by Sweden (though in compliance with the Commission Decision) does not enable confirmation of whether petrol samples complied with the summer limits. However, Sweden has confirmed that all samples did comply.
The quality of the compliance assessment suffers in some cases due to the incomplete information provided by Member Sates. Details on specific exceedances are provided in the individual country chapters of the full report.
The cases of non-compliance identified seem not to have major negative repercussions on fuel quality in general. However, the Commission expressed its concern at an expert meeting and asked Member States to explain the measures taken in order to avoid future violations. A number of member States did so; the replies are given in the detailed report.
5. 2002 Reporting
5.1 Fuel Qualities and Volumes
Submissions have been received from all Member States, although some of them were so late that the Commission Report could not be finalised before 31 December 2003. Figure 10 (see also Annex Table 4) show that in 2002, whilst a wide variety of RON and sulphur grade fuels were available across the EU, the majority of sales still comprised of RON95 (78 %, with 38.7 % regular, 38.9 % low sulphur and 0.5% sulphur free). Of all petrol sold, 51% was regular sulphur grade, 47% low sulphur (<50 ppm) and 2% sulphur free (<10 ppm). Of all diesel sold the equivalent split was 59%, 43% and 2%. Compared to 2001 the quantities of 50 ppm fuels increased significantly, while the quantities of 10 ppm fuels remained nearly constant.
Figure 10: 2002 EU fuel sales proportions by fuel type (%)
>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>
Legend: EU fuel sales by fuel type (%)
>TABLE POSITION>
Similarly to 2001, the largest total sales of fuels (of submissions received to date) in 2002 were made in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom (Figure 11). Whilst diesel sales are dominant in many Member States, there are still variations in relative sales of petrol and diesel.
Figure 11: 2002 national fuel sales by fuel type across the EU (million litres)
>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>
As in 2001, there is also still a variation in the number of grades of fuel reported to be available across the EU (Figure 12) in 2002, with clearly more petrol grades available, despite the larger quantities of diesel sold (though less than in 2001). Six Member States, two more than in 2001, have actually defined national fuel grades for low (<50 ppm) or sulphur free (<10 ppm) fuels. Reporting of fuel sales under the Commission Decision (which allows Member States to define their own "national fuel grades") has also been varied again, though improved since 2001.
Figure 12: Number of fuel grades available nationally by fuel type across the EU
>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>
Already in 2001 low sulphur fuels were available in many countries across the EU (see Figures 13 and 14). However, there are still five countries which are yet to introduce separately marketed low (<50 ppm) or sulphur free (<10 ppm) fuels at all (France, Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain). Compared to 2001, Belgium now disappeared from this list since all diesel marketed is of the <50 ppm quality.
Figure 13: National sales proportions of low sulphur petrol grades across the EU (%)
>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>
As in 2001, sulphur free petrol was only available in Austria, Germany and Ireland, and sulphur free diesel was only available in Sweden. Also, in 2002 seven countries (only three in 2001) had fully moved over to low or sulphur free diesel fuel; Sweden had moved completely over to sulphur free diesel, but none of the countries had fully switched to sulphur free petrol.
Figure 14: National sales proportions of low sulphur diesel grades across the EU (%)
>REFERENCE TO A GRAPHIC>
5.2 Compliance with Directive 98/70/EC in 2002
In terms of compliance with Directive 98/70/EC, four Member States (France, Luxembourg, Portugal, Spain and Sweden) were in complete compliance with limit values for both petrol and diesel (compared to five in 2001).
In 2002, nine of the Member States reported at least one petrol sample that was noncompliant with Directive 98/70/EC (compared to ten in 2001). Of these, the main parameters of concern were summer vapour pressure (the most often exceeded, across all fuel grades), research and motor octane number (RON, MON). Distillation (evaporation at 100°C), ethers with 5 or more C atoms per molecule, benzene and aromatics content were also exceeded by some samples for more than one Member State. However for all parameters at least one sample exceeded the limit value (and the limit of tolerance for the test method).
For diesel reporting, six of the Member States reported at least one sample that was noncompliant with Directive 98/70/EC (compared to four in 2001). Of these, the main parameters of concern were sulphur content and Distillation 95% point, however for all parameters the Directive's limit values were exceeded by at least one sample.
The following table summarises the compliance of Member States with Directive 98/70/EC for the year 2002 reporting in terms of the results of analysis of samples against limit values and the reporting format and content.
Table 2: Summary of MS compliance with 98/70/EC for 2002 reporting.
>TABLE POSITION>
Notes:
1. It is not possible to confirm whether limit values have been respected in all samples, where reporting data is incomplete.
2. The Finnish Customs Laboratory is of the opinion that all samples comply with the requirements of the Directive on the basis of expanded uncertainty limits of +/-10% for ethers [i.e. 90% confidence limits].
3. Although all oxygenates were not measured (other than ethers with more than 5 carbon atoms per molecule), Greece has stated the other oxygenates were not added and the oxygen content can be calculated directly from the oxygenates content, so would also be compliant.
4. Although all oxygenates were not measured (other than ethers with more than 5 carbon atoms per molecule), Italy and Portugal have stated no other oxygenates are added to the fuel.
As in 2001 the quality of the compliance assessment suffers in some cases due to the incomplete information provided by Member Sates. Details on specific exceedances are provided in the individual country chapters of the full report.
The Commission is concerned about the violations identified. Member States will be asked to explain the reasons as well as the measures taken, or planned to be taken, in order to Ensure that the fuel quality specifications are met.
6. Conclusions
The monitoring of fuel quality in 2001 and 2002 shows that the specifications for petrol and diesel laid down in Directive 98/70/EC are in general met. Only very few violations were identified namely related to exceedances of the maximum limit for vapour pressure during the summer period.
Details of action taken by Member States with regard to non-compliance are included, where provided, in the individual country chapters of the detailed reports for the years 2001 and 2002 [9]. The Commission will continue urging Member States to ensure full compliance with the fuel quality requirements laid down in the Directive. The recent amendments to Directive 98/70/EC (see Directive 2003/17/EC) included the insertion of a paragraph which states "Member States shall determine the penalties applicable to breaches of the national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive. The penalties determined must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive." It is expected that the implementation of this requirement will have positive repercussions on compliance.
[9] See http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/air/ transport.htm
2
It should be noted that the share of 50 ppm fuels increased significantly from 2001 to 2002, while the shares of 10 ppm fuels remained nearly constant.
The fuel quality monitoring systems established at national level differ considerably and require harmonisation in order to provide transparent and comparable results. The implementation of Directive 2003/17/EC is expected to improve the quality of reporting in this respect when Member States are required to report in accordance to the new European Standard, EN 14274, or with systems of equivalent confidence.
ANNEX
Table 3: 2001 EU fuel sales by fuel type (million litres)
>TABLE POSITION>
Table 4: 2002 EU fuel sales by fuel type (million litres)
>TABLE POSITION>