Annexes to COM(2007)617 - Quality of petrol and diesel fuel used for road transport in the EU: Fourth annual Report (Reporting year 2005) - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
dossier | COM(2007)617 - Quality of petrol and diesel fuel used for road transport in the EU: Fourth annual Report (Reporting year 2005). |
---|---|
document | COM(2007)617 ![]() |
date | October 17, 2007 |
3. National monitoring systems
A number of different approaches have been used to implement Fuel Quality Monitoring Systems (FQMS) across the EU. These range from those based on European Standard EN 14274, with sampling at a range of fuel retail stations, through to national systems. For example, systems in Sweden and the UK integrate sampling and analysis of all refinery or imported batches into the requirements for distribution of fuels within the country. There is also random sampling across the distribution chain throughout the year. The systems active in several Member States were originally designed for other purposes, and this explains some of the variations in coverage and application across the EU. A greater degree of homogeneity was expected from 2004, when the amended Directive requires Member States to: "establish a fuel quality monitoring system in accordance with the requirements of the relevant European Standard" (EN 14274 & EN 14275[9]) from 1 January 2004. Since 2001 a significant number of changes have been made to Monitoring Systems. From the EU-15 Member States, 6 have now moved their systems to ones based upon EN 14274 as have 6 of the EU-10 Member States. Portugal has stated it is still in the process of changing its system to comply with EN 14274. Alternative monitoring systems may be permitted by the Directive, provided such systems ensure results of an equivalent confidence. So far only Cyprus, Denmark and Malta have provided information justifying their use of National Systems with reduced sampling. The UK has also provided information on the statistical confidence of its system. Figure 2 summarises the sampling rate across the EU in 2005.
4. 2005 Reporting
4.1 Fuel Qualities and Volumes
While a wide variety of octane and sulphur grade petrols were available across the EU in 2005, the majority of sales comprised RON95 (84% of the total, 66% of which was low sulphur and 34% sulphur free[10]), see Figure 1 and table in the Annex for full details by Member State (no submission was provided by France for 2003 to 2005 fuel quality monitoring). Of all petrol sold, 61% was low sulphur (<50 ppm) and 39% sulphur free (<10 ppm). Of all diesel sold the equivalent split was 67% and 33%.Compared to 2001 the quantities of <50 ppm and <10 ppm sulphur fuels have increased significantly since in that year they accounted for approximately 20% of all petrol and diesel sales in the EU while they now account for virtually all petrol and diesel sales.
Sales in EU-10 Member States comprised 10.5% and 11.3% of total petrol and diesel sales in the EU respectively (up slightly since 2004).Compared to the EU-15, much lower proportions of sulphur-free petrol grades were sold in the EU-10 (15.5%), but a slightly higher proportion of sulphur-free diesel (36%) was sold.
Figure 1: EU Fuel sales proportions by fuel type (%)
Petrol Sales | 2005 | Diesel Sales | 2005 |
[pic] | [pic] |
Fuel TypType | % | Fuel TypType | % |
1 | Unleaded petrol min. RON=91 | 0.0% | 13 | Diesel | 0.1% |
2 | Unleaded petrol min. RON=91 (<50 ppm S) | 0.3% | 14 | Diesel (<50 ppm sulphur) | 66.5% |
3 | Unleaded petrol min. RON=91 (<10 ppm S) | 7.7% | 15 | Diesel (<10 ppm sulphur) | 33.5% |
4 | Unleaded petrol min. RON=95 | 0.0% |
5 | Unleaded petrol min. RON=95 (<50 ppm S) | 55.4% |
6 | Unleaded petrol min. RON=95 (<10 ppm S) | 28.0% |
7 | Unleaded petrol 95=<RON<98 | 0.0% |
8 | Unleaded petrol 95=<RON<98 (<50 ppm S) | 4.1% |
9 | Unleaded petrol 95=<RON<98 (<10 ppm S) | 0.00% |
10 | Unleaded petrol RON>=98 | 0.0% |
11 | Unleaded petrol RON>=98 (<50 ppm S) | 0.9% |
12 | Unleaded petrol RON>=98 (<10 ppm S) | 3.5% |
Similarly to 2001-2004, the largest total sales of fuels (of submissions received) in 2005 were made in Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom (Figure 3). Diesel sales are dominant in many Member States; however the relative proportions of petrol and diesel vary.
Since 2001 there has been increased homogeneity in the number of grades of fuel reported to be available across the EU (Figure 4). In 2005 there are generally 2-3 petrol grades available, mainly a result of different octane levels (RON category), however separate sulphur-free grades are appearing in some cases (for example Estonia, which has a sulphur-free version of each fuel type).Separate (marked) national sulphur-free (<10 ppm) fuel grades were available in 10 EU15 (only 1 in 2001) and 4 EU10 Member States in 2005 (in others fuel meeting the sulphur limit is available but unmarked at sale).
Figure 2: Fuel Quality Monitoring sampling rate across the EU in 2005 (average number of samples per fuel grade)
Average Number Samples / Fuel Grade | [pic] |
Petrol | Diesel | Petrol | Diesel |
Austria | 4 / 205 | 3 / 100 |
Belgium | 232 / 4957 | 232 / 3748 | 1 / 18 | <6 months | (3) |
Cyprus | 19 / 155 | 7 / 18 | <1 month | (4) |
Czech Republic | 45 / 1381 | 64 / 1653 |
Denmark |
Estonia | 10 / 300 | 1 / 114 | <4 months | (7) |
Finland | 2 / 257 |
Greece | 1 / 289 | 6 / 18 | <2 months | (4) |
Hungary | 7 / 120 |
Ireland | 3 / 118 | 6 / 18 | <2 months | (5) |
Italy | 3 / 318 | 6 / 309 |
Latvia | 1 / 251 | 9 / 438 | <1 month | (8) |
Lithuania | 8 / 192 | 20 / 268 |
Luxembourg | <6 months |
Malta | 13 / 51 | 23 / 31 | 1 / 5 | <5 months | (9) |
Netherlands | 1 / 106 |
Poland | 16 / 392 | 15 / 204 |
Portugal | 7 / 18 | (4) (6) |
Slovakia | 7 / 236 | 1 / 102 |
Slovenia | 22 / 136 | 25 / 152 |
Spain | <1 month |
Sweden | 6 / 18 | (4) |
UK | <3 months |
No. Countries | 17 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 12 |
Notes:
It is not possible to confirm whether limit values have been respected in all samples, where reporting data is incomplete. Where it has not been possible to establish from submissions the number of samples exceeding the limit value a ‘>’ symbol indicates that the number of samples exceeding limits is a minimum and might be greater. |
Directive 98/70/EC states that Member States should submit monitoring reports by no later than 30th June each year. |
Oxygen content has not been reported |
Oxygenates (other than ethers with more than 5 carbon atoms per molecule) have not been reported. However, in principle, all substances on the list are measured at once using the oxygenate test methods. However, the system has to be calibrated using a calibration sample, containing the same oxygenates in similar proportions as present in the sample under test.It is not clear in most cases, whether this has been carried out, however Portugal have stated no other oxygenates are added to the fuel.The total organically bound oxygen is calculated from the percentages by mass of the individual components after identification. |
Oxygenates (other than ethers with more than 5 carbon atoms per molecule) have not been reported (see note 4 for more details). |
Portugal also carried out no measurements on lead content this year. |
Estonia also reported 5 samples of sulphur-free petrol and 4 samples of sulphur-free diesel that exceeded the 10ppm sulphur tolerance limits for this class of fuel in national specifications. These non-compliant samples are not included in the total as they are within the mandatory <50ppm limit value for petrol and diesel. |
Quantities of regular diesel <350ppm appear to have been sold in Latvia in early 2005, in non-compliance with the <50 ppm limit value mandatory from start 2005. |
Cetane index has been measured instead of Cetane number |
1. 5. Conclusions
Fuel quality is environmentally important because it affects engine pollutant emissions and thus air quality as well as the ease and cost with which desired pollutant and greenhouse gas emission limits can be achieved by manufacturers. The monitoring of fuel quality in 2005 shows that the specifications for petrol and diesel laid down in Directive 98/70/EC are in general met and very few exceedances were identified. The Commission is not aware of any negative repercussions on vehicle emissions or engine functioning due to these exceedances. The Commission remains concerned about the exceedances and will continue monitoring compliance with the fuel quality requirements laid down in the Directive. In support of this, from 2006 reporting, the Commission intends to carry out more detailed statistical analysis of reported data.
The share of <10 and <50 ppm fuels have been increasing from 2001 to 2004.For 2005 the proportions have increased significantly, with the <50 ppm sulphur limit becoming mandatory, and the requirement for introduction of <10 ppm sulphur fuels across the EU. Zero sulphur fuels were available in the majority of Member States in 2005 (UK, Malta and Cyprus still need to introduce these fuels).However, from current indications there are still cases where the grades do not appear to be labelled in certain Member States.
This lack of labelling could hamper the introduction of vehicles using technology requiring sulphur-free fuels before full mandatory introduction in 2009 since without labelling consumers have no possibility to choose these fuels. This is particularly important for owners of vehicles utilising technology that requires sulphur-free fuel and significantly undermines the value of having fuels meeting this criterion available.As a result the full potential offered for reductions in CO2 from the road transport sector would not be realised.Belgium, Czech Republic, Ireland, Latvia, Luxemburg and Slovenia are countries where action could be taken to ensure zero sulphur fuels are labelled in future years Reporting on this labelling could help the automotive industry gain confidence in fuel availability so that vehicles taking full advantage of the zero sulphur content are more widely introduced leading to an environmental gain through lower pollutant and greenhouse gas emissionsIn general very limited information has been provided by Member States on the geographical availability of zero sulphur fuels. Most Member States simply stating they were widely available, but provided no supplementary information to provide a measure of the geographical availability.
The fuel quality monitoring systems established at national level differ considerably and require further uniformity in order to provide transparent and comparable results. The implementation of Directive 2003/17/EC has led to improved quality of reporting as it requires Member States to report on monitoring in accordance to the new European Standard, EN 14274, or with systems of equivalent confidence. Where Member States do not report according to EN 14274 format, justification for this must be provided.
ANNEX: 2005 EU fuel sales by fuel type (million litres)
ID No. |Million litres |Austria |Belgium | Denmark |Finland |France |Germany |Greece |Ireland |Italy |Luxembourg | Netherlands |Portugal |Spain |Sweden |UK | EU15 | EU15 | | |Fuel grade |AU |BE | DK |FI |FR |DE |EL |IE |IT |LU | NL |PT |ES |SE |UK |EU15 | % Total | |1 |Unleaded petrol min. RON=91 |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |0 |0.0% | |2 |Unleaded petrol min. RON=91 (<50 ppm S) |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |3 |- |- |- |- |- |3 |0.0% | |3 |Unleaded petrol min. RON=91 (<10 ppm S) |738 |- |525 |- |- |8,884 |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |10,147 |8.6% | |4 |Unleaded petrol min. RON=95 |- |- |- |- |0 |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |0 |0.0% | |5 |Unleaded petrol min. RON=95 (<50 ppm S) |- |1,055 |- |- |- |- |4,229 |1,646 |16,461 |524 |7,089 |- |8,066 |- |24,082 |63,151 |53.4% | |6 |Unleaded petrol min. RON=95 (<10 ppm S) |1,986 |659 |1,951 |2,232 |- |21,849 |- |669 |979 |- |- |- |- |5,104 |- |35,429 |30.0% | |7 |Unleaded petrol 95=<RON<98 |- |- |- |- |0 |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |0 |0.0% | |8 |Unleaded petrol 95=<RON<98 (<50 ppm S) |- |- |- |- |- |- |735 |- |- |- |- |1,919 |575 |- |1,273 |4,502 |3.8% | |9 |Unleaded petrol 95=<RON<98 (<10 ppm S) |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |1 |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |1 |0.0% | |10 |Unleaded petrol RON>=98 |- |- |- |- |0 |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |0 |0.0% | |11 |Unleaded petrol RON>=98 (<50 ppm S) |- |276 |- |- |- |- |136 |- |- |131 |310 |- |- |- |- |854 |0.7% | |12 |Unleaded petrol RON>=98 (<10 ppm S) |83 |395 |16 |269 |- |992 |268 |- |- |- |1 |495 |1,190 |384 |- |4,094 |3.5% | | |Petrol (regular) | 0 |0 | 0 |0 |0 |0 |0 |0 |0 |0 | 0 |0 |0 |0 |0 |0 | 0.0% | | |Petrol (<50 ppm sulphur) | 0 |1,331 | 0 |0 |0 |0 |5,100 |1,646 |16,461 |659 | 7,399 |1,919 |8,641 |0 |25,355 |68,510 | 58.0% | | |Petrol (<10 ppm sulphur) | 2,807 |1,055 | 2,492 |2,501 |0 |31,725 |268 |670 |979 |0 | 1 |495 |1,190 |5,488 |0 |49,671 | 42.0% | | |Total Petrol | 2,807 |2,386 | 2,492 |2,501 |0 |31,725 |5,369 |2,315 |17,440 |659 | 7,400 |2,413 |9,831 |5,488 |25,355 |118,181 | 100.0% | |13 | Diesel | - |- |- |- |0 |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |0 |0.0% | |14 | Diesel (<50 ppm sulphur) | 976 |7,269 |- |- |- |- |2,446 |1,801 |27,081 |2,139 |9,000 |5,476 |27,840 |- |23,389 |107,418 |66.9% | |15 | Diesel (<10 ppm sulphur) | 6,535 |168 |2,782 |2,383 |- |34,206 |9 |890 |1,467 |- |- |403 |0 |4,270 |- |53,113 |33.1% | | | Total Diesel | 7,511 |7,437 | 2,782 |2,383 |0 |34,206 |2,455 |2,691 |28,549 |2,139 | 9,000 |5,879 |27,840 |4,270 |23,389 |160,530 | 100.0% | |
ID No. |Million litres |Cyprus |Czech Republic |Estonia |Hungary |Latvia |Lithuania |Malta |Poland |Slovakia |Slovenia | EU10 |EU10 | |European Union | European Union | | |Fuel grade |CY |CZ |EE |HU |LV |LT |MT |PL |SK |SI |EU10 | % Total | |EU | % Total | |1 |Unleaded petrol min. RON=91 |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |0 |0.0% | |0 |0.0% | |2 |Unleaded petrol min. RON=91 (<50 ppm S) |- |280 |14 |- |21 |80 |- |- |28 |- |423 |3.0% | |426 |0.3% | |3 |Unleaded petrol min. RON=91 (<10 ppm S) |- |- |5 |- |- |- |- |- |73 |- |78 |0.6% | |10,225 |7.7% | |4 |Unleaded petrol min. RON=95 |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |9 |5 |- |14 |0.1% | |14 |0.0% | |5 |Unleaded petrol min. RON=95 (<50 ppm S) |355 |2,762 |176 |1,801 |350 |355 |66 |4,130 |94 |- |10,088 |72.4% | |73,239 |55.4% | |6 |Unleaded petrol min. RON=95 (<10 ppm S) |- |- |121 |- |- |2 |- |912 |562 |- |1,596 |11.5% | |37,025 |28.0% | |7 |Unleaded petrol 95=<RON<98 |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |0 |0.0% | |0 |0.0% | |8 |Unleaded petrol 95=<RON<98 (<50 ppm S) |- |- |- |- |- |- |24 |- |- |833 |857 |6.2% | |5,359 |4.1% | |9 |Unleaded petrol 95=<RON<98 (<10 ppm S) |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |0 |0.0% | |1 |0.0% | |10 |Unleaded petrol RON>=98 |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |- |0 |0.0% | |0 |0.0% | |11 |Unleaded petrol RON>=98 (<50 ppm S) |55 |27 |43 |175 |36 |1 |- |- |2 |53 |393 |2.8% | |1,246 |0.9% | |12 |Unleaded petrol RON>=98 (<10 ppm S) |- |- |36 |4 |10 |7 |- |404 |18 |- |478 |3.4% | |4,572 |3.5% | | |Petrol (regular) | 0 |0 |0 |0 |0 |0 |0 |9 |5 |0 |14 |0.1% | |14 | 0.0% | | |Petrol (<50 ppm sulphur) | 410 |3,069 |233 |1,976 |408 |436 |90 |4,130 |124 |886 |11,760 |84.4% | |80,270 | 60.8% | | |Petrol (<10 ppm sulphur) | 0 |0 |162 |4 |10 |9 |0 |1,316 |652 |0 |2,152 |15.5% | |51,823 | 39.2% | | |Total Petrol | 410 |3,069 |394 |1,980 |418 |444 |90 |5,455 |781 |886 |13,927 |100.0% | |132,108 | 100.0% | |13 | Diesel | - |- |- |- |49 |- |- |45 |45 |- |139 |0.7% | |139 |0.1% | |14 | Diesel (<50 ppm sulphur) | 414 |5,003 |118 |2,901 |716 |888 |116 |1,273 |443 |1,010 |12,882 |63.0% | |120,299 |66.5% | |15 | Diesel (<10 ppm sulphur) | - |- |227 |59 |0 |65 |- |6,875 |215 |- |7,441 |36.4% | |60,553 |33.5% | | | Total Diesel | 414 |5,003 |345 |2,960 |765 |953 |116 |8,193 |703 |1,010 |20,461 |100.0% | |180,991 | 100.0% | |
[1] Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels and amending Council Directive 93/12/EEC O.J. L 350, 28.12.1998, p. 58
[2] Directive 2003/17/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 March 2003 amending Directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels O.J. L 76, 22.3.2003, p. 10
[3] Research Octane Number (RON) is a quantitative measure of the maximum compression ratio at which petrol can be used in an engine without some of the mixture self igniting in the engine. Self ignition leads to excess fuel consumption and an increase in Volatile Organic Compound and Carbon Monoxide emissions.
[4] Vapour pressure is a measure of the propensity of the fuel to evaporate. It is regulated in summer because temperatures at that time of year can lead to high emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds, which are a precursor of ground level ozone. Exceedances will result in ns of Volatile Organic Compounds, which are a precursor of ground level ozone. Exceedances will result in increased Volatile Organic Compound emissions.
[5] The distillation parameter establishes the proportion of the fuel that evaporates at 100˚C and 150˚C. It limits the range of lighter components that can be blended in the petrol. Exceedances could lead to vapour locks and driveability problems.
[6] See http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/pdf/fqm_summary_2005.pdf
[7] EN 14274:2003 - Automotive fuels - Assessment of petrol and diesel quality - Fuel Quality Monitoring System (FQMS).
[8] http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/air/fuel_quality_monitoring.htm
[9] EN 14275:2003 - Automotive fuels - Assessment of petrol and diesel fuel quality -Sampling from retail site station pumps and commercial site fuel dispensers.
[10] The term “low sulphur” corresponds to a sulphur content of 50 ppm; the term “sulphur free” to a sulphur content of 10 ppm
[11] See http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/air/fuel_quality_monitoring.htm
114 ppm