Annexes to COM(2012)561 - Community system for registration of carriers of radioactive materials - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
| dossier | COM(2012)561 - Community system for registration of carriers of radioactive materials. |
|---|---|
| document | COM(2012)561  |
| date | September 28, 2012 |
ANNEX I APPLICATION FORM FOR COMMUNITY CARRIER REGISTRATION
PLEASE SEND THIS APPLICATION ONLY USING THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S SECURE ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FOR CARRIER REGISTRATION (ESCReg)
IF THERE IS ANY CHANGE IN THE INFORMATION IN PART A, A NEW REGISTRATION MUST BE REQUESTED. The carrier is responsible for ensuring that the data provided in the application form for Community carrier registration submitted through this system remain accurate.
The information provided in the present application form will be processed by the European Commission in compliance with Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.
NEW CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION
MODIFICATION OF AN EXISTING REGISTRATION
RENEWAL OF AN EXISTING REGISTRATION
Registration Certificate number/s:
Please give details of why a change to an existing registration is being sought
1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE APPLICANT:
PART A || PART B
COMPANY NAME: FULL ADDRESS: NATIONAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: || 1. Name, position, full address, telephone number and e-mail-address of the responsible representative of the carrier’s organisation (person empowered to commit the carrier’s organisation): 2. Name, position, full address, telephone number and e-mail-address of the contact person for the authorities on technical/administrative issues (who has the responsibility for compliance with the regulations for the activities deployed by the carrier company): 3. Name, position and full address of the safety adviser (only for inland transport modes and if different from 1 or 2): 4. Name, position and full address of the person responsible for the implementation of the Radiation Protection Programme if different from 1 or 2 or 3:
2. NATURE OF TRANSPORT:
PART A || PART B
ROAD RAIL INLAND WATERWAYS || 1 Staff involved and trained for transport (information) 1 to 5 5 to 10 10 to 20 >20 2 Transport activity sector: general description of the nature of the transport activities to be undertaken (information) medical use industrial use, non-destructive testing use, research nuclear fuel cycle use waste high consequence dangerous goods - radioactive material
3. GEOGRAPHICAL COVERAGE
Please tick in the list below those Member States in which radioactive material is planned to be transported and select the nature of the activity
If activities are also deployed in Member States other than the Member State where the application for registration is made, please provide more specific details for every country, i.e. transit only, or major loading/unloading places within the particular country, frequency:
PART A || PART B
Austria Belgium Bulgaria Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Estonia Finland France Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Italy Latvia Lithuania Luxembourg Malta Netherlands Poland Portugal Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden United Kingdom || transit unloading loading major loading places: major unloading places: frequency: daily weekly monthly less frequent
4. TYPE OF CONSIGNMENTS
Registration is requested for:
PART A PACKAGE TYPE - Classification following TS-R-1 || PART B: Estimated number of packages /year
UN 2908 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, EXCEPTED PACKAGE — EMPTY PACKAGING UN 2909 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, EXCEPTED PACKAGE — ARTICLES MANUFACTURED FROM NATURAL URANIUM or DEPLETED URANIUM or NATURAL THORIUM UN 2910 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, EXCEPTED PACKAGE — LIMITED QUANTITY OF MATERIAL UN 2911 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, EXCEPTED PACKAGE — INSTRUMENTS or ARTICLES UN 2912 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, LOW SPECIFIC ACTIVITY (LSA-I), non-fissile or fissile excepted UN 2913 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, SURFACE CONTAMINATED OBJECTS (SCO-I or SCO-II), non-fissile or fissile excepted UN 2915 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, TYPE A PACKAGE, non-special form, non-fissile or fissile excepted UN 2916 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, TYPE B(U) PACKAGE, non-fissile or fissile excepted UN 2917 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, TYPE B(M) PACKAGE, non-fissile or fissile excepted UN 2919 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, TRANSPORTED UNDER SPECIAL ARRANGEMENT, non-fissile or fissile excepted UN 2977 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, URANIUM HEXAFLUORIDE, FISSILE UN 2978 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, URANIUM HEXAFLUORIDE, non-fissile or fissile excepted UN 3321 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, LOW SPECIFIC ACTIVITY (LSA-II), non-fissile or fissile excepted UN 3322 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, LOW SPECIFIC ACTIVITY (LSA-III), non-fissile or fissile excepted UN 3323 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, TYPE C PACKAGE, non-fissile or fissile excepted UN 3324 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, LOW SPECIFIC ACTIVITY (LSA-II), FISSILE UN 3325 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, LOW SPECIFIC ACTIVITY (LSA-III), FISSILE UN 3326 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, SURFACE CONTAMINATED OBJECTS (SCO-I or SCO-II), FISSILE UN 3327 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, TYPE A PACKAGE, FISSILE, non-special form UN 3328 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, TYPE B(U) PACKAGE, FISSILE UN 3329 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, TYPE B(M) PACKAGE, FISSILE UN 3330 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, TYPE C PACKAGE, FISSILE UN 3331 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, TRANSPORTED UNDER SPECIAL ARRANGEMENT, FISSILE UN 3332 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, TYPE A PACKAGE, SPECIAL FORM, non-fissile or fissile excepted UN 3333 RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL, TYPE A PACKAGE, SPECIAL FORM, FISSILE ||
5. RADIATION PROTECTION PROGRAMME (RPP)
PART A: By ticking this box: I declare that we have an RPP that is fully implemented and strictly applied || PART B: reference and date of the document describing the RPP Upload of the RPP
6. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMME (QAP)
This QAP must be available for inspection by the competent authority (in accordance Article 1(7)(3) of the ADR)
PART A: By ticking this box: I declare that we have a QAP that is fully implemented and strictly applied || PART B: Reference and date of the document
7. Declaration
I, the carrier, hereby certify that I comply with all the relevant international, Community and national regulations relating to the transport of radioactive materials.
I, the carrier, hereby certify that the information contained in this form is correct.
Date ……….. Name ………..…….. Signature ………
ANNEX II ELECTRONIC CERTIFICATE OF CARRIER REGISTRATION FOR THE TRANSPORT OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL
NOTE:
A COPY OF THIS CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION SHALL ACCOMPANY EACH TRANSPORT FALLING UNDER THE SCOPE OF THIS REGULATION.
This certificate of registration is issued in compliance with Council Regulation (Euratom) xxxxx
This certificate does not relieve the carrier from compliance with the other applicable transport regulations.
1) REGISTRATION REFERENCE NUMBER: BE/ xxxx / dd-mm-yyyy
2) NAME OF THE AUTHORITY / COUNTRY:
3) COMPANY NAME & ADDRESS
4) MODE OF TRANSPORT:
ROAD RAIL INLAND WATERWAYS
7) MEMBER STATES where the certificate is applicable
8) PACKAGE TYPE – UN NUMBER (see annex 1- same format )
9) DATE
ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE
VALIDITY PERIOD : DATE + 5 years
LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
1. FRAMEWORK OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE
1.1. Title of the proposal/initiative
1.2. Policy area(s) concerned in the ABM/ABB structure
1.3. Nature of the proposal/initiative
1.4. Objective(s)
1.5. Grounds for the proposal/initiative
1.6. Duration and financial impact
1.7. Management method(s) envisaged
2. MANAGEMENT MEASURES
2.1. Monitoring and reporting rules
2.2. Management and control system
2.3. Measures to prevent fraud and irregularities
3. ESTIMATED FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE
3.1. Heading(s) of the multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected
3.2. Estimated impact on expenditure
3.2.1. Summary of estimated impact on expenditure
3.2.2. Estimated impact on operational appropriations
3.2.3. Estimated impact on appropriations of an administrative nature
3.2.4. Compatibility with the current multiannual financial framework
3.2.5. Third-party participation in financing
3.3. Estimated impact on revenue
LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
1. FRAMEWORK OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE
1.1. Title of the proposal/initiative
COUNCIL REGULATION establishing a Community system for registration of carriers of radioactive materials
1.2. Policy area(s) concerned in the ABM/ABB structure[11]
Energy
Nuclear safety
1.3. Nature of the proposal/initiative
X The proposal/initiative relates to a new action
¨ The proposal/initiative relates to a new action following a pilot project/preparatory action[12]
¨ The proposal/initiative relates to the extension of an existing action
¨ The proposal/initiative relates to an action redirected towards a new action
1.4. Objectives
1.4.1. The Commission's multiannual strategic objective(s) targeted by the proposal/initiative
1. Sustainable Growth
1a. Competitiveness for growth and employment
The general objectives of the proposal are directly linked to the fundamental objectives of EU policy, as applied in this specific field, that is,
• to ensure and maintain adequate safety standards to protect the public and the environment during transports of radioactive materials and
• to aim at an European single market for transport services of radioactive materials
1.4.2. Specific objective(s) and ABM/ABB activity(ies) concerned
The specific objectives of the proposed Community action should be
• to guarantee safety and health protection of citizens during the transport of radioactive materials in the territory of the EU,
• to contribute to remove obstacles to the internal market in this sector,
• to increase transparency in TRAM legislation allowing carriers and users to easily find the information needed and authorities involved,
• to create the appropriate legislative and organisational conditions to ensure delivery in time and in good conditions of lifesaving radioisotopes essential for trials and therapy treatments concerning a large number of diseases.
Finally, operational objectives are related to the specific outputs of Community action:
• to apply internationally accepted regulations so as to make repetitive Member States rules obsolete,
• to allow carriers to transport materials in the Community without the need for additional administrative procedures for registration or licenses in other Member States,
• to establish national Contact Points guiding carriers to the information and authorities needed,
• to drop notification requirements for individual transports for radioactive materials – apart from fissile and high-consequence radioactive materials.
With regards to expenditure the objective is to develop and maintain a the European System of Carrier Registration.
ABM/ABB activity(ies) concerned
32 05 Nuclear Energy
1.4.3. Expected result(s) and impact
Specify the effects which the proposal/initiative should have on the beneficiaries/groups targeted.
Results
• to ensure and maintain adequate safety standards to protect the public and the environment during transports of radioactive materials and
• to aim at a European single market for transport services of radioactive materials
Impact:
By providing for, among others, the mutual recognition of licences for carriers, the Regulation is expected to lead to annual savings of € 13.6 million per year across the economy. The proposed approach would reduce the bureaucratic burden on carriers, users and producers while freeing resources in authorities, which then could be partially, at least, used for compliance checks.
The savings coming from an improved regulatory frame total (Fewer derogations from the regulative framework; better and harmonised rules at European level; Reduced complexity of regulations; Decrease of costs due to less administrative burden; Costs of additional requirements in national law; Less time needed for approvals) would total € 9.8 million while costs for transport operations would be reduced by € 5.2 million (Decrease in delays of trans-boundary shipments; Decrease of denials and non-compliance of shipments; Tear down entry barriers for small and medium-sized enterprises).
These savings of € 15 million would be countered by public sector costs of € 1.4 million per year including the set-up and running costs of the registration system.
The Regulation will effectively simplify the current approval systems, introduce transparency and eliminate barriers to a functioning internal market while maintaining a high level of safety.
1.4.4. Indicators of results and impact
Specify the indicators for monitoring implementation of the proposal/initiative.
The European Commission will closely follow the impacts of the Regulation through intensive consultation of the stakeholdes involved: Member States, carriers and those demanding such transport services.
The lack of reliable statistics in the area makes it difficult to quantify exact targets. The close contacts Commission services have with all stakeholders should allow, however, whether the specific objectives of this initiative are met:
• to guarantee safety and health protection of citizens during the transport of radioactive materials in the territory of the EU,
• to contribute to remove obstacles to the internal market in this sector,
• to increase transparency in legislation allowing carriers and users to easily find the information needed and authorities involved,
• to create the appropriate legislative and organisational conditions to ensure delivery in time and in good conditions of lifesaving radioisotopes essential for trials and therapy treatments concerning a large number of diseases
With regards to the registration system, the following indicators will be used:
• To have the system operational in time and on budget;
• The features provided fully comply with the Regulation;
• The system is user friendly
1.5. Grounds for the proposal/initiative
1.5.1. Requirement(s) to be met in the short or long term
The registration system must be fully and reliably available.
1.5.2. Added value of EU involvement
Taking into account
• the need to provide for high safety standards for the transport of radioactive materials in all 27 Member States ,
• the need to tackle the problems encountered in trans-boundary transports, in particular, the variety in the implementation of Articles 3 and 4 of the Basic Standards Directive,
it is more than evident that EU action can help to harmonise and simplify rules in the Community and increase transparency while continuing to guarantee a high level of safety.
1.5.3. Lessons learned from similar experiences in the past
Opening the full potential of the internal market has provided benefits to both consumers and producers or service providers.
1.5.4. Coherence and possible synergy with other relevant instruments
The Regulation is fully in line with the general objectives of the EU/Euratom (single market, protection of workers and the public).
1.6. Duration and financial impact
¨ Proposal/initiative of limited duration
– ¨ Proposal/initiative in effect from [DD/MM]YYYY to [DD/MM]YYYY
– ¨ Financial impact from YYYY to YYYY
X Proposal/initiative of unlimited duration
– Implementation with a start-up period from Year N[13] to Year N+3,
– followed by full-scale operation.
1.7. Management mode(s) envisaged[14]
X Centralised direct management by the Commission
¨ Centralised indirect management with the delegation of implementation tasks to:
– ¨ executive agencies
– ¨ bodies set up by the Communities[15]
– ¨ national public-sector bodies/bodies with public-service mission
– ¨ persons entrusted with the implementation of specific actions pursuant to Title V of the Treaty on European Union and identified in the relevant basic act within the meaning of Article 49 of the Financial Regulation
¨ Shared management with the Member States
¨ Decentralised management with third countries
¨ Joint management with international organisations (to be specified)
If more than one management mode is indicated, please provide details in the "Comments" section.
Comments
2. MANAGEMENT MEASURES
2.1. Monitoring and reporting rules
Specify frequency and conditions.
DG Energy proposes to follow the expert advice received and to evaluate the effects of this Regulation two years after it enters into force. This interim evaluation could reveal any difficulties and bottlenecks to be solved. After this initial evaluation it might be useful to revisit the issue at a five-year interval to monitor what barriers may still exist for the smooth operation of the transport of radioactive materials in the European Union.
2.2. Management and control system
2.2.1. Risk(s) identified
MS unwilling to make the necessary investments (in terms of effort) in the project
Legal base delay. The proposal is being adopted by the EC but with an unknown time horizons on the Council outcomes
Legal base blockage for whatever reason (eg. The proposal will not reach the requested majority in the Council)
The final text of the Regulation will differ significantly with respect to the actual version
National authorization procedures are difficult to be integrated in a unified EU27 framework
The subcontractor may not deliver the project at the required quality level and, as a result, the reliability of the total system may not meet performance specifications.
Requirements mismatch
Architecture faults; difficulty in integrating commercial off-the-shelf software
2.2.2. Control method(s) envisaged
The development of the registration systems follows the guidelines set by DIGIT and will make use of the DIGIT Framework Contracts in place and therefore follow the standard procedure in agreement with the Financial Regulation including all the controls foreseen there. In addition, hosting will be done through administrative agreement with DIGIT.
2.3. Measures to prevent fraud and irregularities
Specify existing or envisaged prevention and protection measures.
DG ENER will apply all regulatory control mechanisms.
3. ESTIMATED FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE
3.1. Heading(s) of the multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected
· Existing expenditure budget lines
In order of multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines.
Heading of multiannual financial framework || Budget line || Type of expenditure || Contribution
Number [Description………………………...……….] || Diff./non-diff. ([16]) || from EFTA[17] countries || from candidate countries[18] || from third countries || within the meaning of Article 18(1)(aa) of the Financial Regulation
N°1 || 32.0502 "Sureté Nucléaire et Radioprotection" || Diff || NO || NO || NO || NO
· New budget lines requested
In order of multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines.
Heading of multiannual financial framework || Budget line || Type of expenditure || Contribution
Number [Heading……………………………………..] || Diff./non-diff. || from EFTA countries || from candidate countries || from third countries || within the meaning of Article 18(1)(aa) of the Financial Regulation
|| [XX.YY.YY.YY] || || YES/NO || YES/NO || YES/NO || YES/NO
3.2. Estimated impact on expenditure
3.2.1. Summary of estimated impact on expenditure
EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
Heading of multiannual financial framework: || 1a || Competitiveness for growth and employment
DG: ENER || || || N || N+1 || N+2 || N+3 || N+4 and next || TOTAL
Ÿ Operational appropriations [19] || || || || || || || ||
32.0502 || Commitments || (1) || 0.142 || 0.471 || 0.412 || 0.193 || 0.177 || 0.177 || 0.177 ||
Payments || (2) || 0.100 || 0.450 || 0.400 || 0.200 || 0.200 || 0.200 || 0.199 ||
|| || || || || || || || || ||
|| || || || || || || || ||
Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes[20] || || || || || || || ||
Number of budget line || || (3) || || || || || || || ||
TOTAL appropriations for DG ENER || Commitments || =1+1a +3 || 0.142 || 0.471 || 0.412 || 0.193 || 0.177 || 0.177 || 0.177 ||
Payments || =2+2a +3 || 0.100 || 0.450 || 0.400 || 0.200 || 0.200 || 0.200 || 0.197 ||
Ÿ TOTAL operational appropriations || Commitments || (4) || 0.142 || 0.471 || 0.412 || 0.193 || 0.177 || 0.177 || 0.177 ||
Payments || (5) || 0.100 || 0.450 || 0.400 || 0.200 || 0.200 || 0.200 || 0.197 ||
Ÿ TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes || (6) || || || || || || || ||
TOTAL appropriations under HEADING N°1 of the multiannual financial framework || Commitments || =4+ 6 || 0.142 || 0.471 || 0.412 || 0.193 || 0.177 || 0.177 || 0.177 ||
Payments || =5+ 6 || 0.100 || 0.450 || 0.400 || 0.200 || 0.200 || 0.200 || 0.197 ||
If more than one heading is affected by the proposal / initiative:
Ÿ TOTAL operational appropriations || Commitments || (4) || || || || || || || ||
Payments || (5) || || || || || || || ||
Ÿ TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes || (6) || || || || || || || ||
TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 4 of the multiannual financial framework (Reference amount) || Commitments || =4+ 6 || || || || || || || ||
Payments || =5+ 6 || || || || || || || ||
Heading of multiannual financial framework: || 5 || " Administrative expenditure "
EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
|| || || Year N || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || N+4 and next || TOTAL
DG: ENER ||
Ÿ Human resources || 0,191 || 0,318 || 0,191 || 0,095 || 0,095 || 0,095 || 0,095 ||
Ÿ Other administrative expenditure || 0,05 || 0,05 || 0,05 || 0,05 || 0,03 || 0,03 || 0,03 ||
TOTAL DG ENER || Appropriations || 0,241 || 0,368 || 0,241 || 0,145 || 0,125 || 0,125 || 0,125 ||
TOTAL appropriations under HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || (Total commitments = Total payments) || 0,241 || 0,368 || 0,241 || 0,145 || 0,125 || 0,125 || 0,125 ||
EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
|| || || Year N || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || N+4 and next || TOTAL
TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 5 of the multiannual financial framework || Commitments || 0,383 || 0,838 || 0,653 || 0,338 || 0,302 || 0,302 || 0,302 ||
Payments || 0,341 || 0,818 || 0,641 || 0,345 || 0,325 || 0,325 || 0,320 ||
3.2.2. Estimated impact on operational appropriations
– ¨ The proposal/initiative does not require the use of operational appropriations
– x The proposal/initiative requires the use of operational appropriations, as explained below:
Commitment appropriations in EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
Indicate objectives and outputs ò || || || N || N+1 || N+2 || N+3 || N+4 and next || TOTAL
OUTPUTS
Type of output[21] || Average cost of the output || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Total number of outputs || Total cost
SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 1[22]… || || || || || || || || || || || || || || || ||
European System for Carrier Registration || || || || 0.142 || || 0.471 || || 0.412 || || 0.193 || || 0,177 || || 0.177 || || 0.177 || ||
3.2.3. Estimated impact on appropriations of an administrative nature
3.2.3.1. Summary
– ¨ The proposal/initiative does not require the use of administrative appropriations
– x The proposal/initiative requires the use of administrative appropriations, as explained below:
EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
|| N || N+1 || N+2 || N+3 || N+4 and next || TOTAL
HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || || || || || || || ||
Human resources || 0,191 || 0,318 || 0,191 || 0,095 || 0,095 || 0,095 || 0,095 ||
Other administrative expenditure || 0,05 || 0,05 || 0,05 || 0,05 || 0,03 || 0,03 || 0,03 ||
Subtotal HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || 0,241 || 0,368 || 0,241 || 0,145 || 0,125 || 0,125 || 0,125 ||
Outside HEADING 5[23] of the multiannual financial framework || || || || || || || ||
Human resources || || || || || || || ||
Other expenditure of an administrative nature || || || || || || || ||
Subtotal outside HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || || || || || || || ||
TOTAL || 0,241 || 0,368 || 0,241 || 0,145 || 0,125 || 0,125 || 0,125 || 1,37
3.2.3.2. Estimated requirements of human resources
– ¨ The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human resources
– X The proposal/initiative requires the use of human resources, as explained below:
Estimate to be expressed in full amounts (or at most to one decimal place)
|| N || N+1 || N+2 || N+3 || N+4 and next
Ÿ Establishment plan posts (officials and temporary agents)
XX 01 01 01 (Headquarters and Commission’s Representation Offices) || 1,5 || 2,5 || 1,5 || 0,75 || 0,75 || 0,75 || 0,75
XX 01 01 02 (Delegations) || || || || || || ||
XX 01 05 01 (Indirect research) || || || || || || ||
10 01 05 01 (Direct research) || || || || || || ||
Ÿ External personnel (in Full Time Equivalent unit: FTE)[24]
XX 01 02 01 (CA, INT, SNE from the "global envelope") || || || || || || ||
XX 01 02 02 (CA, INT, JED, LA and SNE in the delegations) || || || || || || ||
XX 01 04 yy [25] || - at Headquarters[26] || || || || || || ||
- in delegations || || || || || || ||
XX 01 05 02 (CA, INT, SNE - Indirect research) || || || || || || ||
10 01 05 02 (CA, INT, SNE - Direct research) || || || || || || ||
Other budget lines (specify) || || || || || || ||
TOTAL || 1,5 || 2,5 || 1,5 || 0,75 || 0,75 || 0,75 || 0,75
Nuclear safety is the policy area or budget title concerned.
The human resources required will be met by staff from the DG who are already assigned to management of the action and/or have been redeployed within the DG, together if necessary with any additional allocation which may be granted to the managing DG under the annual allocation procedure and in the light of budgetary constraints.
Description of tasks to be carried out:
Officials and temporary agents || Development of the European System of carrier Registration
External personnel ||
3.2.4. Compatibility with the current multiannual financial framework
– X Proposal/initiative is compatible with both 2007-2013 and 2014-2010 multiannual financial frameworks.
– ¨ Proposal/initiative will entail reprogramming of the relevant heading in the multiannual financial framework.
Explain what reprogramming is required, specifying the budget lines concerned and the corresponding amounts.
– ¨ Proposal/initiative requires application of the flexibility instrument or revision of the multiannual financial framework[27].
Explain what is required, specifying the headings and budget lines concerned and the corresponding amounts.
3.2.5. Third-party contributions
– The proposal/initiative does not provide for co-financing by third parties
3.3. Estimated impact on revenue
– X Proposal/initiative has no financial impact on revenue.
– ¨ Proposal/initiative has the following financial impact:
– ¨ on own resources
– ¨ on miscellaneous revenue
EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
Budget revenue line: || Appropriations available for the ongoing budget year || Impact of the proposal/initiative[28]
Year N || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || … insert as many columns as necessary in order to reflect the duration of the impact (see point 1.6)
Article …………. || || || || || || || ||
For miscellaneous assigned revenue, specify the budget expenditure line(s) affected.
Specify the method for calculating the impact on revenue.
[1] C-187/87 (1988 ECR p.5013) and C-29/99 (2002 ECR p. I-11221)
[2] OJ L 159, 29.6.1996, p. 1.
[3] OJ C 143, 22.5.2012, p. 110.
[4] OJ , , , p. .
[5] OJ L 159, 29.6.1996, p. 1.
[6] OJ L 373, 31.12.1991, p. 4.
[7] OJ L 208, 5.8.2002, p. 10.
[8] OJ L 260, 30.9.2008, p. 13.
[9] OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31.
[10] OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13.
[11] ABM: Activity-Based Management – ABB: Activity-Based Budgeting.
[12] As referred to in Article 49(6)(a) or (b) of the Financial Regulation.
[13] Year N is the first year after the Adoption of a Council Regulation establishing a Community system for registration of carriers of radioactive materials.
[14] Details of management modes and references to the Financial Regulation may be found on the BudgWeb site: http://www.cc.cec/budg/man/budgmanag/budgmanag_en.html
[15] As referred to in Article 185 of the Financial Regulation.
[16] Diff. = Differentiated appropriations / Non-diff. = Non-Differentiated Appropriations
[17] EFTA: European Free Trade Association.
[18] Candidate countries and, where applicable, potential candidate countries from the Western Balkans.
[19] The commitments are split as follows; the payments are slightly deferred taking into account how the contractors are expected to be reimbursed. The running costs covering maintenance, support and infrastructure will be phased in and be stable at € 177000 from 2016 .
|| N || N+1 || N+2 || N+3 || N+4
Development || 114 || 352 || 116 || ||
Test || 9 || 44 || 122 || ||
Maintenance || || || 29 || 58 || 52
Support || || || 50 || 50 || 50
Training || || || 20 || 10 ||
Infrastructure || 19 || 75 || 75 || 75 || 75
|| 142 || 471 || 412 || 193 || 177
[20] Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former "BA" lines), indirect research, direct research.
[21] Outputs are products and services to be supplied (e.g.: number of student exchanges financed, number of km of roads built, etc.).
[22] As described in Section 1.4.2. "Specific objective(s)…"
[23] Technical and/or administrative assistance and expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions (former "BA" lines), indirect research, direct research.
[24] CA= Contract Agent; INT= agency staff ("Intérimaire"); JED= "Jeune Expert en Délégation" (Young Experts in Delegations); LA= Local Agent; SNE= Seconded National Expert;
[25] Under the ceiling for external personnel from operational appropriations (former "BA" lines).
[26] Essentially for Structural Funds, European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and European Fisheries Fund (EFF).
[27] See points 19 and 24 of the Interinstitutional Agreement.
[28] As regards traditional own resources (customs duties, sugar levies), the amounts indicated must be net amounts, i.e. gross amounts after deduction of 25% for collection costs.