Annexes to COM(2013)326 - Third biannual report on the functioning of the Schengen area_1 November 2012 - 30 April 2013 - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
| dossier | COM(2013)326 - Third biannual report on the functioning of the Schengen area_1 November 2012 - 30 April 2013. |
|---|---|
| document | COM(2013)326  |
| date | May 31, 2013 |
Application of the Schengen acquis during sea border surveillance
Further, on 23 February 2012, the European Court of Human Rights found Italy to be in violation of the European Convention of Human Rights, for intercepting migrants on the high seas and sending them back to Libya[9]. The facts of this case also formed the subject-matter of an examination undertaken by the Commission with the Italian authorities. The Commission therefore analysed the implications of the judgment and inquired into which measures Italy would take to ensure compliance with the judgment. Italy is bound by the ruling and has expressed its commitment to abide by it, particularly as regards any existing or future agreements of an operative nature with Libya. In view of the reassurances provided by Italy, the Commission has now closed this case. The analysis of the judgment has been taken it into account in the Commission's proposal for a regulation establishing rules for sea operations coordinated by Frontex, which is intended to replace the annulled Council Decision 2010/252/EU[10]. This proposal was adopted on 12 April 2013[11] and discussions have been initiated with the European Parliament as well as the Council.
3.4. Weaknesses identified in the framework of the Schengen evaluation mechanism
In the framework of the current Schengen evaluation mechanism[12], Member States' application of the Schengen acquis is regularly evaluated by experts from the Member States, the Council General Secretariat and the Commission.
In the period 1 November 2012 – 30 April 2013, Schengen evaluations were carried out:
· regarding police cooperation in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania;
· regarding air borders in Poland, Slovakia and the Czech Republic;
· regarding land borders in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania
· regarding visa in Estonia, Poland and Slovakia.
The reports are still being finalised, but are expected to include positive as well as negative comments and recommendations on issues such as training, use of risk analysis, information exchange, international cooperation and infrastructure at border crossing points and embassies/consulates. As was the case during the previous six months, there is generally room for improvement, but no deficiencies have been found that would require the Commission to take immediate action.
Following its last mission of February 2013, the Commission invites Greece to continue the implementation of its Schengen action plan and reiterates its commitment to support the Greek efforts to manage its external borders, i.a. through the External Borders Fund and Frontex assistance.
For an indicative calendar of Schengen evaluations in May – October 2013, see Annex I.
3.5. Lifting of control at internal borders with Bulgaria and Romania
Following the Council conclusion in June 2011 that both Bulgaria and Romania fulfil the criteria to apply in full the Schengen acquis, further measures were implemented which would contribute to their accession. Still, the Council has not been able to decide on the lifting of control at the internal borders to these countries. The Commission continues to fully support Bulgaria's and Romania's accession to the Schengen area as well as the Presidency's efforts in this direction.
4. Flanking measures
4.1. Use of the Schengen Information System
The second generation of the Schengen Information System (SIS II) entered into operation on 9 April 2013, thereby providing Member States with enhanced and new functionalities and categories of alerts. In order to ensure the use of the SIS II to its full potential, the Commission, in cooperation with the Member States, has updated the SIRENE Manual to adapt the practical cooperation among the SIRENE Bureaux (created for exchanging supplementary information on alerts in the SIS) to the SIS II environment. Furthermore, the Commission has supported the European Agency for the operational management of large-scale IT systems in the area of freedom, security and justice (eu-LISA) in establishing the modules for training of technical use of SIS II. Initial residential and e-learning courses have been organised in cooperation with the European Police College (CEPOL) and Member States' experts and are to be continued after the hand-over of the operational management of the SIS II to eu-LISA in May 2013. Finally, an information campaign, focussing on the new system's objective and data protection aspects, accompanied the entry into operations of SIS II.
4.2. Use of the Visa Information System
The Visa Information System (VIS)[13] is a system for exchange of information on short-stay visas. After its entry into operation in the first region (North Africa), the second region (Near East) and the third region (the Gulf)[14], the VIS has been launched on 14th of March 2013 in the fourth region (West Africa) and fifth region (Central Africa). On 6 June 2013, VIS will become operational in the sixth region (East Africa) and in the seventh region (South Africa), on 5 September 2013 in the eighth region (South America) and on 14 November 2013 in the ninth region (Central Asia), tenth region (South-East Asia) and eleventh region (Palestine). The sequence and possibly the dates of deployment for the remaining regions are being discussed with Member States and will be decided in the coming months.
The VIS is functioning well and by 6 May 2013 the system had processed 2,9 million visa applications, whereby 2,4 million visas have been issued and 348 000 visas have been refused. Despite continuous efforts by Member States, the main issue of concern remains the mid to long-term effect of a non-optimal quality of data (both biometric and alphanumeric) introduced by the consular authorities of Member States into the VIS. As from 1 December 2012, the VIS is operated by eu-LISA.
4.3. Visa policy and readmission agreements
Post-visa liberalisation monitoring mechanism for Western Balkan countries[15]
According to the Frontex report for the period 31 December 2012 – 3 February 2013 the number of asylum applications by Western Balkan nationalities in the top five EU/Schengen states decreased by 44 % in January 2013 compared to the same month in 2012. While the number of asylum seekers from Serbia, Montenegro and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia decreased (-61% for Serbia, -45 % for Montenegro and -46% for the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia), there was a considerable increase of asylum seekers from Albania (+74%) and Bosnia and Herzegovina (+51%). The top destination continues to be Germany, followed by Sweden, Belgium, Switzerland and Luxemburg.
Readmission agreements
In order to facilitate the readmission to the country of origin of persons residing without authorisation in a Member State, the Commission in April 2012 initialled a readmission agreement with Cape Verde, the signature of which was authorised by the Council in February 2013. The readmission agreement with Turkey was initialled in June 2012 and its signature and the launch of a dialogue on visa liberalisation are expected. In October 2012, a readmission agreement with Armenia was initialled and the Commission continues to work towards its signing and conclusion as soon as possible. Furthermore, negotiations have been launched also with Azerbaijan on visa facilitation and readmission agreements.
ANNEX I: Indicative calendar of Schengen evaluations in May – October 2013[16]
Time || Member States || Theme
2-10 June 2013 || Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania || SIS/Sirene
7-18 July 2013 || Poland, Slovakia || Land borders
8-14 September 2013 || Malta, Slovenia || SIS/Sirene
29 September-9 October 2013 || Hungary, Slovenia || Land borders
6-12 October 2013 || Czech Republic, Slovakia || SIS/Sirene
[1] COM (2011) 561 final
[2] Frontex quarterly risk analysis October-December 2012
[3] Frontex quarterly risk analysis October-December 2012
[4] France and Greece did not participate.
[5] Presentation by the Cypriot Presidency in the Council Working Party on Frontiers in December 2012
[6] Moreover, 728 persons were detected in the United Kingdom, the main country of destination in the EU.
[7] Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a Community Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code)
[8] Council document 6346/13 FRONT 9 COMIX 90
[9] Case of Hirsi Jamaa and others v. Italy. Application no. 27765/09
[10] Judgment of 5 September 2012 in case C-355/10, European Parliament v. Council
[11] COM (2013) 197 final
[12] SCH/Com-ex (98) 26 def.
[13] Council Decision of 8 June 2004 establishing the Visa Information System (VIS) (2004/512/EC)
[14] Commission Implementing Decision of 21 September 2011 determining the date from which the Visa Information System (VIS) is to start operations in a first region (2011/636/EU), Commission Implementing Decision of 21 September 2012 determining the date from which the Visa Information System (VIS) is to start operations in a third region (2012/512/EU), Commission Implementing Decision of 7 March 2013 determining the date from which the Visa Information System (VIS) is to start operations in a fourth and a fifth region (2013/122/EU)
[15] Since 19 December 2009, the citizens of the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia, holding a biometric passport, have enjoyed visa-free travel to the EU Member States, in accordance with Regulation 539/2001. Under the same conditions the citizens of Albania as well as Bosnia and Herzegovina have enjoyed visa-free travel to the EU Member States since 15 December 2010.
[16] Council document 12032/12 SCH-EVAL 99 COMIX 423