Annexes to COM(2015)454 - Public Procurement rules in connection with the current asylum crisis - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
| dossier | COM(2015)454 - Public Procurement rules in connection with the current asylum crisis. |
|---|---|
| document | COM(2015)454  |
| date | September 9, 2015 |
2.2.Urgency
If urgency requires it, the Directive foresees a substantial reduction of the general deadlines. In this case, contracting authorities can choose an "accelerated restricted procedure", in which the deadlines to submit a request for participation are 15 days and to submit an offer 10 days 27 . This allows for a speedy award of the contract.
Directive 2014/24/EU maintains this procedure 28 and introduces in addition an “accelerated open procedure”, by providing that the deadline for the submission of tenders may be reduced to 15 days in cases of duly justified urgency 29 .
Using an "accelerated restricted procedure" means applying a minimum of equal treatment and transparency, making it possible to ensure some competition even in cases of urgency. In many cases, it might be possible to award the necessary contracts using such "accelerated restricted procedures" (or, under Directive 2014/24/EU, “accelerated open procedures”).
3. Negotiated procedure without publication in cases of extreme urgency
With the "negotiated procedure without publication", Union law provides an additional tool, which will allow awarding contracts to provide for the asylum seekers' need also in the most urgent cases.
Contracting authorities may award public contracts by a negotiated procedure without publication "insofar as is strictly necessary when, for reasons of extreme urgency brought about by events unforeseeable by the contracting authorities in question, the time limit for the open, restricted or negotiated procedures with publication cannot be complied with. The circumstances invoked to justify extreme urgency must not in any event be attributable to the contracting authority." (Article 31(1)(c) of the Directive 30 ).
As contracting authorities derogate in this case from the basic principle of the Treaty concerning transparency, the European Court of Justice requires that the use of this procedure remains exceptional. All the conditions have to be met cumulatively and they have to be interpreted restrictively (see, for instance cases C-275/08, Commission v Germany, and C-352/12, Consiglio Nazionale degli Ingegneri). A "negotiated procedure without publication" allows contracting authorities to negotiate directly with potential contractors; it does not allow for a direct award to a preselected economic operator unless only one will be able to deliver within the technical and time constraints imposed by the extreme urgency.
Each contracting authority will have to evaluate whether the conditions for using such a "negotiated procedure without prior publication" are met. It will have to justify its choice of such a procedure in an individual report. 31 In the individual assessment of each case the following cumulative criteria will have to be fulfilled:
3.1."Events unforeseeable by the contracting authority in question"
In many Member States, the number of persons seeking asylum has increased significantly over a relatively short period.
It can be expected that, in general, a concrete contracting authority did not and could not know sufficiently in advance how many asylum seekers it would have to provide for. The specific need for an individual municipality to provide housing, supplies or services to asylum seekers could, therefore, not be planned in advance, and would thus constitute an unforeseeable event for the municipality in question.
3.2.Extreme urgency making compliance with general deadlines impossible
It cannot be doubted that the most immediate needs of the asylum seekers coming to the various Member States (housing, supplies and services) should be ensured with all possible speed.
Whether this makes it impossible to respect even the very short deadlines of the accelerated restricted procedure (or the accelerated open procedure provided for under Directive 2014/24/EU), will have to be assessed on a case-by-case basis.
As clarified in the Court’s jurisprudence 32 , if extreme urgency is invoked, the procurement need has to be satisfied without delay. The exception cannot be invoked for the award of contracts that take longer than they would have taken if a transparent, open or restricted, procedure had been used, including accelerated (restricted) procedures.
3.3.Causal link between the unforeseen event and the extreme urgency
For the provision of the most immediate needs to asylum seekers within a very short timeframe the causal link between the increase in asylum seekers and the need to provide for their needs cannot reasonably be doubted.
3.4.“Insofar as is strictly necessary”
Negotiated procedures without prior publication may offer the possibility to meet adequately immediate needs. They cover only the gap until more stable solutions can be found, such as framework contracts for supplies and services, awarded by regular procedures (including accelerated procedures).
4. Conclusions
Contracting authorities will have to assess on a case-by-case basis which procedure they choose for the award of contracts aiming at providing for the immediate needs of asylum seekers (housing, supplies or services).
For individual projects above the relevant thresholds for the application of Union public procurement directives, where the needs must be met through new procurement 33 , contracting authorities will, first, consider to avail themselves of all possibilities to substantially reduce the deadlines by using an accelerated (restricted or, under Directive 2014/24/EU, open) procedure.
Should those not allow for the sufficiently speedy provision of housing, supplies and services, a negotiated procedure without publication can be envisaged.
Union procurement rules provide for adequate rules to satisfy the most immediate needs of asylum seekers in the current exceptional circumstances.
(1) The State, regional or local authorities, bodies governed by public law, associations formed by one or several of such authorities or one or several of such bodies governed by public law.
(2) Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, OJ L 134 of 30.4.2004, p. 114.
(3) Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, OJ L 94 of 28.3.2014, p. 65.
(4) This concerns especially the major change of the rules applicable to services (see point 1.3 below) and the introduction of an accelerated open procedure (see point 3 below).
(5) Cf. also Article 10(a) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
(6) Article 1 (2)(b) of the Directive and Article 2(6) of Directive 2014/24/EU on the definition of public works contracts.
(7) Each two years, the applicable thresholds and their countervalue in the national currencies of the Member States, whose currency is not the euro, are revised following a purely mathematical methodology, set out directly in the public procurement directives themselves. The next revision will apply as of 1 January 2016.
(8) Whether a given procurement presents or not a “certain cross-border interest”, must be determined by a case-by-case analysis based on the different factors, see the Commission interpretative communication on the Community law applicable to contract awards not or not fully subject to the provisions of the public procurement directives, OJ C 179, 1.8.2006, p. 2–7 and further developed in the recent jurisprudence of the European Court of Justice. See for instance point 46 of the judgment of the Court of 11 December 2014 in Case C‑113/13, and the jurisprudence referred to therein.
(9) In specific cases, exceptions might apply as specified in the Directive.
(10) See footnote 7.
(11) The lower threshold applies to supply contracts awarded by central government authorities (e.g. ministries), which are listed in the Directive’s Annex IV, whereas the higher threshold applies to supply contracts awarded by any other contracting authority, including in particular regional and local authorities.
(12) Annex II A of the Directive: maintenance and repair services, land transport services, air transport services, mail transport, telecommunication services, financial services, computer and related services, research and development services, accounting, auditing and bookkeeping services, market research and public opinion polling services, management consulting services, architechtural and engineering services, advertising services, building cleaning and property management services, publishing and printing services, sewage and refuse disposal services (further specified by their CPV-codes).
(13) Listed non-exhaustively in Annex II B of the Directive (it includes the catch-all category “other services”).
(14) I.e. sending a notice to the Office of Publication of the European Union, for information or publication once the contract has been awarded.
(15) Below the relevant threshold for the services exhaustively listed in Annex II A, both above and below the thresholds for all other services.
(16) Articles 74 to 77 of Directive 2014/24/EU; those services are exhaustively listed in Annex XIV of Directive 2014/24/EU: Health, social and related services; administrative social, educational, healthcare and cultural services; compulsory social security services; benefit services; other community, social and personal services; religious services; hotel and restaurant services; legal services; other administrative and government services; provision of services to the community; prison related services, public security and res cue services; investigation and security services; international services; postal services (further specified by their CPV-codes).
(17) Recital 28 of Directive 2014/24/EU.
(18) Article 10 (h) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
(19) The lower threshold applies to service contracts awarded by central government authorities, whereas the higher threshold applies to service contracts awarded by any other contracting authority, including in particular regional and local authorities.
(20) This threshold will remain unaltered also after 1 January 2016, since it will not be revised as the other thresholds.
(21) Recitals 114 to 117 of Directive 2014/24/EU offer some clarifications on this notion in the particular context of the light regime.
(22) Negotiated procedures with prior publication or competitive dialogues would probably not be of interest in this context as the conditions for their use would not be met under the circumstances envisaged in this communication.
(23) Article 38(5) and (6) of the Directive.
(24) Article 27 of Directive 2014/24/EU.
(25) Article 28 of Directive 2014/24/EU.
(26) Article 28(4) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
(27) Article 38(8) of the Directive.
(28) Article 28(6) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
(29) Article 27(3) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
(30) A substantially identical provision is set out in Article 32(2)(c) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
(31) Article 43(f) of Directive 2004/18/EC and Article 84 (1) (f) of Directive 2014/24/EU.
(32) See Judgment of the Court in case C-352/12 of 20 June 2013, par. 50 – 52.
(33) As opposed to meeting them e.g. through own resources, public-public cooperation, drawing on existing contracts.