Annexes to COM(2011)179 - Opinion on the EP's amendments to the Council's position on the proposal for a REGULATION amending Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
| dossier | COM(2011)179 - Opinion on the EP's amendments to the Council's position on the proposal for a REGULATION amending Regulation (EC) No ... |
|---|---|
| document | COM(2011)179  |
| date | April 1, 2011 |
Date of formal adoption of the Council position: 10 December 2010
Date of Parliament's opinion at second reading: 3 February 2011
3. PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSAL
African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries have traditionally had preferential access to the European Union (EU) market. Further to rulings by the WTO’s Dispute Settlement and Appellate Bodies, the Union’s banana trade regime had to be brought into conformity with WTO law. Thus, the Geneva Agreement on Trade in Bananas (GATB), initialled on 15 December 2009, settles all banana-related trade disputes and achieves WTO-compliance.
In the framework of the GATB, the European Commission agreed to propose a development programme to help the main ACP banana-exporting countries adapt to the changes in the EU’s import regime. This ACP Banana Accompanying Measures (BAM) programme, the aim of which is to assist the restructuring of the banana sectors in the ten main ACP banana-exporting countries, requires an amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1905/2006 establishing a financing instrument for development cooperation (DCI).
The proposal is limited in time to the period 2010-2013 and is limited in scope in terms of its policy content and budgetary implications. It does not prejudge any future proposals for the new generation of external relations financial instruments under the next financial framework.
4. OPINION OF THE COMMISSION ON THE AMENDMENTS BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
4.1. Amendment s accepted by the Commission
The Commission can accept the amendments introduced by the Parliament in recital 5.
4.2. Amendments rejected by the Commission
The Commission cannot accept the amendments relating to delegated acts and Comitology issues (Recital 12; Articles 21, 22(3), 23, 33(2), and 35).
5. CONCLUSION
The discussions with the co-legislators shall continue after the second reading, in order to work on a consensual solution preferably giving substantive scrutiny rights to the European Parliament for the remainder of the current Multiannual Programming Period and leaving options open for the next one, including the possibility of having recourse to delegated acts while fully respecting the criteria established in Article 290 TFEU.