Directive 2021/514 - Amendment of Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation - Main contents
25.3.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 104/1 |
COUNCIL DIRECTIVE (EU) 2021/514
of 22 March 2021
amending Directive 2011/16/EU on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 113 and 115 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee (2),
Acting in accordance with a special legislative procedure,
Whereas:
(1) |
In order to accommodate new initiatives of the Union in the field of tax transparency, Council Directive 2011/16/EU (3) has been the subject of a series of amendments over recent years. Those changes mainly introduced reporting obligations, followed by a communication to other Member States, related to financial accounts, advance cross-border rulings and advance pricing arrangements, country-by-country reports and reportable cross-border arrangements. Those amendments thus extended the scope of the automatic exchange of information. The tax authorities of Member States now have a broader set of cooperation tools at their disposal, to detect and tackle forms of tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance. |
(2) |
In recent years, the Commission has been monitoring the application, and, in 2019, completed an evaluation, of Directive 2011/16/EU. While significant improvements have been made in the field of automatic exchange of information, there is still a need to improve provisions that relate to all forms of exchanges of information and administrative cooperation. |
(3) |
Pursuant to Article 5 of Directive 2011/16/EU, the requested authority is to communicate to the requesting authority any information it has in its possession, or that it obtains as a result of administrative enquiries, which is foreseeably relevant to the administration and enforcement of the domestic laws of Member States concerning the taxes falling within the scope of that Directive. To ensure the effectiveness of the exchanges of information and to prevent unjustified refusals of requests, as well as to provide legal certainty for both tax administrations and taxpayers, the internationally agreed standard of foreseeable relevance should be clearly delineated and codified. |
(4) |
There is sometimes a need for addressing requests for information that concern groups of taxpayers who cannot be identified individually and the foreseeable relevance of the requested information can rather only be described on the basis of a common set of characteristics. Considering this, tax administrations should continue using group requests for information under a clear legal framework. |
(5) |
It is important that Member States exchange information related to income derived from intellectual property, as this area of the economy is prone to profit shifting arrangements due to its highly mobile underlying assets. Therefore, royalties as defined in point (b) of Article 2 of Council Directive 2003/49/EC (4) should be included in the categories of income subject to mandatory automatic exchange of information in order to strenghten the fight against tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance. Member States should make every possible and reasonable effort to include the tax identification number (TIN) of residents issued by the Member State of residence in the communication of the categories of income and capital subject to mandatory automatic exchange of information. |
(6) |
The digitalisation of the economy has been growing rapidly over recent years. This has given rise to an increasing number of complex situations linked to tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance. The cross-border dimension of services offered through the use of platform operators has created a complex environment where it can be challenging to enforce tax rules and ensure tax compliance. There is a lack of tax compliance and the value of unreported income is significant. Tax administrations of Member States have insufficient information to correctly assess and control gross income earned in their country from commercial activities performed with the intermediation of digital platforms. This is particularly problematic where the income or taxable amount flows via digital platforms established in another jurisdiction. |
(7) |
Tax administrations frequently request information from platform operators. This causes platform operators significant administrative and compliance costs. At the same time, some Member States have imposed a unilateral reporting obligation, which creates an additional administrative burden for platform operators, as they have to comply with many national standards of reporting. It is therefore essential to introduce a standardised reporting requirement which would apply across the internal market. |
(8) |
Considering that most of the income or taxable amounts of the sellers on digital platforms flow cross-border, the reporting of information related to the relevant activity would bring additional positive results if that information were also communicated to the Member States that would be eligible for taxing the earned income. In particular, the automatic exchange of information between tax authorities is crucial in order to provide those tax authorities with the necessary information to enable them to assess income taxes and value added tax (VAT) due correctly. |
(9) |
To ensure the proper functioning of the internal market, the reporting rules should be both effective and simple. Recognising the difficulties in detecting taxable events that occur while performing a commercial activity which is facilitated through digital platforms and also taking account of the additional administrative burden that tax administrations would face in such cases, it is necessary to impose a reporting obligation on platform operators. The platform operators are better placed to collect and verify the necessary information on all sellers operating on and making use of a specific digital platform. |
(10) |
The reporting obligation should cover both cross-border and non-cross-border activities, in order to ensure the effectiveness of the reporting rules, the proper functioning of the internal market, a level playing field and the principle of non-discrimination. In addition, such an application of the reporting rules would reduce the administrative burden on the digital platforms. |
(11) |
Given the wide use of digital platforms in performing commercial activities, both by individuals and entities, it is crucial to ensure that the reporting obligation applies regardless of the legal nature of the seller. Nevertheless, an exception should be provided for governmental entities, which should not be subject to the reporting obligation. |
(12) |
The reporting of income earned through such activities should provide tax administrations with comprehensive information necessary for correctly assessing the income tax due. |
(13) |
For the sake of simplification and mitigation of compliance costs, it would be reasonable to require platform operators to report income earned by the sellers through the use of the digital platform in one single Member State. |
(14) |
Given the nature and flexibility of digital platforms, the reporting obligation should also extend to those platform operators that perform commercial activity in the Union but are neither resident for tax purposes, nor incorporated or managed, or have a permanent establishment in a Member State (‘foreign platform operators’). This would ensure a level playing field among all digital platforms and prevent unfair competition. In order to facilitate achieving this objective, foreign platform operators should be required to register and report in one single Member State for the purpose of operating in the internal market. After revoking a registration of a foreign platform operator, Member States should ensure that such foreign platform operator is required to provide to the Member State concerned appropriate assurances, such as affidavits or security deposits, while re-registering in the Union. |
(15) |
Nevertheless, it is appropriate to lay down measures that would reduce administrative burden on foreign platform operators and tax authorities of Member States, in cases where adequate arrangements exist, ensuring that equivalent information is exchanged between a non-Union jurisdiction and a Member State. In those cases, it would be appropriate to relieve platform operators that reported in a non-Union jurisdiction from an obligation to report in a Member State, to the extent that the information received by the Member State relates to the activities in the scope of this Directive and the information is equivalent to the information required under the reporting rules set out in this Directive. In order to foster administrative cooperation in this field with non-Union jurisdictions and recognising the need for flexibility in the negotiations of agreements between Member States and non-Union jurisdictions, this Directive should allow a qualified platform operator of a non-Union jurisdiction to solely report equivalent information on reportable sellers to the tax authorities of a non-Union jurisdiction, which, in turn, would send such information to the tax administrations of Member States. Wherever appropriate, this mechanism should be enabled in order to prevent equivalent information from being reported and transmitted more than once. |
(16) |
In view of the fact that tax authorities worldwide are confronted with the challenges linked to the ever growing digital platform economy, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) has developed Model Rules for Reporting by Platform Operators with respect to Sellers in the Sharing and Gig Economy (‘Model Rules’). Given the prevalence of cross-border activities that are carried out by digital platforms as well as the sellers active on them, it can reasonably be expected that non-Union jurisdictions will have sufficient incentives to follow the leading example of the Union and implement the collection and mutual automatic exchange of information on reportable sellers according to the Model Rules. Although not identical to the scope of this Directive in terms of the sellers on which information must be reported and the digital platforms by which information must be reported, the Model Rules are expected to provide for the reporting of equivalent information in relation to relevant activities that are in scope of both this Directive and the Model Rules, which may be expanded further to cover additional relevant activities. |
(17) |
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Directive, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council (5). More specifically, the Commission should, by means of implementing acts, determine whether information required to be exchanged pursuant to an agreement between the competent authorities of a Member State and a non-Union jurisdiction is equivalent to that specified in this Directive. Given that the conclusion of agreements with non-Union jurisdictions on administrative cooperation in the area of taxation remains within the competence of Member States, the Commission’s action could also be triggered by a request from a Member State. This administrative procedure should, without altering the scope and conditions of this Directive, provide for legal certainty as regards the correlation of the obligations stemming from this Directive and any exchange of information agreements Member States may have with non-Union jurisdictions. For this purpose, it is necessary that, following the request of a Member State, the determination of equivalence could also be made in advance of an envisaged conclusion of such an agreement. Where the exchange of such information is based on a multilateral instrument, the decision on equivalence should be taken in relation to the whole of the relevant framework covered by such an instrument. Nevertheless, it should still remain possible to take the decision on equivalence, where appropriate, concerning a bilateral instrument or the exchange relationship with an individual non-Union jurisdiction. |
(18) |
For the reasons of preventing tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance, it is appropriate that the reporting of commercial activity includes rental of immovable property, personal services, sale of goods and rental of any mode of transport. Activities carried out by a seller acting as an employee of the platform operator should not fall within the scope of such reporting. |
(19) |
For reasons of reducing unnecessary compliance costs for sellers that engage in real estate renting, such as hotel chains or tour operators, there should be a threshold of a number of rentals per property listing above which the reporting obligation would not apply. Nevertheless, in order to avoid the risk of circumventing reporting obligations by intermediaries appearing on the digital platforms as a single seller while managing a large number of property units, appropriate safeguards should be introduced. |
(20) |
The objective of preventing tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance could be ensured by requiring platform operators to report income earned through digital platforms at an early stage, before the tax authorities of Member States carry out their yearly tax assessments. To facilitate the work of tax authorities of Member States, the reported information should be exchanged within one month following the reporting. In order to facilitate the automatic exchange of information and enhance the efficient use of resources, exchanges of information should be carried out electronically through the existing common communication network (CCN) developed by the Union. |
(21) |
Where foreign platform operators report equivalent information on reportable sellers to the respective tax authorities of non-Union jurisdictions, the effective implementation of due diligence procedures and reporting requirements is expected to be assured by the tax authorities of those jurisdictions. However, in instances where this is not the case, foreign platform operators should be obliged to register and report in the Union, and Member States should enforce the registration, due diligence and reporting obligations of such foreign platform operators. Therefore, Member States should lay down rules on penalties applicable to infringements of national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive and should take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. While the choice of penalties remains within the discretion of Member States, the penalties provided for should be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Given that digital platforms often have a wide geographical reach, it is appropriate that Member States endeavour to act in a coordinated manner when aiming at enforcement of compliance with the registration and reporting requirements applicable to digital platforms operating from non-Union jurisdictions, including the prevention of digital platforms from being able to operate within the Union as a last resort. Within the limits of its competence, the Commission should facilitate the coordination of such Member States’ actions, thereby taking into account any future common measures towards digital platforms as well as differences in the potential measures available to Member States. |
(22) |
It is necessary to strengthen the provisions of Directive 2011/16/EU regarding the presence of officials of one Member State in the territory of another Member State and the carrying out of simultaneous controls by two or more Member States in order to ensure the effective application of those provisions. Therefore, the responses to requests for the presence of officials of another Member State should be provided by the competent authority of the requested Member State within a specified timeframe. Where officials of one Member State are present in the territory of another Member State during an administrative enquiry, or participate in an administrative enquiry through the use of electronic means of communication, they should be subject to the procedural arrangements laid down by the requested Member State to directly interview individuals and examine records. |
(23) |
A Member State that intends to carry out a simultaneous control should be required to communicate its intention to the other Member States concerned. For reasons of efficiency and legal certainty, it is appropriate to provide that the competent authority of each Member State concerned is obliged to respond within a specified timeframe. |
(24) |
Multilateral controls carried out with the support of the Fiscalis 2020 programme established by Regulation (EU) No 1286/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (6) have demonstrated the benefit of coordinated controls of one or more taxpayers that are of common or complementary interest to the competent authorities of two or more Member States. Such joint actions are currently conducted only on the basis of the combined application of the existing provisions regarding the presence of officials of one Member State in the territory of another Member State and simultaneous controls. However, in many cases that practice has shown that further improvements are needed to ensure legal certainty. |
(25) |
It is therefore appropriate that Directive 2011/16/EU is supplemented with a number of provisions that further clarify the framework and the main principles that should apply when the competent authorities of Member States choose to resort to the means of a joint audit. Joint audits should be an additional tool available for administrative cooperation among Member States in the area of taxation, which would supplement the existing framework that provides for the possibilities for the presence of officials of another Member State in administrative offices, participation in administrative enquiries as well as simultaneous controls. Joint audits would take the form of administrative enquiries conducted jointly by the competent authorities of two or more Member States, and be linked to one or more persons of common or complementary interest to the competent authorities of those Member States. Joint audits can play an important role in contributing to the better functioning of the internal market. Joint audits should be structured to offer legal certainty to taxpayers through clear procedural rules, including measures to mitigate the risk of double taxation. |
(26) |
For the purpose of ensuring legal certainty, the provisions of Directive 2011/16/EU as regards joint audits should also contain the main aspects of further details of that tool, such as the specified timeframe for response to a request for a joint audit, the scope of rights and obligations of the officials participating in a joint audit and the process leading to establishment of a final report of a joint audit. Those provisions on joint audits should not be interpreted as prejudging any processes that would take place in a Member State in accordance with its national law as a consequence or a follow-up to the joint audit, such as charging or assessing tax by a decision of tax authorities of Member States, process of appeal or settlement relating thereto or remedies available to taxpayers arising from those processes. In order to ensure legal certainty, the final report of a joint audit should reflect the findings on which the competent authorities concerned agreed. Moreover, the competent authorities concerned could also agree that the final report of a joint audit includes any issues where an agreement could not be reached. The mutually agreed findings of the final report of a joint audit should be taken into account in the relevant instruments issued by the competent authorities of the participating Member States following that joint audit. |
(27) |
In order to ensure legal certainty, it is appropriate to provide that joint audits should be conducted in a pre-agreed and coordinated manner, and in accordance with the laws and procedural requirements of the Member State where the activities of a joint audit take place. Such requirements may also include an obligation to ensure that officials of a Member State who took part in the joint audit in another Member State, also take part, if required, in any process of complaint, review or appeal in that Member State. |
(28) |
The rights and obligations of the officials who participate in the joint audit, when they are present in activities performed in a different Member State, should be determined in accordance with the laws of the Member State where the activities of the joint audit take place. At the same time, while complying with the laws of the Member State where the activities of a joint audit take place, officials of another Member State should not exercise any powers that would exceed the scope of the powers granted to them under the laws of their Member State. |
(29) |
While the objective of the provisions on joint audits is to provide a useful tool for administrative cooperation in the field of taxation, nothing in this Directive should be construed as being contrary to the established rules on cooperation of Member States in judicial matters. |
(30) |
It is important that, as a matter of principle, the information communicated under Directive 2011/16/EU is used for the assessment, administration and enforcement of taxes which are covered by the material scope of that Directive. While this was not precluded so far, uncertainties regarding the use of information have arisen due to unclear framework. Therefore, and considering the significance that VAT has for the functioning of the internal market, it is appropriate to clarify that information communicated between Member States may also be used for the assessment, administration and enforcement of VAT and other indirect taxes. |
(31) |
A Member State communicating information to another Member State for tax purposes should permit the use of that information for other purposes in so far as it is allowed under the national law of both Member States. A Member State can do this either by permitting the different use after a mandatory request of the other Member State or by communicating to all Member States a list of allowed other purposes. |
(32) |
In order to assist tax administrations participating in exchange of information under this Directive, practical arrangements, including where appropriate a joint data controller agreement, a data processor – data controller agreement or models thereof, should be drafted by Member States, assisted by the Commission. Only persons duly accredited by the Security Accreditation Authority of the Commission may have access to the information communicated pursuant to Directive 2011/16/EU and provided by electronic means using the CCN, and only in so far as it is necessary for the care, maintenance and development of the central directory on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation and of the CCN. The Commission is also responsible for ensuring the security of the central directory on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation and of the CCN. |
(33) |
In order to prevent data breaches and limit potential damage, it is of utmost importance to improve the security of all data, exchanged between the competent authorities of Member States in the framework of Directive 2011/16/EU. Therefore, it is appropriate to supplement that Directive with rules on the procedure to be followed by Member States and the Commission in the event of a data breach in a Member State as well as in the cases when the breach occurs to the CCN. Given the sensitive nature of the data that could be subject to a data breach, it would be appropriate to provide for measures such as requesting the suspension of the exchange of information with the Member State(s) where the data breach occurred, or suspending access to the CCN to one or more Member States until the data breach is remedied. Given the technical nature of the processes related to data exchange, Member States, assisted by the Commission, should agree on the practical arrangements necessary for the implementation of the procedures to be followed in case of a data breach and measures to be taken to prevent future data breaches. |
(34) |
In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of Directive 2011/16/EU and in particular, for the automatic exchange of information between competent authorities, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to adopt a standard form, with a limited number of components, including the linguistic arrangements. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. |
(35) |
The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in accordance with Article 42 of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council (7). |
(36) |
Any processing of personal data carried out within the framework of Directive 2011/16/EU should continue to comply with Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council (8) and Regulation (EU) 2018/1725. Data processing is set out in Directive 2011/16/EU solely with the objective of serving a general public interest, namely the matters of taxation and the purposes of combating tax fraud, tax evasion and tax avoidance, safeguarding tax revenues and promoting fair taxation, which strengthen opportunities for social, political and economic inclusion in Member States. Therefore, in Directive 2011/16/EU, the references to the relevant Union law on data protection should be updated and extended to the rules introduced by this Directive. This is in particular important for the purpose of ensuring legal certainty for data controllers and data processors within the meaning of Regulations (EU) 2016/679 and (EU) No 2018/1725 while ensuring the protection of the rights of data subjects. |
(37) |
This Directive respects the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. In particular, this Directive seeks to ensure full respect for the right to the protection of personal data and the freedom to conduct business. |
(38) |
Since the objective of this Directive, namely efficient administrative cooperation between Member States under conditions compatible with the proper functioning of the internal market, cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States because the aim of this Directive to improve the cooperation between tax administrations requires uniform rules that can be effective in cross-border situations but can rather, be better achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union. In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Directive does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that objective. |
(39) |
Directive 2011/16/EU should therefore be amended accordingly, |
HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
Article 1
Directive 2011/16/EU is amended as follows:
(1) |
Article 3 is amended as follows:
|
(2) |
the following Article is inserted: ‘Article 5a Foreseeable relevance
|
(3) |
in Article 6, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: ‘2. The request referred to in Article 5 may contain a reasoned request for an administrative enquiry. If the requested authority takes the view that no administrative enquiry is necessary, it shall immediately inform the requesting authority of the reasons thereof.’; |
(4) |
in Article 7, paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: ‘1. The requested authority shall provide the information referred to in Article 5 as quickly as possible, and no later than three months from the date of receipt of the request. However, where the requested authority is unable to respond to the request by the relevant time limit, it shall inform the requesting authority immediately and in any event within three months of the receipt of the request, of the reasons for its failure to do so, and the date by which it considers it might be able to respond. The time limit shall not be longer than six months from the date of receipt of the request. However, where the requested authority is already in possession of that information, the information shall be transmitted within two months of that date.’; |
(5) |
in Article 7, paragraph 5 is deleted; |
(6) |
Article 8 is amended as follows:
|
(7) |
Article 8a is amended as follows:
|
(8) |
the following Article is inserted: ‘Article 8ac Scope and conditions of mandatory automatic exchange of information reported by Platform Operators
Where the Reportable Seller provides immovable property rental services, the following additional information shall be communicated:
Member States shall lay down rules pursuant to which a Reporting Platform Operator may choose to register with the competent authority of a single Member State in accordance with the rules laid down in paragraph F of Section IV of Annex V. Member States shall take the necessary measures to require that a Reporting Platform Operator within the meaning of point (b) of subparagraph A(4) of Section I of Annex V, whose registration has been revoked in accordance with subparagraph F(7) of Section IV of Annex V, can only be permitted to re-register on the condition that it provides to the authorities of a Member State concerned appropriate assurances as regards its commitment to comply with the reporting requirements within the Union, including any outstanding unfulfilled reporting requirements. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, lay down the practical arrangements necessary for the registration and identification of Reporting Platform Operators. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 26(2).
A Member State requesting the measure referred to in the first subparagraph shall send a reasoned request to the Commission. If the Commission considers that it does not have all the information necessary for the appraisal of the request, it shall contact the Member State concerned within two months of receipt of the request and specify what additional information is required. Once the Commission has all the information it considers necessary, it shall, within one month, notify the requesting Member State and it shall submit the relevant information to the Committee referred to in Article 26(2). When acting on its own initiative, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act as referred to in the first subparagraph only after a Member State has concluded a competent authority agreement with a non-Union jurisdiction that requires the automatic exchange of information on sellers deriving income from activities facilitated by Platforms. When determining whether information is equivalent within the meaning of the first subparagraph in relation to a Relevant Activity, the Commission shall take into due account the extent to which the regime on which such information is based corresponds to that set out in Annex V, in particular with regard to:
The same procedure shall apply for determining that the information is no longer equivalent.’; |
(9) |
Article 8b is amended as follows:
|
(10) |
Article 11 is amended as follows:
|
(11) |
in Article 12, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following: ‘3. The competent authority of each Member State concerned shall decide whether it wishes to take part in simultaneous controls. It shall confirm its agreement or communicate its reasoned refusal to the authority that proposed a simultaneous control within 60 days of receiving the proposal.’; |
(12) |
the following Section is inserted: ‘SECTION IIa Joint audits Article 12a Joint audits
The rights and obligations of the officials of Member States who participate in the joint audit, when they are present in activities performed in a different Member State, shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the Member State where the activities of the joint audit take place. While complying with the laws of the Member State where the activities of the joint audit take place, officials of another Member State shall not exercise any powers that would exceed the scope of the powers granted to them under the laws of their Member State.
Subject to the first subparagraph, the actions by the competent authorities of a Member State or any of its officers following a joint audit and any further processes taking place in that Member State, such as a decision of tax authorities, process of appeal or settlement relating thereto, shall take place in accordance with the national law of that Member State.
|
(13) |
Article 16 is amended as follows:
|
(14) |
Article 20 is amended as follows:
|
(15) |
in Article 21, the following paragraph is added: ‘7. The Commission shall develop and provide technical and logistical support for a secure central interface on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation where Member States communicate with the use of standard forms pursuant to Article 20(1) and (3). The competent authorities of all Member States shall have access to that interface. For the purpose of collecting statistics, the Commission shall have access to information about the exchanges recorded to the interface and which can be extracted automatically. The Commission shall have only access to anonymous and aggregated data. The access by the Commission shall be without prejudice to the obligation of Member States to provide statistics on exchanges of information in accordance with Article 23(4). The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, lay down the necessary practical arrangements. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 26(2).’; |
(16) |
in Article 22, paragraph 1a is replaced by the following: ‘1a. For the purposes of the implementation and enforcement of the laws of Member States giving effect to this Directive and to ensure the functioning of the administrative cooperation it establishes, Member States shall provide by law for access by tax authorities to the mechanisms, procedures, documents and information referred to in Articles 13, 30, 31, 32a and 40 of Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council (*1). (*1) Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC (OJ L 141, 5.6.2015, p. 73).’;" |
(17) |
in Article 23a, paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: ‘2. Information communicated to the Commission by a Member State under Article 23, as well as any report or document produced by the Commission using such information, may be transmitted to other Member States. Such transmitted information shall be covered by the obligation of official secrecy and enjoy the protection extended to similar information under the national law of the Member State which received it. Reports and documents produced by the Commission, referred to in the first subparagraph, may be used by Member States only for analytical purposes, and shall not be published or made available to any other person or body without the express agreement of the Commission. Notwithstanding the first and second subparagraphs, the Commission may publish annually anonymised summaries of the statistical data that Member States communicate to it in accordance with Article 23(4).’; |
(18) |
Article 25 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 25 Data protection
Notwithstanding point (b) of the first subparagraph, each Member State shall lay down rules obliging Reporting Platform Operators to inform Reportable Sellers of the reported Consideration.
Each Member State may suspend the exchange of information to the Member State(s) where the data breach occurred by giving notice in writing to the Commission and the Member State(s) concerned. Such suspension shall have immediate effect. The Member State(s) where the data breach occurred shall investigate, contain and remedy the data breach and shall, by giving notice in writing to the Commission, request the suspension of the CCN access for the purposes of this Directive, if the data breach cannot be contained immediately and appropriately. Upon such request, the Commission shall suspend the CCN access of such Member State(s) for the purposes of this Directive. Upon reporting by the Member State where the data breach occurred of remedying the data breach, the Commission shall resume the CCN access of the Member State(s) concerned for the purposes of this Directive. In case one or more Member States request the Commission to jointly verify whether the remediation of the data breach was successful, the Commission shall resume the CCN access of such Member State(s) for the purposes of this Directive upon such verification. Where a data breach occurs to the central directory or the CCN for the purposes of this Directive and where the exchanges of Member States through the CCN can potentially be affected, the Commission shall inform Member States of the data breach and any remedial actions taken without undue delay. Such remedial actions may include suspending access to the central directory or the CCN for the purposes of this Directive until the data breach is remedied.
(*2) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1)." (*3) Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39).’;" |
(19) |
Article 25a is replaced by the following: ‘Article 25a Penalties Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive and concerning Articles 8aa, 8ab and 8ac, and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.’; |
(20) |
Annex V, the text of which is set out in the Annex to this Directive, is added. |
Article 2
-
1.Member States shall adopt and publish, by 31 December 2022, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.
They shall apply those provisions from 1 January 2023.
When Member States adopt those provisions, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. The methods of making such reference shall be laid down by Member States.
-
2.By way of derogation from paragraph 1 of this Article, Member States shall adopt and publish, by 31 December 2023, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with point (1)(d) of Article 1 of this Directive as regards point (26) of Article 3 of Directive 2011/16/EU and with point (12) of Article 1 of this Directive as regards Section IIa of Directive 2011/16/EU. They shall immediately inform the Commission thereof.
They shall apply those provisions from 1 January 2024, at the latest.
When Member States adopt those provisions, they shall contain a reference to this Directive or shall be accompanied by such a reference on the occasion of their official publication. The methods of making such reference shall be laid down by Member States.
-
3.Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the main provisions of national law which they adopt in the field covered by this Directive.
Article 3
This Directive shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
Article 4
This Directive is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels, 22 March 2021.
For the Council
The President
-
M.do C. ANTUNES
-
Not yet published in the Official Journal.
-
Not yet published in the Official Journal.
-
Council Directive 2011/16/EU of 15 February 2011 on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation and repealing Directive 77/799/EEC (OJ L 64, 11.3.2011, p. 1).
-
Council Directive 2003/49/EC of 3 June 2003 on a common system of taxation applicable to interest and royalty payments made between associated companies of different Member States (OJ L 157, 26.6.2003, p. 49).
-
Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 laying down the rules and general principles concerning mechanisms for control by Member States of the Commission’s exercise of implementing powers (OJ L 55, 28.2.2011, p. 13).
-
Regulation (EU) No 1286/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing an action programme to improve the operation of taxation systems in the European Union for the period 2014-2020 (Fiscalis 2020) and repealing Decision No 1482/2007/EC (OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 25).
-
Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 and Decision No 1247/2002/EC (OJ L 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39).
-
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) (OJ L 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1).
ANNEX
‘ANNEX V
DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURES, REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER RULES FOR PLATFORM OPERATORS
This Annex lays down the due diligence procedures, reporting requirements and other rules that shall be applied by the Reporting Platform Operators in order to enable Member States to communicate, by automatic exchange, the information referred to in Article 8ac of this Directive.
This Annex also lays down the rules and administrative procedures that Member States shall have in place to ensure effective implementation of, and compliance with, the due diligence procedures and reporting requirements set out in it.
SECTION I
DEFINED TERMS
The following terms have the meaning set forth below:
A. |
Reporting Platform Operators
|
B. |
Reportable Sellers
|
C. |
Other definitions
|
SECTION II
DUE DILIGENCE PROCEDURES
The following procedures shall apply for the purpose of identifying Reportable Sellers.
A. |
Sellers not subject to review For the purpose of determining whether a Seller that is an Entity qualifies as an Excluded Seller described in points (a) and (b) of subparagraph B(4) of Section I, a Reporting Platform Operator may rely on publicly available information or a confirmation from the Seller that is an Entity. For the purpose of determining whether a Seller qualifies as an Excluded Seller described in points (c) and (d) of subparagraph B(4) of Section I, a Reporting Platform Operator may rely on its available records. |
B. |
Collection of Seller information
|
C. |
Verification of Seller information
|
D. |
Determination of Member State(s) of residence of Seller for the purposes of this Directive
|
E. |
Collection of information on rented immovable property Where a Seller is engaged in Relevant Activity involving the rental of immovable property, the Reporting Platform Operator shall collect the address of each Property Listing and, where issued, respective land registration number or its equivalent under the national law of the Member State where it is located. Where a Reporting Platform Operator facilitated more than 2 000 Relevant Activities by means of the rental of a Property Listing for the same Seller that is an Entity, the Reporting Platform Operator shall collect supporting documents, data or information that the Property Listing is owned by the same owner. |
F. |
Timing and validity of due diligence procedures
|
G. |
Application of the due diligence procedures to Active Sellers only A Reporting Platform Operator may elect to complete the due diligence procedures pursuant to paragraphs A to F in respect of Active Sellers only. |
H. |
Completion of the due diligence procedures by third parties
|
SECTION III
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
A. |
Time and manner of reporting
|
B. |
Information to be reported Each Reporting Platform Operator shall report the following information:
|
SECTION IV
EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION
Pursuant to Article 8ac, Member States shall have rules and administrative procedures in place to ensure effective implementation of, and compliance with, the due diligence procedures and reporting requirements set out in Sections II and III of this Annex.
A. |
Rules to enforce the collection and verification requirements laid down in Section II
|
B. |
Rules requiring Reporting Platform Operators to keep records of the steps undertaken and any information relied upon for the performance of the due diligence procedures and reporting requirements and adequate measures to obtain those records
|
C. |
Administrative procedures to verify compliance of Reporting Platform Operators with the due diligence procedures and reporting requirements Member States shall lay down administrative procedures to verify the compliance of Reporting Platform Operators with the due diligence procedures and reporting requirements set out in Sections II and III. |
D. |
Administrative procedures to follow up with a Reporting Platform Operator where incomplete or inaccurate information is reported Member States shall lay down procedures for following up with Reporting Platform Operators where the reported information is incomplete or inaccurate. |
E. |
Administrative procedure for the election of a single Member State in which to report If a Reporting Platform Operator within the meaning of point (a) of subparagraph A(4) of Section I fulfils any of the conditions listed therein in more than one Member State, it shall elect one of those Member States, to fulfil its reporting requirements pursuant to Section III. The Reporting Platform Operator shall notify all the competent authorities of those Member States of its election. |
F. |
Administrative procedure for single registration of a Reporting Platform Operator
|
(*1) Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1)."
This summary has been adopted from EUR-Lex.