Decision 2000/709 - 2000/709/EC: Commission Decision of 6 November 2000 on the minimum criteria to be taken into account by Member States when designating bodies in accordance with Article 3(4) of Directive 1999/93/EC on a Community framework for electronic signatures (notified under document number C(2000) 3179)

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

1.

Current status

This decision has been published on November 16, 2000.

2.

Key information

official title

2000/709/EC: Commission Decision of 6 November 2000 on the minimum criteria to be taken into account by Member States when designating bodies in accordance with Article 3(4) of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Community framework for electronic signatures (notified under document number C(2000) 3179)
 
Legal instrument Decision
Number legal act Decision 2000/709
CELEX number i 32000D0709

3.

Key dates

Document 06-11-2000
Publication in Official Journal 16-11-2000; Special edition in Czech: Chapter 13 Volume 026,Special edition in Latvian: Chapter 13 Volume 026,Special edition in Polish: Chapter 13 Volume 026,Special edition in Croatian: Chapter 13 Volume 038,Special edition in Slovenian: Chapter 13 Volume 026,Special edition in Bulgarian: Chapter 13 Volume 030,OJ L 289, 16.11.2000,Special edition in Maltese: Chapter 13 Volume 026,Special edition in Slovak: Chapter 13 Volume 026,Special edition in Romanian: Chapter 13 Volume 030,Special edition in Estonian: Chapter 13 Volume 026,Special edition in Hungarian: Chapter 13 Volume 026,Special edition in Lithuanian: Chapter 13 Volume 026
Effect 01-01-1001; Entry into force Date notif.
End of validity 31-12-9999

4.

Legislative text

Avis juridique important

|

5.

32000D0709

2000/709/EC: Commission Decision of 6 November 2000 on the minimum criteria to be taken into account by Member States when designating bodies in accordance with Article 3(4) of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Community framework for electronic signatures (notified under document number C(2000) 3179) (Text with EEA relevance)

Official Journal L 289 , 16/11/2000 P. 0042 - 0043

Commission Decision

of 6 November 2000

on the minimum criteria to be taken into account by Member States when designating bodies in accordance with Article 3(4) of Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Community framework for electronic signatures

(notified under document number C(2000) 3179)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2000/709/EC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Directive 1999/93/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 1999 on a Community framework for electronic signatures(1), and in particular Article 3(4) thereof,

Whereas:

  • (1) 
    On 13 December 1999, the European Parliament and the Council adopted the Directive 1999/93/EC on a Community framework for electronic signatures.
  • (2) 
    Annex III to Directive 1999/93/EC contains the requirements for secure signature-creation-devices. According to Article 3(4) of the Directive, the conformity of secure signature-creation-devices with the requirements laid down in Annex III shall be determined by appropriate public or private bodies designated by Member States and the Commission shall establish criteria for Member States to determine whether a body should be designated for performing such conformity assessments.
  • (3) 
    The establishment of the above criteria by the Commission has to be made after consultation of the "Electronic Signature Committee" set up under Article 9(1) of Directive 1999/93/EC.
  • (4) 
    The measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the "Electronic Signature Committee",

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The purpose of this Decision is to establish the criteria for Member States to determine whether a national body should be designated as responsible for the conformity assessments of secure signature-creation-devices.

Article 2

Where a designated body is part of an organisation involved in activities other than conformance assessment of secure signature-creation-devices with the requirements laid down in Annex III to Directive 1999/93/EC it must be identifiable within that organisation. Different activities must be clearly distinguished.

Article 3

The body and its staff must not engage in any activities that may conflict with their independence of judgement and integrity in relation to their task. In particular, the body must be independent of the parties involved. Therefore, the body, its executive officer and the staff responsible for carrying out the conformance assessment tasks must not be a designer, manufacturer, supplier or installer of secure signature-creation-devices, or a certification service provider issuing certificates to the public, nor the authorised representative of any of such parties.

In addition, they must be financially independent and not become directly involved in the design, construction, marketing or maintenance of secure signature-creation-devices, nor represent the parties engaged in these activities. This does not preclude the possibility of exchange of technical information between the manufacturer and the designated body.

Article 4

The body and its personnel must be able to determine the conformity of secure signature-creation-devices with the requirements laid down in Annex III to Directive 1999/93/EC with a high degree of professional integrity, reliability and sufficient technical competence.

Article...


More

This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.

 

6.

Sources and disclaimer

For further information you may want to consult the following sources that have been used to compile this dossier:

This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.

 

7.

Full version

This page is also available in a full version containing the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand and the related cases of the European Court of Justice.

The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.

8.

EU Monitor

The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.