COM(2001)335 - Amendment of Council Regulation 95/93 on common rules for the allocation of slots at Community airports

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

Contents

  1. Key information
  2. Key dates
  3. Related information
  4. Resulting legislation
  5. Full version
  6. EU Monitor

1.

Key information

official title

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 of 18 January 1993 on common rules for the allocation of slots at Community airports
 
Legal instrument Regulation
Decision making procedure ordinary legislative procedure (COD)
reference by COM-number139 COM(2001)335 EN
Additional COM-numbers COM(2002)623; COM(2003)207; COM(2004)136
procedure number141 2001/0140(COD)A
CELEX number142 52001PC0335

2.

Key dates

Document 21-06-2001
Online publication 21-06-2001
Decision 21-04-2004; Verordening 2003/1554
Publication in Official Journal143 30-04-2004; OJ L 138, 30.4.2004,Special edition in Polish: Chapter 07 Volume 008,Special edition in Latvian: Chapter 07 Volume 008,Special edition in Slovak: Chapter 07 Volume 008,Special edition in Bulgarian: Chapter 07 Volume 014,Special edition in Hungarian: Chapter 07 Volume 008,Special edition in Czech: Chapter 07 Volume 008,Special edition in Lithuanian: Chapter 07 Volume 008,Special edition in Slovenian: Chapter 07 Volume 008,Special edition in Estonian: Chapter 07 Volume 008,Special edition in Romanian: Chapter 07 Volume 014,Special edition in Maltese: Chapter 07 Volume 008,Special edition in Croatian: Chapter 07 Volume 017

3.

Related information

4.

Resulting legislation

 

5.

Full version

This page is also available in a full version containing the latest state of affairs, the summary of the European Parliament Legislative Observatory, the legal basis, the legal context, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand, the stakeholders involved (e.g. European Commission directorates-general, European Parliament committees, Council configurations and even individual EU Commissioners and Members of the European Parliament) and finally documents of the European Parliament, the Council of Ministers and the European Commission.

The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.

6.

EU Monitor

The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.

  • 1. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 2. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 3. 
    A list of stakeholders and Member States that contributed to that debate can be found in annex 1.

     
  • 4. 
    ATFM slots being essentially a tactical tool designed to prevent the overloading of ATC sectors along an aircraft's route including those sectors at the airports of departure and arrival. Such slots are only issued when required and only two hours before take-off. Depending on changes to air traffic circumstances ATFM slots may be revised ad hoc.

     
  • 5. 
    Report of 24 November 2000 presented to the Council of Ministers for Transport during their meeting on 22 December 2000; see in particular Chapter 3.2 Airspace Management, pp. 19-20.

     
  • 6. 
    Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on "Air Transport and Environment, COM(1999) 640 final of 1.12.99, point 5, page 6.

     
  • 7. 
    Ibid, points 62 c, page 23.

     
  • 8. 
    ibid; pages 23 and 29.

     
  • 9. 
    See e.g. M. 616 Swissair/Sabena of 20.7.1995, 96/180 Lufthansa/SAS of 16.01.1996, JV.19 KLM/ALITALIA of 11.8.1999, M.2041 - UNITED AIRLINES / US AIRWAYS decision of 12.01.2001

     
  • 10. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 11. 
    A list of stakeholders and Member States that contributed to that debate can be found in annex 1.

     
  • 12. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 13. 
    Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on "Air Transport and Environment, COM(1999) 640 final of 1.12.99, point 5, page 6.

     
  • 14. 
    Ibid, points 62 c, page 23.

     
  • 15. 
    ibid; pages 23 and 29.

     
  • 16. 
    For these measures see pages 33-41 and 51-53 of the Report by PriceWaterhouseCoopers of May 2000 assessing the application of certain articles of the Regulation in Member States;

     
  • 17. 
    For these measures see pages 33-41 and 51-53 of the Report by PriceWaterhouseCoopers of May 2000 assessing the application of certain articles of the Regulation in Member States;

     
  • 18. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 19. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 20. 
    A list of stakeholders and Member States that contributed to that debate can be found in annex 1.

     
  • 21. 
    ATFM slots being essentially a tactical tool designed to prevent the overloading of ATC sectors along an aircraft's route including those sectors at the airports of departure and arrival. Such slots are only issued when required and only two hours before take-off. Depending on changes to air traffic circumstances ATFM slots may be revised ad hoc.

     
  • 22. 
    Report of 24 November 2000 presented to the Council of Ministers for Transport during their meeting on 22 December 2000; see in particular Chapter 3.2 Airspace Management, pp. 19-20.

     
  • 23. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 24. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 25. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 26. 
    A list of stakeholders and Member States that contributed to that debate can be found in annex 1.

     
  • 27. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 28. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 29. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 30. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 31. 
    ATFM slots being essentially a tactical tool designed to prevent the overloading of ATC sectors along an aircraft's route including those sectors at the airports of departure and arrival. Such slots are only issued when required and only two hours before take-off. Depending on changes to air traffic circumstances ATFM slots may be revised ad hoc.

     
  • 32. 
    ATFM slots being essentially a tactical tool designed to prevent the overloading of ATC sectors along an aircraft's route including those sectors at the airports of departure and arrival. Such slots are only issued when required and only two hours before take-off. Depending on changes to air traffic circumstances ATFM slots may be revised ad hoc.

     
  • 33. 
    Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on "Air Transport and Environment, COM(1999) 640 final of 1.12.99, point 5, page 6.

     
  • 34. 
    Council Regulation '(EEC) 4064/89 on the control of concentrations between undertakings as amended by Council Regulation (EC) 1310/1997, articles 14 and 15.

     
  • 35. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 36. 
    OJ No C

     
  • 37. 
    .OJ No C

     
  • 38. 
    OJ No C

     
  • 39. 
    OJ No L 14, 22.1.1993, p.1

     
  • 40. 
    OJ No L 184, 17.7.1999, p.23

     
  • 41. 
    OJ No L 395, 30.12.1989, p.1; corrected version, OJ L 257, 21.9.1990, p. 13

     
  • 42. 
    OJ No L 180, 9.7.1997, p.1

     
  • 43. 
    OJ No L228, 9.9.1996, p.99

     
  • 44. 
    See e.g. M. 616 Swissair/Sabena of 20.7.1995, 96/180 Lufthansa/SAS of 16.01.1996, JV.19 KLM/ALITALIA of 11.8.1999, M.2041 - UNITED AIRLINES / US AIRWAYS decision of 12.01.2001

     
  • 45. 
    A list of stakeholders and Member States that contributed to that debate can be found in annex 1.

     
  • 46. 
    Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on "Air Transport and Environment, COM(1999) 640 final of 1.12.99, point 5, page 6.

     
  • 47. 
    ATFM slots being essentially a tactical tool designed to prevent the overloading of ATC sectors along an aircraft's route including those sectors at the airports of departure and arrival. Such slots are only issued when required and only two hours before take-off. Depending on changes to air traffic circumstances ATFM slots may be revised ad hoc.

     
  • 48. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 49. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 50. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 51. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 52. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 53. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 54. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 55. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 56. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 57. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 58. 
    A list of stakeholders and Member States that contributed to that debate can be found in annex 1.

     
  • 59. 
    ATFM slots being essentially a tactical tool designed to prevent the overloading of ATC sectors along an aircraft's route including those sectors at the airports of departure and arrival. Such slots are only issued when required and only two hours before take-off. Depending on changes to air traffic circumstances ATFM slots may be revised ad hoc.

     
  • 60. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 61. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 62. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 63. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 64. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 65. 
    A list of stakeholders and Member States that contributed to that debate can be found in annex 1.

     
  • 66. 
    Report of 24 November 2000 presented to the Council of Ministers for Transport during their meeting on 22 December 2000; see in particular Chapter 3.2 Airspace Management, pp. 19-20.

     
  • 67. 
    A list of stakeholders and Member States that contributed to that debate can be found in annex 1.

     
  • 68. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 69. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 70. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 71. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 72. 
    A list of stakeholders and Member States that contributed to that debate can be found in annex 1.

     
  • 73. 
    ATFM slots being essentially a tactical tool designed to prevent the overloading of ATC sectors along an aircraft's route including those sectors at the airports of departure and arrival. Such slots are only issued when required and only two hours before take-off. Depending on changes to air traffic circumstances ATFM slots may be revised ad hoc.

     
  • 74. 
    Report of 24 November 2000 presented to the Council of Ministers for Transport during their meeting on 22 December 2000; see in particular Chapter 3.2 Airspace Management, pp. 19-20.

     
  • 75. 
    Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on "Air Transport and Environment, COM(1999) 640 final of 1.12.99, point 5, page 6.

     
  • 76. 
    Ibid, points 62 c, page 23.

     
  • 77. 
    ibid; pages 23 and 29.

     
  • 78. 
    See e.g. M. 616 Swissair/Sabena of 20.7.1995, 96/180 Lufthansa/SAS of 16.01.1996, JV.19 KLM/ALITALIA of 11.8.1999, M.2041 - UNITED AIRLINES / US AIRWAYS decision of 12.01.2001

     
  • 79. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 80. 
    A list of stakeholders and Member States that contributed to that debate can be found in annex 1.

     
  • 81. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 82. 
    Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on "Air Transport and Environment, COM(1999) 640 final of 1.12.99, point 5, page 6.

     
  • 83. 
    Ibid, points 62 c, page 23.

     
  • 84. 
    ibid; pages 23 and 29.

     
  • 85. 
    For these measures see pages 33-41 and 51-53 of the Report by PriceWaterhouseCoopers of May 2000 assessing the application of certain articles of the Regulation in Member States;

     
  • 86. 
    For these measures see pages 33-41 and 51-53 of the Report by PriceWaterhouseCoopers of May 2000 assessing the application of certain articles of the Regulation in Member States;

     
  • 87. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 88. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 89. 
    A list of stakeholders and Member States that contributed to that debate can be found in annex 1.

     
  • 90. 
    ATFM slots being essentially a tactical tool designed to prevent the overloading of ATC sectors along an aircraft's route including those sectors at the airports of departure and arrival. Such slots are only issued when required and only two hours before take-off. Depending on changes to air traffic circumstances ATFM slots may be revised ad hoc.

     
  • 91. 
    Report of 24 November 2000 presented to the Council of Ministers for Transport during their meeting on 22 December 2000; see in particular Chapter 3.2 Airspace Management, pp. 19-20.

     
  • 92. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 93. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 94. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 95. 
    A list of stakeholders and Member States that contributed to that debate can be found in annex 1.

     
  • 96. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 97. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 98. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 99. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 100. 
    ATFM slots being essentially a tactical tool designed to prevent the overloading of ATC sectors along an aircraft's route including those sectors at the airports of departure and arrival. Such slots are only issued when required and only two hours before take-off. Depending on changes to air traffic circumstances ATFM slots may be revised ad hoc.

     
  • 101. 
    ATFM slots being essentially a tactical tool designed to prevent the overloading of ATC sectors along an aircraft's route including those sectors at the airports of departure and arrival. Such slots are only issued when required and only two hours before take-off. Depending on changes to air traffic circumstances ATFM slots may be revised ad hoc.

     
  • 102. 
    Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on "Air Transport and Environment, COM(1999) 640 final of 1.12.99, point 5, page 6.

     
  • 103. 
    Council Regulation '(EEC) 4064/89 on the control of concentrations between undertakings as amended by Council Regulation (EC) 1310/1997, articles 14 and 15.

     
  • 104. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 105. 
    OJ No C

     
  • 106. 
    .OJ No C

     
  • 107. 
    OJ No C

     
  • 108. 
    OJ No L 14, 22.1.1993, p.1

     
  • 109. 
    OJ No L 184, 17.7.1999, p.23

     
  • 110. 
    OJ No L 395, 30.12.1989, p.1; corrected version, OJ L 257, 21.9.1990, p. 13

     
  • 111. 
    OJ No L 180, 9.7.1997, p.1

     
  • 112. 
    OJ No L228, 9.9.1996, p.99

     
  • 113. 
    See e.g. M. 616 Swissair/Sabena of 20.7.1995, 96/180 Lufthansa/SAS of 16.01.1996, JV.19 KLM/ALITALIA of 11.8.1999, M.2041 - UNITED AIRLINES / US AIRWAYS decision of 12.01.2001

     
  • 114. 
    A list of stakeholders and Member States that contributed to that debate can be found in annex 1.

     
  • 115. 
    Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on "Air Transport and Environment, COM(1999) 640 final of 1.12.99, point 5, page 6.

     
  • 116. 
    ATFM slots being essentially a tactical tool designed to prevent the overloading of ATC sectors along an aircraft's route including those sectors at the airports of departure and arrival. Such slots are only issued when required and only two hours before take-off. Depending on changes to air traffic circumstances ATFM slots may be revised ad hoc.

     
  • 117. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 118. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 119. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 120. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 121. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 122. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 123. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 124. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 125. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 126. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 127. 
    A list of stakeholders and Member States that contributed to that debate can be found in annex 1.

     
  • 128. 
    ATFM slots being essentially a tactical tool designed to prevent the overloading of ATC sectors along an aircraft's route including those sectors at the airports of departure and arrival. Such slots are only issued when required and only two hours before take-off. Depending on changes to air traffic circumstances ATFM slots may be revised ad hoc.

     
  • 129. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 130. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 131. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 132. 
    Final Report delivered on 20 May 2000.

     
  • 133. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 134. 
    A list of stakeholders and Member States that contributed to that debate can be found in annex 1.

     
  • 135. 
    Report of 24 November 2000 presented to the Council of Ministers for Transport during their meeting on 22 December 2000; see in particular Chapter 3.2 Airspace Management, pp. 19-20.

     
  • 136. 
    A list of stakeholders and Member States that contributed to that debate can be found in annex 1.

     
  • 137. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 138. 
    Judgement of the British High Court of Justice of 25 March 1999, Regina vs. Airport Co-ordination Limited ex parte The States of Guernsey Board of Transport

     
  • 139. 
    De Europese Commissie kent nummers toe aan officiële documenten van de Europese Unie. De Commissie maakt onderscheid in een aantal typen documenten door middel van het toekennen van verschillende nummerseries. Het onderscheid is gebaseerd op het soort document en/of de instelling van de Unie van wie het document afkomstig is.
     
  • 140. 
    De Raad van de Europese Unie kent aan wetgevingsdossiers een uniek toe. Dit nummer bestaat uit een vijfcijferig volgnummer gevolgd door een schuine streep met de laatste twee cijfers van het jaartal, bijvoorbeeld 12345/00 - een document met nummer 12345 uit het jaar 2000.
     
  • 141. 
    Het interinstitutionele nummer is een nummerreeks die binnen de Europese Unie toegekend wordt aan voorstellen voor regelgeving van de Europese Commissie.
    Binnen de Europese Unie worden nog een aantal andere nummerseries gebruikt. Iedere instelling heeft één of meerdere sets documenten met ieder een eigen nummering. Die reeksen komen niet overeen met elkaar of het interinstitutioneel nummer.
     
  • 142. 
    Deze databank van de Europese Unie biedt de mogelijkheid de actuele werkzaamheden (workflow) van de Europese instellingen (Europees Parlement, Raad, ESC, Comité van de Regio's, Europese Centrale Bank, Hof van Justitie enz.) te volgen. EURlex volgt alle voorstellen (zoals wetgevende en begrotingsdossiers) en mededelingen van de Commissie, vanaf het moment dat ze aan de Raad of het Europees Parlement worden voorgelegd.
     
  • 143. 
    Als dag van bekendmaking van een Europees besluit geldt de dag waarop het besluit in het Publicatieblad wordt bekendgemaakt, en daardoor in alle officiële talen van de Europese Unie bij het Publicatiebureau beschikbaar is.
     
  • 144. 
    This legally binding act of the European Union is directly applicable in all member states of the European Union. The regulation is similar to national legislation in terms of the impact and direct effect it generates. As such the regulation is the most pervasive of all the legal instruments of the EU.