COM(2005)649 - Jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

Contents

  1. Key information
  2. Key dates
  3. Related information
  4. Resulting legislation
  5. Full version
  6. EU Monitor

1.

Key information

official title

Proposal for a Council Regulation on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations
 
Legal instrument Regulation
Decision making procedure Consultation procedure (CNS)
reference by COM-number93 COM(2005)649 EN
Additional COM-numbers SEC(2005)1629
procedure number95 2005/0259(CNS)
CELEX number96 52005PC0649

2.

Key dates

Document 15-12-2005
Online publication 15-12-2005
Decision 18-12-2008; Verordening 2009/4
Publication in Official Journal97 10-01-2009; Special edition in Croatian: Chapter 19 Volume 005,OJ L 7, 10.1.2009

3.

Related information

4.

Resulting legislation

 

5.

Full version

This page is also available in a full version containing the latest state of affairs, the summary of the European Parliament Legislative Observatory, the legal basis, the legal context, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand, the stakeholders involved (e.g. European Commission directorates-general, European Parliament committees, Council configurations and even individual EU Commissioners and Members of the European Parliament) and finally documents of the European Parliament, the Council of Ministers and the European Commission.

The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.

6.

EU Monitor

The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.

  • 1. 
    OJ C 12 of 15 January 2001.

     
  • 2. 
    OJ L 12 of 16 January 2001.

     
  • 3. 
    Document of the Council of the European Union n° 9778/2/05 REV 2 JAI 207.

     
  • 4. 
    Web Site: www.hcch.net .

     
  • 5. 
    The Hague Convention of 24 October 1956 on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations Towards Children; The Hague Convention of 15 April 1958 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions Relating to Maintenance Obligations Towards Children; The Hague Convention of 2 October 1973 on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations, which replaces the Convention of 24 October 1956 in relations between the States that are Parties to it; The Hague Convention of 2 October 1973 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions Relating to Maintenance Obligations, which replaces the Convention of 15 April 1958 in relations between the States that are Parties to it. To this list it is necessary to add the New York Convention of 20 June 1956 on the Recovery Abroad of Maintenance, concluded in the United Nations.

     
  • 6. 
    17 Member States: Germany, Denmark, Spain, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Czech Republic, United Kingdom, Slovakia, Sweden.

     
  • 7. 
    This study can be consulted on the
     
  • 8. 
    COM (2004) 254 final.

     
  • 9. 
    The responses are published at the following address: europa.eu.int:8082/comm/justice_home/ejn/maintenance_claim/maintenance_claim_ec_en.htm

     
  • 10. 
    OJ L 12 of 16 January 2001.

     
  • 11. 
    Web Site: www.hcch.net .

     
  • 12. 
    OJ L 338 of 23 December 2003, pp. 1
     
  • 13. 
    OJ L 143 of 30 April 2004, pp. 15
     
  • 14. 
    OJ L 12 of 16 January 2001.

     
  • 15. 
    OJ L 12 of 16 January 2001.

     
  • 16. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 17. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 18. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 19. 
    OJ L 160, 30.6.2000, p. 37.

     
  • 20. 
    OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p. 1.

     
  • 21. 
    OJ L 174, 27.6.2001, p. 25.

     
  • 22. 
    OJ L 174, 27.6.2001, p. 1.

     
  • 23. 
    OJ L 338, 23.12.2003, p. 1.

     
  • 24. 
    OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p. 15.

     
  • 25. 
    OJ C 12 of 15 January 2001.

     
  • 26. 
    OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31-50

     
  • 27. 
    OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.

     
  • 28. 
    OJ L 12 of 16 January 2001.

     
  • 29. 
    OJ C 12 of 15 January 2001.

     
  • 30. 
    OJ C 12 of 15 January 2001.

     
  • 31. 
    OJ C 12 of 15 January 2001.

     
  • 32. 
    OJ C 12 of 15 January 2001.

     
  • 33. 
    OJ C 12 of 15 January 2001.

     
  • 34. 
    OJ L 12 of 16 January 2001.

     
  • 35. 
    OJ L 12 of 16 January 2001.

     
  • 36. 
    JO C 53 of 3 March 2005.

     
  • 37. 
    JO C 53 of 3 March 2005.

     
  • 38. 
    Web Site: www.hcch.net .

     
  • 39. 
    OJ
     
  • 40. 
    OJ
     
  • 41. 
    OJ
     
  • 42. 
    Web Site: www.hcch.net .

     
  • 43. 
    OJ
     
  • 44. 
    OJ C 12 of 15 January 2001.

     
  • 45. 
    OJ
     
  • 46. 
    OJ
     
  • 47. 
    OJ C 12 of 15 January 2001.

     
  • 48. 
    OJ L 12 of 16 January 2001.

     
  • 49. 
    Document of the Council of the European Union n° 9778/2/05 REV 2 JAI 207.

     
  • 50. 
    Web Site: www.hcch.net .

     
  • 51. 
    The Hague Convention of 24 October 1956 on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations Towards Children; The Hague Convention of 15 April 1958 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions Relating to Maintenance Obligations Towards Children; The Hague Convention of 2 October 1973 on the Law Applicable to Maintenance Obligations, which replaces the Convention of 24 October 1956 in relations between the States that are Parties to it; The Hague Convention of 2 October 1973 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions Relating to Maintenance Obligations, which replaces the Convention of 15 April 1958 in relations between the States that are Parties to it. To this list it is necessary to add the New York Convention of 20 June 1956 on the Recovery Abroad of Maintenance, concluded in the United Nations.

     
  • 52. 
    17 Member States: Germany, Denmark, Spain, Estonia, Finland, France, Greece, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Czech Republic, United Kingdom, Slovakia, Sweden.

     
  • 53. 
    This study can be consulted on the
     
  • 54. 
    COM (2004) 254 final.

     
  • 55. 
    The responses are published at the following address: europa.eu.int:8082/comm/justice_home/ejn/maintenance_claim/maintenance_claim_ec_en.htm

     
  • 56. 
    OJ L 12 of 16 January 2001.

     
  • 57. 
    Web Site: www.hcch.net .

     
  • 58. 
    OJ L 338 of 23 December 2003, pp. 1
     
  • 59. 
    OJ L 143 of 30 April 2004, pp. 15
     
  • 60. 
    OJ L 12 of 16 January 2001.

     
  • 61. 
    OJ L 12 of 16 January 2001.

     
  • 62. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 63. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 64. 
    OJ C , , p. .

     
  • 65. 
    OJ L 160, 30.6.2000, p. 37.

     
  • 66. 
    OJ L 12, 16.1.2001, p. 1.

     
  • 67. 
    OJ L 174, 27.6.2001, p. 25.

     
  • 68. 
    OJ L 174, 27.6.2001, p. 1.

     
  • 69. 
    OJ L 338, 23.12.2003, p. 1.

     
  • 70. 
    OJ L 143, 30.4.2004, p. 15.

     
  • 71. 
    OJ C 12 of 15 January 2001.

     
  • 72. 
    OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31-50

     
  • 73. 
    OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23.

     
  • 74. 
    OJ L 12 of 16 January 2001.

     
  • 75. 
    OJ C 12 of 15 January 2001.

     
  • 76. 
    OJ C 12 of 15 January 2001.

     
  • 77. 
    OJ C 12 of 15 January 2001.

     
  • 78. 
    OJ C 12 of 15 January 2001.

     
  • 79. 
    OJ C 12 of 15 January 2001.

     
  • 80. 
    OJ L 12 of 16 January 2001.

     
  • 81. 
    OJ L 12 of 16 January 2001.

     
  • 82. 
    JO C 53 of 3 March 2005.

     
  • 83. 
    JO C 53 of 3 March 2005.

     
  • 84. 
    Web Site: www.hcch.net .

     
  • 85. 
    OJ
     
  • 86. 
    OJ
     
  • 87. 
    OJ
     
  • 88. 
    Web Site: www.hcch.net .

     
  • 89. 
    OJ
     
  • 90. 
    OJ C 12 of 15 January 2001.

     
  • 91. 
    OJ
     
  • 92. 
    OJ
     
  • 93. 
    De Europese Commissie kent nummers toe aan officiële documenten van de Europese Unie. De Commissie maakt onderscheid in een aantal typen documenten door middel van het toekennen van verschillende nummerseries. Het onderscheid is gebaseerd op het soort document en/of de instelling van de Unie van wie het document afkomstig is.
     
  • 94. 
    De Raad van de Europese Unie kent aan wetgevingsdossiers een uniek toe. Dit nummer bestaat uit een vijfcijferig volgnummer gevolgd door een schuine streep met de laatste twee cijfers van het jaartal, bijvoorbeeld 12345/00 - een document met nummer 12345 uit het jaar 2000.
     
  • 95. 
    Het interinstitutionele nummer is een nummerreeks die binnen de Europese Unie toegekend wordt aan voorstellen voor regelgeving van de Europese Commissie.
    Binnen de Europese Unie worden nog een aantal andere nummerseries gebruikt. Iedere instelling heeft één of meerdere sets documenten met ieder een eigen nummering. Die reeksen komen niet overeen met elkaar of het interinstitutioneel nummer.
     
  • 96. 
    Deze databank van de Europese Unie biedt de mogelijkheid de actuele werkzaamheden (workflow) van de Europese instellingen (Europees Parlement, Raad, ESC, Comité van de Regio's, Europese Centrale Bank, Hof van Justitie enz.) te volgen. EURlex volgt alle voorstellen (zoals wetgevende en begrotingsdossiers) en mededelingen van de Commissie, vanaf het moment dat ze aan de Raad of het Europees Parlement worden voorgelegd.
     
  • 97. 
    Als dag van bekendmaking van een Europees besluit geldt de dag waarop het besluit in het Publicatieblad wordt bekendgemaakt, en daardoor in alle officiële talen van de Europese Unie bij het Publicatiebureau beschikbaar is.
     
  • 98. 
    This legally binding act of the European Union is directly applicable in all member states of the European Union. The regulation is similar to national legislation in terms of the impact and direct effect it generates. As such the regulation is the most pervasive of all the legal instruments of the EU.