Regulation 2009/207 - EC trade mark (codified version)

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

1.

Current status

This regulation was in effect from March 15, 1994 until September 30, 2017.

2.

Key information

official title

Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (codified version)
 
Legal instrument Regulation
Number legal act Regulation 2009/207
Original proposal COM(2006)830 EN
CELEX number i 32009R0207

3.

Key dates

Document 26-02-2009
Publication in Official Journal 24-03-2009; OJ L 78, 24.3.2009,Special edition in Croatian: Chapter 17 Volume 001
Effect 15-03-1994; Partial application See Art 167
13-04-2009; Entry into force Date pub. + 20 See Art 167
End of validity 30-09-2017; Repealed and replaced by 32017R1001

4.

Legislative text

24.3.2009   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 78/1

 

COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 207/2009

of 26 February 2009

on the Community trade mark

(codified version)

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 308 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

 

(1)

Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (2) has been substantially amended several times (3). In the interests of clarity and rationality the said Regulation should be codified.

 

(2)

It is desirable to promote throughout the Community a harmonious development of economic activities and a continuous and balanced expansion by completing an internal market which functions properly and offers conditions which are similar to those obtaining in a national market. In order to create a market of this kind and make it increasingly a single market, not only must barriers to free movement of goods and services be removed and arrangements be instituted which ensure that competition is not distorted, but, in addition, legal conditions must be created which enable undertakings to adapt their activities to the scale of the Community, whether in manufacturing and distributing goods or in providing services. For those purposes, trade marks enabling the products and services of undertakings to be distinguished by identical means throughout the entire Community, regardless of frontiers, should feature amongst the legal instruments which undertakings have at their disposal.

 

(3)

For the purpose of pursuing the Community's said objectives it would appear necessary to provide for Community arrangements for trade marks whereby undertakings can by means of one procedural system obtain Community trade marks to which uniform protection is given and which produce their effects throughout the entire area of the Community. The principle of the unitary character of the Community trade mark thus stated should apply unless otherwise provided for in this Regulation.

 

(4)

The barrier of territoriality of the rights conferred on proprietors of trade marks by the laws of the Member States cannot be removed by approximation of laws. In order to open up unrestricted economic activity in the whole of the internal market for the benefit of undertakings, trade marks should be created which are governed by a uniform Community law directly applicable in all Member States.

 

(5)

Since the Treaty has not provided the specific powers to establish such a legal instrument, Article 308 of the Treaty should be applied.

 

(6)

The Community law relating to trade marks nevertheless does not replace the laws of the Member States on trade marks. It would not in fact appear to be justified to require undertakings to apply for registration of their trade marks as Community trade marks. National trade marks continue to be necessary for those undertakings which do not want protection of their trade marks at Community level.

 

(7)

The rights in a Community trade mark should not be obtained otherwise than by registration, and registration should be refused in particular if the trade mark is not distinctive, if it is unlawful or if it conflicts with earlier rights.

 

(8)

The protection afforded by a Community trade mark, the function of which is in particular to guarantee the trade mark as an indication of origin, should be absolute in the case of identity between the mark and the sign and the goods or services. The protection should apply also in cases of similarity between the mark and the sign and the goods or services. An interpretation should be given of the concept of...


More

This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.

5.

Original proposal

 

6.

Sources and disclaimer

For further information you may want to consult the following sources that have been used to compile this dossier:

This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.

 

7.

Full version

This page is also available in a full version containing de geconsolideerde versie, the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand, the related cases of the European Court of Justice and finally consultations relevant to the dossier at hand.

The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.

8.

EU Monitor

The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.