Implementing decision 2016/1070 - Subjecting 1-phenyl-2-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)pentan-1-one (α-pyrrolidinovalerophenone, α-PVP) to control measures

Please note

This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.

1.

Current status

This implementing decision has been published on July  2, 2016 and entered into force on July  3, 2016.

2.

Key information

official title

Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1070 of 27 June 2016 on subjecting 1-phenyl-2-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)pentan-1-one (α-pyrrolidinovalerophenone, α-PVP) to control measures
 
Legal instrument implementing decision
Number legal act Implementing decision 2016/1070
Original proposal COM(2015)674 EN
CELEX number i 32016D1070

3.

Key dates

Document 27-06-2016; Date of adoption
Publication in Official Journal 02-07-2016; OJ L 178 p. 18-20
Effect 03-07-2016; Entry into force Date pub. +1 See Art 3
End of validity 31-12-9999

4.

Legislative text

2.7.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 178/18

 

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2016/1070

of 27 June 2016

on subjecting 1-phenyl-2-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)pentan-1-one (α-pyrrolidinovalerophenone, α-PVP) to control measures

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Decision 2005/387/JHA of 10 May 2005 on the information exchange, risk-assessment and control of new psychoactive substances (1), and in particular Article 8(3) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Whereas:

 

(1)

A risk assessment report on the new psychoactive substance 1-phenyl-2-(pyrrolidin-1-yl)pentan-1-one (α-pyrrolidinovalerophenone, α-PVP) was drawn up in accordance with Decision 2005/387/JHA by a special session of the extended Scientific Committee of the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction, and was subsequently submitted to the Commission and to the Council on 27 November 2015.

 

(2)

α-PVP is a potent psychostimulant, structurally related to cathinone, pyrovalerone and methylendioxypyrovaleron (MDPV), which are controlled under the 1971 United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances. α-PVP has been detected in all 28 Member States, as well as Turkey and Norway, and the information from seizures and collected samples indicate that it is mainly present in powder and tablet form. The available information suggests that multi-kilogram quantities of α-PVP are imported into the Union drug market from China and then distributed across the Union. Two illicit production sites have been seized in a Member State, indicating that the capacity to manufacture α-PVP also exists within the Union.

 

(3)

Eight Member States have reported a total of 115 deaths and 191 acute intoxications where α-PVP was detected. In most cases, the use of α-PVP was combined with other pharmacologically active substances, either intentionally or unintentionally. If α-PVP were to become more widely available and used, the implications for individual and public health could be significant.

 

(4)

The available data suggests that α-PVP is used by stimulant users in recreational settings as well as by high-risk drug users, including those injecting stimulants and opioids, and that polydrug use may be common among them. There is limited data on prevalence of drug use, long-term consequences and on the social risks associated with the substance.

 

(5)

There is no available information or any published study assessing in a comprehensive way the health risks associated with α-PVP, namely chronic and acute toxicity, but observations in animals suggest similar effects to those observed in other stimulants. Adverse symptoms observed in humans include tachycardia, hyperthermia, diaphoresis, agitation, convulsions or seizures, confusion and aggression. Data from non-clinical studies suggest that α-PVP may have an abuse liability and possibly a dependence potential in humans.

 

(6)

α-PVP has no established or acknowledged human or veterinary medical use. Apart from its use in analytical reference materials and in scientific research investigating its chemistry, pharmacology and toxicology as a result of its emergence on the drug market, there is no indication that it is being used for other purposes.

 

(7)

Despite the limited scientific evidence available on α-PVP, the evidence and information on the health risks that the substance poses, as documented in its detection in fatalities and acute intoxications, provides sufficient grounds for subjecting α-PVP to control measures across the Union.

 

(8)

Given that 16 Member States control α-PVP under national legislation...


More

This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.

5.

Original proposal

 

6.

Sources and disclaimer

For further information you may want to consult the following sources that have been used to compile this dossier:

This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.

 

7.

Full version

This page is also available in a full version containing the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand and the related cases of the European Court of Justice.

The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.

8.

EU Monitor

The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.