The Future of the Transatlantic Alliance - Main contents
In the keynote talk of the evening, Dutch Minister of Defense Jeanine Hennis-Plasschaert offered her insights into the security aspect of the U.S.-EU relationship. She made the case for a stronger Europe that has the military capacity to be a valuable partner to NATO. Emphasizing the importance of “acting in unison,” she argued for an ambitious security agenda, in which the EU and the U.S. take charge. If we don’t act, according to the Minister, we let others determine the course of international events.
VVD party chairman Henry Keizer talked about the uncertainty of the present day, and the need for the EU and NATO to reinvent themselves in order to stay relevant and be able to address contemporary global challenges. Mr. Hans van Baalen, MEP, said that the beneficial consequences of the European Union are often being taken for granted. Open borders, for instance, are a development that should not be turned back, yet the global security situation requires that the outer borders be better protected. This is where a good cooperation with NATO is important and strong American leadership in this regard is indispensable.
U.S. election expert Koen Petersen discussed the possible consequences of the American election results in November. A Clinton presidency would most likely mean a continuation of the current transatlantic relationship. A Trump presidency, on the other hand, could lead to disruption and a return to American isolationism.