Recommendation 2017/432 - Making returns more effective when implementing the Directive 2008/115/EC - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
Contents
official title
Commission Recommendation (EU) 2017/432 of 7 March 2017 on making returns more effective when implementing the Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the CouncilLegal instrument | Recommendation |
---|---|
Number legal act | Recommendation 2017/432 |
CELEX number i | 32017H0432 |
Document | 07-03-2017; Date of adoption |
---|---|
Publication in Official Journal | 11-03-2017; OJ L 66 p. 15-21 |
11.3.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 66/15 |
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION (EU) 2017/432
of 7 March 2017
on making returns more effective when implementing the Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 292 thereof,
Whereas:
(1) |
Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) lays down common standards and procedures to be applied in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals. |
(2) |
The Schengen Evaluation Mechanism (2) and the information collected through the European Migration Network (3) have allowed for a comprehensive assessment of how Member States implement the Union policy on return. |
(3) |
The evaluations indicate that the margins of discretion left to the Member States by Directive 2008/115/EC led to an inconsistent transposition in national legislations, with a negative impact on the effectiveness of the Union return policy. |
(4) |
Since the entry into force of Directive 2008/115/EC, and in the light of the increasing migratory pressure on the Member States, the challenges that the Union return policy needs to respond to have increased and brought this aspect of the European comprehensive migration policy to the forefront. In its Conclusions of 20-21 October 2016 (4), the European Council called for reinforcing national administrative processes for returns. |
(5) |
The Malta Declaration of Heads of State or Government (5) of 3 February 2017 highlighted the need for a review of EU return policy based on an objective analysis of the way in which the legal, operational, financial and practical tools available at Union and national level are applied. It welcomed the Commission's intention to rapidly present an updated EU Action Plan on Return and to provide guidance for more operational returns by the EU and Member States and effective readmission based upon the existing acquis. |
(6) |
In view of the current increase in the number of third-country nationals illegally entering and staying in the Member States, and in order to ensure appropriate capacity to protect those in need, it is necessary to use to the full extent the flexibility provided for in Directive 2008/115/EC. A more effective implementation of that Directive would reduce possibilities of misuse of procedures and remove inefficiencies, while ensuring the protection of fundamental rights as enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. |
(7) |
This Recommendation provides guidance on how the provisions of Directive 2008/115/EC should be used for achieving more effective return procedures, and call on the Member States to take the necessary measures to remove legal and practical obstacles to return. |
(8) |
An effective Union return policy requires efficient and proportionate measures for the apprehension and identification of illegally staying third-country nationals, swift processing of their cases, and adequate capacity to ensure their presence in view of return. |
(9) |
Organising return requires a streamlined and well integrated organisation of multi-disciplinary competences at national level. In addition, it demands procedures and instruments that allow information to be made promptly available to the competent authorities, as well as cooperation between all actors that are involved in the different procedures. |
(10) |
Multi-disciplinary trained and competent staff gathering all relevant competences is needed to ensure that national authorities are able to respond to the needs, particularly in circumstances where Member States are confronted with a significant burden... |
More
This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.
This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.
This page is also available in a full version containing the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand and the related cases of the European Court of Justice.
The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.
The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.