Regulation (EU) 2017/2225 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2017 amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 as regards the use of the Entry/Exit System - Main contents
Contents
9.12.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 327/1 |
REGULATION (EU) 2017/2225 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
of 30 November 2017
amending Regulation (EU) 2016/399 as regards the use of the Entry/Exit System
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 77(2)(b) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,
Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee (1),
After consulting the Committee of the Regions,
Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure (2),
Whereas:
(1) |
Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council (3) lays down the conditions, criteria and detailed rules for the crossing of the external borders of the Member States. |
(2) |
Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 of the European Parliament and of the Council (4) aims at creating a centralised system for the registration of entry and exit data and refusal of entry data concerning third-country nationals crossing the external borders of the Member States of the Union for a short stay. |
(3) |
In order to carry out checks on third-country nationals pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/399, which include the verification of the identity of third-country nationals, their identification, or both, as well as the verification that a third-country national has not exceeded the maximum duration of authorised stay on the territory of the Member States, border guards should use all the information available, including data from the Entry/Exit System established by Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 (‘EES’), where required. The data stored in the EES should also be used to verify that third-country nationals holding a visa issued for one or two entries have respected the maximum number of authorised entries. |
(4) |
In certain cases, biometric data need to be provided by third-country nationals for the purpose of border checks. The entry conditions for third-country nationals should therefore be amended by including an obligation to provide those biometric data. Where a third-country national refuses to provide biometric data for the creation of his or her individual file or for the carrying out of border checks, a refusal of entry decision should be adopted. |
(5) |
To ensure the full effectiveness of the EES, entry and exit checks need to be carried out in a harmonised way at the borders at which the EES is operated. |
(6) |
The establishment of the EES requires the adaptation of the procedures for checking persons when crossing the borders at which the EES is operated. In particular, the EES aims to abolish on entry and exit the stamping of the travel documents of third-country nationals admitted for a short stay by replacing it by the electronic recording of the entry and exit directly in the EES. Furthermore, the interoperability between the EES and the Visa Information System (VIS) established by Council Decision 2004/512/EC (5) needs to be taken into account in the border check procedures. Lastly, the EES opens the possibility of using new technologies for the border crossings of short-stay travellers. Those adaptations to the border check procedures should become effective in the Member States operating the EES on the date of start of operations of the EES determined in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/2226. |
(7) |
For a period of six months after the EES has started operations, border guards should take into account the stays of third-country nationals on the territory of the Member States in the six months preceding the entry or the exit by checking the stamps in the travel documents in addition to the entry/exit data recorded in the EES. That measure should enable the required verifications to be carried out in those cases where a person would have been admitted for a short stay on the territory of the Member States in the six months before the EES started operations. In addition, there is a need to lay down specific provisions for those third-country nationals who, having entered the territory of the Member States, have not yet exited it before the EES has started operations. In those situations, the last entry should also be recorded in the EES when the third-country national exits the territory of the Member States. |
(8) |
Taking into account the different situations in the Member States and at the different border crossing points of the Member States concerning the number of third-country nationals crossing the borders, Member States should be able to decide whether and to what extent to make use of technologies such as self-service systems, e-gates and automated border control systems. When using such technologies, entry and exit checks at the external borders should be carried out in a harmonised way and an appropriate level of security should be ensured. |
(9) |
In addition, it is necessary to specify the tasks and roles of the border guards when making use of such technologies. In this regard, it should be ensured that the results of border checks carried out by automated means are available to border guards so as to enable them to take the appropriate decisions. In addition, there is a need to supervise the use of self-service systems, e-gates and automated border control systems by travellers so as to prevent fraudulent behaviour and uses. In addition, when carrying out this supervision, border guards should pay particular attention to minors and should be placed in a position that should enable them to identify persons needing protection. |
(10) |
Member States should also be able to establish national facilitation programmes on a voluntary basis in order to allow pre-vetted third-country nationals to benefit on entry from derogations from certain aspects of thorough checks. Where such national facilitation programmes are used, they should be established in accordance with a harmonised model and an appropriate level of security should be guaranteed. |
(11) |
This Regulation is without prejudice to the application of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (6). |
(12) |
Since the objective of this Regulation, namely to amend the existing rules of Regulation (EU) 2016/399, can only be achieved at Union level, the Union may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out in Article 5 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU). In accordance with the principle of proportionality as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve this objective. |
(13) |
In accordance with Articles 1 and 2 of Protocol No 22 on the position of Denmark, annexed to the TEU and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application. Given that this Regulation builds upon the Schengen acquis, Denmark shall, in accordance with Article 4 of that Protocol, decide within a period of six months after the Council has decided on this Regulation whether it will implement it in its national law. |
(14) |
This Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which the United Kingdom does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2000/365/EC (7); the United Kingdom is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application. |
(15) |
This Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis in which Ireland does not take part, in accordance with Council Decision 2002/192/EC (8); Ireland is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this Regulation and is not bound by it or subject to its application. |
(16) |
As regards Iceland and Norway, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the latters’ association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis (9) which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A of Council Decision 1999/437/EC (10). |
(17) |
As regards Switzerland, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis (11) which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2008/146/EC (12). |
(18) |
As regards Liechtenstein, this Regulation constitutes a development of the provisions of the Schengen acquis within the meaning of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis (13) which fall within the area referred to in Article 1, point A, of Decision 1999/437/EC read in conjunction with Article 3 of Council Decision 2011/350/EU (14). |
(19) |
As regards Cyprus, Bulgaria, Romania and Croatia, the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 that relate to the EES should only apply where the conditions set out in Article 66(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 are met. As a result, for those Member States that do not fulfil the conditions set out in Article 66(2) of that Regulation by the date of start of operations of the EES, it is necessary to lay down specific transitional provisions on stamping pending their connection to the EES. Those transitional provisions should ensure that the stamping of travel documents has the same effect as an entry/exit record in the EES. |
(20) |
The Member States which do not meet the conditions set out in Article 66(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 at the date of the start of operations of the EES should continue to systematically stamp, on entry and exit, the travel documents of third-country nationals admitted for a short stay. Those Member States should examine the entry and exit stamps on the travel document of the third-country national concerned in order to verify, by comparing the dates of entry and exit, that the person has not exceeded the maximum duration of authorised stay on the territory of the Member State concerned. The stamping of travel documents and the examination of the stamps should continue until the Member State concerned is connected to the EES as referred to in Article 66(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2226. |
(21) |
Regulation (EU) 2016/399 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
(22) |
The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in accordance with Article 28(2) of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council (15) and delivered an opinion on 21 September 2016, |
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Regulation (EU) 2016/399 is amended as follows:
(1) |
in Article 2, the following points are added:
|
(2) |
Article 6 is amended as follows:
|
(3) |
the following Article is inserted: ‘Article 6a Third-country nationals for whom data are to be entered in the EES
|
(4) |
Article 8 is amended as follows:
|
(5) |
the following Articles are inserted: ‘Article 8a Use of self-service systems for pre-enrolling data in the EES
In addition, in accordance with Articles 23(4) of the Regulation (EU) 2017/2226, where an identification in the EES is carried out:
Article 8b Use of self-service systems and e-gates for the border crossing by persons whose border crossing is subject to a registration in the EES
Where a person is granted access to a national facilitation programme established by a Member State pursuant to Article 8d, the border checks carried out through a self-service system on entry may omit the examination of the aspects referred to in Article 8(3)(a)(iv) and (v) when that person crosses the external borders of that Member State or the external borders of a Member State which has concluded an agreement with the Member State which granted the access as referred to under Article 8d(9).
Article 8c Standards for automated border control systems Automated border control systems shall, to the extent possible, be designed in such a way that they can be used by all persons, with the exception of children under 12 years of age. They shall also be designed in a way that fully respects human dignity, in particular in cases involving vulnerable persons. Where Member States decide to use automated border control systems, they shall ensure the presence of a sufficient number of staff to assist persons with the use of such systems. Article 8d National facilitation programmes
Such third-country nationals shall be pre-vetted by border guards, by visa authorities as defined in point 3 of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 or by immigration authorities as defined in point (4) of Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2226.
In the case of an extension the Member State shall reassess every year the situation of each third-country national who is granted access to the national facilitation programme in order to ensure that, based on updated information, that third-country national still meets the conditions laid down in paragraph 4. This reassessment may be performed when border checks are carried out.
Border guards may carry out the verification of the third-country national benefiting from the national facilitation programme on entry pursuant to Articles 8(3)(a) and (b) and on exit pursuant to Article 8(3)(g) without comparing biometrics electronically but by comparing the facial image taken from the electronic storage medium (chip) and the facial image in the third-country national's individual EES file with that third-country national’s face. Full verification shall be carried out at random and on the basis of a risk analysis.
The means of subsistence for the intended stays shall be assessed according to the duration and the purpose of the envisaged stay or stays and by reference to average prices in the Member States concerned for board and lodging in budget accommodation, on the basis of the reference amounts set by the Member States in accordance with Article 39(1)(c). Proof of sponsorship, private accommodation, or both, may also constitute evidence of sufficient means of subsistence. The examination of an application shall be based, in particular, on the authenticity and reliability of the documents submitted and on the veracity and reliability of the statements made by the applicant. If a Member State responsible for examining an application has any doubts about the applicant, the applicant’s statements or supporting documents that have been provided, it may consult other Member States before any decision on the application is taken.
|
(6) |
Article 9 is amended as follows:
|
(7) |
in Article 10, the following paragraphs are inserted: ‘3a. Where Member States decide to use e-gates, self-service systems or automated border control systems, they shall use the signs provided for in part D of Annex III to identify the respective lanes. 3b. Where Member States decide to establish a national facilitation programme in accordance with Article 8d, they may decide to use specific lanes for the third-country nationals benefiting from such a national facilitation programme. They shall use the signs provided for in part E of Annex III to identify the respective lanes.’; |
(8) |
Article 11 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 11 Stamping of travel documents
|
(9) |
Article 12 is replaced by the following: ‘Article 12 Presumption as regards fulfilment of conditions of duration of short stay
In the case of a rebuttal, the competent authorities shall create an individual file in the EES if necessary or indicate in the EES the date on which, and the place where, the third-country national crossed the external border of one of the Member States or the internal border of a Member State not yet fully applying the Schengen acquis but operating the EES in accordance with Article 20 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2226.
A third-country national enjoying the right of free movement under Union law may only be returned in accordance with Directive 2004/38/EC. |
(10) |
the following Article is inserted: ‘Article 12a Transitional period and transitional measures
|
(11) |
Article 14 is amended as follows:
|
(12) |
in Article 20(1), point (a) is replaced by the following:
|
(13) |
the following Article is inserted: ‘Article 42a Transitional measures for the Member States not yet operating the EES
The travel documents of third-country nationals referred to in Article 6a(1)(b) and (c) of this Regulation crossing the borders of the Member States referred to in Article 66(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 shall be stamped on entry and exit. These stamping obligations shall also apply when border checks are relaxed in accordance with Article 9 of this Regulation.
|
(14) |
Annexes III, IV, V and VII are amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation. |
Article 2
-
1.This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.
-
2.This Regulation shall apply from the date on which the EES is to start operations, as determined by the Commission in accordance with Article 66 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2226.
-
3.By way of derogation from paragraph 2 of this Article, this Regulation shall, from the date of their connection to the EES in accordance with Article 66(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2226, apply to those Member States referred to in Article 66(3) of that Regulation that are not yet operating the EES. Pending their connection to the EES, transitional provisions concerning the stamping of the travel documents laid down in Article 42a of Regulation (EU) 2016/399 shall apply to those Member States.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in the Member States in accordance with the Treaties.
Done at Brussels, 30 November 2017.
For the European Parliament
The President
-
A.TAJANI
For the Council
The President
-
M.MAASIKAS
-
Position of the European Parliament of 25 October 2017 (not yet published in the Official Journal) and decision of the Council of 20 November 2017.
-
Regulation (EU) 2016/399 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen Borders Code) (OJ L 77, 23.3.2016, p. 1).
-
Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2017 establishing an Entry/Exit System (EES) to register entry and exit data and refusal of entry data of third-country nationals crossing the external borders of the Member States and determining the conditions for access to the EES for law enforcement purposes, and amending the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement and Regulations (EC) No 767/2008 and (EU) No 1077/2011 (see page 20 of this Official Journal).
-
Council Decision 2004/512/EC of 8 June 2004 establishing the Visa Information System (VIS) (OJ L 213, 15.6.2004, p. 5).
-
Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 77).
-
Council Decision 2000/365/EC of 29 May 2000 concerning the request of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis (OJ L 131, 1.6.2000, p. 43).
-
Council Decision 2002/192/EC of 28 February 2002 concerning Ireland’s request to take part in some of the provisions of the Schengen acquis (OJ L 64, 7.3.2002, p. 20).
-
Council Decision 1999/437/EC of 17 May 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of the Agreement concluded by the Council of the European Union and the Republic of Iceland and the Kingdom of Norway concerning the association of those two States with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis (OJ L 176, 10.7.1999, p. 31).
-
Council Decision 2008/146/EC of 28 January 2008 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Community, of the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis (OJ L 53, 27.2.2008, p. 1).
-
Council Decision 2011/350/EU of 7 March 2011 on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Protocol between the European Union, the European Community, the Swiss Confederation and the Principality of Liechtenstein on the accession of the Principality of Liechtenstein to the Agreement between the European Union, the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on the Swiss Confederation’s association with the implementation, application and development of the Schengen acquis, relating to the abolition of checks at internal borders and movement of persons (OJ L 160, 18.6.2011, p. 19).
-
Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ L 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1).
(*1) Regulation (EU) 2017/2226 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2017 establishing an Entry/Exit System (EES) to register entry and exit data and refusal of entry data of third-country nationals crossing the external borders of the Member States and determining the conditions for access to the EES for law enforcement purposes, and amending the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement and Regulations (EC) No 767/2008 and (EU) No 1077/2011 (OJ L 327, 9.12.2017, p. 20).’;
(*2) Regulation (EC) No 767/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 July 2008 concerning the Visa Information System (VIS) and the exchange of data between Member States on short-stay visas (VIS Regulation) (OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 60).’;
(*3) Directive 2014/66/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals in the framework of an intra-corporate transfer (OJ L 157, 27.5.2014, p. 1).
(*4) Directive (EU) 2016/801 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purpose of research, studies, training, voluntary service, pupil exchange schemes or educational projects and au pairing (OJ L 132, 21.5.2016, p. 21).
(*5) Regulation (EC) No 1931/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 laying down rules on local border traffic at the external land borders of the Member States and amending the provisions of the Schengen Convention (OJ L 405, 30.12.2006, p. 1).
(*6) Council Regulation (EC) No 693/2003 of 14 April 2003 establishing a specific Facilitated Transit Document (FTD), a Facilitated Rail Transit Document (FRTD) and amending the Common Consular Instructions and the Common Manual (OJ L 99, 17.4.2003, p. 8).’;
(*7) Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ L 348, 24.12.2008, p. 98).’;
ANNEX
Annexes to Regulation (EU) 2016/399 are amended as follows:
1. |
in Annex III, the following Parts are added: ‘PART D Part D1: Automated border control lanes for EU/EEA/CH citizens Stars are not required for Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Iceland Part D2: Automated border control lanes for third-country nationals Part D3: Automated border control lanes for all passports Part E: Lanes for Registered Travelers ’. |
2. |
Annex IV is amended as follows:
|
3. |
Annex V is amended as follows:
|
4. |
point 1 of Annex VII is replaced by the following:
|
This page is also available in a full version containing de juridische context.
The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.
The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.