Implementing decision 2021/1968 - Amendment of Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2429 authorising Latvia to derogate from point (a) of Article 26(1) and Articles 168 and 168a of the VAT Directive - Main contents
Please note
This page contains a limited version of this dossier in the EU Monitor.
Contents
official title
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/1968 of 9 November 2021 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2429 authorising Latvia to introduce a special measure derogating from point (a) of Article 26(1) and Articles 168 and 168a of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax| Legal instrument | implementing decision |
|---|---|
| Number legal act | Implementing decision 2021/1968 |
| Regdoc number | ST(2021)12807 |
| Original proposal | COM(2021)606  |
| CELEX number i | 32021D1968 |
| Document | 09-11-2021; Date of adoption |
|---|---|
| Publication in Official Journal | 12-11-2021; OJ L 401 p. 1-2 |
| Effect | 10-11-2021; Takes effect Date notif. See Art 2 01-01-2022; Application See Art 2 |
| End of validity | 31-12-2027; Linked to 32015D2429 |
| Notification | 10-11-2021 |
12.11.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
L 401/1 |
COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2021/1968
of 9 November 2021
amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2429 authorising Latvia to introduce a special measure derogating from point (a) of Article 26(1) and Articles 168 and 168a of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1), and in particular Article 395(1), first subparagraph, thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1) |
Articles 168 and 168a of Directive 2006/112/EC establish a right for taxable persons to deduct value added tax (VAT) due in respect of supplies to them of goods and services that are used for the purposes of their taxed transactions. Pursuant to Article 26(1), point (a), of that Directive, the use of business assets for private use of taxable persons or their staff or, more generally, for purposes other than those of their business is to be treated as a supply of services. |
(2) |
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2429 (2) authorised Latvia, until 31 December 2018, to limit to 50 % the right to deduct the VAT on the purchase, leasing, intra-Community acquisition and importation of passenger cars with a maximum authorised weight not exceeding 3 500 kilograms and having not more than eight seats in addition to the driver’s seat, as well as on expenditure related to the maintenance, repair, and fuel of such passenger cars. The authorisation also relieves taxable persons from having to treat the non-business use of such passenger cars as a supply of services. |
(3) |
Council Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/1921 (3) extended the validity of Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2429 to 31 December 2021. |
(4) |
By letter of 21 April 2021, Latvia submitted a request to the Commission to continue to apply the special measure derogating from Article 26(1), point (a), and Articles 168 and 168a of Directive 2006/112/EC in order to restrict the right of deduction in relation to expenditure on certain passenger cars not wholly used for business purposes (‘the request’). |
(5) |
In accordance with Article 395(2), second subparagraph, of Directive 2006/112/EC, the Commission transmitted the request to the other Member States, by letters of 10 June 2021. By letter of 14 June 2021, the Commission notified Latvia that it had all the information it considered necessary for the appraisal of the request. |
(6) |
As required by Article 6(2) of Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/2429, Latvia submitted a report including the review of the percentage set for the VAT deduction. Based on currently available information, namely tax audit experience and statistical data relating to private use of passenger cars, Latvia claims that the limit of 50 % is still justifiable and remains appropriate. |
(7) |
Given the positive impact of the special measure on the administrative burden of the taxpayers and of tax authorities by simplifying VAT collection and preventing tax evasion through incorrect record keeping, Latvia should be authorised to continue to apply the special measure. |
(8) |
The extension of the special measure should be limited in time to allow for an evaluation of its effectiveness and of the appropriate percentage. |
(9) |
In the event that Latvia considers that a further extension of the special measure is necessary beyond 2024, it should submit to the Commission a report that includes a review of the percentage applied, together with the extension request, by 31 March 2024. |
(10) |
The special... |
More
This text has been adopted from EUR-Lex.
This dossier is compiled each night drawing from aforementioned sources through automated processes. We have invested a great deal in optimising the programming underlying these processes. However, we cannot guarantee the sources we draw our information from nor the resulting dossier are without fault.
This page is also available in a full version containing the legal context, de Europese rechtsgrond, other dossiers related to the dossier at hand and the related cases of the European Court of Justice.
The full version is available for registered users of the EU Monitor by ANP and PDC Informatie Architectuur.
The EU Monitor enables its users to keep track of the European process of lawmaking, focusing on the relevant dossiers. It automatically signals developments in your chosen topics of interest. Apologies to unregistered users, we can no longer add new users.This service will discontinue in the near future.